All season and winter tire testing season is upon us! The first test of the season is the excellent AutoBild AllRad SUV all season tire test, which tested ten of the latest all season tires in 235/65 R17, and included a reference summer and winter tire to see what the differences are between various tire options.

Autobild conducted the test using an Audi Q3, and are the first publication to test the new Bridgestone Turanza 6 All Season! Can the new Bridgestone take on the established king, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV? Read on to find out!

Test setup & methodology

The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.

Recorded test conditions

Wet Braking: 62.1 → 0.0 mph
Snow Braking: 31.1 → 0.0 mph

Dry

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV leads with a 38.1-meter distance. Reference Summer is the best overall at 118 feet, but among non-reference tires, Michelin stands out and also performs well in other categories like dry handling.

Dry Braking
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best
RefReference Summer	118 ft	-7 ft
1Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV	125 ft	Best
2Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6	130 ft	+5 ft
3Toyo Celsius AS2	132 ft	+7 ft
3Falken Euroall Season AS220 Pro	132 ft	+7 ft
5Hankook Kinergy 4S 2 X	134 ft	+9 ft
6Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 SUV	135 ft	+10 ft
6Vredestein Quatrac Pro+	135 ft	+10 ft
8Kenda Kenetica 4S SUV KR609	136 ft	+11 ft
9Imperial All Season Driver	139 ft	+14 ft
RefReference Winter	145 ft	+20 ft
10Uniroyal AllSeasonExpert 2	152 ft	+27 ft

The difference between best and worst was 28% (34 ft ≈ 2.2 Car Lengths).

Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 SUV tops the list with an average speed of 58.1 mph. Reference Summer matches Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV at 58.0 mph, but among non-reference tires, Goodyear and Michelin are neck-and-neck, both excelling in dry conditions.

Dry Handling
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best
1Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 SUV	58.1 mph	Best
RefReference Summer	58.0 mph	-0.1 mph
2Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV	58.0 mph	-0.1 mph
3Falken Euroall Season AS220 Pro	58.0 mph	-0.1 mph
4Vredestein Quatrac Pro+	57.8 mph	-0.3 mph
5Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6	57.7 mph	-0.4 mph
6Hankook Kinergy 4S 2 X	57.5 mph	-0.6 mph
7Imperial All Season Driver	57.4 mph	-0.7 mph
8Toyo Celsius AS2	57.3 mph	-0.8 mph
9Kenda Kenetica 4S SUV KR609	57.2 mph	-0.9 mph
10Uniroyal AllSeasonExpert 2	56.7 mph	-1.4 mph
RefReference Winter	56.4 mph	-1.7 mph

All the tires in the Dry Handling test finished less than 3% apart.

Wet

Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 excels with a 43.9-meter distance. It's a strong performer not just in dry but also in wet conditions, making it a versatile choice.

Wet Braking
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best	Residual speed
1Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6	144 ft	Best	0 mph
RefReference Summer	147 ft	+3 ft	11 mph
2Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 SUV	147 ft	+3 ft	12 mph
3Hankook Kinergy 4S 2 X	149 ft	+5 ft	15 mph
4Vredestein Quatrac Pro+	151 ft	+7 ft	17 mph
5Falken Euroall Season AS220 Pro	153 ft	+9 ft	19 mph
6Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV	153 ft	+9 ft	20 mph
7Uniroyal AllSeasonExpert 2	160 ft	+16 ft	26 mph
8Toyo Celsius AS2	162 ft	+18 ft	26 mph
RefReference Winter	167 ft	+23 ft	30 mph
9Kenda Kenetica 4S SUV KR609	178 ft	+34 ft	35 mph
10Imperial All Season Driver	180 ft	+36 ft	36 mph

The difference between best and worst was 24.8% (36 ft ≈ 2.4 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Imperial All Season Driver would still be travelling at 36 mph when the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Vredestein Quatrac Pro Plus leads with with an average speed of 52.0 mph, outperforming Reference Summer's 52 mph. It's a tire that handles wet conditions exceptionally well, but naturally it has no snow performance.

