Data Explorer / Tire Reviews
2022/23 Tire Reviews All Season Tire Test
- Tested size
- 225/45 R17
- Tires tested
- 10
- Disciplines
- 11
Set the weightings
Move a slider. The other categories rebalance automatically to keep the total at 100%.
Starts with the saved weights for this test.
Test defaults
Results
Movement is compared with the default calculation, not the published finishing order. Scores use unrounded totals for ranking.
No ranking for this setup. Give at least one category a positive weight and include a discipline in each active category, or reset the weights.
Filtering never changes the benchmark, scores or positions.
No tires selected. Add tires to your shortlist to focus the ranking.
| ft ↓ | s ↓ | ft ↓ | s ↓ | mph ↑ | ft/s² ↑ | ft ↓ | s ↓ | s ↓ | dB ↓ | kg/t ↓ | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1= | 1 | 97.61 | 127 | 79.3 | 99.7 | 106 | 99.0 | 49.0 | 21.3 | 95.0 | 102 | 5.5 | 110.0 | 100.0 | 69.6 | 99.3 | 7.9 | 94.9 | |
StrengthsThe best snow performance on test by a margin, rivaling winter tire ability, shortest dry braking with good grip in dry handling, high aquaplaning resistance, low rolling resistance. ConsiderationsLimited grip in the wet grip tests with high levels of understeer. Score contributionCategory score × of overall score Dry99.68 × 25% = 24.92 Wet94.96 × 35% = 33.24 Snow100 × 25% = 25 Comfort99.28 × 5% = 4.96 Rolling Resistance94.94 × 10% = 9.49 | |||||||||||||||||||
| 1= | 2 | 96.81 | 129 | 79.3 | 98.8 | 104 | 97.1 | 50.0 | 24.6 | 98.0 | 106 | 6.0 | 114.3 | 96.0 | 69.4 | 99.6 | 8.5 | 88.2 | |
StrengthsBest aquaplaning resistance, extremely short wet braking and excellent wet handling, excellent grip in all snow tests, high grip levels in the dry, low noise. ConsiderationsHigh rolling resistance. Score contributionCategory score × of overall score Dry98.79 × 25% = 24.7 Wet98.03 × 35% = 34.31 Snow96.01 × 25% = 24 Comfort99.57 × 5% = 4.98 Rolling Resistance88.24 × 10% = 8.82 | |||||||||||||||||||
| 3 | 3 | 96.10 | 136 | 78.7 | 95.8 | 105 | 97.5 | 49.3 | 24.0 | 97.0 | 103 | 7.1 | 114.7 | 96.3 | 69.5 | 99.4 | 8.2 | 91.5 | |
StrengthsExcellent grip in the wet with short braking distances and good handling, very high aquaplaning resistance, excellent braking and handling in the snow, fastest dry handling time. ConsiderationsLower snow traction, long dry braking distances. Score contributionCategory score × of overall score Dry95.83 × 25% = 23.96 Wet97.01 × 35% = 33.95 Snow96.29 × 25% = 24.07 Comfort99.42 × 5% = 4.97 Rolling Resistance91.46 × 10% = 9.15 | |||||||||||||||||||
| 4 | 4 | 94.73 | 136 | 78.8 | 95.8 | 109 | 98.1 | 48.7 | 22.0 | 93.9 | 106 | 6.8 | 115.5 | 94.8 | 69.7 | 99.1 | 8.1 | 92.6 | |
StrengthsGood handling in the wet and dry, good snow braking and handling, low rolling resistance. ConsiderationsHigh internal noise, weak snow traction, extended dry braking. Score contributionCategory score × of overall score Dry95.77 × 25% = 23.94 Wet93.91 × 35% = 32.87 Snow94.82 × 25% = 23.7 Comfort99.14 × 5% = 4.96 Rolling Resistance92.59 × 10% = 9.26 | |||||||||||||||||||
| 5 | 5 | 94.35 | 129 | 78.9 | 98.9 | 105 | 98.6 | 48.5 | 22.6 | 95.8 | 120 | 9.5 | 125.4 | 84.6 | 69.8 | 99.0 | 7.5 | 100.0 | |
StrengthsExcellent grip in the wet and dry, good aquaplaning resistance, short dry braking, lowest rolling resistance on test. ConsiderationsExtremely limited snow performance with the longest braking, lowest traction and most difficult snow handling lap. Highest internal noise. Score contributionCategory score × of overall score Dry98.86 × 25% = 24.72 Wet95.84 × 35% = 33.54 Snow84.57 × 25% = 21.14 Comfort99 × 5% = 4.95 Rolling Resistance100 × 10% = 10 | |||||||||||||||||||
| 6 | 6 | 93.80 | 132 | 79.7 | 97.3 | 107 | 97.7 | 47.8 | 20.7 | 94.3 | 109 | 6.2 | 118.9 | 92.9 | 69.1 | 100.0 | 9.1 | 82.4 | |
StrengthsLowest internal noise on test, good snow traction and wet handling. ConsiderationsAverage grip in the snow and the dry, low aquaplaning resistance, very high rolling resistance. Score contributionCategory score × of overall score Dry97.31 × 25% = 24.33 Wet94.32 × 35% = 33.01 Snow92.88 × 25% = 23.22 Comfort100 × 5% = 5 Rolling Resistance82.42 × 10% = 8.24 | |||||||||||||||||||
| 7 | 7 | 93.74 | 131 | 80.1 | 97.4 | 100 | 96.6 | 46.0 | 19.7 | 97.1 | 113 | 7.8 | 120.0 | 89.9 | 69.3 | 99.7 | 9.4 | 79.8 | |
StrengthsBest wet grip on test with the shortest wet braking and fastest wet handling lap, low internal noise. ConsiderationsLow grip in the snow and in the dry, low aquaplaning resistance, highest rolling resistance in the test. Score contributionCategory score × of overall score Dry97.38 × 25% = 24.34 Wet97.06 × 35% = 33.97 Snow89.86 × 25% = 22.47 Comfort99.71 × 5% = 4.99 Rolling Resistance79.79 × 10% = 7.98 | |||||||||||||||||||
| 8 | 8 | 93.37 | 130 | 80.6 | 97.7 | 118 | 100.3 | 48.4 | 21.0 | 89.2 | 115 | 6.7 | 116.7 | 91.0 | 69.5 | 99.4 | 7.5 | 100.0 | |
