Auto Express has returned to 205/55 R16 for its 2026 all-season tire test, with eight tires bought on the open market through an independent German supplier. The snow tests were run at Hankook's proving ground at Ivalo in Finland, well inside the Arctic Circle, and the wet and dry tests at Continental's Contidrom in Germany, using a Volkswagen Golf and a Skoda Octavia. Two Continental tires ran alongside the field as references, the WinterContact TS 870 winter tire and the PremiumContact 7 summer tire.
The Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF3 won again, having also won Auto Express's previous all-season test. It took the key wet braking test, the wet handling lap and dry braking, and finished in the top three in most of the others. The margins behind it are tiny: the Michelin CrossClimate 3 was second, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 third and the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 fourth, with the Nokian Seasonproof 2 fifth, and a single percentage point covers all five on Auto Express's overall score. The Falken Euroall Season AS220 and the Linglong Sport Master 4S took sixth and seventh, and the budget Tomket Allyear 3 was a distant last.
Test setup & methodology
The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.
Recorded test conditions
Recorded test conditions
- Dry Braking
- 62.1 → 0.0 mph
- Wet Braking
- 49.7 → 0.0 mph
- Snow Braking
- 24.9 → 3.1 mph
The Michelin is the most interesting result. It won all three snow tests, and in snow traction it was quicker than even the winter reference tire, but it was only sixth in wet braking and seventh on the wet circle. That is not a one-off: in our own 2026/27 all-season test it also won every snow test and finished ninth of ten in wet braking. The Pirelli is close to the mirror image. It won both of the main wet tests, and it was last of the eight all-season tires in snow braking, just as it was last in snow braking in our own test, although only a small distance covers the snow braking field here. Elsewhere the Nokian won both aquaplaning tests by a clear margin, and the Linglong, the cheapest tire in the test, set the fastest dry handling lap of the all-season tires.
The two references show how far all-season tires have come. The Continental WinterContact TS 870, winner of the 2026 Auto Express winter test, stopped shortest of all on snow and tied the Michelin on the snow handling lap, yet the Michelin beat it in snow traction. In the wet it was quicker around the circle than any all-season tire, but it needed more distance to stop than the best three all-season tires, and in dry braking only the Tomket stopped longer. The summer PremiumContact 7, runner-up in the 2026 Auto Express summer test, stopped shortest of all in both wet and dry braking and set the fastest wet and dry laps, but on snow it needed more than twice the Michelin's braking distance and could barely pull away. The Pirelli also ran in the winter test, as its all-season reference, where Auto Express judged its snow performance good enough for a mid-field finish among dedicated winter tires. Neither reference is included in the ranking here.
A note on the numbers below. Auto Express do not publish raw measurements, only each tire's result as a percentage of the best in that test, so the figures in these charts are built from estimated bests. The percentage gaps between the tires are exact; what is estimated is the absolute value the scale starts from. Auto Express quote the Michelin's snow traction time outright and enough distances and gaps to pin wet and dry braking closely, their note that the Michelin was the only all-season tire to stop in under 62 feet on snow narrows snow braking to a few tenths of a meter, and gaps in their text also set the snow and wet handling laps. For wet cornering, straight-line aquaplaning and rolling resistance, the Pirelli and the WinterContact TS 870 sit in the same relation to each other, within rounding, as they do in the Auto Express winter test, so the scale is taken from our figures for that test. Curved aquaplaning, dry handling and cabin noise have no anchor and are our own estimate, so treat those absolute figures as indicative. Because our scoring works on percentages, none of this affects the score weighting calculator on the results tab.
The full test, including Auto Express's own driving impressions of every tire, is on the Auto Express website.
Snow
Snow braking was measured from 25 mph down to 3 mph, with the track at between 12°F and 16°F. The Michelin stopped shortest of the all-season tires and was the only one to stop in under 62 feet, with the Bridgestone second and the Linglong, Falken and Tomket just behind. The winning Pirelli was last of the eight, but less than 3 feet covers the whole all-season field, so none of these tires is weak here. The winter reference stopped fractionally shorter than the Michelin, while the summer tire needed more than twice the distance.
