Menu

Test source Auto Bild

2026 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test

Overall test winnerGoodyear Vector All Season 4

Auto Bild has published the full results of its 2026 all-season tire test in 225/45 R17, a size fitted to compact cars such as the VW Golf, Audi A3, Seat Leon, Skoda Octavia and Hyundai i30.

Tires tested
15
Tested size
225/45 R17
Test vehicle
VW Golf and VW Golf GTI
Disciplines
17

At a glance

Tire shortlist

15 Tires tested

Published finishing positions, with the strengths and considerations from this test. Owner reviews cover other sizes and driving conditions.

1st

Goodyear Vector All Season 4

+The Goodyear Vector All Season 4 pulled harder on snow than any other tire in the test, including the winter reference, and was among the best in the snow handling and slalom tests. In the wet it was in the top five of the all-season tires in every test, from braking and handling to both aquaplaning tests, and on dry roads it was second fastest on the handling course, quicker than the summer reference. It was also rated one of the most comfortable tires and had low rolling resistance.

−The Goodyear's projected tread life was only mid-field, and with a higher purchase price that put it among the more expensive tires to run per kilometer. Its snow braking was good rather than class-leading, and its pass-by noise was in the louder half of the field.

Joint2nd

Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF3

+The Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF3 was consistently strong across the test. It had the third-shortest dry braking and fourth-shortest wet braking of the all-season tires, was well placed in both aquaplaning tests and on the dry handling course, and was among the quietest and more comfortable tires. Its tread life was above the field average.

−The Pirelli was a step behind the best tires on snow, mid-field for snow braking and handling and in the lower half in the slalom. Its rolling resistance was also in the higher half of the field, and its high purchase price made it only average on cost per kilometer.

Joint2nd

Vredestein Quatrac Pro 2

+The Vredestein Quatrac Pro 2 was the best tire in the snow tests, with the shortest snow braking and the fastest snow handling and slalom results, ahead of the winter reference in all three. It also had the second-shortest wet braking of the all-season tires, a quick wet circle time, the lowest pass-by noise in the test and joint-best ride comfort.

−The Vredestein lost the most rubber in the wear test and had one of the shortest projected tread lives, so it was in the lower half on cost per kilometer. Its dry braking was only mid-field, and it was in the lower half in both aquaplaning tests.

4th

Michelin CrossClimate 3

+The Michelin CrossClimate 3 was one of the best tires on snow, second in the traction, handling and slalom tests and ahead of the winter reference in all three, with the third-shortest snow braking of the all-season tires. On dry roads it matched the summer reference on the handling course, and it was among the quietest and most comfortable tires in the test.

−The Michelin was weaker in the wet, with some of the longest wet braking of the all-season tires and slow wet handling and wet circle times. It was also the most expensive tire to buy, and with a below-average tread life it was clearly the most expensive to run per kilometer.

Joint5th

Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6

+The Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 was the strongest all-season tire on dry roads, with the shortest dry braking of the all-season tires and the fastest lap of any tire on the dry handling course, quicker even than the summer reference. It also had the third-shortest wet braking of the all-season tires, excellent resistance to straight-line aquaplaning and low rolling resistance.

−The Bridgestone was weak on snow, in the bottom three of the all-season tires for snow braking and slalom and in the lower half for traction and handling. It was slow on the wet handling course and wet circle, among the loudest tires on the pass-by test, and had one of the shortest projected tread lives.

Joint5th

Continental AllSeasonContact 2

+The Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was consistent on snow, where it was fourth fastest of the all-season tires in snow handling, and it was well placed for wet braking, wet handling and the wet circle. It was fourth fastest of the all-season tires in dry handling and was rated, with the Vredestein, the most comfortable tire in the test. Its projected tread life was above the field average.

−The Continental floated earlier than most in straight-line aquaplaning and was in the lower half for curved aquaplaning. Its dry braking was among the longer distances, it had the second-highest rolling resistance, and its high price made it the second most expensive tire to run per kilometer.

Joint7th

Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5

+The Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5 had the best resistance to aquaplaning of any all-season tire, in both the straight-line and curved tests, and the second-shortest dry braking of the all-season tires. It was the cheapest tire in the test and, with a long projected tread life, one of the cheapest to run per kilometer. Its pass-by noise was among the lower figures.

−The Ceat fell behind on snow, in the bottom four of the all-season tires for snow braking and traction. It had the highest rolling resistance in the test by a clear margin, slow wet circle times, below-average ride comfort and it lost more rubber than most in the wear test.

Joint7th

Falken Euroall Season AS220

+The Falken Euroall Season AS220 had the longest projected tread life and lost the least rubber of any tire in the wear test, which made it the cheapest tire to run per kilometer. Its dry braking was in the top half of the all-season tires.

−The Falken was slow in the wet, with the slowest wet circle time of any tire, a slow lap on the wet handling course and weak results in both aquaplaning tests. It was in the lower half on snow and on the dry handling course, had high rolling resistance and was rated among the less comfortable tires.

Joint7th

Kleber Quadraxer 3

+The Kleber Quadraxer 3 was solid on snow, in the top half of the all-season tires in all four snow tests. It had good resistance to straight-line aquaplaning, was among the quieter tires on the pass-by test and lost less rubber than most in the wear test.

−The Kleber had the longest wet braking of the all-season tires and was among the slowest on the wet handling course. It was also slow on the dry handling course, was rated among the least comfortable tires, and had a below-average projected tread life.

Joint7th

Nokian Seasonproof 2

+The Nokian Seasonproof 2 was the fastest tire in the test on the wet handling course and on the wet circle, beating both references, and had the second-best curved aquaplaning result of the all-season tires. It shared the lowest rolling resistance in the test.

−The Nokian was in the lower half on snow for braking, traction and handling, and in the lower half for dry braking and dry handling. Its wet braking was only mid-field despite its wet handling pace, it was one of the louder tires on the pass-by test, and it lost more rubber than most in the wear test.

11th

Dunlop All Season 2

+The Dunlop All Season 2 had the second-shortest snow braking in the test, ahead of the winter reference, and was strong in the snow slalom and traction tests. It shared the lowest rolling resistance, had the second-longest projected tread life and was the second cheapest tire to run per kilometer.

−The Dunlop had the longest dry braking of the all-season tires, which triggered Auto Bild's safety penalty. It also floated early in straight-line aquaplaning and only mid-field on the dry handling course.

Joint12th

Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02

+The Firestone MultiSeason 2 had the fourth-shortest snow braking of the all-season tires, ahead of several premium tires, and was mid-field for snow traction. It was one of the cheapest tires to buy and to run per kilometer, with low rolling resistance.

−The Firestone was the first of the all-season tires to float in straight-line aquaplaning, which triggered Auto Bild's safety penalty, and it was joint last in curved aquaplaning. It was the slowest tire in the test on the dry handling course, had long dry braking and was one of the loudest on the pass-by test.

Joint12th

Toyo Celsius AS2

+The Toyo Celsius AS2 was the best all-season tire in the wet, with the shortest wet braking of the all-season tires, second-fastest wet handling and wet circle times, and strong aquaplaning results. It also had a long projected tread life and low running costs.

−The Toyo was weak on snow, with the longest snow braking of the all-season tires, which triggered Auto Bild's safety penalty, and it was near the bottom for snow traction, handling and slalom. Its ride comfort was rated below average.