StrengthsLowest rolling resistance on test, short braking distance in the dry. ConsiderationsLimited snow and wet grip in braking and handling. Score contributionCategory score × of overall score Dry97.69 × 25% = 24.42 Wet89.23 × 35% = 31.23 Snow91.01 × 25% = 22.75 Comfort99.42 × 5% = 4.97 Rolling Resistance100 × 10% = 10 | |||||||||||||||||||
| 9 | 9 | 92.51 | 140 | 80.8 | 93.5 | 120 | 101.3 | 49.0 | 22.0 | 88.5 | 104 | 5.7 | 113.3 | 97.4 | 69.4 | 99.6 | 8.5 | 88.2 | |
StrengthsExcellent grip in the snow, high aquaplaning resistance, low internal noise. ConsiderationsLow grip in the wet and dry with long braking distances and slow to react handling. High rolling resistance. Score contributionCategory score × of overall score Dry93.47 × 25% = 23.37 Wet88.54 × 35% = 30.99 Snow97.41 × 25% = 24.35 Comfort99.57 × 5% = 4.98 Rolling Resistance88.24 × 10% = 8.82 | |||||||||||||||||||
| 10 | 10 | 88.79 | 143 | 80.2 | 92.7 | 135 | 108.6 | 44.8 | 17.1 | 79.3 | 107 | 5.9 | 115.8 | 95.0 | 69.4 | 99.6 | 8.2 | 91.5 | |
StrengthsGood snow traction, low internal noise, reasonable rolling resistance. ConsiderationsDangerously long braking distances in the wet and dry, inharmonious handling in the wet with oversteer, very low aquaplaning resistance. Score contributionCategory score × of overall score Dry92.69 × 25% = 23.17 Wet79.29 × 35% = 27.75 Snow94.95 × 25% = 23.74 Comfort99.57 × 5% = 4.98 Rolling Resistance91.46 × 10% = 9.15 | |||||||||||||||||||
Raw results do not change when you move the sliders. Scroll horizontally to see every discipline.
Leading with these priorities
Michelin CrossClimate 2
These are calculated scenarios, not new test awards. The published verdict may reflect judgement, close results and factors outside this calculation.
Not ranked: a measurement needed for these weights is missing. Missing results are not treated as zero or redistributed.
Reference tires provide context only. They do not set the benchmark and cannot win the personalised ranking.
Weighting vs real impact
What decides this ranking
The weighting is how much each category counts. The real impact is how much of the difference between the tires it creates: a discipline in which every tire performed about the same barely changes the order, however much it counts.
- Dry Weighting 25% Real impact 18%
- Wet Weighting 35% Real impact 43%
- Snow Weighting 25% Real impact 26%
- Comfort Weighting 5% Real impact <1%
- Rolling Resistance Weighting 10% Real impact 12%
- Wet Braking counts for 18.4% of the score but creates 32% of the difference between the tires, because their results in it were far apart.
- Dry Handling counts for 10.5% of the score but creates only 3% of the difference, because most tires performed about the same in it.
Every discipline 11
| Discipline | Weighting | Real impact |
|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | 14.5% | 15% |
| Dry Handling | 10.5% | 3% |
| Wet Braking | 18.4% | 32% |
| Wet Handling | 9.2% | 4% |
| Straight Aqua | 3.7% | 1% |
| Curved Aquaplaning | 3.7% | 5% |
| Snow Braking | 12.5% | 15% |
| Snow Traction | 1.4% | 4% |
| Snow Handling | 11.1% | 7% |
| Noise | 5% | <1% |
| Rolling Resistance | 10% | 12% |
How it is worked out: each discipline’s weighting is multiplied by the spread of its results (the gap across the middle half of the tires, as a percentage of the best result), then shared out so that all the disciplines add up to 100%. It estimates what separates the tires; it is not a second set of weights, and it follows the weights you set.
How your ranking is calculated
Each discipline is scored against the best non-reference tire in the full test field: best ÷ result × 100 when lower is better, or result ÷ best × 100 when higher is better. Discipline scores are rounded to two decimal places, then combined using your weights.
Within-category weights divide that category’s share of the overall score. A 50% wet category and 40% wet-braking share give wet braking 20% of the total. A weight is a scoring priority, not a measure of its actual effect on the ranking: the performance gaps matter too. What decides this ranking ↑
Published joint positions are preserved separately. Calculated positions tie only when their underlying scores match; two displayed scores can look equal after rounding.
A zero weight excludes that category or discipline. At least one active discipline is required, and the disciplines in every active category must have a positive total.
More tire tests
Cross-check this test
Where these tires were tested again, and how the verdict held up.
2021 All Season Tire Market Overview
225/50 R1732 tires tested
10 of these 10 tires tested again
2024 Minivan / SUV All Season Tire Test
235/55 R1712 tires tested
8 of these 10 tires tested again
2021 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test
225/50 R1716 tires tested
8 of these 10 tires tested again