Wet Handling
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best
1Vredestein Quatrac Pro+	52.0 mph	Best
RefReference Summer	51.6 mph	-0.4 mph
2Hankook Kinergy 4S 2 X	51.5 mph	-0.5 mph
3Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 SUV	51.3 mph	-0.7 mph
4Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6	50.7 mph	-1.3 mph
5Falken Euroall Season AS220 Pro	50.5 mph	-1.5 mph
6Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV	50.0 mph	-2.0 mph
RefReference Winter	49.9 mph	-2.1 mph
7Toyo Celsius AS2	49.7 mph	-2.3 mph
8Uniroyal AllSeasonExpert 2	49.5 mph	-2.5 mph
9Imperial All Season Driver	49.0 mph	-3.0 mph
10Kenda Kenetica 4S SUV KR609	48.8 mph	-3.2 mph

The difference between best and worst was 6.2% (3.2 mph).

Vredestein Quatrac Pro Plus comes close to Reference Summer's best lap time of 15.77 seconds with 15.89 seconds. It's another category where Vredestein shows its prowess in wet conditions.

Wet Circle
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best
RefReference Summer	15.77 s	-0.12 s
1Vredestein Quatrac Pro+	15.89 s	Best
2Hankook Kinergy 4S 2 X	16.04 s	+0.15 s
3Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 SUV	16.16 s	+0.27 s
4Falken Euroall Season AS220 Pro	16.2 s	+0.31 s
5Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6	16.24 s	+0.35 s
6Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV	16.35 s	+0.46 s
7Toyo Celsius AS2	16.42 s	+0.53 s
RefReference Winter	16.5 s	+0.61 s
8Kenda Kenetica 4S SUV KR609	16.52 s	+0.63 s
9Uniroyal AllSeasonExpert 2	16.75 s	+0.86 s
10Imperial All Season Driver	16.89 s	+1.00 s

The difference between best and worst was 7.1% (1.12 s).

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV leads with an average float speed of 55.4 mph, proving its versatility in both dry and wet conditions.

Straight Aqua
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best
1Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV	55.4 mph	Best
2Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 SUV	55.1 mph	-0.3 mph
RefReference Winter	54.6 mph	-0.8 mph
3Uniroyal AllSeasonExpert 2	54.4 mph	-1.0 mph
4Kenda Kenetica 4S SUV KR609	54.1 mph	-1.3 mph
5Toyo Celsius AS2	53.9 mph	-1.5 mph
5Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6	53.9 mph	-1.5 mph
RefReference Summer	53.2 mph	-2.2 mph
7Hankook Kinergy 4S 2 X	52.1 mph	-3.3 mph
8Falken Euroall Season AS220 Pro	50.8 mph	-4.6 mph
9Vredestein Quatrac Pro+	50.0 mph	-5.4 mph
10Imperial All Season Driver	48.6 mph	-6.8 mph

The difference between best and worst was 12.3% (6.8 mph).

Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 SUV is a close second to Reference Winter's 4.71 m/sec² with 4.61 m/sec². It's a tire that handles well in both wet and dry conditions.

Curved Aquaplaning
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best
RefReference Winter	15.5 ft/s²	+0.2 ft/s²
1Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV	15.3 ft/s²	Best
2Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 SUV	15.1 ft/s²	-0.2 ft/s²
3Kenda Kenetica 4S SUV KR609	15.0 ft/s²	-0.3 ft/s²
4Uniroyal AllSeasonExpert 2	14.8 ft/s²	-0.5 ft/s²
5Toyo Celsius AS2	14.2 ft/s²	-1.1 ft/s²
6Hankook Kinergy 4S 2 X	13.7 ft/s²	-1.6 ft/s²
RefReference Summer	13.5 ft/s²	-1.8 ft/s²
7Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6	13.4 ft/s²	-1.9 ft/s²
8Falken Euroall Season AS220 Pro	12.9 ft/s²	-2.4 ft/s²
9Vredestein Quatrac Pro+	11.9 ft/s²	-3.4 ft/s²
10Imperial All Season Driver	11.0 ft/s²	-4.3 ft/s²

The difference between best and worst was 29.1% (4.5 ft/s²).

Snow

Uniroyal AllSeasonExpert 2 is the best of the all season tires, stopping at 77 feet, closely following the reference Winter's 75 feet. It's a strong performer in snowy conditions but falls short in dry handling.