Joint12th

Uniroyal AllSeasonExpert 3

+The Uniroyal AllSeasonExpert 3 was strong on snow, with the fourth-most traction of the all-season tires and a good slalom result, and it was solid on the wet handling course and the wet circle.

−The Uniroyal had the second-longest dry braking of the all-season tires, which triggered Auto Bild's safety penalty, and it was slow on the dry handling course. It was weak in both aquaplaning tests and had the shortest projected tread life in the test.

15th

Nexen N Blue 4Season 2

+The Nexen N'Blue 4Season 2 had short dry braking, in the top four of the all-season tires, the second-lowest pass-by noise in the test and joint-lowest rolling resistance. It also lost little rubber in the wear test and had an above-average projected tread life.

−The Nexen was the weakest tire on snow, with the least traction and grip of the all-season tires and the slowest snow handling, and its snow braking and handling triggered Auto Bild's safety penalty. It was also slow in the wet, with long wet braking and the slowest wet handling lap of any tire, and it was rated among the least comfortable.

Tire shortlist

Compare selected tires

2026 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test · 225/45 R17

TireGoodyear Vector All Season 4Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF3Vredestein Quatrac Pro 2Michelin CrossClimate 3Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6Continental AllSeasonContact 2Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5Falken Euroall Season AS220Kleber Quadraxer 3Nokian Seasonproof 2Dunlop All Season 2Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02Toyo Celsius AS2Uniroyal AllSeasonExpert 3Nexen N Blue 4Season 2
Position1stJoint 2ndJoint 2nd4thJoint 5thJoint 5thJoint 7thJoint 7thJoint 7thJoint 7th11thJoint 12thJoint 12thJoint 12th15th
Category scores (% of best)
Dry98.1%98.8%95.9%96.9%100%95.6%99.1%96.4%95.9%94.6%93%93.7%95.5%93.2%97.1%
Wet97.2%96.1%97%92.8%95.3%95.2%94.5%91.8%92.7%97.8%94.8%94.5%99%94.4%91.3%
Snow97%94.5%99.3%98%89.4%94.5%90.4%92.4%95.2%92.2%97%93.8%87.3%94.8%85.5%
Comfort96.6%95.3%100%98.3%93.3%98.9%88%86.6%85.9%89.3%90.4%88.2%86.6%90.7%86.6%
Value84.5%82.2%74.9%79.4%78.6%78.6%80.8%97.2%80.5%80.3%97.1%83.6%84.1%76.3%87.7%
Keep researchingRead owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results

Explore the complete results →

The full test

The evidence behind the verdict

Auto Bild has published the full results of its 2026 all-season tire test in 225/45 R17, a size fitted to compact cars such as the VW Golf, Audi A3, Seat Leon, Skoda Octavia and Hyundai i30. Thirty tires started in a wet and dry braking qualifier, and the 15 with the shortest combined stopping distances went through to the full test on snow, wet and dry roads, with tread wear, rolling resistance and running cost making up a separate cost chapter. The test cars were a VW Golf and a VW Golf GTI, and a summer tire and a winter tire were run alongside as references.

The new Goodyear Vector All Season 4 won, which Auto Bild counts as the tire's second test win of the season after its SUV test in 225/55 R18, with the most snow traction of any tire and, by Auto Bild's account, only a mid-field tread life to count against it. The new Vredestein Quatrac Pro 2 and the Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF3 shared second, and only these three earned Auto Bild's top "exemplary" verdict. The Vredestein was the best tire on snow, stopping shorter and lapping faster than the winter reference, while the Michelin CrossClimate 3 finished fourth, strong on snow but weaker in the wet. Five tires were marked down under Auto Bild's safety rule, including the Dunlop All Season 2, which had the longest dry braking of the all-season tires but was second for both tread life and running cost. The Nexen N'Blue 4Season 2 finished last, the only tire rated "satisfactory", after the lowest snow score in the test.

Test setup & methodology

The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.

Recorded test conditions

Recorded test conditions

Dry Braking
62.1 → 0.0 mph
Wet Braking
62.1 → 0.0 mph
Snow Braking
31.1 → 0.0 mph

The full test follows Auto Bild's braking qualifier, which we covered in our report on the 30-tire qualifier, and the wet and dry braking distances below are the same measurements. The snow tests were run at the Southern Hemisphere Proving Grounds near Wanaka in New Zealand, the wet and dry tests at the ÖAMTC Wachauring near Melk in Austria, and the tread wear was measured by the engineering firm IFV after 8,078 miles of driving on each tire. Auto Bild also notes that Dunlop and Falken now both belong to Sumitomo Rubber, and the two finished first and second for tread life. This is our summary of the headline results; for every grade, the weighting and Auto Bild's methodology, see the original test.

Snow

The Vredestein stopped shortest on snow, with the Dunlop second, and both stopped shorter than the winter reference. The Michelin and Firestone were next. The Toyo and Nexen needed the most room of the all-season tires, and the summer reference took almost twice the Vredestein's distance.

Snow Braking

Snow braking in feet (31 - 0 mph)

Lower is better ↓
Snow Braking
Position / TireResultGap to bestResidual speed
82 ft Best 0 mph
83 ft +1 ft 7 mph
RefReference Winter
84 ft +2 ft 11 mph
85 ft +3 ft 14 mph
87 ft +5 ft 19 mph
88 ft +6 ft 21 mph
88 ft +6 ft 21 mph
90 ft +8 ft 23 mph
90 ft +8 ft 24 mph
90 ft +8 ft 24 mph
92 ft +10 ft 26 mph
93 ft +11 ft 27 mph
95 ft +13 ft 30 mph
96 ft +14 ft 31 mph
99 ft +17 ft 33 mph
99 ft +17 ft 33 mph
RefReference Summer
158 ft +76 ft 55 mph

The difference between best and worst was 92.4% (76 ft ≈ 5.1 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Toyo Celsius AS2 would still be travelling at 33 mph when the Vredestein Quatrac Pro 2 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

The Goodyear pulled hardest on snow, with the Michelin second, and both out-pulled the winter reference, which the Vredestein only just missed. The Toyo and Nexen had the least traction of the all-season tires, and the summer reference managed around half the Goodyear's pulling force.

Snow Traction

Pulling Force in pounds-force

Higher is better ↑
Snow Traction
Position / TireResultGap to best
464 lbf Best
453 lbf -11 lbf
RefReference Winter
451 lbf -13 lbf
450 lbf -14 lbf
443 lbf -21 lbf
441 lbf -23 lbf
440 lbf -24 lbf
437 lbf -27 lbf
434 lbf -30 lbf
429 lbf -35 lbf
428 lbf -36 lbf
416 lbf -48 lbf
413 lbf -51 lbf
407 lbf -57 lbf
386 lbf -78 lbf
381 lbf -83 lbf
RefReference Summer
238 lbf -226 lbf

The difference between best and worst was 48.6% (226 lbf).

The Vredestein was also fastest round the snow handling course, just ahead of the Michelin, and both lapped faster than the winter reference, with the Goodyear and Continental close behind it. The Nokian, Toyo and Nexen were the slowest. Auto Bild did not run the summer reference here: with front-wheel drive, the car got stuck on its way to the course.