Snow Braking
Snow braking in feet (25 - 3 mph)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
RefContinental WinterContact TS 870 |
61 ft | -1 ft | 0 mph |
| 62 ft | Best | 0 mph | |
| 63 ft | +1 ft | 12 mph | |
| 63 ft | +1 ft | 12 mph | |
| 63 ft | +1 ft | 12 mph | |
| 63 ft | +1 ft | 13 mph | |
| 64 ft | +2 ft | 14 mph | |
| 64 ft | +2 ft | 15 mph | |
| 65 ft | +3 ft | 17 mph | |
RefContinental PremiumContact 7 |
143 ft | +81 ft | 60 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 133.4% (82 ft ≈ 5.5 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF3 would still be travelling at 17 mph when the Michelin CrossClimate 3 had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
Derived data. Auto Express publish percentages, not measurements. The gaps between these tires are exact. Auto Express say the Michelin was the only all-season tire to stop in under 62 feet, which limits the scale to a window of a few tenths of a meter, and we have used the middle of it.
Snow traction is the time taken to accelerate from 3 mph to 25 mph. The Michelin was quickest by a clear margin and also beat the winter reference, with the Bridgestone and Pirelli next and the Tomket slowest. The summer tire took around three times as long as the best.
Snow Traction
Snow acceleration time
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 5.68 s | Best | |
RefContinental WinterContact TS 870 |
5.91 s | +0.23 s |
| 5.93 s | +0.25 s | |
| 5.94 s | +0.26 s | |
| 5.98 s | +0.30 s | |
| 5.99 s | +0.31 s | |
| 6.04 s | +0.36 s | |
| 6.07 s | +0.39 s | |
| 6.09 s | +0.41 s | |
RefContinental PremiumContact 7 |
17.59 s | +11.91 s |
The difference between best and worst was 209.7% (11.91 s).
Derived data. Auto Express publish percentages, not measurements. The gaps between these tires are exact, and the scale is anchored on the 5.68 seconds Auto Express quote for the Michelin.
The snow handling lap is an undulating track of around 1 mile. The Michelin set the fastest time, matched only by the winter reference, and Auto Express praised its grip and adjustability. The Pirelli was second, with the Bridgestone, Nokian and Continental closely grouped behind it, and the Linglong and Tomket were the slowest of the all-season tires. The summer tire was well over half a minute a lap slower than the best.
Snow Handling
Snow handling time in seconds
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
RefContinental WinterContact TS 870 |
89.2 s | 0.00 s |
| 89.2 s | Best | |
| 90.65 s | +1.45 s | |
| 91.02 s | +1.82 s | |
| 91.11 s | +1.91 s | |
| 91.49 s | +2.29 s | |
| 92.34 s | +3.14 s | |
| 93.8 s | +4.60 s | |
| 94.49 s | +5.29 s | |
RefContinental PremiumContact 7 |
137.65 s | +48.45 s |
The difference between best and worst was 54.3% (48.45 s).
Derived data. Auto Express publish percentages, not measurements. The gaps between these tires are exact; the scale is set by the gap of almost one and a half seconds a lap that Auto Express quote between the Michelin and the Pirelli, so treat the absolute times as indicative.
Wet
The wet and dry tests ran at temperatures just above 45°F. Straight-line wet braking from 50 mph, done on a rail so that every stop used the same stretch of asphalt, is the test Auto Express treat as the benchmark, and the Pirelli won it, with the Bridgestone and Continental just 0 feet behind. The Nokian and Falken were next, the Michelin only sixth and the Linglong seventh. The Tomket needed 135 feet, more than 23 feet further than the next-worst tire from the same speed, which matches our own 2025/26 all-season test, where it was also last in wet braking. Of the references, the summer tire stopped shortest of all, while the winter tire stopped behind the best three all-season tires.
