Menu

Test source Motor

2024 Motor SUV All Season Tire Test

Overall test winnerMichelin CrossClimate 2 SUV

Motor magazine has recently conducted an SUV all-season tire test, focusing on the popular 235/60 R18 size commonly found on SUVs and family vans.The Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV won the test.

Tires tested
9
Tested size
235/60 R18
Disciplines
13

At a glance

Tire shortlist

9 Tires tested

Published finishing positions, with the strengths and considerations from this test. Owner reviews cover other sizes and driving conditions.

6th

Vredestein Quatrac Pro+

7th

Debica Navigator 3

8th

Kleber Citilander

9th

Imperial All Season Driver

Tire shortlist

Compare selected tires

2024 Motor SUV All Season Tire Test · 235/60 R18

TireMichelin CrossClimate 2 SUVContinental AllSeasonContact 2Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 SUVFalken Euroall Season AS220 ProVredestein Quatrac Pro+Debica Navigator 3Kleber CitilanderImperial All Season Driver
Position1st2nd3rd4th5th6th7th8th9th
Category scores (% of best)
Dry99.8%97.4%99%95.2%96.9%93.6%93.4%92.6%94.2%
Wet98.4%99.3%98.9%98.2%97.1%94.7%90.2%90.6%89%
Snow99.7%96.2%97.9%95.9%91.7%92.7%99.8%90.6%87.8%
Comfort99.9%98.6%99.2%98.5%96.3%96.4%92.2%90.7%92.7%
Rolling Resistance94.7%100%87%80.8%84.1%84.5%93.6%82.8%84.4%
Keep researchingRead owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results

Explore the complete results →

The full test

The evidence behind the verdict

Motor magazine has recently conducted an SUV all-season tire test, focusing on the popular 235/60 R18 size commonly found on SUVs and family vans.

The Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV won the test. It had a great balance between snow, wet, and dry performance, while maintaining low rolling resistance and noise levels. The Continental AllSeasonContact 2 secured the second position, excelling in wet conditions and achieving the lowest rolling resistance. Bridgestone's Turanza All Season 6 completed the top three, displaying consistent high-level performance across all tests. In the mid-range segment, the Falken EuroAll Season AS220 Pro showed strong dry handling characteristics but underperformed in snow conditions. The budget-oriented Dębica Navigator 3 demonstrated impressive snow performance and competitive pricing, although its wet performance was subpar. The Imperial All Season Driver, while offering the lowest price point, consistently ranked at the bottom of most performance metrics, with notable weaknesses in wet and snow conditions. These results indicate a clear correlation between tire price and performance, with higher-priced options generally offering superior all-round capabilities. However, some mid-range and budget options showed strengths in specific areas, suggesting potential value for users with particular performance priorities.

Read on for the full data below.

Test setup & methodology

The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.

Recorded test conditions

Recorded test conditions

Wet Braking
62.1 → 0.0 mph
Snow Braking
31.1 → 0.0 mph
Snow Traction
0.0 → 12.4 mph

Dry

In dry conditions, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV demonstrated exceptional braking capabilities, stopping from 62 mph in just 130 feet. The Kleber Citilander, on the other hand, required 150 feet - a difference of over 20 feet. The Falken EuroAll Season AS220 Pro surprised with the fastest lap time of 54.16 seconds, while the Vredestein Quatrac Pro+ was the slowest at 55.45 seconds. The Continental AllSeasonContact 2 received top marks for handling characteristics with 7.250 points, while the Vredestein again underperformed with only 5.500 points.

Dry Braking

Dry braking in feet

Lower is better ↓
Dry Braking
Position / TireResultGap to best
130 ft Best
132 ft +2 ft
136 ft +6 ft
138 ft +8 ft
144 ft +14 ft
145 ft +15 ft
145 ft +15 ft
148 ft +18 ft
150 ft +20 ft

The difference between best and worst was 15.4% (20 ft ≈ 1.4 Car Lengths).

Dry Handling

Dry handling time in seconds

Lower is better ↓
Dry Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
54.16 s Best
54.18 s +0.02 s
54.34 s +0.18 s
54.37 s +0.21 s
54.55 s +0.39 s
54.77 s +0.61 s
54.84 s +0.68 s
55.01 s +0.85 s
55.54 s +1.38 s

All the tires in the Dry Handling test finished less than 3% apart.