Snow Handling

Snow handling average speed

Higher is better ↑
Snow Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
34.5 mph Best
34.5 mph 0.0 mph
RefReference Winter
34.4 mph -0.1 mph
34.4 mph -0.1 mph
34.3 mph -0.2 mph
34.1 mph -0.4 mph
33.7 mph -0.8 mph
33.5 mph -1.0 mph
33.4 mph -1.1 mph
33.4 mph -1.1 mph
33.3 mph -1.2 mph
33.2 mph -1.3 mph
33.0 mph -1.5 mph
32.9 mph -1.6 mph
32.4 mph -2.1 mph
31.8 mph -2.7 mph

The difference between best and worst was 7.9% (2.7 mph).

The Vredestein held the most grip in the snow slalom as well, ahead of the Michelin and Dunlop, and eight of the 15 all-season tires beat the winter reference here. The Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6, so strong on dry roads, held the second-least grip of the all-season tires, ahead of only the Nexen, and it was also in the bottom three for snow braking.

Snow Slalom

Lateral acceleration

Higher is better ↑
Snow Slalom
Position / TireResultGap to best
8.2 ft/s² Best
8.0 ft/s² -0.2 ft/s²
7.9 ft/s² -0.3 ft/s²
7.9 ft/s² -0.3 ft/s²
7.9 ft/s² -0.3 ft/s²
7.9 ft/s² -0.3 ft/s²
7.8 ft/s² -0.4 ft/s²
7.8 ft/s² -0.4 ft/s²
RefReference Winter
7.7 ft/s² -0.5 ft/s²
7.6 ft/s² -0.6 ft/s²
7.6 ft/s² -0.6 ft/s²
7.4 ft/s² -0.8 ft/s²
7.4 ft/s² -0.8 ft/s²
7.3 ft/s² -0.9 ft/s²
7.1 ft/s² -1.1 ft/s²
7.0 ft/s² -1.2 ft/s²
RefReference Summer
4.0 ft/s² -4.2 ft/s²

The difference between best and worst was 51.8% (4.2 ft/s²).

Wet

The summer reference stopped shortest in the wet, but the Toyo Celsius AS2 was only a meter behind it and the best of the all-season tires, ahead of the Vredestein and Bridgestone. That is a big change for the Toyo, which was 14th of 15 for wet braking in Auto Bild's 2025 all-season test and 13th of 15 in the 2024 edition. The Michelin, Nexen and Kleber needed the most room of the all-season tires; the Michelin's result matches our own 2026/27 all-season test, where it was ninth of ten for wet braking. The winter reference stopped furthest of all, more than 20 feet behind the summer tire.

Wet Braking

Wet braking in feet (62 - 0 mph)

Lower is better ↓
Wet Braking
Position / TireResultGap to bestResidual speed
RefReference Summer
135 ft -3 ft 0 mph
138 ft Best 0 mph
140 ft +2 ft 10 mph
141 ft +3 ft 11 mph
142 ft +4 ft 13 mph
142 ft +4 ft 14 mph
145 ft +7 ft 17 mph
146 ft +8 ft 19 mph
146 ft +8 ft 19 mph
146 ft +8 ft 19 mph
147 ft +9 ft 20 mph
148 ft +10 ft 20 mph
148 ft +10 ft 20 mph
152 ft +14 ft 24 mph
153 ft +15 ft 25 mph
153 ft +15 ft 25 mph
RefReference Winter
156 ft +18 ft 27 mph

The difference between best and worst was 15.8% (21 ft ≈ 1.4 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Kleber Quadraxer 3 would still be travelling at 25 mph when the Toyo Celsius AS2 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

The Nokian Seasonproof 2 was fastest on the wet handling course, with the Toyo and Goodyear next, and all three lapped faster than both references. The Vredestein also beat the summer reference, which was a fraction slower than the winter tire here. The Falken, Kleber and Nexen were the slowest.

Wet Handling

Wet Handling Average Speed

Higher is better ↑
Wet Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
45.5 mph Best
45.4 mph -0.1 mph
45.0 mph -0.5 mph
RefReference Winter
44.9 mph -0.6 mph
44.9 mph -0.6 mph
RefReference Summer
44.8 mph -0.7 mph
44.7 mph -0.8 mph
44.7 mph -0.8 mph
44.6 mph -0.9 mph
44.6 mph -0.9 mph
44.4 mph -1.1 mph
43.9 mph -1.6 mph
43.8 mph -1.7 mph
43.3 mph -2.2 mph
42.9 mph -2.6 mph
42.9 mph -2.6 mph
42.1 mph -3.4 mph

The difference between best and worst was 7.5% (3.4 mph).

The Nokian was quickest on the wet circle too, by a clear margin, ahead of the Toyo and Vredestein, which both beat the summer reference. The Ceat, Nexen and Falken were the slowest.

Wet Circle

Wet Circle Lap Time in seconds

Lower is better ↓
Wet Circle
Position / TireResultGap to best
10.32 s Best
10.55 s +0.23 s
10.76 s +0.44 s
RefReference Summer
10.78 s +0.46 s
10.82 s +0.50 s
10.92 s +0.60 s
10.94 s +0.62 s
10.99 s +0.67 s
11.13 s +0.81 s
11.15 s +0.83 s
RefReference Winter
11.2 s +0.88 s
11.24 s +0.92 s
11.28 s +0.96 s
11.35 s +1.03 s
11.47 s +1.15 s
11.56 s +1.24 s
11.7 s +1.38 s

The difference between best and worst was 13.4% (1.38 s).

In straight-line aquaplaning the summer reference was best, with the Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5, the cheapest tire in the test, a close second and the best of the all-season tires, ahead of the Bridgestone, Goodyear and Toyo. That reverses the Ceat's result in Auto Bild's 2025 test, where it was 14th of 15 for straight-line aquaplaning. The Continental and Firestone floated earliest of the all-season tires, and the winter reference was the first of all.

Straight Aqua

Float Speed in mph

Higher is better ↑
Straight Aqua
Position / TireResultGap to best
RefReference Summer
47.2 mph +0.1 mph
47.1 mph Best
47.1 mph 0.0 mph
47.0 mph -0.1 mph
46.9 mph -0.2 mph
46.6 mph -0.5 mph
46.5 mph -0.6 mph
45.9 mph -1.2 mph
45.8 mph -1.3 mph
45.6 mph -1.5 mph
45.5 mph -1.6 mph
44.3 mph -2.8 mph
44.3 mph -2.8 mph
44.1 mph -3.0 mph
43.6 mph -3.5 mph
43.2 mph -3.9 mph
RefReference Winter
42.9 mph -4.2 mph

The difference between best and worst was 9.2% (4.3 mph).

The order in curved aquaplaning was similar at the top, with the summer reference first and the Ceat again the best all-season tire, followed by the Nokian and Toyo. The Uniroyal and Firestone were level with the winter reference at the bottom.