Wet Braking
Wet braking in feet (50 - 0 mph)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
RefContinental PremiumContact 7 |
90 ft | -15 ft | 0 mph |
| 105 ft | Best | 0 mph | |
| 105 ft | 0 ft | 4 mph | |
| 105 ft | 0 ft | 4 mph | |
RefContinental WinterContact TS 870 |
108 ft | +3 ft | 15 mph |
| 110 ft | +5 ft | 17 mph | |
| 110 ft | +5 ft | 18 mph | |
| 111 ft | +6 ft | 19 mph | |
| 112 ft | +7 ft | 21 mph | |
| 136 ft | +31 ft | 38 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 51.3% (46 ft ≈ 3.1 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Tomket Allyear 3 would still be travelling at 38 mph when the Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF3 had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
Derived data. Auto Express publish percentages, not measurements. The gaps between these tires are exact, and the scale is pinned by two distances quoted in the Auto Express text, 110 feet for the Falken and 135 feet for the Tomket. The other gaps they quote are consistent with it.
The wet handling circuit is 1 mile long and shows up grip, traction, balance and breakaway. The Pirelli set the fastest lap of the all-season tires, with the Continental a hair behind and the Michelin third, and Auto Express singled out the Pirelli's feel and the Continental's composure at the limit. The Tomket was almost ten seconds off the pace, and its behavior was so unpredictable that the testers stopped the car because it had made them feel sick.
Wet Handling
Wet handling time in seconds
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
RefContinental PremiumContact 7 |
84.75 s | -1.95 s |
| 86.7 s | Best | |
| 86.79 s | +0.09 s | |
RefContinental WinterContact TS 870 |
87.14 s | +0.44 s |
| 87.31 s | +0.61 s | |
| 88.02 s | +1.32 s | |
| 88.2 s | +1.50 s | |
| 88.74 s | +2.04 s | |
| 88.92 s | +2.22 s | |
| 96.55 s | +9.85 s |
The difference between best and worst was 13.9% (11.8 s).
Derived data. Auto Express publish percentages, not measurements. The gaps between these tires are exact; the scale comes from the lap-time gaps Auto Express quote for the Bridgestone and the Tomket, so treat the absolute times as indicative.
Wet cornering was timed on a 189 feet diameter circle. The Continental was quickest of the all-season tires, with the Nokian, Bridgestone and Pirelli close behind, while the Michelin was only seventh and the Tomket last. Both references were quicker than every all-season tire here.
Wet Circle
Wet Circle Lap Time in seconds
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
RefContinental PremiumContact 7 |
11.76 s | -0.55 s |
RefContinental WinterContact TS 870 |
12.1 s | -0.21 s |
| 12.31 s | Best | |
| 12.33 s | +0.02 s | |
| 12.36 s | +0.05 s | |
| 12.36 s | +0.05 s | |
| 12.47 s | +0.16 s | |
| 12.47 s | +0.16 s | |
| 12.6 s | +0.29 s | |
| 13.12 s | +0.81 s |
The difference between best and worst was 11.6% (1.36 s).
Derived data. Auto Express publish percentages, not measurements. The gaps between these tires are exact. The Pirelli and the WinterContact TS 870 sit in the same relation to each other here as in the 2026 Auto Express winter test, so the scale comes from our figures for that test.
Straight-line aquaplaning is the speed at which a tire running through 9mm of standing water reaches 15 per cent slip. The Nokian was best and the only all-season tire to beat the winter reference, with the Pirelli and Bridgestone next, while the Falken, Linglong and Tomket trailed the rest.