Wet

On wet surfaces, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 exhibited superior braking performance, stopping from 62 mph in 147 feet. The Dębica Navigator 3, which excelled in snow conditions, struggled here, requiring 178 feet - nearly 33 feet more than the Continental. The Goodyear Vector 4Seasons SUV Gen-3 showed impressive resistance to aquaplaning, maintaining grip up to 49.6 mph, while the Imperial All Season Driver lost traction at just 44.9 mph. In the wet handling test, the Goodyear again stood out with the highest lateral grip of 0.790 g, while the Dębica continued to underperform with only 0.719 g.

Wet Braking

Wet braking in feet (62 - 0 mph)

Lower is better ↓
Wet Braking
Position / TireResultGap to bestResidual speed
147 ft Best 0 mph
148 ft +1 ft 5 mph
151 ft +4 ft 13 mph
151 ft +4 ft 13 mph
153 ft +6 ft 16 mph
159 ft +12 ft 22 mph
172 ft +25 ft 30 mph
173 ft +26 ft 31 mph
178 ft +31 ft 33 mph

The difference between best and worst was 21% (31 ft ≈ 2.1 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Debica Navigator 3 would still be travelling at 33 mph when the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Wet Handling

Wet handling time in seconds

Lower is better ↓
Wet Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
87 s Best
87.4 s +0.40 s
87.5 s +0.50 s
87.8 s +0.80 s
87.9 s +0.90 s
88.3 s +1.30 s
90.6 s +3.60 s
90.6 s +3.60 s
91.8 s +4.80 s

The difference between best and worst was 5.5% (4.8 s).

Straight Aqua

Float Speed in mph

Higher is better ↑
Straight Aqua
Position / TireResultGap to best
49.6 mph Best
49.5 mph -0.1 mph
49.3 mph -0.3 mph
48.2 mph -1.4 mph
48.2 mph -1.4 mph
46.5 mph -3.1 mph
46.4 mph -3.2 mph
45.8 mph -3.8 mph
44.9 mph -4.7 mph

The difference between best and worst was 9.4% (4.7 mph).

Snow

In snow conditions, the Dębica Navigator 3 emerged as the top performer in braking, stopping from 25 mph in just 60 feet. In stark contrast, the Imperial All Season Driver required 67 feet - a 2.3-meter difference that could be crucial in emergency situations. The Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV demonstrated excellent traction, while the Imperial again struggled. This performance gap was further emphasized in the timed lap, where the Dębica completed the course in 78.4 seconds, while the Kleber Citilander lagged behind at 89.5 seconds.

Snow Braking

Snow braking in feet (31 - 0 mph)

Lower is better ↓
Snow Braking
Position / TireResultGap to bestResidual speed
60 ft Best 0 mph
60 ft 0 ft 6 mph
60 ft 0 ft 6 mph
61 ft +1 ft 13 mph
62 ft +2 ft 15 mph
63 ft +3 ft 19 mph
64 ft +4 ft 21 mph
65 ft +5 ft 23 mph
67 ft +7 ft 27 mph

The difference between best and worst was 12.6% (7 ft ≈ 0.5 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Imperial All Season Driver would still be travelling at 27 mph when the Debica Navigator 3 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Snow Traction

Snow acceleration time (0 - 12 mph)

Lower is better ↓
Snow Traction
Position / TireResultGap to best
8.52 s Best
8.85 s +0.33 s
8.96 s +0.44 s
8.97 s +0.45 s
9.05 s +0.53 s
9.58 s +1.06 s
10.35 s +1.83 s
10.71 s +2.19 s
11.01 s +2.49 s

The difference between best and worst was 29.2% (2.49 s).

Snow Traction

Pulling Force in pounds-force

Higher is better ↑
Snow Traction
Position / TireResultGap to best
74 lbf Best
74 lbf 0 lbf
72 lbf -2 lbf
71 lbf -3 lbf
71 lbf -3 lbf
69 lbf -5 lbf
63 lbf -11 lbf
63 lbf -11 lbf
58 lbf -16 lbf

The difference between best and worst was 21.6% (16 lbf).

Snow Handling

Snow handling time in seconds

Lower is better ↓
Snow Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
78.4 s Best
78.6 s +0.20 s
79.4 s +1.00 s
80.2 s +1.80 s
81.6 s +3.20 s
81.9 s +3.50 s
82.3 s +3.90 s
82.7 s +4.30 s
89.5 s +11.10 s

The difference between best and worst was 14.2% (11.1 s).

Comfort

In terms of comfort, the Michelin and Bridgestone tires tied for the top spot with 7 points, while the budget options from Dębica and Imperial, along with Kleber, scored lowest with 6 points. The Vredestein Quatrac Pro+ proved to be the quietest tire at 65.4 dB, while the Kleber Citilander was the noisiest at 68.3 dB.