Snow Braking
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best	Residual speed
RefReference Winter	75 ft	-2 ft	0 mph
1Uniroyal AllSeasonExpert 2	77 ft	Best	0 mph
2Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6	79 ft	+2 ft	13 mph
3Hankook Kinergy 4S 2 X	81 ft	+4 ft	17 mph
4Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 SUV	81 ft	+4 ft	18 mph
5Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV	83 ft	+6 ft	21 mph
6Imperial All Season Driver	83 ft	+6 ft	21 mph
7Toyo Celsius AS2	84 ft	+7 ft	23 mph
8Vredestein Quatrac Pro+	86 ft	+9 ft	25 mph
9Kenda Kenetica 4S SUV KR609	88 ft	+11 ft	28 mph
10Falken Euroall Season AS220 Pro	90 ft	+13 ft	30 mph
RefReference Summer	143 ft	+66 ft	54 mph

The difference between best and worst was 90.4% (68 ft ≈ 4.6 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Falken Euroall Season AS220 Pro would still be travelling at 30 mph when the Uniroyal AllSeasonExpert 2 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 is a close second to the reference winter's traction ability.

Snow Traction
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best
RefReference Winter	682 lbf	+16 lbf
1Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6	666 lbf	Best
2Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV	662 lbf	-4 lbf
3Uniroyal AllSeasonExpert 2	644 lbf	-22 lbf
4Hankook Kinergy 4S 2 X	638 lbf	-28 lbf
5Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 SUV	616 lbf	-50 lbf
6Imperial All Season Driver	600 lbf	-66 lbf
7Falken Euroall Season AS220 Pro	592 lbf	-74 lbf
8Vredestein Quatrac Pro+	583 lbf	-83 lbf
9Toyo Celsius AS2	553 lbf	-113 lbf
10Kenda Kenetica 4S SUV KR609	544 lbf	-122 lbf
RefReference Summer	220 lbf	-446 lbf

The difference between best and worst was 67.7% (462 lbf).

The Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 is again the best of the all season tires in the snow. It's a tire that performs well across the board, from dry to snowy conditions.

Snow Handling
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best
RefReference Winter	63.6 mph	+0.5 mph
1Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6	63.1 mph	Best
2Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV	62.9 mph	-0.2 mph
3Hankook Kinergy 4S 2 X	62.1 mph	-1.0 mph
4Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 SUV	61.5 mph	-1.6 mph
5Vredestein Quatrac Pro+	61.0 mph	-2.1 mph
6Uniroyal AllSeasonExpert 2	60.4 mph	-2.7 mph
7Toyo Celsius AS2	60.2 mph	-2.9 mph
8Falken Euroall Season AS220 Pro	59.4 mph	-3.7 mph
9Imperial All Season Driver	58.9 mph	-4.2 mph
10Kenda Kenetica 4S SUV KR609	58.4 mph	-4.7 mph
RefReference Summer	39.6 mph	-23.5 mph

The difference between best and worst was 37.7% (24 mph).

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV leads among non-reference tires with 4.52 m/sec², showing its adaptability in various conditions.

Snow Slalom
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best
1Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV	14.8 ft/s²	Best
2Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6	14.7 ft/s²	-0.1 ft/s²
RefReference Winter	14.3 ft/s²	-0.5 ft/s²
3Hankook Kinergy 4S 2 X	13.7 ft/s²	-1.1 ft/s²
4Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 SUV	13.3 ft/s²	-1.5 ft/s²
5Toyo Celsius AS2	12.9 ft/s²	-1.9 ft/s²
6Vredestein Quatrac Pro+	12.8 ft/s²	-2.0 ft/s²
7Imperial All Season Driver	12.5 ft/s²	-2.3 ft/s²
8Uniroyal AllSeasonExpert 2	12.3 ft/s²	-2.5 ft/s²
9Falken Euroall Season AS220 Pro	12.1 ft/s²	-2.7 ft/s²
10Kenda Kenetica 4S SUV KR609	10.8 ft/s²	-4.0 ft/s²
RefReference Summer	8.5 ft/s²	-6.3 ft/s²

The difference between best and worst was 42.7% (6.3 ft/s²).

Comfort

Hankook Kinergy 4S 2 X is the quietest among non-reference tires at 72.1 dB. It's not just quiet; it also handles well in wet conditions.

Noise
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best
RefReference Summer	72 dB	-0.10 dB
1Hankook Kinergy 4S 2 X	72.1 dB	Best
2Imperial All Season Driver	72.4 dB	+0.30 dB
3Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV	72.9 dB	+0.80 dB
4Uniroyal AllSeasonExpert 2	73.2 dB	+1.10 dB
5Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 SUV	73.3 dB	+1.20 dB
6Toyo Celsius AS2	73.4 dB	+1.30 dB
6Vredestein Quatrac Pro+	73.4 dB	+1.30 dB
8Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6	73.6 dB	+1.50 dB
9Falken Euroall Season AS220 Pro	74 dB	+1.90 dB
RefReference Winter	74.6 dB	+2.50 dB
10Kenda Kenetica 4S SUV KR609	76.2 dB	+4.10 dB

The difference between best and worst was 5.8% (4.2 dB).

