Menu
Hankook Ventus S1 evo View Gallery (1)
195-345/25-50 R15-22 30 sizes 2021

Hankook Ventus S1 evo

The Hankook Ventus S1 evo is a Max Performance Summer tire designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars.

8.8
Tire Reviews Score Based on Professional Tests & User Reviews
Medium Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
81%
Wet Grip
73%
Road Feedback
75%
Handling
73%
Wear
75%
Comfort
72%
Buy again
71%
45 Reviews
74% Average
604,521 miles driven
15 Tests (avg: 4th)
Hankook Ventus S1 evo

Hankook Ventus S1 evo

Summer Premium
BETA
8.8 / 10
Based on Professional Tests & User Reviews · Medium Confidence · Updated 23 Feb 2026

The Tire Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tire scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Value
89
0.42x / 1 test
Dry
84
1.8x / 2 tests
Wet
78
2x / 3 tests
Comfort
55
0.32x / 1 test

Cross-category scores are derived metrics that combine data from multiple test disciplines to evaluate real-world performance characteristics.

Handling
91.9
2 tests
Braking
82.1
2 tests
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 15
Publications: 9
Period: 2010 - 2018
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 45
Avg Rating: 74.3%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 1.04
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tire tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.9 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 12 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.75 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
combined_penalty_floor 0.2
Data Sources
TestPublicationDateSizePositionMetrics
2018 Auto Bild 20 inch UHP Tire Test Auto Bild Sportscars 2018 245/30 R20 3/8 7 metrics
2015 Auto Bild Performance Tire Test Auto Bild Sportscars 2015 275/35 R19 1/7 0 metrics
2012 Auto Bild 20 inch Tire Test Auto Bild Sportscars 2012 245/30 R20 5/8 0 metrics
2012 EVO Max Performance Tire Test EVO 2012 235/40 R18 2/10 0 metrics
2011 Auto Express Ultra High Performance Tire Test Auto Express 2011 225/45 R17 10/10 0 metrics
2011 Autoreview Max Performance Summer Tire Test Auto Review 2011 235/35 R19 3/9 0 metrics
2011 Autobild Max Performance Summer Tire Test Auto Bild 2011 225/40 R18 1/10 0 metrics
2011 Auto Zeitung Max Performance Tire Test Auto Zeitung 2011 225/45 R17 4/14 0 metrics
2010 EVO FWD Tire Test EVO 2010 235/35 R19 8/9 0 metrics
2010 Auto Express Ultra High Performance Tire Test Auto Express 2010 225/45 r18 5/11 0 metrics
2010 Sport Auto Ultra High Performance Tire Test Sport Auto 2010 235/35 R19 3/11 0 metrics
2010 European Summer Tire Test ADAC 2010 225/45 r17 8/16 0 metrics
2010 Auto Bild Ultra High Performance Tire Test Auto Bild 2010 255/30 R19 3/6 0 metrics
2010 AMS Premium Brand Tire Test Auto Motor Und Sport 2010 245/45 R17 1/10 0 metrics
2010 Auto Zeitung Ultra High Performance Summer Tire Test Auto Zeitung 2010 235/40 R18 4/9 0 metrics
15
Tests
4th
Average
1st
Best
10th
Worst
Latest Tire Test Results
3rd/8
Short braking distances in any weather, good steering response and car balance, good price / performance ratio.
Average aquaplaning.
1st/7
Balanced tires without obvious disadvantages, the shortest braking distance in the wet, very low rolling resistance
None mentioned
2nd/10
Although the Hankook S1 Evo only managed a single top place (its subjective feel on the dry track) the rest of its results were strong enough to give it a close second behind the Conti and a whisker ahead of the Goodyear.

Questions and Answers for the Hankook Ventus S1 evo

Ask a question
Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the Hankook Ventus S1 evo. Why not submit a question to our tire experts using the form below!
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

Review Summary

Based on 36 user reviews

Overall, drivers rate the Hankook Ventus S1 evo positively for strong dry grip, stable handling, and good value, with many noting low noise and respectable longevity. Wet performance divides opinion: several high-scoring reviews praise predictable wet grip, but a notable minority report weak wet traction and aquaplaning, especially as the tire ages or in certain sizes. Comfort and noise are generally acceptable, with some run-flat users impressed. Considering the weighted mix of scores, the Ventus S1 evo is a capable, good-value UHP tire with standout dry performance and variable wet confidence.

