Data Explorer / Vi Bilagare
2022 ViBilagare Eco vs Normal Tire Test
- Tested size
- 205/55 R16
- Tires tested
- 10
- Disciplines
- 9
Set the weightings
Move a slider. The other categories rebalance automatically to keep the total at 100%.
No test-specific category weights are recorded; this starts with season defaults.
Season defaults
Results
Movement is compared with the default calculation, not the published finishing order. Scores use unrounded totals for ranking.
No ranking for this setup. Give at least one category a positive weight and include a discipline in each active category, or reset the weights.
Filtering never changes the benchmark, scores or positions.
No tires selected. Add tires to your shortlist to focus the ranking.
| ft ↓ | s ↓ | ft ↓ | s ↓ | s ↓ | mph ↑ | ft/s² ↑ | kg/t ↓ | l/100km ↓ | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | 97.07 | 112 | 107.1 | 100.0 | 98 | 68.1 | 20.5 | 50.5 | 219.8 | 98.0 | 8.46 | 5.26 | 81.5 | |
StrengthsShort braking distances and high cornering grip. Safe driving characteristics. ConsiderationsSlightly lower comfort level. Score contributionCategory score × of overall score Dry100 × 37% = 37 Wet97.96 × 53% = 51.92 Value81.53 × 10% = 8.15 | |||||||||||||||
| 2 | 2 | 96.88 | 115 | 108.3 | 98.2 | 94 | 67.9 | 20.6 | 50.8 | 220.8 | 99.1 | 8.23 | 5.49 | 80.4 | |
StrengthsHigh wet grip, easy to control on the grip limit. Quiet on the rough road. ConsiderationsRelatively high consumption. Score contributionCategory score × of overall score Dry98.17 × 37% = 36.32 Wet99.08 × 53% = 52.51 Value80.44 × 10% = 8.04 | |||||||||||||||
| 3 | 3 | 96.37 | 115 | 107.6 | 98.5 | 105 | 68.2 | 20.7 | 50.8 | 229.0 | 96.5 | 7.12 | 5.24 | 88.0 | |
StrengthsRapid steering reactions, high driving pleasure. ConsiderationsRolls hard over bumps, road noise. Score contributionCategory score × of overall score Dry98.49 × 37% = 36.44 Wet96.47 × 53% = 51.13 Value87.99 × 10% = 8.8 | |||||||||||||||
| 4 | 5 | 95.57 | 115 | 107.7 | 98.6 | 104 | 68.7 | 20.7 | 50.1 | 225.4 | 96.2 | 8.22 | 5.41 | 81.2 | |
StrengthsHigh grip level overall, good curved aquaplaning ability. ConsiderationsRelatively high fuel consumption. Score contributionCategory score × of overall score Dry98.58 × 37% = 36.47 Wet96.19 × 53% = 50.98 Value81.17 × 10% = 8.12 | |||||||||||||||
| 5 | 4 | 95.85 | 116 | 107.8 | 98.1 | 103 | 69.1 | 21.0 | 52.8 | 226.0 | 96.5 | 7.87 | 5.29 | 83.8 | |
StrengthsLogical and easy to drive. Good aquaplaning resistance. ConsiderationsSide grip on wet road. Sound comfort. Score contributionCategory score × of overall score Dry98.12 × 37% = 36.3 Wet96.54 × 53% = 51.17 Value83.75 × 10% = 8.38 | |||||||||||||||
| 6 | 6 | 95.06 | 118 | 107.8 | 97.2 | 108 | 68.9 | 20.9 | 50.0 | 222.8 | 94.8 | 7.15 | 5.14 | 88.8 | |
StrengthsHigh comfort, low rolling resistance, price. ConsiderationsSlightly diffuse driving characteristics. Score contributionCategory score × of overall score Dry97.18 × 37% = 35.95 Wet94.78 × 53% = 50.23 Value88.76 × 10% = 8.88 | |||||||||||||||
| 7 | 7 | 94.00 | 123 | 109.4 | 94.6 | 111 | 69.1 | 21.2 | 49.3 | 220.8 | 93.6 | 6.29 | 5.17 | 93.9 | |
StrengthsSilent. Decent wet grip for an eco-tire. ConsiderationsLong braking distances. Not efficient enough. Score contributionCategory score × of overall score Dry94.55 × 37% = 34.98 Wet93.65 × 53% = 49.63 Value93.87 × 10% = 9.39 | |||||||||||||||
| 8 | 8 | 93.53 | 119 | 108.3 | 96.6 | 112 | 71.7 | 21.6 | 48.3 | 214.6 | 91.4 | 6.48 | 5.07 | 93.5 | |
StrengthsLow consumption. Good comfort. ConsiderationsPoor wet grip. Extended braking distances. Slow steering reaction. Score contributionCategory score × of overall score Dry96.55 × 37% = 35.72 Wet91.42 × 53% = 48.45 Value93.52 × 10% = 9.35 | |||||||||||||||
| 9 | 9 | 93.12 | 117 | 108.4 | 97.4 | 119 | 72.4 | 22.0 | 46.7 | 210.0 | 88.9 | 5.64 | 5.13 | 99.4 | |
