Menu

Test source Auto Express

2026 Auto Express All Season Tire Test

Overall test winnerPirelli Cinturato All Season SF3

Auto Express has returned to 205/55 R16 for its 2026 all-season tire test, with eight tires bought on the open market through an independent German supplier.

Tires tested
8
Tested size
205/55 R16
Test vehicle
Volkswagen Golf, Skoda Octavia
Disciplines
12

At a glance

Tire shortlist

8 Tires tested

Published finishing positions, with the strengths and considerations from this test. Owner reviews cover other sizes and driving conditions.

1st

Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF3

+The Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF3 won the key wet braking test, the wet handling lap and dry braking, the last by a clear margin. It was second in both aquaplaning tests and on the snow handling lap, and third in snow traction. On both handling circuits it combined strong grip and balance with the best steering feel in the group, and it was one of the quietest tires in the cabin.

−The Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF3 had the highest rolling resistance in the test, which makes it the least economical choice here. It was last of the all-season tires in snow braking, although the snow braking results were closely grouped, and only fifth on the dry handling lap. On the snow circuit it was quick but felt a little less positive than the Michelin.

2nd

Michelin CrossClimate 3

+The Michelin CrossClimate 3 won all three snow tests, braking, traction and the handling lap, and it accelerated on snow faster than even the winter reference tire. It was a strong third on the wet handling lap, with good grip and calm, precise responses, third in dry braking and second only to the Tomket for low rolling resistance.

−The Michelin CrossClimate 3 was only sixth in wet braking, clearly behind the top three, and seventh on the wet circle. It was mid-field in both aquaplaning tests and seventh on the dry handling lap, and the noise meter rated it the loudest tire in the group, though the spread there was small.

3rd

Continental AllSeasonContact 2

+The Continental AllSeasonContact 2 won the wet circle test, joint second in wet braking a fraction behind the winner, and second on the wet handling lap by the smallest of margins. It stayed grippy and composed right at the limit in the wet, and it was second on the dry handling lap as well, with good grip and adjustability.

−The Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was mid-pack on snow, sixth in braking and fifth in traction and on the handling lap, although not far off the best in any of them. It was only joint fifth in dry braking, mid-field in both aquaplaning tests, and among the noisier and less economical tires in the group.

4th

Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6

+The Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 was second in snow braking, snow traction and dry braking, joint second in wet braking, and third on the snow handling lap and in both aquaplaning tests. It was the quietest of the all-season tires in the cabin, and it handled with a calm, predictable balance and good steering feel on every surface.

−The Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 was only fifth on the wet handling lap, clearly off the pace of the leaders despite its strong wet braking, and fourth on the dry handling lap. It had the second-highest rolling resistance of the all-season tires, so it is one of the less economical choices.

5th

Nokian Seasonproof 2

+The Nokian Seasonproof 2 won both aquaplaning tests, straight-line and curved, by a clear margin, and it was the only all-season tire to beat the winter reference in either. It was second on the wet circle and fourth in wet braking and on the wet handling lap, with grip close to the best, and on the snow circuit it was easy to place and only just off third. It was also fourth for rolling resistance.

−The Nokian Seasonproof 2 was the slowest all-season tire on the dry handling lap and seventh in dry braking. It was also seventh in snow braking and sixth in snow traction, though close to the leaders in both, and on the wet circuit it was easy to overdrive, which cost it time.

6th

Falken Euroall Season AS220

+The Falken Euroall Season AS220 was third on the dry handling lap and fourth in dry braking, snow braking and snow traction. It was easy to drive on every surface, with good front-end grip and a stable, predictable rear, and it was among the quietest tires in the cabin.

−The Falken Euroall Season AS220 was sixth in both aquaplaning tests, well short of the leaders, and only mid-field in wet braking. It was sixth on the wet handling lap and on the snow handling lap, and joint fifth on the wet circle.

7th

Linglong Sport Master 4S

+The Linglong Sport Master 4S set the fastest dry handling lap of all the all-season tires, with good grip and useful adjustability, although the times were very close. It was third in snow braking and third for rolling resistance, and it was consistent on the wet handling circuit, making the most of the grip it had. It was also the cheapest tire in the test.

−The Linglong Sport Master 4S was seventh in wet braking, on the wet handling lap and in both aquaplaning tests, clearly behind the mid-field. On the snow circuit it lacked grip and predictability, finishing seventh there and in snow traction.