Straight Aqua
Float Speed in mph
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 51.9 mph | Best | |
RefContinental WinterContact TS 870 |
51.4 mph | -0.5 mph |
| 50.1 mph | -1.8 mph | |
| 49.5 mph | -2.4 mph | |
| 48.7 mph | -3.2 mph | |
| 47.7 mph | -4.2 mph | |
RefContinental PremiumContact 7 |
47.5 mph | -4.4 mph |
| 45.9 mph | -6.0 mph | |
| 44.4 mph | -7.5 mph | |
| 42.3 mph | -9.6 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 18.7% (9.6 mph).
Derived data. Auto Express publish percentages, not measurements. The gaps between these tires are exact. The Pirelli and the WinterContact TS 870 sit in the same relation to each other here, within rounding, as in the 2026 Auto Express winter test, so the scale comes from our figures for that test.
Curved aquaplaning measures the average sideways grip left through a bend flooded to 5mm, driven between 37 mph and 56 mph. The Nokian's advantage was even bigger here, and again it was the only all-season tire ahead of the winter reference. The Falken, Linglong and Tomket were well short of the rest, the Tomket by the widest margin.
Curved Aquaplaning
Remaining lateral acceleration
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 11.5 ft/s² | Best | |
RefContinental WinterContact TS 870 |
11.0 ft/s² | -0.5 ft/s² |
RefContinental PremiumContact 7 |
10.9 ft/s² | -0.6 ft/s² |
| 10.6 ft/s² | -0.9 ft/s² | |
| 10.1 ft/s² | -1.4 ft/s² | |
| 10.0 ft/s² | -1.5 ft/s² | |
| 9.8 ft/s² | -1.7 ft/s² | |
| 8.6 ft/s² | -2.9 ft/s² | |
| 7.6 ft/s² | -3.9 ft/s² | |
| 7.3 ft/s² | -4.2 ft/s² |
The difference between best and worst was 37.2% (4.2 ft/s²).
Derived data. Auto Express publish percentages, not measurements. The gaps between these tires are exact, but no figure in the Auto Express text fixes the scale, and the three tires that also ran in the 2026 Auto Express winter test (the Pirelli and the two references) do not line up with it here, so it is an average of what those three imply. Treat the absolute figures as indicative.
Dry
Dry braking was measured from 62 mph to a standstill. The Pirelli stopped shortest of the all-season tires by a clear margin, 4 feet ahead of the Bridgestone, with the Michelin third, and the Tomket was last of the all-season tires. The Pirelli's win is typical of it, as it has stopped shortest in the dry in most of the tests it has appeared in on our site. The winter reference stopped almost as long as the Tomket, nearly 20 feet behind the Pirelli, while the summer tire stopped shortest of all.
Dry Braking
Dry braking in feet (62 - 0 mph)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
RefContinental PremiumContact 7 |
117 ft | -10 ft | 0 mph |
| 127 ft | Best | 0 mph | |
| 131 ft | +4 ft | 14 mph | |
| 133 ft | +6 ft | 16 mph | |
| 134 ft | +7 ft | 18 mph | |
| 136 ft | +9 ft | 21 mph | |
| 136 ft | +9 ft | 21 mph | |
| 137 ft | +10 ft | 21 mph | |
RefContinental WinterContact TS 870 |
146 ft | +19 ft | 29 mph |
| 146 ft | +19 ft | 29 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 25.6% (29 ft ≈ 2 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Tomket Allyear 3 would still be travelling at 29 mph when the Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF3 had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
Derived data. Auto Express publish percentages, not measurements. The gaps between these tires are exact, and the scale is pinned by the gaps Auto Express quote: the Pirelli stopped 4 feet shorter than the Bridgestone, which was 2 feet ahead of the Michelin.
The dry handling lap is a twisting section of the handling circuit about 1 mile long. The Linglong set the fastest time of the all-season tires, ahead of the Continental and the Falken, but the times were very close and only the Nokian was clearly adrift. That result is out of character for the Linglong, which was mid-field on the dry handling lap in our own 2025/26 all-season test. The summer tire was quickest overall and the winter tire, level with the Nokian, the slowest.