StrengthsLow rolling resistance, good stability, crisp steering feel. ConsiderationsVery poor wet grip! Long stopping distances in wet. Score contributionCategory score × of overall score Dry97.44 × 37% = 36.05 Wet88.92 × 53% = 47.13 Value99.42 × 10% = 9.94 | |||||||||||||||
| 10 | 10 | 89.84 | 124 | 108.7 | 94.4 | 125 | 72.6 | 22.1 | 48.7 | 218.5 | 88.6 | 8.39 | 5.48 | 79.9 | |
StrengthsGood shock absorption and low noise on rough asphalt. ConsiderationsDifficult to control in a crisis situations. Poor braking performance. Score contributionCategory score × of overall score Dry94.39 × 37% = 34.92 Wet88.56 × 53% = 46.93 Value79.87 × 10% = 7.99 | |||||||||||||||
Raw results do not change when you move the sliders. Scroll horizontally to see every discipline.
Leading with these priorities
Continental Premium Contact 6
These are calculated scenarios, not new test awards. The published verdict may reflect judgement, close results and factors outside this calculation.
Not ranked: a measurement needed for these weights is missing. Missing results are not treated as zero or redistributed.
Reference tires provide context only. They do not set the benchmark and cannot win the personalised ranking.
Weighting vs real impact
What decides this ranking
The weighting is how much each category counts. The real impact is how much of the difference between the tires it creates: a discipline in which every tire performed about the same barely changes the order, however much it counts.
No weighting is recorded for this test, so the weighting here starts from Tire Reviews’ season defaults, not from the test’s own scoring.
- Dry Weighting 37% Real impact 16%
- Wet Weighting 53% Real impact 58%
- Value Weighting 10% Real impact 25%
- Rolling Resistance counts for 5% of the score but creates 20% of the difference between the tires, because their results in it were far apart.
- Dry Handling counts for 18.5% of the score but creates only 3% of the difference, because most tires performed about the same in it.
Every discipline 9
| Discipline | Weighting | Real impact |
|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | 18.5% | 14% |
| Dry Handling | 18.5% | 3% |
| Wet Braking | 13.8% | 24% |
| Wet Handling | 13.8% | 13% |
| Wet Circle | 13.8% | 12% |
| Straight Aqua | 5.8% | 5% |
| Curved Aquaplaning | 5.8% | 4% |
| Rolling Resistance | 5% | 20% |
| Fuel Consumption | 5% | 5% |
How it is worked out: each discipline’s weighting is multiplied by the spread of its results (the gap across the middle half of the tires, as a percentage of the best result), then shared out so that all the disciplines add up to 100%. It estimates what separates the tires; it is not a second set of weights, and it follows the weights you set.
How your ranking is calculated
Each discipline is scored against the best non-reference tire in the full test field: best ÷ result × 100 when lower is better, or result ÷ best × 100 when higher is better. Discipline scores are rounded to two decimal places, then combined using your weights.
Within-category weights divide that category’s share of the overall score. A 50% wet category and 40% wet-braking share give wet braking 20% of the total. A weight is a scoring priority, not a measure of its actual effect on the ranking: the performance gaps matter too. What decides this ranking ↑
Published joint positions are preserved separately. Calculated positions tie only when their underlying scores match; two displayed scores can look equal after rounding.
A zero weight excludes that category or discipline. At least one active discipline is required, and the disciplines in every active category must have a positive total.
More tire tests
Cross-check this test
Where these tires were tested again, and how the verdict held up.
2023 ADAC Summer Tire Test
205/55 R1650 tires tested
6 of these 10 tires tested again
2021 53 Summer Tire Braking Test
205/55 R1653 tires tested
6 of these 10 tires tested again
2022 Auto Bild Summer Tire Test
215/55 R1721 tires tested
5 of these 10 tires tested again