8th

Tomket Allyear 3

+The Tomket Allyear 3 had the lowest rolling resistance of any tire in the test, which makes it the most economical choice here. It was fifth in snow braking and sixth on the dry handling lap.

−The Tomket Allyear 3 was last in all five wet tests, with by far the longest wet braking distance and a wet handling lap nowhere near the rest. Its behavior on the wet circuit was so unpredictable that the testers had to stop the car. It was also last in dry braking, snow traction and on the snow handling lap.

Tire shortlist

Compare selected tires

2026 Auto Express All Season Tire Test · 205/55 R16

TirePirelli Cinturato All Season SF3Michelin CrossClimate 3Continental AllSeasonContact 2Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6Nokian Seasonproof 2Falken Euroall Season AS220Linglong Sport Master 4STomket Allyear 3
Position1st2nd3rd4th5th6th7th8th
Category scores (% of best)
Dry99.4%97.1%96.6%98%95%97.2%96.7%92.8%
Wet99%96%98.4%98.1%98.2%94.9%93.6%84.8%
Snow96.5%100%96.5%97.3%96.3%96.5%95.6%95.1%
Comfort99.9%99%99.3%100%99.7%99.9%99.6%99.4%
Rolling Resistance85.5%99.2%93.2%86.1%96.4%94%96.7%100%
Keep researchingRead owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results

Explore the complete results →

The full test

The evidence behind the verdict

Auto Express has returned to 205/55 R16 for its 2026 all-season tire test, with eight tires bought on the open market through an independent German supplier. The snow tests were run at Hankook's proving ground at Ivalo in Finland, well inside the Arctic Circle, and the wet and dry tests at Continental's Contidrom in Germany, using a Volkswagen Golf and a Skoda Octavia. Two Continental tires ran alongside the field as references, the WinterContact TS 870 winter tire and the PremiumContact 7 summer tire.

The Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF3 won again, having also won Auto Express's previous all-season test. It took the key wet braking test, the wet handling lap and dry braking, and finished in the top three in most of the others. The margins behind it are tiny: the Michelin CrossClimate 3 was second, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 third and the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 fourth, with the Nokian Seasonproof 2 fifth, and a single percentage point covers all five on Auto Express's overall score. The Falken Euroall Season AS220 and the Linglong Sport Master 4S took sixth and seventh, and the budget Tomket Allyear 3 was a distant last.

Test setup & methodology

The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.

Recorded test conditions

Recorded test conditions

Dry Braking
62.1 → 0.0 mph
Wet Braking
49.7 → 0.0 mph
Snow Braking
24.9 → 3.1 mph

The Michelin is the most interesting result. It won all three snow tests, and in snow traction it was quicker than even the winter reference tire, but it was only sixth in wet braking and seventh on the wet circle. That is not a one-off: in our own 2026/27 all-season test it also won every snow test and finished ninth of ten in wet braking. The Pirelli is close to the mirror image. It won both of the main wet tests, and it was last of the eight all-season tires in snow braking, just as it was last in snow braking in our own test, although only a small distance covers the snow braking field here. Elsewhere the Nokian won both aquaplaning tests by a clear margin, and the Linglong, the cheapest tire in the test, set the fastest dry handling lap of the all-season tires.

The two references show how far all-season tires have come. The Continental WinterContact TS 870, winner of the 2026 Auto Express winter test, stopped shortest of all on snow and tied the Michelin on the snow handling lap, yet the Michelin beat it in snow traction. In the wet it was quicker around the circle than any all-season tire, but it needed more distance to stop than the best three all-season tires, and in dry braking only the Tomket stopped longer. The summer PremiumContact 7, runner-up in the 2026 Auto Express summer test, stopped shortest of all in both wet and dry braking and set the fastest wet and dry laps, but on snow it needed more than twice the Michelin's braking distance and could barely pull away. The Pirelli also ran in the winter test, as its all-season reference, where Auto Express judged its snow performance good enough for a mid-field finish among dedicated winter tires. Neither reference is included in the ranking here.