Dry Handling
Dry handling time in seconds
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
RefContinental PremiumContact 7 |
55.22 s | -0.55 s |
| 55.77 s | Best | |
| 55.94 s | +0.17 s | |
| 56.16 s | +0.39 s | |
| 56.33 s | +0.56 s | |
| 56.5 s | +0.73 s | |
| 56.56 s | +0.79 s | |
| 56.73 s | +0.96 s | |
RefContinental WinterContact TS 870 |
57.55 s | +1.78 s |
| 57.55 s | +1.78 s |
The difference between best and worst was 4.2% (2.33 s).
Derived data. Auto Express publish percentages, not measurements. The gaps between these tires are exact, but no figure in the Auto Express text fixes the scale, and the three tires that also ran in the 2026 Auto Express winter test (the Pirelli and the two references) do not line up with it here, so it is an average of what those three imply. Treat the absolute times as indicative.
Comfort
Rather than use the drive-by figure on the EU label, Auto Express measure the noise heard inside the car, averaging coastdown readings from 50 mph across three surfaces. The Bridgestone was the quietest all-season tire and the Michelin the loudest, but the whole field sits within a decibel, so this test decides very little. The winter reference was quieter than all of them.
Noise
Internal noise in dB
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
RefContinental WinterContact TS 870 |
67.7 dB | -0.30 dB |
| 68 dB | Best | |
| 68.1 dB | +0.10 dB | |
| 68.1 dB | +0.10 dB | |
| 68.2 dB | +0.20 dB | |
RefContinental PremiumContact 7 |
68.3 dB | +0.30 dB |
| 68.3 dB | +0.30 dB | |
| 68.4 dB | +0.40 dB | |
| 68.5 dB | +0.50 dB | |
| 68.7 dB | +0.70 dB |
All the tires in the Noise test finished less than 3% apart.
Derived data. Auto Express publish percentages, not measurements. The gaps between these tires are exact, but no figure in the Auto Express text fixes the scale, and the three tires that also ran in the 2026 Auto Express winter test (the Pirelli and the two references) do not line up with it here, so it is an average of what those three imply. Treat the absolute figures as indicative.
Value
Rolling resistance was measured to industry standards rather than taken from the label. The budget Tomket had the lowest, just ahead of the Michelin, with the Linglong and Nokian next, while the Bridgestone and the winning Pirelli had the highest. Lower rolling resistance means less energy is needed to keep the tire turning, so these results feed straight into running costs.
Rolling Resistance
Rolling resistance in kg t
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best | Extra fuel / year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7.51 kg/t | Best | $0 | |
| 7.57 kg/t | +0.06 kg/t | $2 | |
| 7.77 kg/t | +0.26 kg/t | $10 | |
| 7.79 kg/t | +0.28 kg/t | $11 | |
| 7.99 kg/t | +0.48 kg/t | $19 | |
| 8.06 kg/t | +0.55 kg/t | $22 | |
RefContinental WinterContact TS 870 |
8.21 kg/t | +0.70 kg/t | $27 |
RefContinental PremiumContact 7 |
8.43 kg/t | +0.92 kg/t | $36 |
| 8.72 kg/t | +1.21 kg/t | $47 | |
| 8.78 kg/t | +1.27 kg/t | $50 |
The difference between best and worst was 16.9% (1.27 kg / t). Over 12,000 miles a year at $3.60/gal, the Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF3 uses about 14 gal ($50) more fuel than the Tomket Allyear 3.
Adjust the assumptions
Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions.
Derived data. Auto Express publish percentages, not measurements. The gaps between these tires are exact, and the three tires that also ran in the 2026 Auto Express winter test (the Pirelli and the two references) all agree with their figures there to within a hundredth of a kg/t, so this scale is well anchored.