Strengths
  • Dry grip and handling
  • Good value/price
  • Low noise for many users
  • Predictable at the limit
  • Decent tread life
Areas for Improvement
  • Inconsistent wet grip and aquaplaning for some
  • Performance drop-off with age
  • Occasional rapid wear reports

Top 3 Hankook Ventus S1 evo Reviews

Given 70% while driving a Lancia Ypsilon 1.4 16V (195/45 R16) on a combination of roads for 35,000 spirited miles
Excellent tires for spritely driving in a moderately powerful sub-compact car. The dry handling 'wears out' over time a bit quicker than the thread. After 5 or 6 years of going like glued to the tarmac, with still plenty of thread left, they started to gradually lose a bit of that grip, probably due to rubber aging. I wish they would feel a bit quieter inside, especially at A-roads speeds at which you still hear more rolling noise than engine and wind noise, but I guess that's the price you pay for such performance at a relatively attractive price.
April 3, 2023
Given 79% while driving a Lancia Ypsilon 1.4 16V (195/45 R16) on a combination of roads for 25,000 spirited miles
Very good small car tires allowing for spirited driving with a wide safety margin. I got them with the car and didn’t give them a deeper thought throughout the 40.000 km they lasted, being convinced all decent brand low profile tires should perform like that nowadays. So I thought… until I replaced them with a set of newly introduced Continental EcoContact 6. I never thought the gap in the level of grip through the bends and general feel of the car would be so huge. Knowing that I would surely buy them again, unfortunately they don’t make them anymore. In general, getting UHP 16" tires is getting more and more difficult these days, it’s aging SportContact 3, equally dated Pilot Sport 3 and that’s about it.
December 2, 2025
Given 50% while driving a MINI MINI COUNTRYMAN S ALL4 (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 11 average miles
I have 4No Hankook Ventus S1 evo tires fitted on a 2017 Mini Countryman Cooper SD which has now covered 11,767 miles from new, with one pair having 6mm of wear left and one pair with 4.5mm of wear left, all 4No tires have started to perish around the outer treads and 2No in particular are perishing around the tires in the inner grooves, I have been advised to replace these or risk a high speed blow out, I have contacted Hankook Tires UK who have stated that they take these matters seriously but would need the tires returned to them through the vehicle dealership in the cases of original equipment fitment to consider a warranty claim, what's the car going to run on during this period?, I will let everyone draw their own conclusions as to quality and warranty
August 28, 2019

How would you rate the Hankook Ventus S1 evo?

Click a star to start your review

Latest Hankook Ventus S1 evo Reviews

Given 41% while driving a Ford Fiesta (195/50 R15 V) on mostly country roads for 1,000 spirited miles
I can't believe how bad these tires are considering the good reviews they get in larger sizes. I know that tire manufacturers use different compounds and carcasses for different sizes but in this size on this car (195/50R15) they are awful. They feel like they've been designed for taxi drivers and slow drivers. Compared to the Turanza T001 Evo tires I had before they have no steering feel, a harder ride, less grip and zero progression at the limit they just snap into understeer. I've driven budget tires for less money that are better overall. The good thing about them is that they aren't noisy the hard tread means they wear slowly. For the tiny price difference per corner (about £3-9) I'd buy a better tire from Bridgestone, Michelin or Continental unless you drive slowly and want a tire that lasts a long time.
July 11, 2019
Given 85% while driving a BMW 218d Active Tourer (225/45 R17) on mostly country roads for 200 spirited miles
I have switched to Hankook (run flats) after reading reviews for them on my car, I did have Bridgestone 050 rft. The Bridgestones had poor grip, breaking away with no warning and had serious tramlining feeling dangerous. Since getting the Hankooks they make the car feel as it should, both wet and dry performance is great, I will definately replace with the same when the time comes. I am so glad I did not wait for the old tires to wear before replacing them!
January 21, 2018
Check out how the BEST all seasons tires perform against premium summer and winter tires!
Given 47% while driving a Vauxhall 1.4 auto mk3 (245/45 R18) on a combination of roads for 6,000 spirited miles
These where fitted by the garage when i bought the car.
Didn't like them at all, poor wet grip causing bad understeer in the damp.
Wet braking was sketchy with the cars ABS and stability control working overtime.
Dry grip isn't too bad until the price of them is considered.
Road feel and feedback not too bad but the absolute worst was the wear.... 6000 or so miles and they were worn to the tread limit.
November 21, 2017
Given 73% while driving a Renault Twingo RS (195/40 R17 V) on mostly country roads for 20,000 spirited miles
I had 4 on my Renault Twingo RS 133. On the dry, not much to blame this tire. Accurate, sporty behavior. But he suffers from some shortcomings on the wet. For wear, it is average.
September 12, 2017
Given 86% while driving a Ford Fiesta (195/50 R15 H) on a combination of roads for 35,000 average miles
I have 2013 Fiesta 1.5tdci. Between 0- 30.000km is very good handling and wet grip. But if i apply to break a little hard (with low speed) ABS moves in very often.