Curved Aquaplaning

Remaining lateral acceleration

Higher is better ↑
Curved Aquaplaning
Position / TireResultGap to best
RefReference Summer
10.8 ft/s² +0.5 ft/s²
10.3 ft/s² Best
10.1 ft/s² -0.2 ft/s²
9.9 ft/s² -0.4 ft/s²
9.9 ft/s² -0.4 ft/s²
9.8 ft/s² -0.5 ft/s²
9.7 ft/s² -0.6 ft/s²
9.6 ft/s² -0.7 ft/s²
9.5 ft/s² -0.8 ft/s²
9.5 ft/s² -0.8 ft/s²
9.4 ft/s² -0.9 ft/s²
9.2 ft/s² -1.1 ft/s²
9.0 ft/s² -1.3 ft/s²
8.9 ft/s² -1.4 ft/s²
8.8 ft/s² -1.5 ft/s²
8.8 ft/s² -1.5 ft/s²
RefReference Winter
8.8 ft/s² -1.5 ft/s²

The difference between best and worst was 18.8% (2 ft/s²).

Dry

The Bridgestone was fastest on the dry handling course, with the Goodyear second, and both lapped faster than the summer reference, which the Michelin matched. The winter reference was mid-field here, level with the Toyo, while the Firestone was the slowest tire in the test.

Dry Handling

Dry Handling Average Speed

Higher is better ↑
Dry Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
61.2 mph Best
61.1 mph -0.1 mph
RefReference Summer
60.8 mph -0.4 mph
60.8 mph -0.4 mph
60.7 mph -0.5 mph
60.6 mph -0.6 mph
60.3 mph -0.9 mph
60.1 mph -1.1 mph
RefReference Winter
59.8 mph -1.4 mph
59.8 mph -1.4 mph
59.6 mph -1.6 mph
59.5 mph -1.7 mph
59.4 mph -1.8 mph
59.3 mph -1.9 mph
59.2 mph -2.0 mph
59.1 mph -2.1 mph
59.0 mph -2.2 mph

The difference between best and worst was 3.7% (2.2 mph).

The summer reference stopped around 7 feet shorter on dry roads than any all-season tire. The Bridgestone was the best of the all-season tires, a fraction ahead of the Ceat, with the Pirelli third. The Dunlop needed the most room of the all-season tires and the Uniroyal the second most, and both were marked down for it under Auto Bild's safety rule. For the Dunlop this is a pattern: it was also last of the all-season tires for dry braking in ADAC's 2026 all-season test and in Auto Bild's 2025 test. Only the winter reference stopped further.

Dry Braking

Dry braking in feet (62 - 0 mph)

Lower is better ↓
Dry Braking
Position / TireResultGap to bestResidual speed
RefReference Summer
113 ft -7 ft 0 mph
120 ft Best 0 mph
120 ft 0 ft 4 mph
121 ft +1 ft 9 mph
123 ft +3 ft 12 mph
124 ft +4 ft 15 mph
125 ft +5 ft 17 mph
126 ft +6 ft 18 mph
127 ft +7 ft 19 mph
128 ft +8 ft 20 mph
128 ft +8 ft 21 mph
130 ft +10 ft 22 mph
130 ft +10 ft 23 mph
132 ft +12 ft 24 mph
134 ft +14 ft 26 mph
135 ft +15 ft 27 mph
RefReference Winter
141 ft +21 ft 31 mph

The difference between best and worst was 25.3% (28 ft ≈ 1.9 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Dunlop All Season 2 would still be travelling at 27 mph when the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Comfort

On the pass-by noise measurement at 50 mph, the new Vredestein was the quietest tire, with the Nexen a close second. The Bridgestone and Firestone were the loudest of the all-season tires, level with the summer reference, and the winter reference was the loudest of all.

Noise

External noise in dB

Lower is better ↓
Noise
Position / TireResultGap to best
69.6 dB Best
69.8 dB +0.20 dB
70.5 dB +0.90 dB
70.5 dB +0.90 dB
70.7 dB +1.10 dB
70.8 dB +1.20 dB
71.1 dB +1.50 dB
71.2 dB +1.60 dB
71.2 dB +1.60 dB
71.3 dB +1.70 dB
71.6 dB +2.00 dB
71.6 dB +2.00 dB
71.8 dB +2.20 dB
71.9 dB +2.30 dB
71.9 dB +2.30 dB
RefReference Summer
71.9 dB +2.30 dB
RefReference Winter
72.3 dB +2.70 dB

The difference between best and worst was 3.9% (2.7 dB).

Ride comfort was graded subjectively by Auto Bild's test drivers, the only score in the test without a measurement of its own. The Continental and Vredestein were rated the most comfortable, followed by the Michelin and Goodyear, while the Kleber and Nexen were rated the least comfortable.

Subj. Comfort

Subjective Comfort Score

Higher is better ↑
Subj. Comfort
Position / TireResultGap to best
9.8 Points Best
9.8 Points Best
9.6 Points -0.20 Points
9.4 Points -0.40 Points
9 Points -0.80 Points
8.8 Points -1.00 Points
8.2 Points -1.60 Points
8.2 Points -1.60 Points
8 Points -1.80 Points
7.8 Points -2.00 Points
7.6 Points -2.20 Points
7.4 Points -2.40 Points
7.4 Points -2.40 Points
7.2 Points -2.60 Points
7.2 Points -2.60 Points

The difference between best and worst was 26.5% (2.6 Points).

Value

The Dunlop, Nexen and Nokian shared the lowest rolling resistance, with the Goodyear just behind. The Ceat had the highest by a clear margin. There are no reference values for the cost tests.

Rolling Resistance

Rolling resistance in kg t

Lower is better ↓
Rolling Resistance
Position / TireResultGap to bestExtra fuel / year
7.53 kg/t Best $0
7.53 kg/t Best $0
7.53 kg/t Best $0
7.59 kg/t +0.06 kg/t $2
7.7 kg/t +0.17 kg/t $7
7.74 kg/t +0.21 kg/t $8
7.94 kg/t +0.41 kg/t $16
7.95 kg/t +0.42 kg/t $16
8 kg/t +0.47 kg/t $18
8.07 kg/t +0.54 kg/t $21
8.17 kg/t +0.64 kg/t $25
8.26 kg/t +0.73 kg/t $28
8.34 kg/t +0.81 kg/t $32
8.39 kg/t +0.86 kg/t $34
9.27 kg/t +1.74 kg/t $68

The difference between best and worst was 23.1% (1.74 kg / t). Over 12,000 miles a year at $3.60/gal, the Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5 uses about 19 gal ($68) more fuel than the Nexen N Blue 4Season 2.

Adjust the assumptions

Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions.

12,000 mi
$3.60/gal
Estimates based on typical driving conditions. Rolling resistance accounts for approximately 20% of IC vehicle fuel consumption and 25% of EV energy consumption. Actual savings vary based on driving style, vehicle weight, road conditions, and tire age. For comparative purposes only. Lifetime savings based on a 40,000km / 25,000 mile tread life.

For tread life, IFV drove 8,078 miles on every tire and projected the distance to the legal minimum tread depth on the driven axle. The Falken Euroall Season AS220 and the Dunlop were well clear of the rest, with the Toyo and Ceat next, while the Uniroyal AllSeasonExpert 3 had the shortest projected life, behind the Bridgestone and Vredestein.