Value

Vredestein Quatrac Pro Plus has the lowest rolling resistance among non-reference tires at 7 kg/t. It's an eco-friendly option but performs less well in snow.

Rolling Resistance
Position / Tire	Result	Gap to best	Extra fuel / year
RefReference Summer	5.88 kg/t	-0.63 kg/t	$0
1Uniroyal AllSeasonExpert 2	6.51 kg/t	Best	$0
2Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV	6.77 kg/t	+0.26 kg/t	$12
3Hankook Kinergy 4S 2 X	6.86 kg/t	+0.35 kg/t	$16
4Vredestein Quatrac Pro+	7 kg/t	+0.49 kg/t	$22
5Toyo Celsius AS2	7.07 kg/t	+0.56 kg/t	$25
6Kenda Kenetica 4S SUV KR609	7.26 kg/t	+0.75 kg/t	$34
7Falken Euroall Season AS220 Pro	7.33 kg/t	+0.82 kg/t	$37
RefReference Winter	7.46 kg/t	+0.95 kg/t	$43
8Imperial All Season Driver	7.54 kg/t	+1.03 kg/t	$46
9Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 SUV	7.59 kg/t	+1.08 kg/t	$49
10Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6	7.77 kg/t	+1.26 kg/t	$57

The difference between best and worst was 32.1% (1.89 kg / t). Over 12,000 miles a year at $3.60/gal, the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 uses about 16 gal ($57) more fuel than the Uniroyal AllSeasonExpert 2.

Adjust the assumptions

Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions.

Gas/Diesel Electric

Annual Mileage

12,000 mi

km (L)

miles (US gal)

Fuel Price

$3.60/gal

GBP (£)

EUR (€)

USD ($)

Set my vehicle consumption

Estimates based on typical driving conditions. Rolling resistance accounts for approximately 20% of IC vehicle fuel consumption and 25% of EV energy consumption. Actual savings vary based on driving style, vehicle weight, road conditions, and tire age. For comparative purposes only. Lifetime savings based on a 40,000km / 25,000 mile tread life.

Results

Dry97.9%

Wet97.6%

Snow99.2%

Comfort98%

Rolling Resistance83.8%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (13)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	2^nd / 10	130 ft	+5 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better	5^th / 10	57.7 mph	-0.4 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better	1^st / 10	144 ft	Best in this discipline
Wet HandlingHigher is better	4^th / 10	50.7 mph	-1.3 mph
Wet CircleLower is better	5^th / 10	16.24 s	+0.35 s
Straight AquaHigher is better	5^th / 10	53.9 mph	-1.5 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	7^th / 10	13.4 ft/s²	-1.9 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better	2^nd / 10	79 ft	+2 ft
Snow TractionHigher is better	1^st / 10	666 lbf	Best in this discipline
Snow HandlingHigher is better	1^st / 10	63.1 mph	Best in this discipline
Snow SlalomHigher is better	2^nd / 10	14.7 ft/s²	-0.1 ft/s²
NoiseLower is better	8^th / 10	73.6 dB	+1.50 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	10^th / 10	7.77 kg/t	+1.26 kg/t

EU Label: C/B/70
3PMSF: Yes

Dry99.9%

Wet96.4%

Snow97.9%

Comfort98.9%

Rolling Resistance96.2%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (13)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	1^st / 10	125 ft	Best in this discipline
Dry HandlingHigher is better	2^nd / 10	58.0 mph	-0.1 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better	6^th / 10	153 ft	+9 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better	6^th / 10	50.0 mph	-2.0 mph
Wet CircleLower is better	6^th / 10	16.35 s	+0.46 s
Straight AquaHigher is better	1^st / 10	55.4 mph	Best in this discipline
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	1^st / 10	15.3 ft/s²	Best in this discipline
Snow BrakingLower is better	5^th / 10	83 ft	+6 ft
Snow TractionHigher is better	2^nd / 10	662 lbf	-4 lbf
Snow HandlingHigher is better	2^nd / 10	62.9 mph	-0.2 mph
Snow SlalomHigher is better	1^st / 10	14.8 ft/s²	Best in this discipline
NoiseLower is better	3^rd / 10	72.9 dB	+0.80 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	2^nd / 10	6.77 kg/t	+0.26 kg/t