Between 30.000-50.000km, comfort is very good but handling and feedback lose last performance's (100to70)
They have long life, they have still 3,5mm depth.

As a result they are good tires.
May 4, 2017
Given 77% while driving a BMW 1 series (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 10 spirited miles
This is my second set of Hankook tires having used the EVO 1 variety in the past on a previous car, The S1 EVO 2 version has an all around improvement with very good grip in dry conditions, low road noise and a minor improvements in wet conditions. I feel very comfortable throwing my car around tight corners and accelerating out of corners during spirited driving. When the tires do let go you get a very progressive and controlled release which is easy to catch. Front end grip is excellent with almost no signs of under steer.

In the wet the progressive feeling diminishes and I'm somewhat wary of how unpredictable the car can handles and as such it's best not to explore the limits of these tires in anything but dry conditions.
August 15, 2016
Given 33% while driving a Ford Fiesta (225/50 R16) on mostly town for 6,000 spirited miles
Dont bother. decent dry grip but wet grip is a disaster. Came with my new Fiesta 1.4 diesel and in the rain it is unresponsive and it aqua-planes. had to change after just 10000km. Replaced by Continental Premium Contact 5 and they made a huge difference!!
November 9, 2015
Given 70% while driving a Ford fiesta (195/50 R15) on a combination of roads for 28,000 average miles
These came new on my 2009 Fiesta 1.4 zetec diesel, i did rotate them twice to even out any wear, Ive just changed them after 6 years and 28000 miles not because they are worn out, they still have 4mm left on all tires, but because they have started to crack pretty badly down the groove in the tread on all tires, plus I fancied a new set of michelin pilot sport 3, i reckon the hankoooks would have lasted me 40000+ had they not started to crack up! nice silent comfy ride, good grip, not quite so good in the wet, looking forward to trying the new michelins out in the wet !
October 2, 2015
Given 93% while driving a Vauxhall astra vxr with 280bhp and coilovers (245/35 R20 W) on a combination of roads for 3,000 spirited miles
Excellent tires all round. Up grade from Pirelli p zero and glad I did.
Wet grip excellent, dry grip also excellent. Had them on for three months now and no noticeable wear or deteriation the the grip in all conditions.
For the cost I would recommend these for the Astra j vxr.
April 25, 2015
Given 90% while driving a Ford Fiesta (195/50 R15 V) on a combination of roads for 75,000 average miles
Excellent long lasting tires. Still had some tread on 2 tires when new tires were put on. Two of the tires were damaged and prematurely worn due to mag wheels being buckled by bad potholes and roads in South Africa
October 11, 2014
Given 35% while driving a Ford 05 Mondeo 185 (modded) diesel (205/55 R16) on mostly town for 0 easy going miles
Very poor quality don't feel safe with these add 4 tires fitted last week £259 total waste of money
August 7, 2014
Given 83% while driving a Lexus GS450h (245/40 R18 W) on mostly motorways for 20,000 spirited miles
Better in the wet than Bridgestone REO50. Not quite as sharp in the dry. Confidence inspiring grip particularly in colder wetter weather where I think it really matters in Northern Europe. Let's you know when it's going to start giving out whereas the Bridgestone will throw you sideways in the wet without warning. Wear is reasonable but this was the weakest area overall but by no means a show stopper.
July 25, 2014
Rate the Hankook Ventus S1 evo