Subj. Comfort

Subjective Comfort Score

Higher is better ↑
Subj. Comfort
Position / TireResultGap to best
7 Points Best
7 Points Best
6.88 Points -0.12 Points
6.88 Points -0.12 Points
6.5 Points -0.50 Points
6.5 Points -0.50 Points
6 Points -1.00 Points
6 Points -1.00 Points
6 Points -1.00 Points

The difference between best and worst was 14.3% (1 Points).

Noise

External noise in dB

Lower is better ↓
Noise
Position / TireResultGap to best
65.4 dB Best
65.6 dB +0.20 dB
65.6 dB +0.20 dB
65.6 dB +0.20 dB
66.1 dB +0.70 dB
66.3 dB +0.90 dB
66.3 dB +0.90 dB
66.5 dB +1.10 dB
68.3 dB +2.90 dB

The difference between best and worst was 4.4% (2.9 dB).

Value

For rolling resistance, a crucial factor in fuel efficiency, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 led the pack with a coefficient of 0.655, while the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons SUV Gen-3 had the highest resistance at 0.811.

Rolling Resistance

Rolling resistance in kg t

Lower is better ↓
Rolling Resistance
Position / TireResultGap to bestExtra fuel / year
0.66 kg/t Best $0
0.69 kg/t +0.03 kg/t $13
0.7 kg/t +0.04 kg/t $18
0.75 kg/t +0.09 kg/t $40
0.78 kg/t +0.12 kg/t $53
0.78 kg/t +0.12 kg/t $53
0.78 kg/t +0.12 kg/t $53
0.79 kg/t +0.13 kg/t $58
0.81 kg/t +0.15 kg/t $67

The difference between best and worst was 22.7% (0.15 kg / t). Over 12,000 miles a year at $3.60/gal, the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 SUV uses about 19 gal ($67) more fuel than the Continental AllSeasonContact 2.

Adjust the assumptions

Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions.

12,000 mi
$3.60/gal
Estimates based on typical driving conditions. Rolling resistance accounts for approximately 20% of IC vehicle fuel consumption and 25% of EV energy consumption. Actual savings vary based on driving style, vehicle weight, road conditions, and tire age. For comparative purposes only. Lifetime savings based on a 40,000km / 25,000 mile tread life.

Results

1st

Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV

235/60 R18
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV wins this year's test thanks to its very good balance. The tire provides a high level of safety on all types of surfaces. It is also quiet and has low rolling resistance. The disadvantage of the tire is its high purchase price.
Dry99.8%
Wet98.4%
Snow99.7%
Comfort99.9%
Rolling Resistance94.7%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (13)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better1st / 9130 ftBest in this discipline
Dry HandlingLower is better3rd / 954.34 s+0.18 s
Wet BrakingLower is better3rd / 9151 ft+4 ft
Wet HandlingLower is better5th / 987.9 s+0.90 s
Straight AquaHigher is better2nd / 949.5 mph-0.1 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better2nd / 910.3 ft/s²-0.1 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better2nd / 960 ft0 ft
Snow TractionLower is better1st / 98.52 sBest in this discipline
Snow TractionHigher is better1st / 974 lbfBest in this discipline
Snow HandlingLower is better2nd / 978.6 s+0.20 s
Subj. ComfortHigher is better1st / 97 PointsBest in this discipline
NoiseLower is better2nd / 965.6 dB+0.20 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better2nd / 90.692 kg/t+0.04 kg/t
3PMSF
Yes
2nd

Continental AllSeasonContact 2

235/60 R18
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
Continental AllSeasonContact 2 confirms its high parameters in all conditions with a very good point result. In this year's test, the German tire wins the competition on wet asphalt. It also has the lowest rolling resistance in the stake.
Dry97.4%
Wet99.3%
Snow96.2%
Comfort98.6%
Rolling Resistance100%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (13)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better3rd / 9136 ft+6 ft
Dry HandlingLower is better4th / 954.37 s+0.21 s
Wet BrakingLower is better1st / 9147 ftBest in this discipline
Wet HandlingLower is better1st / 987 sBest in this discipline
Straight AquaHigher is better5th / 948.2 mph-1.4 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better4th / 99.9 ft/s²-0.5 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better6th / 963 ft+3 ft
Snow TractionLower is better4th / 98.97 s+0.45 s
Snow TractionHigher is better4th / 971 lbf-3 lbf
Snow HandlingLower is better3rd / 979.4 s+1.00 s
Subj. ComfortHigher is better3rd / 96.88 Points-0.12 Points
NoiseLower is better5th / 966.1 dB+0.70 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better1st / 90.655 kg/tBest in this discipline
3PMSF
Yes
3rd

Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6

235/60 R18
Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6
Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 is hot on Continental's heels, losing just 0.7 points to it. The tire offers balanced performance at a high level. It works well both in winter conditions and on dry and wet asphalt. It also has an attractive price.
Dry99%
Wet98.9%
Snow97.9%
Comfort99.2%
Rolling Resistance87%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (13)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better2nd / 9132 ft+2 ft
Dry HandlingLower is better5th / 954.55 s+0.39 s
Wet BrakingLower is better2nd / 9148 ft+1 ft
Wet HandlingLower is better6th / 988.3 s+1.30 s
Straight AquaHigher is better3rd / 949.3 mph-0.3 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better3rd / 910.1 ft/s²-0.3 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better2nd / 960 ft0 ft
Snow TractionLower is better3rd / 98.96 s+0.44 s
Snow TractionHigher is better3rd / 972 lbf-2 lbf
Snow HandlingLower is better4th / 980.2 s+1.80 s
Subj. ComfortHigher is better1st / 97 PointsBest in this discipline
NoiseLower is better8th / 966.5 dB+1.10 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better4th / 90.753 kg/t+0.10 kg/t
3PMSF
Yes
4th

Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 SUV

235/60 R18
Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 SUV
Goodyear Vector 4Seasons SUV of the third generation is a tire that has been on the market for several years. Despite this, the product achieves a high point result and takes fourth place in the test. It performs very well on wet asphalt. However, it loses in the rolling resistance competition.
Dry95.2%
Wet98.2%
Snow95.9%
Comfort98.5%
Rolling Resistance80.8%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (13)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better5th / 9144 ft+14 ft
Dry HandlingLower is better2nd / 954.18 s+0.02 s
Wet BrakingLower is better5th / 9153 ft+6 ft
Wet HandlingLower is better2nd / 987.4 s+0.40 s
Straight AquaHigher is better1st / 949.6 mphBest in this discipline
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better1st / 910.4 ft/s²Best in this discipline
Snow BrakingLower is better4th / 961 ft+1 ft
Snow TractionLower is better5th / 99.05 s+0.53 s
Snow TractionHigher is better5th / 971 lbf-3 lbf
Snow HandlingLower is better7th / 982.3 s+3.90 s
Subj. ComfortHigher is better3rd / 96.88 Points-0.12 Points
NoiseLower is better6th / 966.3 dB+0.90 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better9th / 90.811 kg/t+0.16 kg/t
3PMSF
Yes
5th

Falken Euroall Season AS220 Pro

235/60 R18
Falken Euroall Season AS220 Pro
Falken EuroAll Season AS220 Pro performs very well on dry and wet asphalt, and loses the most points on snow, where it has average properties. Falken wins the dry sport driving competition. It also has an attractive price and emits low noise levels.
Dry96.9%
Wet97.1%
Snow91.7%
Comfort96.3%
Rolling Resistance84.1%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (13)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better4th / 9138 ft+8 ft
Dry HandlingLower is better1st / 954.16 sBest in this discipline
Wet BrakingLower is better3rd / 9151 ft+4 ft
Wet HandlingLower is better4th / 987.8 s+0.80 s
Straight AquaHigher is better7th / 946.4 mph-3.2 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better6th / 99.4 ft/s²-1.0 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better7th / 964 ft+4 ft
Snow TractionLower is better7th / 910.35 s+1.83 s
Snow TractionHigher is better7th / 963 lbf-11 lbf
Snow HandlingLower is better6th / 981.9 s+3.50 s
Subj. ComfortHigher is better5th / 96.5 Points-0.50 Points
NoiseLower is better2nd / 965.6 dB+0.20 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better7th / 90.779 kg/t+0.12 kg/t
3PMSF
Yes
6th

Vredestein Quatrac Pro+

235/60 R18
Vredestein Quatrac Pro+
Vredestein Quatrac Pro+ is not a well-balanced product. In some competitions it performs well, while in others it falls to the bottom of the table. However, it provides the required level of security. It does not have an attractive price. Wins the external noise competition.
Dry93.6%
Wet94.7%
Snow92.7%
Comfort96.4%
Rolling Resistance84.5%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (13)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better6th / 9145 ft+15 ft
Dry HandlingLower is better9th / 955.54 s+1.38 s
Wet BrakingLower is better6th / 9159 ft+12 ft
Wet HandlingLower is better3rd / 987.5 s+0.50 s
Straight AquaHigher is better6th / 946.5 mph-3.1 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better7th / 99.0 ft/s²-1.4 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better5th / 962 ft+2 ft
Snow TractionLower is better8th / 910.71 s+2.19 s
Snow TractionHigher is better8th / 963 lbf-11 lbf
Snow HandlingLower is better5th / 981.6 s+3.20 s
Subj. ComfortHigher is better5th / 96.5 Points-0.50 Points
NoiseLower is better1st / 965.4 dBBest in this discipline
Rolling ResistanceLower is better5th / 90.775 kg/t+0.12 kg/t
3PMSF
Yes
7th