A note on the numbers below. Auto Express do not publish raw measurements, only each tire's result as a percentage of the best in that test, so the figures in these charts are built from estimated bests. The percentage gaps between the tires are exact; what is estimated is the absolute value the scale starts from. Auto Express quote the Michelin's snow traction time outright and enough distances and gaps to pin wet and dry braking closely, their note that the Michelin was the only all-season tire to stop in under 62 feet on snow narrows snow braking to a few tenths of a meter, and gaps in their text also set the snow and wet handling laps. For wet cornering, straight-line aquaplaning and rolling resistance, the Pirelli and the WinterContact TS 870 sit in the same relation to each other, within rounding, as they do in the Auto Express winter test, so the scale is taken from our figures for that test. Curved aquaplaning, dry handling and cabin noise have no anchor and are our own estimate, so treat those absolute figures as indicative. Because our scoring works on percentages, none of this affects the score weighting calculator on the results tab.

The full test, including Auto Express's own driving impressions of every tire, is on the Auto Express website.

Snow

Snow braking was measured from 25 mph down to 3 mph, with the track at between 12°F and 16°F. The Michelin stopped shortest of the all-season tires and was the only one to stop in under 62 feet, with the Bridgestone second and the Linglong, Falken and Tomket just behind. The winning Pirelli was last of the eight, but less than 3 feet covers the whole all-season field, so none of these tires is weak here. The winter reference stopped fractionally shorter than the Michelin, while the summer tire needed more than twice the distance.

Snow Braking

Snow braking in feet (25 - 3 mph)

Lower is better ↓
Snow Braking
Position / TireResultGap to bestResidual speed
RefContinental WinterContact TS 870
61 ft -1 ft 0 mph
62 ft Best 0 mph
63 ft +1 ft 12 mph
63 ft +1 ft 12 mph
63 ft +1 ft 12 mph
63 ft +1 ft 13 mph
64 ft +2 ft 14 mph
64 ft +2 ft 15 mph
65 ft +3 ft 17 mph
RefContinental PremiumContact 7
143 ft +81 ft 60 mph

The difference between best and worst was 133.4% (82 ft ≈ 5.5 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF3 would still be travelling at 17 mph when the Michelin CrossClimate 3 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Derived data. Auto Express publish percentages, not measurements. The gaps between these tires are exact. Auto Express say the Michelin was the only all-season tire to stop in under 62 feet, which limits the scale to a window of a few tenths of a meter, and we have used the middle of it.

Snow traction is the time taken to accelerate from 3 mph to 25 mph. The Michelin was quickest by a clear margin and also beat the winter reference, with the Bridgestone and Pirelli next and the Tomket slowest. The summer tire took around three times as long as the best.

Snow Traction

Snow acceleration time

Lower is better ↓
Snow Traction
Position / TireResultGap to best
5.68 s Best
RefContinental WinterContact TS 870
5.91 s +0.23 s
5.93 s +0.25 s
5.94 s +0.26 s
5.98 s +0.30 s
5.99 s +0.31 s
6.04 s +0.36 s
6.07 s +0.39 s
6.09 s +0.41 s
RefContinental PremiumContact 7
17.59 s +11.91 s

The difference between best and worst was 209.7% (11.91 s).

Derived data. Auto Express publish percentages, not measurements. The gaps between these tires are exact, and the scale is anchored on the 5.68 seconds Auto Express quote for the Michelin.

The snow handling lap is an undulating track of around 1 mile. The Michelin set the fastest time, matched only by the winter reference, and Auto Express praised its grip and adjustability. The Pirelli was second, with the Bridgestone, Nokian and Continental closely grouped behind it, and the Linglong and Tomket were the slowest of the all-season tires. The summer tire was well over half a minute a lap slower than the best.

Snow Handling

Snow handling time in seconds

Lower is better ↓
Snow Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
RefContinental WinterContact TS 870
89.2 s 0.00 s
89.2 s Best
90.65 s +1.45 s
91.02 s +1.82 s
91.11 s +1.91 s
91.49 s +2.29 s
92.34 s +3.14 s
93.8 s +4.60 s
94.49 s +5.29 s
RefContinental PremiumContact 7
137.65 s +48.45 s

The difference between best and worst was 54.3% (48.45 s).

Derived data. Auto Express publish percentages, not measurements. The gaps between these tires are exact; the scale is set by the gap of almost one and a half seconds a lap that Auto Express quote between the Michelin and the Pirelli, so treat the absolute times as indicative.

Wet

The wet and dry tests ran at temperatures just above 45°F. Straight-line wet braking from 50 mph, done on a rail so that every stop used the same stretch of asphalt, is the test Auto Express treat as the benchmark, and the Pirelli won it, with the Bridgestone and Continental just 0 feet behind. The Nokian and Falken were next, the Michelin only sixth and the Linglong seventh. The Tomket needed 135 feet, more than 23 feet further than the next-worst tire from the same speed, which matches our own 2025/26 all-season test, where it was also last in wet braking. Of the references, the summer tire stopped shortest of all, while the winter tire stopped behind the best three all-season tires.

