Test Charts / Auto Bild
2018 Auto Bild Winter Tire Test
Compare each discipline in the tested size. See the measured result, position and gap to the best tire, then read the verdict for the trade-offs behind the finishing order.
- Tested size
- 195/65 R15
- Tires tested
- 20
- Disciplines
- 11
Read the measurements, not just the rank
Lower is better for braking distances and lap times; higher is better for subjective scores and aquaplaning speed. Bars start at zero. Read the gap alongside the position: adjacent tires can be separated by very different margins.
Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tires does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.
Focus on your tires
Select tires to highlight them throughout the charts.
Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tires does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.
Dry
2Dry Braking
Dry braking in feet
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
RefReference Summer |
130 ft | -14 ft |
RefReference All Season |
138 ft | -6 ft |
| 144 ft | Best | |
| 146 ft | +2 ft | |
| 147 ft | +3 ft | |
| 147 ft | +3 ft | |
| 148 ft | +4 ft | |
| 149 ft | +5 ft | |
| 149 ft | +5 ft | |
| 150 ft | +6 ft | |
| 150 ft | +6 ft | |
| 150 ft | +6 ft | |
| 150 ft | +6 ft | |
| 150 ft | +6 ft | |
| 152 ft | +8 ft | |
| 152 ft | +8 ft | |
| 152 ft | +8 ft | |
| 153 ft | +9 ft | |
| 155 ft | +11 ft | |
| 155 ft | +11 ft | |
| 155 ft | +11 ft | |
| 155 ft | +11 ft |
The difference between best and worst was 19.5% (25 ft ≈ 1.7 Car Lengths).
Dry Handling
Dry Handling Average Speed
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
RefReference Summer |
68.3 mph | +1.4 mph |
RefReference All Season |
66.9 mph | 0.0 mph |
| 66.9 mph | Best | |
| 66.2 mph | -0.7 mph | |
| 66.2 mph | -0.7 mph | |
| 66.2 mph | -0.7 mph | |
| 66.1 mph | -0.8 mph | |
| 66.1 mph | -0.8 mph | |
| 66.1 mph | -0.8 mph | |
| 66.1 mph | -0.8 mph | |
| 66.0 mph | -0.9 mph | |
| 66.0 mph | -0.9 mph | |
| 65.9 mph | -1.0 mph | |
| 65.9 mph | -1.0 mph | |
| 65.9 mph | -1.0 mph | |
| 65.7 mph | -1.2 mph | |
| 65.6 mph | -1.3 mph | |
| 65.6 mph | -1.3 mph | |
| 65.4 mph | -1.5 mph | |
| 65.3 mph | -1.6 mph | |
| 65.3 mph | -1.6 mph | |
| 65.1 mph | -1.8 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 4.6% (3.2 mph).
Wet
3Wet Braking
Wet braking in feet
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 113 ft | Best | |
| 113 ft | 0 ft | |
| 114 ft | +1 ft | |
| 114 ft | +1 ft | |
RefReference All Season |
115 ft | +2 ft |
| 115 ft | +2 ft | |
| 116 ft | +3 ft | |
RefReference Summer |
118 ft | +5 ft |
| 118 ft | +5 ft | |
| 118 ft | +5 ft | |
| 118 ft | +5 ft | |
| 118 ft | +5 ft | |
| 119 ft | +6 ft | |
| 120 ft | +7 ft | |
| 120 ft | +7 ft | |
| 120 ft | +7 ft | |
| 120 ft | +7 ft | |
| 121 ft | +8 ft | |
| 122 ft | +9 ft | |
| 122 ft | +9 ft | |
| 125 ft | +12 ft | |
| 125 ft | +12 ft |
The difference between best and worst was 11.4% (12 ft ≈ 0.9 Car Lengths).
Wet Handling
Wet Handling Average Speed
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 45.2 mph | Best | |
| 45.0 mph | -0.2 mph | |
RefReference Summer |
44.9 mph | -0.3 mph |
| 44.9 mph | -0.3 mph | |
| 44.8 mph | -0.4 mph | |
| 44.8 mph | -0.4 mph | |
| 44.8 mph | -0.4 mph | |
RefReference All Season |
44.7 mph | -0.5 mph |
| 44.6 mph | -0.6 mph | |
| 44.4 mph | -0.8 mph | |
| 44.4 mph | -0.8 mph | |
| 44.2 mph | -1.0 mph | |
| 44.2 mph | -1.0 mph | |
| 44.1 mph | -1.1 mph | |
| 43.8 mph | -1.4 mph | |
| 43.8 mph | -1.4 mph | |
| 43.6 mph | -1.6 mph | |
| 43.3 mph | -1.9 mph | |
| 43.2 mph | -2.0 mph | |
| 43.2 mph | -2.0 mph | |
| 43.1 mph | -2.1 mph | |
| 41.9 mph | -3.3 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 7.3% (3.3 mph).