Debica Navigator 3

235/60 R18
Debica Navigator 3
Dębica Navigator 3 provides very good parameters on snow, and in other conditions it performs averagely. Especially on wet asphalt, it requires conservative driving. The Polish tire offers low rolling resistance and has an attractive price.
Dry93.4%
Wet90.2%
Snow99.8%
Comfort92.2%
Rolling Resistance93.6%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (13)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better8th / 9148 ft+18 ft
Dry HandlingLower is better6th / 954.77 s+0.61 s
Wet BrakingLower is better9th / 9178 ft+31 ft
Wet HandlingLower is better9th / 991.8 s+4.80 s
Straight AquaHigher is better4th / 948.2 mph-1.4 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better5th / 99.9 ft/s²-0.5 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better1st / 960 ftBest in this discipline
Snow TractionLower is better2nd / 98.85 s+0.33 s
Snow TractionHigher is better2nd / 974 lbf0 lbf
Snow HandlingLower is better1st / 978.4 sBest in this discipline
Subj. ComfortHigher is better7th / 96 Points-1.00 Points
NoiseLower is better6th / 966.3 dB+0.90 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better3rd / 90.7 kg/t+0.04 kg/t
3PMSF
Yes
8th

Kleber Citilander

235/60 R18
Kleber Citilander
Kleber Citilander is not impressive in terms of performance. It has long braking distances on all types of surfaces and performs poorly on a snowy track. In addition, the tire is noisy and has a high rolling resistance coefficient. Kleber's price is also not attractive.
Dry92.6%
Wet90.6%
Snow90.6%
Comfort90.7%
Rolling Resistance82.8%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (13)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better9th / 9150 ft+20 ft
Dry HandlingLower is better8th / 955.01 s+0.85 s
Wet BrakingLower is better7th / 9172 ft+25 ft
Wet HandlingLower is better7th / 990.6 s+3.60 s
Straight AquaHigher is better8th / 945.8 mph-3.8 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better8th / 99.0 ft/s²-1.4 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better8th / 965 ft+5 ft
Snow TractionLower is better6th / 99.58 s+1.06 s
Snow TractionHigher is better6th / 969 lbf-5 lbf
Snow HandlingLower is better9th / 989.5 s+11.10 s
Subj. ComfortHigher is better7th / 96 Points-1.00 Points
NoiseLower is better9th / 968.3 dB+2.90 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better8th / 90.791 kg/t+0.14 kg/t
3PMSF
Yes
9th

Imperial All Season Driver

235/60 R18
Imperial All Season Driver
Imperial All Season Driver performs well only on dry surfaces. It also emits low noise levels. On wet asphalt, the tire's parameters are poor, but they are within the required margin. The properties on snow are on the verge of acceptability. Imperial is the cheapest product in the test.
Dry94.2%
Wet89%
Snow87.8%
Comfort92.7%
Rolling Resistance84.4%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (13)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better6th / 9145 ft+15 ft
Dry HandlingLower is better7th / 954.84 s+0.68 s
Wet BrakingLower is better8th / 9173 ft+26 ft
Wet HandlingLower is better7th / 990.6 s+3.60 s
Straight AquaHigher is better9th / 944.9 mph-4.7 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better9th / 97.8 ft/s²-2.6 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better9th / 967 ft+7 ft
Snow TractionLower is better9th / 911.01 s+2.49 s
Snow TractionHigher is better9th / 958 lbf-16 lbf
Snow HandlingLower is better8th / 982.7 s+4.30 s
Subj. ComfortHigher is better7th / 96 Points-1.00 Points
NoiseLower is better2nd / 965.6 dB+0.20 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better6th / 90.776 kg/t+0.12 kg/t
3PMSF
Yes

More tire tests

Cross-check this test

All tire tests

Where these tires were tested again, and how the verdict held up.

Discussion

  1. No comments yet — be the first.
Rate your tires

My tires

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tires

Save tires from a tire page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tires. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.