Wear

Predicted tread life in KM

Higher is better ↑
Wear
Position / TireResultGap to best
48,591 miles Best
47,783 miles -808 miles
40,855 miles -7,736 miles
40,576 miles -8,015 miles
39,861 miles -8,730 miles
39,737 miles -8,854 miles
39,675 miles -8,916 miles
39,240 miles -9,351 miles
38,774 miles -9,817 miles
38,028 miles -10,563 miles
36,319 miles -12,272 miles
36,040 miles -12,551 miles
35,729 miles -12,862 miles
35,449 miles -13,142 miles
33,119 miles -15,472 miles

The difference between best and worst was 31.8% (15,472 miles).

Auto Bild also weighed the rubber each tire lost over the wear test. The Falken lost the least, with the Nexen and Dunlop next, and the Vredestein lost the most by a clear margin. The two rankings don't always line up, since tread life is projected from the depth of tread worn away rather than the weight of rubber lost: the Nexen was second for abrasion but fifth for tread life, and the Ceat was among the heaviest losers yet fourth for tread life.

Abrasion

Total weight loss after wear test in grams

Lower is better ↓
Abrasion
Position / TireResultGap to best
203 g Best
215 g +12.00 g
225 g +22.00 g
229 g +26.00 g
230 g +27.00 g
238 g +35.00 g
248 g +45.00 g
274 g +71.00 g
275 g +72.00 g
278 g +75.00 g
286 g +83.00 g
304 g +101.00 g
308 g +105.00 g
316 g +113.00 g
359 g +156.00 g

The difference between best and worst was 76.8% (156 g).

Dividing the set price by the projected tread life gives the running cost per kilometer. The Falken and Dunlop were the cheapest to run, with the Ceat, the cheapest tire to buy, third. The Michelin, the most expensive set in the test, was the most expensive to run by a clear margin, ahead of the Continental.

Value

Euros/1000km based on cost/wear

Lower is better ↓
Value
Position / TireResultGap to bestcost per 1,000 miles
4.48 Price/1000 Best €13.21
4.55 Price/1000 +0.07 Price/1000 €8.79
4.9 Price/1000 +0.42 Price/1000 €19.43
5.23 Price/1000 +0.75 Price/1000 €11.38
5.32 Price/1000 +0.84 Price/1000 €14.40
6.21 Price/1000 +1.73 Price/1000 €11.83
6.24 Price/1000 +1.76 Price/1000 €11.79
6.55 Price/1000 +2.07 Price/1000 €16.10
6.57 Price/1000 +2.09 Price/1000 €15.33
6.58 Price/1000 +2.10 Price/1000 €15.40
6.61 Price/1000 +2.13 Price/1000 €14.96
6.73 Price/1000 +2.25 Price/1000 €12.98
6.84 Price/1000 +2.36 Price/1000 €13.94
7.04 Price/1000 +2.56 Price/1000 €17.94
8.04 Price/1000 +3.56 Price/1000 €17.18

The difference between best and worst was 79.5% (3.56 Price/1000). Over 25,000 miles the cheapest tire to own (Dunlop All Season 2) works out €266 cheaper than the most expensive (Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5).

How this is calculated

Assumes a typical car doing 29 mpg (rolling resistance causing 20% of fuel use), fuel at €6.25 per gallon and €70 fitting per set of four. Purchase prices are from the time of the 2026 test; financing costs are excluded.

Compared with Auto Bild's SUV test

Eight of these tires were also in Auto Bild's SUV all-season test in 225/55 R18, published a week earlier, and the top of the order held up. The Goodyear won both tests, the Vredestein shared second in both, and the Michelin was fourth in both. The Pirelli moved up from fifth to joint second, while the Continental, joint second in the SUV size, dropped to joint fifth here after weaker aquaplaning and dry braking results. The Nokian was the fastest all-season tire on the wet handling course in both tests, and the Dunlop had the longest dry braking of the all-season tires in both.

Results

The Goodyear Vector All Season 4 wins as the most complete tire in the test, with the most snow traction, a top-five place among the all-season tires in every wet test and the second-fastest dry handling, and Auto Bild's only criticism is its mid-field tread life. The Vredestein Quatrac Pro 2 shares second as the best tire on snow and the quietest, though it wears faster than most, and the Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF3 shares it by matching the winner's grades for wet, dry and cost while giving a little away on snow. The Michelin CrossClimate 3 remains a strong choice for snow but costs the most to buy and to run. Five tires lost ground to Auto Bild's safety rule: the Dunlop and Uniroyal for dry braking, the Toyo and Nexen on snow, and the Firestone for aquaplaning. The penalty cost the Dunlop a place in the top five, and the Toyo, the best of the all-season tires in the wet, would otherwise have finished level with the four tires in seventh. All 15 tires passed Auto Bild's high-speed test. For the full scoring, every grade and Auto Bild's methodology, read the original test.

1st

Goodyear Vector All Season 4

225/45 R17 94W XL
Goodyear Vector All Season 4
Auto Bild Test Winner / Exemplary Testsieger / vorbildlich
The Goodyear Vector All Season 4 is the overall test winner and one of only three tires rated exemplary. It has no real weak area on snow, wet or dry roads, which is what separates it from the tires that won individual tests, and its only shortfall is middling tread life.
Dry98.1%
Wet97.2%
Snow97%
Comfort96.6%
Value84.5%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (17)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better5th / 15124 ft+4 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better2nd / 1561.1 mph-0.1 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better5th / 15142 ft+4 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better3rd / 1545.0 mph-0.5 mph
Wet CircleLower is better4th / 1510.82 s+0.50 s
Straight AquaHigher is better3rd / 1547.0 mph-0.1 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better4th / 159.9 ft/s²-0.4 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better6th / 1588 ft+6 ft
Snow TractionHigher is better1st / 15464 lbfBest in this discipline
Snow HandlingHigher is better3rd / 1534.4 mph-0.1 mph
Snow SlalomHigher is better4th / 157.9 ft/s²-0.3 ft/s²
Subj. ComfortHigher is better4th / 159.4 Points-0.40 Points
NoiseLower is better11th / 1571.6 dB+2.00 dB
WearHigher is better9th / 1538,774 miles-9,817 miles
ValueLower is better12th / 156.73 Price/1000+2.25 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better4th / 157.59 kg/t+0.06 kg/t
AbrasionLower is better4th / 15229 g+26.00 g
EU Label
C/B/72
Origin
Poland
Weight
8.07 kgs
Price
420.00
Joint 2nd

Vredestein Quatrac Pro 2

225/45 R17 94Y XL
Vredestein Quatrac Pro 2
The new Vredestein Quatrac Pro 2 shares second place and is rated exemplary. It is the pick for drivers who see regular snow, and it is strong in the wet and quiet and comfortable as well, with tread life its main weakness.
Dry95.9%
Wet97%
Snow99.3%
Comfort100%
Value74.9%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (17)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better9th / 15128 ft+8 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better7th / 1560.1 mph-1.1 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better2nd / 15140 ft+2 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better4th / 1544.9 mph-0.6 mph
Wet CircleLower is better3rd / 1510.76 s+0.44 s
Straight AquaHigher is better9th / 1545.6 mph-1.5 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better11th / 159.2 ft/s²-1.1 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better1st / 1582 ftBest in this discipline
Snow TractionHigher is better3rd / 15450 lbf-14 lbf
Snow HandlingHigher is better1st / 1534.5 mphBest in this discipline
Snow SlalomHigher is better1st / 158.2 ft/s²Best in this discipline
Subj. ComfortHigher is better1st / 159.8 PointsBest in this discipline
NoiseLower is better1st / 1569.6 dBBest in this discipline
WearHigher is better13th / 1535,729 miles-12,862 miles
ValueLower is better11th / 156.61 Price/1000+2.13 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better8th / 157.95 kg/t+0.42 kg/t
AbrasionLower is better15th / 15359 g+156.00 g
EU Label
C/A/68
Origin
Hungary
Weight
9.47 kgs
Price
380.00
Joint 2nd

Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF3

225/45 R17 94W XL
Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF3
The Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF3 shares second place and is rated exemplary. It matches the winner's standard in the wet, in the dry and on cost, and only gives ground on snow, making it a well-balanced choice for drivers in milder climates.
Dry98.8%
Wet96.1%
Snow94.5%
Comfort95.3%
Value82.2%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (17)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better3rd / 15121 ft+1 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better5th / 1560.6 mph-0.6 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better4th / 15142 ft+4 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better8th / 1544.6 mph-0.9 mph
Wet CircleLower is better8th / 1511.13 s+0.81 s
Straight AquaHigher is better6th / 1546.5 mph-0.6 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better5th / 159.8 ft/s²-0.5 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better7th / 1590 ft+8 ft
Snow TractionHigher is better6th / 15440 lbf-24 lbf
Snow HandlingHigher is better5th / 1534.1 mph-0.4 mph
Snow SlalomHigher is better9th / 157.6 ft/s²-0.6 ft/s²
Subj. ComfortHigher is better5th / 159 Points-0.80 Points
NoiseLower is better3rd / 1570.5 dB+0.90 dB
WearHigher is better7th / 1539,675 miles-8,916 miles
ValueLower is better10th / 156.58 Price/1000+2.10 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better10th / 158.07 kg/t+0.54 kg/t
AbrasionLower is better7th / 15248 g+45.00 g
EU Label
C/A/71
Origin
Romania
Weight
9.08 kgs
Price
420.00
4th

Michelin CrossClimate 3

225/45 R17 94Y XL
Michelin CrossClimate 3
The Michelin CrossClimate 3 finishes fourth and is rated good. It remains one of the strongest all-season tires on snow and good on dry roads, but its wet performance and high running cost hold it back from the top three.
Dry96.9%
Wet92.8%
Snow98%
Comfort98.3%
Value79.4%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (17)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better8th / 15127 ft+7 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better3rd / 1560.8 mph-0.4 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better13th / 15152 ft+14 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better12th / 1543.3 mph-2.2 mph
Wet CircleLower is better11th / 1511.28 s+0.96 s
Straight AquaHigher is better7th / 1545.9 mph-1.2 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better10th / 159.4 ft/s²-0.9 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better3rd / 1585 ft+3 ft
Snow TractionHigher is better2nd / 15453 lbf-11 lbf
Snow HandlingHigher is better2nd / 1534.5 mph0.0 mph
Snow SlalomHigher is better2nd / 158.0 ft/s²-0.2 ft/s²
Subj. ComfortHigher is better3rd / 159.6 Points-0.20 Points
NoiseLower is better3rd / 1570.5 dB+0.90 dB
WearHigher is better11th / 1536,319 miles-12,272 miles
ValueLower is better15th / 158.04 Price/1000+3.56 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better7th / 157.94 kg/t+0.41 kg/t
AbrasionLower is better5th / 15230 g+27.00 g
EU Label
C/B/72
Origin
Spain
Weight
9.01 kgs
Price
470.00
Joint 5th

Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6

225/45 R17 94W XL
Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6
The Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 shares fifth place and is rated good. It is the best choice here for drivers who value dry-road handling and braking and rarely see snow, but its snow results and short tread life keep it out of the top four.
Dry100%
Wet95.3%
Snow89.4%
Comfort93.3%
Value78.6%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (17)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better1st / 15120 ftBest in this discipline
Dry HandlingHigher is better1st / 1561.2 mphBest in this discipline
Wet BrakingLower is better3rd / 15141 ft+3 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better11th / 1543.8 mph-1.7 mph
Wet CircleLower is better12th / 1511.35 s+1.03 s
Straight AquaHigher is better2nd / 1547.1 mph0.0 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better8th / 159.5 ft/s²-0.8 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better13th / 1596 ft+14 ft
Snow TractionHigher is better11th / 15416 lbf-48 lbf
Snow HandlingHigher is better10th / 1533.3 mph-1.2 mph
Snow SlalomHigher is better14th / 157.1 ft/s²-1.1 ft/s²
Subj. ComfortHigher is better6th / 158.8 Points-1.00 Points
NoiseLower is better14th / 1571.9 dB+2.30 dB
WearHigher is better14th / 1535,449 miles-13,142 miles
ValueLower is better13th / 156.84 Price/1000+2.36 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better5th / 157.7 kg/t+0.17 kg/t
AbrasionLower is better10th / 15278 g+75.00 g
EU Label
C/B/70
Origin
Poland
Weight
9.11 kgs
Price
390.00
Joint 5th

Continental AllSeasonContact 2

225/45 R17 94W XL
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
The Continental AllSeasonContact 2 shares fifth place and is rated good. It is a comfortable, even all-rounder, but weaker aquaplaning, longer dry braking and high running costs leave it further back than its overall consistency suggests.
Dry95.6%
Wet95.2%
Snow94.5%
Comfort98.9%
Value78.6%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (17)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better12th / 15130 ft+10 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better4th / 1560.7 mph-0.5 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better6th / 15145 ft+7 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better5th / 1544.7 mph-0.8 mph
Wet CircleLower is better5th / 1510.92 s+0.60 s
Straight AquaHigher is better14th / 1543.6 mph-3.5 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better12th / 159.0 ft/s²-1.3 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better8th / 1590 ft+8 ft
Snow TractionHigher is better10th / 15428 lbf-36 lbf
Snow HandlingHigher is better4th / 1534.3 mph-0.2 mph
Snow SlalomHigher is better7th / 157.8 ft/s²-0.4 ft/s²
Subj. ComfortHigher is better1st / 159.8 PointsBest in this discipline
NoiseLower is better7th / 1571.1 dB+1.50 dB
WearHigher is better6th / 1539,737 miles-8,854 miles
ValueLower is better14th / 157.04 Price/1000+2.56 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better14th / 158.39 kg/t+0.86 kg/t
AbrasionLower is better9th / 15275 g+72.00 g
EU Label
C/B/71
Origin
Slovakia
Weight
9.27 kgs
Price
450.00
Joint 7th