Wet Braking

Wet braking in feet (50 - 0 mph)

Lower is better ↓
Wet Braking
Position / TireResultGap to bestResidual speed
RefContinental PremiumContact 7
90 ft -15 ft 0 mph
105 ft Best 0 mph
105 ft 0 ft 4 mph
105 ft 0 ft 4 mph
RefContinental WinterContact TS 870
108 ft +3 ft 15 mph
110 ft +5 ft 17 mph
110 ft +5 ft 18 mph
111 ft +6 ft 19 mph
112 ft +7 ft 21 mph
136 ft +31 ft 38 mph

The difference between best and worst was 51.3% (46 ft ≈ 3.1 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Tomket Allyear 3 would still be travelling at 38 mph when the Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF3 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Derived data. Auto Express publish percentages, not measurements. The gaps between these tires are exact, and the scale is pinned by two distances quoted in the Auto Express text, 110 feet for the Falken and 135 feet for the Tomket. The other gaps they quote are consistent with it.

The wet handling circuit is 1 mile long and shows up grip, traction, balance and breakaway. The Pirelli set the fastest lap of the all-season tires, with the Continental a hair behind and the Michelin third, and Auto Express singled out the Pirelli's feel and the Continental's composure at the limit. The Tomket was almost ten seconds off the pace, and its behavior was so unpredictable that the testers stopped the car because it had made them feel sick.

Wet Handling

Wet handling time in seconds

Lower is better ↓
Wet Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
RefContinental PremiumContact 7
84.75 s -1.95 s
86.7 s Best
86.79 s +0.09 s
RefContinental WinterContact TS 870
87.14 s +0.44 s
87.31 s +0.61 s
88.02 s +1.32 s
88.2 s +1.50 s
88.74 s +2.04 s
88.92 s +2.22 s
96.55 s +9.85 s

The difference between best and worst was 13.9% (11.8 s).

Derived data. Auto Express publish percentages, not measurements. The gaps between these tires are exact; the scale comes from the lap-time gaps Auto Express quote for the Bridgestone and the Tomket, so treat the absolute times as indicative.

Wet cornering was timed on a 189 feet diameter circle. The Continental was quickest of the all-season tires, with the Nokian, Bridgestone and Pirelli close behind, while the Michelin was only seventh and the Tomket last. Both references were quicker than every all-season tire here.

Wet Circle

Wet Circle Lap Time in seconds

Lower is better ↓
Wet Circle
Position / TireResultGap to best
RefContinental PremiumContact 7
11.76 s -0.55 s
RefContinental WinterContact TS 870
12.1 s -0.21 s
12.31 s Best
12.33 s +0.02 s
12.36 s +0.05 s
12.36 s +0.05 s
12.47 s +0.16 s
12.47 s +0.16 s
12.6 s +0.29 s
13.12 s +0.81 s

The difference between best and worst was 11.6% (1.36 s).

Derived data. Auto Express publish percentages, not measurements. The gaps between these tires are exact. The Pirelli and the WinterContact TS 870 sit in the same relation to each other here as in the 2026 Auto Express winter test, so the scale comes from our figures for that test.

Straight-line aquaplaning is the speed at which a tire running through 9mm of standing water reaches 15 per cent slip. The Nokian was best and the only all-season tire to beat the winter reference, with the Pirelli and Bridgestone next, while the Falken, Linglong and Tomket trailed the rest.

Straight Aqua

Float Speed in mph

Higher is better ↑
Straight Aqua
Position / TireResultGap to best
51.9 mph Best
RefContinental WinterContact TS 870
51.4 mph -0.5 mph
50.1 mph -1.8 mph
49.5 mph -2.4 mph
48.7 mph -3.2 mph
47.7 mph -4.2 mph
RefContinental PremiumContact 7
47.5 mph -4.4 mph
45.9 mph -6.0 mph
44.4 mph -7.5 mph
42.3 mph -9.6 mph

The difference between best and worst was 18.7% (9.6 mph).

Derived data. Auto Express publish percentages, not measurements. The gaps between these tires are exact. The Pirelli and the WinterContact TS 870 sit in the same relation to each other here, within rounding, as in the 2026 Auto Express winter test, so the scale comes from our figures for that test.