Results
Auto Express weight half of the overall score on wet performance and a fifth each on snow and dry, with the focus on braking and handling, and share the final tenth between the other tests. That suits the Pirelli, which led both of the main wet tests and gave little away anywhere else. Behind it, four tires finished within a point of the winner with quite different strengths: the Michelin is the snow specialist, the Nokian the aquaplaning specialist, the Continental the closest to the Pirelli in the wet and the Bridgestone the most consistent, without winning a performance test. The Falken is a solid mid-field choice and the Linglong a reasonable budget option at the lowest price here, while the Tomket, last in every wet test, shows how much wet grip a budget tire can give away.
Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF3
205/55 R16 94V XLCategory scores (% of best)
All discipline results (12)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 1st / 8 | 127 ft | Best in this discipline |
| Dry HandlingLower is better | 5th / 8 | 56.5 s | +0.73 s |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 1st / 8 | 105 ft | Best in this discipline |
| Wet HandlingLower is better | 1st / 8 | 86.7 s | Best in this discipline |
| Wet CircleLower is better | 3rd / 8 | 12.36 s | +0.05 s |
| Straight AquaHigher is better | 2nd / 8 | 50.1 mph | -1.8 mph |
| Curved AquaplaningHigher is better | 2nd / 8 | 10.6 ft/s² | -0.9 ft/s² |
| Snow BrakingLower is better | 8th / 8 | 65 ft | +3 ft |
| Snow TractionLower is better | 3rd / 8 | 5.94 s | +0.26 s |
| Snow HandlingLower is better | 2nd / 8 | 90.65 s | +1.45 s |
| NoiseLower is better | 2nd / 8 | 68.1 dB | +0.10 dB |
| Rolling ResistanceLower is better | 8th / 8 | 8.78 kg/t | +1.27 kg/t |
- EU Label
- C/A/72
- Price
- 105.00
Michelin CrossClimate 3
205/55 R16 94V XLCategory scores (% of best)
All discipline results (12)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 3rd / 8 | 133 ft | +6 ft |
| Dry HandlingLower is better | 7th / 8 | 56.73 s | +0.96 s |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 6th / 8 | 111 ft | +6 ft |
| Wet HandlingLower is better | 3rd / 8 | 87.31 s | +0.61 s |
| Wet CircleLower is better | 7th / 8 | 12.6 s | +0.29 s |
| Straight AquaHigher is better | 4th / 8 | 48.7 mph | -3.2 mph |
| Curved AquaplaningHigher is better | 5th / 8 | 9.8 ft/s² | -1.7 ft/s² |
| Snow BrakingLower is better | 1st / 8 | 62 ft | Best in this discipline |
| Snow TractionLower is better | 1st / 8 | 5.68 s | Best in this discipline |
| Snow HandlingLower is better | 1st / 8 | 89.2 s | Best in this discipline |
| NoiseLower is better | 8th / 8 | 68.7 dB | +0.70 dB |
| Rolling ResistanceLower is better | 2nd / 8 | 7.57 kg/t | +0.06 kg/t |
- EU Label
- B/B/72
- Price
- 110.00
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
205/55 R16 94V XLCategory scores (% of best)
All discipline results (12)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 5th / 8 | 136 ft | +9 ft |
| Dry HandlingLower is better | 2nd / 8 | 55.94 s | +0.17 s |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 2nd / 8 | 105 ft | 0 ft |
| Wet HandlingLower is better | 2nd / 8 | 86.79 s | +0.09 s |
| Wet CircleLower is better | 1st / 8 | 12.31 s | Best in this discipline |
| Straight AquaHigher is better | 5th / 8 | 47.7 mph | -4.2 mph |