Falken Euroall Season AS220

225/45 R17 94V XL
Falken Euroall Season AS220
The Falken Euroall Season AS220 shares seventh place and is rated good. It is the value pick for high-mileage drivers, but outside the cost tests it does not stand out.
Dry96.4%
Wet91.8%
Snow92.4%
Comfort86.6%
Value97.2%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (17)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better6th / 15125 ft+5 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better10th / 1559.5 mph-1.7 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better11th / 15148 ft+10 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better13th / 1542.9 mph-2.6 mph
Wet CircleLower is better15th / 1511.7 s+1.38 s
Straight AquaHigher is better11th / 1544.3 mph-2.8 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better13th / 158.9 ft/s²-1.4 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better11th / 1593 ft+11 ft
Snow TractionHigher is better9th / 15429 lbf-35 lbf
Snow HandlingHigher is better12th / 1533.0 mph-1.5 mph
Snow SlalomHigher is better9th / 157.6 ft/s²-0.6 ft/s²
Subj. ComfortHigher is better12th / 157.4 Points-2.40 Points
NoiseLower is better10th / 1571.3 dB+1.70 dB
WearHigher is better1st / 1548,591 milesBest in this discipline
ValueLower is better1st / 154.48 Price/1000Best in this discipline
Rolling ResistanceLower is better13th / 158.34 kg/t+0.81 kg/t
AbrasionLower is better1st / 15203 gBest in this discipline
EU Label
C/B/68
Origin
Thailand
Weight
9.17 kgs
Price
350.00
Joint 7th

Kleber Quadraxer 3

225/45 R17 94W XL
Kleber Quadraxer 3
The Kleber Quadraxer 3 shares seventh place and is rated good. It is a capable snow tire, and Auto Bild rates it the best of the second-line brands in the test, but its wet braking is a clear weakness.
Dry95.9%
Wet92.7%
Snow95.2%
Comfort85.9%
Value80.5%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (17)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better7th / 15126 ft+6 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better12th / 1559.3 mph-1.9 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better15th / 15153 ft+15 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better14th / 1542.9 mph-2.6 mph
Wet CircleLower is better10th / 1511.24 s+0.92 s
Straight AquaHigher is better5th / 1546.6 mph-0.5 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better6th / 159.7 ft/s²-0.6 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better5th / 1588 ft+6 ft
Snow TractionHigher is better7th / 15437 lbf-27 lbf
Snow HandlingHigher is better6th / 1533.7 mph-0.8 mph
Snow SlalomHigher is better6th / 157.9 ft/s²-0.3 ft/s²
Subj. ComfortHigher is better14th / 157.2 Points-2.60 Points
NoiseLower is better6th / 1570.8 dB+1.20 dB
WearHigher is better12th / 1536,040 miles-12,551 miles
ValueLower is better8th / 156.55 Price/1000+2.07 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better11th / 158.17 kg/t+0.64 kg/t
AbrasionLower is better6th / 15238 g+35.00 g
EU Label
C/B/69
Origin
Poland
Weight
9.38 kgs
Price
380.00
Joint 7th

Nokian Seasonproof 2

225/45 R17 94W XL
Nokian Seasonproof 2
The Nokian Seasonproof 2 shares seventh place and is rated good. It is a wet-road specialist with low rolling resistance, but it cannot match the leaders on snow or on dry roads.
Dry94.6%
Wet97.8%
Snow92.2%
Comfort89.3%
Value80.3%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (17)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better11th / 15130 ft+10 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better11th / 1559.4 mph-1.8 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better10th / 15147 ft+9 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better1st / 1545.5 mphBest in this discipline
Wet CircleLower is better1st / 1510.32 sBest in this discipline
Straight AquaHigher is better10th / 1545.5 mph-1.6 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better2nd / 1510.1 ft/s²-0.2 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better10th / 1592 ft+10 ft
Snow TractionHigher is better12th / 15413 lbf-51 lbf
Snow HandlingHigher is better13th / 1532.9 mph-1.6 mph
Snow SlalomHigher is better7th / 157.8 ft/s²-0.4 ft/s²
Subj. ComfortHigher is better9th / 158 Points-1.80 Points
NoiseLower is better13th / 1571.8 dB+2.20 dB
WearHigher is better10th / 1538,028 miles-10,563 miles
ValueLower is better6th / 156.21 Price/1000+1.73 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better1st / 157.53 kg/tBest in this discipline
AbrasionLower is better14th / 15316 g+113.00 g
EU Label
B/B/70
Origin
Romania
Weight
9.19 kgs
Price
380.00
Joint 7th

Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5

225/45 R17 94V XL
Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5
The Ceat 4 SeasonDrive X5 shares seventh place and is rated good. It offers strong value, short dry braking and very good aquaplaning resistance for a low price, but its snow performance and high rolling resistance are clear compromises.
Dry99.1%
Wet94.5%
Snow90.4%
Comfort88%
Value80.8%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (17)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better2nd / 15120 ft0 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better6th / 1560.3 mph-0.9 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better8th / 15146 ft+8 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better10th / 1543.9 mph-1.6 mph
Wet CircleLower is better13th / 1511.47 s+1.15 s
Straight AquaHigher is better1st / 1547.1 mphBest in this discipline
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better1st / 1510.3 ft/s²Best in this discipline
Snow BrakingLower is better12th / 1595 ft+13 ft
Snow TractionHigher is better13th / 15407 lbf-57 lbf
Snow HandlingHigher is better9th / 1533.4 mph-1.1 mph
Snow SlalomHigher is better11th / 157.4 ft/s²-0.8 ft/s²
Subj. ComfortHigher is better11th / 157.6 Points-2.20 Points
NoiseLower is better5th / 1570.7 dB+1.10 dB
WearHigher is better4th / 1540,576 miles-8,015 miles
ValueLower is better3rd / 154.9 Price/1000+0.42 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better15th / 159.27 kg/t+1.74 kg/t
AbrasionLower is better13th / 15308 g+105.00 g
EU Label
D/B/72
Origin
India
Weight
9.82 kgs
Price
320.00
11th

Dunlop All Season 2

225/45 R17 94W XL
Dunlop All Season 2
The Dunlop All Season 2 finishes eleventh and is rated good. It is good on snow and very cheap to run, but its long dry braking, a pattern across recent tests, cost it heavily under the safety rule.
Dry93%
Wet94.8%
Snow97%
Comfort90.4%
Value97.1%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (17)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better15th / 15135 ft+15 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better9th / 1559.6 mph-1.6 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better8th / 15146 ft+8 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better6th / 1544.7 mph-0.8 mph
Wet CircleLower is better9th / 1511.15 s+0.83 s
Straight AquaHigher is better13th / 1544.1 mph-3.0 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better7th / 159.6 ft/s²-0.7 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better2nd / 1583 ft+1 ft
Snow TractionHigher is better5th / 15441 lbf-23 lbf
Snow HandlingHigher is better7th / 1533.5 mph-1.0 mph
Snow SlalomHigher is better3rd / 157.9 ft/s²-0.3 ft/s²
Subj. ComfortHigher is better7th / 158.2 Points-1.60 Points
NoiseLower is better11th / 1571.6 dB+2.00 dB
WearHigher is better2nd / 1547,783 miles-808 miles
ValueLower is better2nd / 154.55 Price/1000+0.07 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better1st / 157.53 kg/tBest in this discipline
AbrasionLower is better3rd / 15225 g+22.00 g
EU Label
C/B/72
Origin
France
Weight
8.55 kgs
Price
350.00
Joint 12th