EU Label: B/B/71
3PMSF: Yes

Dry96.4%

Wet98.4%

Snow93.9%

Comfort98.4%

Rolling Resistance85.8%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (13)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	6^th / 10	135 ft	+10 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better	1^st / 10	58.1 mph	Best in this discipline
Wet BrakingLower is better	2^nd / 10	147 ft	+3 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better	3^rd / 10	51.3 mph	-0.7 mph
Wet CircleLower is better	3^rd / 10	16.16 s	+0.27 s
Straight AquaHigher is better	2^nd / 10	55.1 mph	-0.3 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	2^nd / 10	15.1 ft/s²	-0.2 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better	4^th / 10	81 ft	+4 ft
Snow TractionHigher is better	5^th / 10	616 lbf	-50 lbf
Snow HandlingHigher is better	4^th / 10	61.5 mph	-1.6 mph
Snow SlalomHigher is better	4^th / 10	13.3 ft/s²	-1.5 ft/s²
NoiseLower is better	5^th / 10	73.3 dB	+1.20 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	9^th / 10	7.59 kg/t	+1.08 kg/t

EU Label: C/B/72
3PMSF: Yes

Dry96.2%

Wet97.3%

Snow95.6%

Comfort100%

Rolling Resistance94.9%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (13)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	5^th / 10	134 ft	+9 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better	6^th / 10	57.5 mph	-0.6 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better	3^rd / 10	149 ft	+5 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better	2^nd / 10	51.5 mph	-0.5 mph
Wet CircleLower is better	2^nd / 10	16.04 s	+0.15 s
Straight AquaHigher is better	7^th / 10	52.1 mph	-3.3 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	6^th / 10	13.7 ft/s²	-1.6 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better	3^rd / 10	81 ft	+4 ft
Snow TractionHigher is better	4^th / 10	638 lbf	-28 lbf
Snow HandlingHigher is better	3^rd / 10	62.1 mph	-1.0 mph
Snow SlalomHigher is better	3^rd / 10	13.7 ft/s²	-1.1 ft/s²
NoiseLower is better	1^st / 10	72.1 dB	Best in this discipline
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	3^rd / 10	6.86 kg/t	+0.35 kg/t

EU Label: C/B/72
3PMSF: Yes

Dry96.1%

Wet96.4%

Snow90.4%

Comfort98.2%

Rolling Resistance93%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (13)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	6^th / 10	135 ft	+10 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better	4^th / 10	57.8 mph	-0.3 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better	4^th / 10	151 ft	+7 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better	1^st / 10	52.0 mph	Best in this discipline
Wet CircleLower is better	1^st / 10	15.89 s	Best in this discipline
Straight AquaHigher is better	9^th / 10	50.0 mph	-5.4 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	9^th / 10	11.9 ft/s²	-3.4 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better	8^th / 10	86 ft	+9 ft
Snow TractionHigher is better	8^th / 10	583 lbf	-83 lbf
Snow HandlingHigher is better	5^th / 10	61.0 mph	-2.1 mph
Snow SlalomHigher is better	6^th / 10	12.8 ft/s²	-2.0 ft/s²
NoiseLower is better	6^th / 10	73.4 dB	+1.30 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	4^th / 10	7 kg/t	+0.49 kg/t

EU Label: C/B/72
3PMSF: Yes

Dry97.2%

Wet95.3%

Snow87.9%

Comfort97.4%

Rolling Resistance88.8%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (13)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	3^rd / 10	132 ft	+7 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better	3^rd / 10	58.0 mph	-0.1 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better	5^th / 10	153 ft	+9 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better	5^th / 10	50.5 mph	-1.5 mph
Wet CircleLower is better	4^th / 10	16.2 s	+0.31 s
Straight AquaHigher is better	8^th / 10	50.8 mph	-4.6 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	8^th / 10	12.9 ft/s²	-2.4 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better	10^th / 10	90 ft	+13 ft
Snow TractionHigher is better	7^th / 10	592 lbf	-74 lbf
Snow HandlingHigher is better	8^th / 10	59.4 mph	-3.7 mph
Snow SlalomHigher is better	9^th / 10	12.1 ft/s²	-2.7 ft/s²
NoiseLower is better	9^th / 10	74 dB	+1.90 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	7^th / 10	7.33 kg/t	+0.82 kg/t