| Curved AquaplaningHigher is better | 4th / 8 | 10.0 ft/s² | -1.5 ft/s² |
| Snow BrakingLower is better | 6th / 8 | 64 ft | +2 ft |
| Snow TractionLower is better | 5th / 8 | 5.99 s | +0.31 s |
| Snow HandlingLower is better | 5th / 8 | 91.49 s | +2.29 s |
| NoiseLower is better | 7th / 8 | 68.5 dB | +0.50 dB |
| Rolling ResistanceLower is better | 6th / 8 | 8.06 kg/t | +0.55 kg/t |
- EU Label
- B/B/71
- Price
- 115.00
Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6
205/55 R16 94V XLCategory scores (% of best)
All discipline results (12)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 2nd / 8 | 131 ft | +4 ft |
| Dry HandlingLower is better | 4th / 8 | 56.33 s | +0.56 s |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 2nd / 8 | 105 ft | 0 ft |
| Wet HandlingLower is better | 5th / 8 | 88.2 s | +1.50 s |
| Wet CircleLower is better | 3rd / 8 | 12.36 s | +0.05 s |
| Straight AquaHigher is better | 3rd / 8 | 49.5 mph | -2.4 mph |
| Curved AquaplaningHigher is better | 3rd / 8 | 10.1 ft/s² | -1.4 ft/s² |
| Snow BrakingLower is better | 2nd / 8 | 63 ft | +1 ft |
| Snow TractionLower is better | 2nd / 8 | 5.93 s | +0.25 s |
| Snow HandlingLower is better | 3rd / 8 | 91.02 s | +1.82 s |
| NoiseLower is better | 1st / 8 | 68 dB | Best in this discipline |
| Rolling ResistanceLower is better | 7th / 8 | 8.72 kg/t | +1.21 kg/t |
- EU Label
- C/B/70
- Price
- 110.00
Nokian Seasonproof 2
205/55 R16 91VCategory scores (% of best)
All discipline results (12)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 7th / 8 | 137 ft | +10 ft |
| Dry HandlingLower is better | 8th / 8 | 57.55 s | +1.78 s |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 4th / 8 | 110 ft | +5 ft |
| Wet HandlingLower is better | 4th / 8 | 88.02 s | +1.32 s |
| Wet CircleLower is better | 2nd / 8 | 12.33 s | +0.02 s |
| Straight AquaHigher is better | 1st / 8 | 51.9 mph | Best in this discipline |
| Curved AquaplaningHigher is better | 1st / 8 | 11.5 ft/s² | Best in this discipline |
| Snow BrakingLower is better | 7th / 8 | 64 ft | +2 ft |
| Snow TractionLower is better | 6th / 8 | 6.04 s | +0.36 s |
| Snow HandlingLower is better | 4th / 8 | 91.11 s | +1.91 s |
| NoiseLower is better | 4th / 8 | 68.2 dB | +0.20 dB |
| Rolling ResistanceLower is better | 4th / 8 | 7.79 kg/t | +0.28 kg/t |
- EU Label
- B/A/70
- Price
- 99.00
Falken Euroall Season AS220
205/55 R16 91VCategory scores (% of best)
All discipline results (12)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 4th / 8 | 134 ft | +7 ft |
| Dry HandlingLower is better | 3rd / 8 | 56.16 s | +0.39 s |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 5th / 8 | 110 ft | +5 ft |
| Wet HandlingLower is better | 6th / 8 | 88.74 s | +2.04 s |
| Wet CircleLower is better | 5th / 8 | 12.47 s | +0.16 s |
| Straight AquaHigher is better | 6th / 8 | 45.9 mph | -6.0 mph |
| Curved AquaplaningHigher is better | 6th / 8 | 8.6 ft/s² | -2.9 ft/s² |
| Snow BrakingLower is better | 4th / 8 | 63 ft | +1 ft |
| Snow TractionLower is better | 4th / 8 | 5.98 s | +0.30 s |
| Snow HandlingLower is better | 6th / 8 | 92.34 s | +3.14 s |
| NoiseLower is better | 2nd / 8 | 68.1 dB | +0.10 dB |
| Rolling ResistanceLower is better | 5th / 8 | 7.99 kg/t | +0.48 kg/t |
- EU Label
- C/B/68
- Price
- 100.00
Linglong Sport Master 4S