Toyo Celsius AS2

225/45 R17 94W XL
Toyo Celsius AS2
The Toyo Celsius AS2 shares twelfth place and is rated good. It is a wet-weather specialist with low running costs, but its snow results make it a poor fit for drivers who expect regular winter conditions.
Dry95.5%
Wet99%
Snow87.3%
Comfort86.6%
Value84.1%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (17)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better10th / 15128 ft+8 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better8th / 1559.8 mph-1.4 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better1st / 15138 ftBest in this discipline
Wet HandlingHigher is better2nd / 1545.4 mph-0.1 mph
Wet CircleLower is better2nd / 1510.55 s+0.23 s
Straight AquaHigher is better4th / 1546.9 mph-0.2 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better3rd / 159.9 ft/s²-0.4 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better15th / 1599 ft+17 ft
Snow TractionHigher is better14th / 15386 lbf-78 lbf
Snow HandlingHigher is better14th / 1532.4 mph-2.1 mph
Snow SlalomHigher is better13th / 157.3 ft/s²-0.9 ft/s²
Subj. ComfortHigher is better12th / 157.4 Points-2.40 Points
NoiseLower is better8th / 1571.2 dB+1.60 dB
WearHigher is better3rd / 1540,855 miles-7,736 miles
ValueLower is better5th / 155.32 Price/1000+0.84 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better12th / 158.26 kg/t+0.73 kg/t
AbrasionLower is better8th / 15274 g+71.00 g
EU Label
C/B/71
Origin
Serbia
Weight
9.01 kgs
Price
350.00
Joint 12th

Uniroyal AllSeasonExpert 3

225/45 R17 94W XL
Uniroyal AllSeasonExpert 3
The Uniroyal AllSeasonExpert 3 shares twelfth place and is rated good. It suits drivers who prioritize snow and wet grip, but its dry braking and short tread life count against it.
Dry93.2%
Wet94.4%
Snow94.8%
Comfort90.7%
Value76.3%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (17)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better14th / 15134 ft+14 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better13th / 1559.2 mph-2.0 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better11th / 15148 ft+10 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better7th / 1544.6 mph-0.9 mph
Wet CircleLower is better7th / 1510.99 s+0.67 s
Straight AquaHigher is better12th / 1544.3 mph-2.8 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better14th / 158.8 ft/s²-1.5 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better8th / 1590 ft+8 ft
Snow TractionHigher is better4th / 15443 lbf-21 lbf
Snow HandlingHigher is better8th / 1533.4 mph-1.1 mph
Snow SlalomHigher is better4th / 157.9 ft/s²-0.3 ft/s²
Subj. ComfortHigher is better7th / 158.2 Points-1.60 Points
NoiseLower is better8th / 1571.2 dB+1.60 dB
WearHigher is better15th / 1533,119 miles-15,472 miles
ValueLower is better9th / 156.57 Price/1000+2.09 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better9th / 158 kg/t+0.47 kg/t
AbrasionLower is better11th / 15286 g+83.00 g
EU Label
C/B/72
Origin
Slovakia
Weight
8.89 kgs
Price
350.00
Joint 12th

Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02

225/45 R17 94V XL
Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
The Firestone MultiSeason 2 shares twelfth place and is rated good. It is a reasonable budget option for snow, but its aquaplaning resistance and dry-road performance lag the leaders.
Dry93.7%
Wet94.5%
Snow93.8%
Comfort88.2%
Value83.6%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (17)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better13th / 15132 ft+12 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better15th / 1559.0 mph-2.2 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better7th / 15146 ft+8 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better9th / 1544.4 mph-1.1 mph
Wet CircleLower is better6th / 1510.94 s+0.62 s
Straight AquaHigher is better15th / 1543.2 mph-3.9 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better14th / 158.8 ft/s²-1.5 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better4th / 1587 ft+5 ft
Snow TractionHigher is better8th / 15434 lbf-30 lbf
Snow HandlingHigher is better11th / 1533.2 mph-1.3 mph
Snow SlalomHigher is better11th / 157.4 ft/s²-0.8 ft/s²
Subj. ComfortHigher is better10th / 157.8 Points-2.00 Points
NoiseLower is better14th / 1571.9 dB+2.30 dB
WearHigher is better8th / 1539,240 miles-9,351 miles
ValueLower is better4th / 155.23 Price/1000+0.75 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better6th / 157.74 kg/t+0.21 kg/t
AbrasionLower is better12th / 15304 g+101.00 g
EU Label
C/B/72
Origin
Italy
Weight
9.28 kgs
Price
330.00
15th

Nexen N Blue 4Season 2

225/45 R17 94W XL
Nexen N Blue 4Season 2
The Nexen N'Blue 4Season 2 finishes last and is the only tire rated satisfactory. It is quiet and efficient on dry roads, but its snow and wet results fall short of what an all-season tire needs.
Dry97.1%
Wet91.3%
Snow85.5%
Comfort86.6%
Value87.7%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (17)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better4th / 15123 ft+3 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better14th / 1559.1 mph-2.1 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better14th / 15153 ft+15 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better15th / 1542.1 mph-3.4 mph
Wet CircleLower is better14th / 1511.56 s+1.24 s
Straight AquaHigher is better8th / 1545.8 mph-1.3 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better8th / 159.5 ft/s²-0.8 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better14th / 1599 ft+17 ft
Snow TractionHigher is better15th / 15381 lbf-83 lbf
Snow HandlingHigher is better15th / 1531.8 mph-2.7 mph
Snow SlalomHigher is better15th / 157.0 ft/s²-1.2 ft/s²
Subj. ComfortHigher is better14th / 157.2 Points-2.60 Points
NoiseLower is better2nd / 1569.8 dB+0.20 dB
WearHigher is better5th / 1539,861 miles-8,730 miles
ValueLower is better7th / 156.24 Price/1000+1.76 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better1st / 157.53 kg/tBest in this discipline
AbrasionLower is better2nd / 15215 g+12.00 g
EU Label
D/A/72
Origin
Czech Republic
Weight
9.74 kgs
Price
400.00
Reference Tire

Reference Summer

225/45 R17
Reference Summer
The summer reference was run outside the classification. It still leads the braking and aquaplaning tests, but the best all-season tires now match or beat it on the wet and dry handling courses.
All discipline results (11)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestResult
Dry BrakingLower is better113 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better60.8 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better135 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better44.8 mph
Wet CircleLower is better10.78 s
Straight AquaHigher is better47.2 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better10.8 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better158 ft
Snow TractionHigher is better238 lbf
Snow SlalomHigher is better4.0 ft/s²
NoiseLower is better71.9 dB
Reference Tire

Reference Winter

225/45 R17
Reference Winter
The winter reference was run outside the classification. It sets a good snow benchmark, but the best all-season tires beat it there and it pays for its snow grip with clearly the longest braking on wet and dry roads.
All discipline results (12)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestResult
Dry BrakingLower is better141 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better59.8 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better156 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better44.9 mph
Wet CircleLower is better11.2 s
Straight AquaHigher is better42.9 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better8.8 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better84 ft
Snow TractionHigher is better451 lbf
Snow HandlingHigher is better34.4 mph
Snow SlalomHigher is better7.7 ft/s²
NoiseLower is better72.3 dB

More tire tests

Cross-check this test

All tire tests

Where these tires were tested again, and how the verdict held up.

Discussion

1 comment
  1. Jay Germany
    Where did the rumor come from that 225/45 R17 is the correct tire size for the Skoda Octavia? That only applies to older models.
    #10844
Rate your tires

My tires

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tires

Save tires from a tire page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tires. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.