Straight Aqua
Float Speed in mph
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 54.9 mph | Best | |
| 53.7 mph | -1.2 mph | |
| 52.7 mph | -2.2 mph | |
| 52.1 mph | -2.8 mph | |
RefReference Summer |
51.9 mph | -3.0 mph |
| 51.9 mph | -3.0 mph | |
| 51.9 mph | -3.0 mph | |
| 51.8 mph | -3.1 mph | |
| 50.5 mph | -4.4 mph | |
| 50.3 mph | -4.6 mph | |
| 50.1 mph | -4.8 mph | |
| 50.1 mph | -4.8 mph | |
| 49.9 mph | -5.0 mph | |
RefReference All Season |
49.5 mph | -5.4 mph |
| 49.4 mph | -5.5 mph | |
| 49.3 mph | -5.6 mph | |
| 49.2 mph | -5.7 mph | |
| 47.7 mph | -7.2 mph | |
| 47.5 mph | -7.4 mph | |
| 47.0 mph | -7.9 mph | |
| 46.7 mph | -8.2 mph | |
| 46.7 mph | -8.2 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 14.9% (8.2 mph).
Snow
2Snow Braking
Snow braking in feet
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 89 ft | Best | |
| 89 ft | 0 ft | |
| 90 ft | +1 ft | |
| 90 ft | +1 ft | |
| 91 ft | +2 ft | |
| 91 ft | +2 ft | |
| 91 ft | +2 ft | |
| 91 ft | +2 ft | |
| 91 ft | +2 ft | |
| 91 ft | +2 ft | |
| 92 ft | +3 ft | |
| 92 ft | +3 ft | |
| 92 ft | +3 ft | |
| 92 ft | +3 ft | |
| 92 ft | +3 ft | |
| 92 ft | +3 ft | |
| 93 ft | +4 ft | |
| 94 ft | +5 ft | |
RefReference All Season |
97 ft | +8 ft |
| 97 ft | +8 ft | |
| 98 ft | +9 ft | |
RefReference Summer |
142 ft | +53 ft |
The difference between best and worst was 60% (53 ft ≈ 3.6 Car Lengths).
Snow Handling
Snow handling average speed
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 32.8 mph | Best | |
| 32.7 mph | -0.1 mph | |
| 32.7 mph | -0.1 mph | |
| 32.5 mph | -0.3 mph | |
| 32.4 mph | -0.4 mph | |
| 32.3 mph | -0.5 mph | |
| 32.3 mph | -0.5 mph | |
| 32.2 mph | -0.6 mph | |
| 32.2 mph | -0.6 mph | |
| 32.2 mph | -0.6 mph | |
| 32.1 mph | -0.7 mph | |
| 32.1 mph | -0.7 mph | |
| 32.1 mph | -0.7 mph | |
| 32.0 mph | -0.8 mph | |
| 32.0 mph | -0.8 mph | |
| 31.9 mph | -0.9 mph | |
| 31.7 mph | -1.1 mph | |
| 31.4 mph | -1.4 mph | |
| 31.3 mph | -1.5 mph | |
| 31.2 mph | -1.6 mph | |
RefReference All Season |
31.1 mph | -1.7 mph |
RefReference Summer |
17.1 mph | -15.7 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 47.7% (15.7 mph).
Comfort
1Noise
External noise in dB
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 64.8 dB | Best | |
| 64.8 dB | Best | |
| 65.6 dB | +0.80 dB | |
| 65.6 dB | +0.80 dB | |
| 65.6 dB | +0.80 dB | |
RefReference All Season |
65.7 dB | +0.90 dB |
| 66 dB | +1.20 dB | |
| 66.2 dB | +1.40 dB | |
| 66.3 dB | +1.50 dB | |
| 66.3 dB | +1.50 dB | |
| 66.4 dB | +1.60 dB | |
| 66.4 dB | +1.60 dB | |
| 66.5 dB | +1.70 dB | |
| 67.3 dB | +2.50 dB | |
| 67.4 dB | +2.60 dB | |
| 67.4 dB | +2.60 dB | |
| 67.7 dB | +2.90 dB | |
| 67.8 dB | +3.00 dB | |
RefReference Summer |
67.8 dB | +3.00 dB |
| 68.2 dB | +3.40 dB | |
| 68.2 dB | +3.40 dB | |
| 68.4 dB | +3.60 dB |
The difference between best and worst was 5.6% (3.6 dB).
Value
3Wear
Predicted tread life in KM
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 45,018 miles | Best | |
| 37,189 miles | -7,829 miles | |
RefReference All Season |
32,436 miles | -12,582 miles |
| 32,156 miles | -12,862 miles | |
| 30,199 miles | -14,819 miles | |
| 29,639 miles | -15,379 miles | |
| 29,360 miles | -15,658 miles | |
| 28,521 miles | -16,497 miles | |
| 27,962 miles | -17,056 miles | |
| 27,123 miles | -17,895 miles | |
| 27,123 miles | -17,895 miles | |
| 26,564 miles | -18,454 miles | |
| 25,725 miles | -19,293 miles | |
| 25,725 miles | -19,293 miles | |
| 25,166 miles | -19,852 miles | |
| 25,166 miles | -19,852 miles | |
| 24,327 miles | -20,691 miles | |
| 23,488 miles | -21,530 miles | |
| 21,251 miles | -23,767 miles | |
| 20,692 miles | -24,326 miles | |
| 17,895 miles | -27,123 miles |
The difference between best and worst was 60.2% (27,123 miles).