EU Label: C/B/71
3PMSF: Yes

Dry96.6%

Wet93.9%

Snow89.7%

Comfort98.2%

Rolling Resistance92.1%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (13)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	3^rd / 10	132 ft	+7 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better	8^th / 10	57.3 mph	-0.8 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better	8^th / 10	162 ft	+18 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better	7^th / 10	49.7 mph	-2.3 mph
Wet CircleLower is better	7^th / 10	16.42 s	+0.53 s
Straight AquaHigher is better	5^th / 10	53.9 mph	-1.5 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	5^th / 10	14.2 ft/s²	-1.1 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better	7^th / 10	84 ft	+7 ft
Snow TractionHigher is better	9^th / 10	553 lbf	-113 lbf
Snow HandlingHigher is better	7^th / 10	60.2 mph	-2.9 mph
Snow SlalomHigher is better	5^th / 10	12.9 ft/s²	-1.9 ft/s²
NoiseLower is better	6^th / 10	73.4 dB	+1.30 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	5^th / 10	7.07 kg/t	+0.56 kg/t

EU Label: C/B/71
3PMSF: Yes

Dry90.1%

Wet93.8%

Snow94.1%

Comfort98.5%

Rolling Resistance100%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (13)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	10^th / 10	152 ft	+27 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better	10^th / 10	56.7 mph	-1.4 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better	7^th / 10	160 ft	+16 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better	8^th / 10	49.5 mph	-2.5 mph
Wet CircleLower is better	9^th / 10	16.75 s	+0.86 s
Straight AquaHigher is better	3^rd / 10	54.4 mph	-1.0 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	4^th / 10	14.8 ft/s²	-0.5 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better	1^st / 10	77 ft	Best in this discipline
Snow TractionHigher is better	3^rd / 10	644 lbf	-22 lbf
Snow HandlingHigher is better	6^th / 10	60.4 mph	-2.7 mph
Snow SlalomHigher is better	8^th / 10	12.3 ft/s²	-2.5 ft/s²
NoiseLower is better	4^th / 10	73.2 dB	+1.10 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	1^st / 10	6.51 kg/t	Best in this discipline

EU Label: C/C/71
3PMSF: Yes

Dry94.2%

Wet88%

Snow90.3%

Comfort99.6%

Rolling Resistance86.3%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (13)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	9^th / 10	139 ft	+14 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better	7^th / 10	57.4 mph	-0.7 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better	10^th / 10	180 ft	+36 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better	9^th / 10	49.0 mph	-3.0 mph
Wet CircleLower is better	10^th / 10	16.89 s	+1.00 s
Straight AquaHigher is better	10^th / 10	48.6 mph	-6.8 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	10^th / 10	11.0 ft/s²	-4.3 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better	6^th / 10	83 ft	+6 ft
Snow TractionHigher is better	6^th / 10	600 lbf	-66 lbf
Snow HandlingHigher is better	9^th / 10	58.9 mph	-4.2 mph
Snow SlalomHigher is better	7^th / 10	12.5 ft/s²	-2.3 ft/s²
NoiseLower is better	2^nd / 10	72.4 dB	+0.30 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	8^th / 10	7.54 kg/t	+1.03 kg/t

EU Label: C/B/71
3PMSF: Yes

Dry95.2%

Wet91.3%

Snow84.2%

Comfort94.6%

Rolling Resistance89.7%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (13)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	8^th / 10	136 ft	+11 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better	9^th / 10	57.2 mph	-0.9 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better	9^th / 10	178 ft	+34 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better	10^th / 10	48.8 mph	-3.2 mph
Wet CircleLower is better	8^th / 10	16.52 s	+0.63 s
Straight AquaHigher is better	4^th / 10	54.1 mph	-1.3 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	3^rd / 10	15.0 ft/s²	-0.3 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better	9^th / 10	88 ft	+11 ft
Snow TractionHigher is better	10^th / 10	544 lbf	-122 lbf
Snow HandlingHigher is better	10^th / 10	58.4 mph	-4.7 mph
Snow SlalomHigher is better	10^th / 10	10.8 ft/s²	-4.0 ft/s²
NoiseLower is better	10^th / 10	76.2 dB	+4.10 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	6^th / 10	7.26 kg/t	+0.75 kg/t

EU Label: C/B/72
3PMSF: Yes

Menu

Tire shortlist

The evidence behind the verdict

Test setup & methodology

Recorded test conditions

Dry

Wet

Snow

Comfort

Value

Results

Cross-check this test