205/55 R16 91VCategory scores (% of best)
All discipline results (12)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 5th / 8 | 136 ft | +9 ft |
| Dry HandlingLower is better | 1st / 8 | 55.77 s | Best in this discipline |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 7th / 8 | 112 ft | +7 ft |
| Wet HandlingLower is better | 7th / 8 | 88.92 s | +2.22 s |
| Wet CircleLower is better | 5th / 8 | 12.47 s | +0.16 s |
| Straight AquaHigher is better | 7th / 8 | 44.4 mph | -7.5 mph |
| Curved AquaplaningHigher is better | 7th / 8 | 7.6 ft/s² | -3.9 ft/s² |
| Snow BrakingLower is better | 3rd / 8 | 63 ft | +1 ft |
| Snow TractionLower is better | 7th / 8 | 6.07 s | +0.39 s |
| Snow HandlingLower is better | 7th / 8 | 93.8 s | +4.60 s |
| NoiseLower is better | 5th / 8 | 68.3 dB | +0.30 dB |
| Rolling ResistanceLower is better | 3rd / 8 | 7.77 kg/t | +0.26 kg/t |
- EU Label
- D/B/69
- Price
- 85.00
Tomket Allyear 3
205/55 R16 94V XLCategory scores (% of best)
All discipline results (12)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 8th / 8 | 146 ft | +19 ft |
| Dry HandlingLower is better | 6th / 8 | 56.56 s | +0.79 s |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 8th / 8 | 136 ft | +31 ft |
| Wet HandlingLower is better | 8th / 8 | 96.55 s | +9.85 s |
| Wet CircleLower is better | 8th / 8 | 13.12 s | +0.81 s |
| Straight AquaHigher is better | 8th / 8 | 42.3 mph | -9.6 mph |
| Curved AquaplaningHigher is better | 8th / 8 | 7.3 ft/s² | -4.2 ft/s² |
| Snow BrakingLower is better | 5th / 8 | 63 ft | +1 ft |
| Snow TractionLower is better | 8th / 8 | 6.09 s | +0.41 s |
| Snow HandlingLower is better | 8th / 8 | 94.49 s | +5.29 s |
| NoiseLower is better | 6th / 8 | 68.4 dB | +0.40 dB |
| Rolling ResistanceLower is better | 1st / 8 | 7.51 kg/t | Best in this discipline |
- EU Label
- C/C/72
- Price
- 86.00
Continental WinterContact TS 870
205/55 R16 91HAll discipline results (12)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Result |
|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 146 ft |
| Dry HandlingLower is better | 57.55 s |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 108 ft |
| Wet HandlingLower is better | 87.14 s |
| Wet CircleLower is better | 12.1 s |
| Straight AquaHigher is better | 51.4 mph |
| Curved AquaplaningHigher is better | 11.0 ft/s² |
| Snow BrakingLower is better | 61 ft |
| Snow TractionLower is better | 5.91 s |
| Snow HandlingLower is better | 89.2 s |
| NoiseLower is better | 67.7 dB |
| Rolling ResistanceLower is better | 8.21 kg/t |
- EU Label
- C/B/70
- Price
- 135.00
Continental PremiumContact 7
205/55 R16 91VAll discipline results (12)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Result |
|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 117 ft |
| Dry HandlingLower is better | 55.22 s |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 90 ft |
| Wet HandlingLower is better | 84.75 s |
| Wet CircleLower is better | 11.76 s |
| Straight AquaHigher is better | 47.5 mph |
| Curved AquaplaningHigher is better | 10.9 ft/s² |
| Snow BrakingLower is better | 143 ft |
| Snow TractionLower is better | 17.59 s |
| Snow HandlingLower is better | 137.65 s |
| NoiseLower is better | 68.3 dB |
| Rolling ResistanceLower is better | 8.43 kg/t |
- EU Label
- C/A/71
- Price
- 113.00


Discussion