Value
Euros/1000km based on cost/wear
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best | cost per 1,000 miles |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4.07 Price/1000 | Best | €21.42 | |
| 4.09 Price/1000 | +0.02 Price/1000 | €21.72 | |
| 5.11 Price/1000 | +1.04 Price/1000 | €21.11 | |
| 5.38 Price/1000 | +1.31 Price/1000 | €17.78 | |
| 5.45 Price/1000 | +1.38 Price/1000 | €20.56 | |
RefReference All Season |
5.46 Price/1000 | +1.39 Price/1000 | €18.21 |
| 5.56 Price/1000 | +1.49 Price/1000 | €24.36 | |
| 5.6 Price/1000 | +1.53 Price/1000 | €18.58 | |
| 5.61 Price/1000 | +1.54 Price/1000 | €20.95 | |
| 5.66 Price/1000 | +1.59 Price/1000 | €11.47 | |
| 5.68 Price/1000 | +1.61 Price/1000 | €21.75 | |
| 5.76 Price/1000 | +1.69 Price/1000 | €15.68 | |
| 5.8 Price/1000 | +1.73 Price/1000 | €21.33 | |
| 5.85 Price/1000 | +1.78 Price/1000 | €23.20 | |
| 5.96 Price/1000 | +1.89 Price/1000 | €18.95 | |
| 6.13 Price/1000 | +2.06 Price/1000 | €19.76 | |
| 6.42 Price/1000 | +2.35 Price/1000 | €21.42 | |
| 6.48 Price/1000 | +2.41 Price/1000 | €22.75 | |
| 6.77 Price/1000 | +2.70 Price/1000 | €19.69 | |
| 8.11 Price/1000 | +4.04 Price/1000 | €25.41 | |
| 9.99 Price/1000 | +5.92 Price/1000 | €32.12 |
The difference between best and worst was 145.5% (5.92 Price/1000). Over 25,000 miles the cheapest tire to own (Nokian WR D4) works out €516 cheaper than the most expensive (Pirelli Cinturato Winter).
How this is calculated
Assumes a typical car doing 29 mpg (rolling resistance causing 20% of fuel use), fuel at €6.25 per gallon and €70 fitting per set of four. Purchase prices are from the time of the 2018 test; financing costs are excluded.
Rolling Resistance
Rolling resistance in kg t
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best | Extra fuel / year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6.96 kg/t | Best | $0 | |
| 7.63 kg/t | +0.67 kg/t | $28 | |
| 8.01 kg/t | +1.05 kg/t | $44 | |
| 8.03 kg/t | +1.07 kg/t | $45 | |
| 8.06 kg/t | +1.10 kg/t | $46 | |
| 8.11 kg/t | +1.15 kg/t | $49 | |
RefReference All Season |
8.15 kg/t | +1.19 kg/t | $50 |
| 8.17 kg/t | +1.21 kg/t | $51 | |
| 8.32 kg/t | +1.36 kg/t | $57 | |
| 8.43 kg/t | +1.47 kg/t | $62 | |
| 8.48 kg/t | +1.52 kg/t | $64 | |
RefReference Summer |
8.48 kg/t | +1.52 kg/t | $64 |
| 8.49 kg/t | +1.53 kg/t | $65 | |
| 8.49 kg/t | +1.53 kg/t | $65 | |
| 8.49 kg/t | +1.53 kg/t | $65 | |
| 8.58 kg/t | +1.62 kg/t | $68 | |
| 8.66 kg/t | +1.70 kg/t | $72 | |
| 8.68 kg/t | +1.72 kg/t | $73 | |
| 8.88 kg/t | +1.92 kg/t | $81 | |
| 9.03 kg/t | +2.07 kg/t | $87 | |
| 9.13 kg/t | +2.17 kg/t | $92 | |
| 9.14 kg/t | +2.18 kg/t | $92 |
The difference between best and worst was 31.3% (2.18 kg / t). Over 12,000 miles a year at $3.60/gal, the Michelin Alpin 5 uses about 26 gal ($92) more fuel than the Nokian WR D4.
Adjust the assumptions
Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions. These calculators use the full test field, independently of your tire selection above.
More tire tests
Cross-check this test
Where these tires were tested again, and how the verdict held up.
2018 51 Winter Tire Shootout
195/65 R1552 tires tested
20 of these 20 tires tested again
2019 Winter Tire Test Market Overview
225/45 R1747 tires tested
12 of these 20 tires tested again
2016 Winter Tire Market Overview
205/55 R1643 tires tested
12 of these 20 tires tested again