Curved aquaplaning measures the average sideways grip left through a bend flooded to 5mm, driven between 37 mph and 56 mph. The Nokian's advantage was even bigger here, and again it was the only all-season tire ahead of the winter reference. The Falken, Linglong and Tomket were well short of the rest, the Tomket by the widest margin.

Curved Aquaplaning

Remaining lateral acceleration

Higher is better ↑
Curved Aquaplaning
Position / TireResultGap to best
11.5 ft/s² Best
RefContinental WinterContact TS 870
11.0 ft/s² -0.5 ft/s²
RefContinental PremiumContact 7
10.9 ft/s² -0.6 ft/s²
10.6 ft/s² -0.9 ft/s²
10.1 ft/s² -1.4 ft/s²
10.0 ft/s² -1.5 ft/s²
9.8 ft/s² -1.7 ft/s²
8.6 ft/s² -2.9 ft/s²
7.6 ft/s² -3.9 ft/s²
7.3 ft/s² -4.2 ft/s²

The difference between best and worst was 37.2% (4.2 ft/s²).

Derived data. Auto Express publish percentages, not measurements. The gaps between these tires are exact, but no figure in the Auto Express text fixes the scale, and the three tires that also ran in the 2026 Auto Express winter test (the Pirelli and the two references) do not line up with it here, so it is an average of what those three imply. Treat the absolute figures as indicative.

Dry

Dry braking was measured from 62 mph to a standstill. The Pirelli stopped shortest of the all-season tires by a clear margin, 4 feet ahead of the Bridgestone, with the Michelin third, and the Tomket was last of the all-season tires. The Pirelli's win is typical of it, as it has stopped shortest in the dry in most of the tests it has appeared in on our site. The winter reference stopped almost as long as the Tomket, nearly 20 feet behind the Pirelli, while the summer tire stopped shortest of all.

Dry Braking

Dry braking in feet (62 - 0 mph)

Lower is better ↓
Dry Braking
Position / TireResultGap to bestResidual speed
RefContinental PremiumContact 7
117 ft -10 ft 0 mph
127 ft Best 0 mph
131 ft +4 ft 14 mph
133 ft +6 ft 16 mph
134 ft +7 ft 18 mph
136 ft +9 ft 21 mph
136 ft +9 ft 21 mph
137 ft +10 ft 21 mph
RefContinental WinterContact TS 870
146 ft +19 ft 29 mph
146 ft +19 ft 29 mph

The difference between best and worst was 25.6% (29 ft ≈ 2 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Tomket Allyear 3 would still be travelling at 29 mph when the Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF3 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Derived data. Auto Express publish percentages, not measurements. The gaps between these tires are exact, and the scale is pinned by the gaps Auto Express quote: the Pirelli stopped 4 feet shorter than the Bridgestone, which was 2 feet ahead of the Michelin.

The dry handling lap is a twisting section of the handling circuit about 1 mile long. The Linglong set the fastest time of the all-season tires, ahead of the Continental and the Falken, but the times were very close and only the Nokian was clearly adrift. That result is out of character for the Linglong, which was mid-field on the dry handling lap in our own 2025/26 all-season test. The summer tire was quickest overall and the winter tire, level with the Nokian, the slowest.

Dry Handling

Dry handling time in seconds

Lower is better ↓
Dry Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
RefContinental PremiumContact 7
55.22 s -0.55 s
55.77 s Best
55.94 s +0.17 s
56.16 s +0.39 s
56.33 s +0.56 s
56.5 s +0.73 s
56.56 s +0.79 s
56.73 s +0.96 s
RefContinental WinterContact TS 870
57.55 s +1.78 s
57.55 s +1.78 s

The difference between best and worst was 4.2% (2.33 s).

Derived data. Auto Express publish percentages, not measurements. The gaps between these tires are exact, but no figure in the Auto Express text fixes the scale, and the three tires that also ran in the 2026 Auto Express winter test (the Pirelli and the two references) do not line up with it here, so it is an average of what those three imply. Treat the absolute times as indicative.

Comfort

Rather than use the drive-by figure on the EU label, Auto Express measure the noise heard inside the car, averaging coastdown readings from 50 mph across three surfaces. The Bridgestone was the quietest all-season tire and the Michelin the loudest, but the whole field sits within a decibel, so this test decides very little. The winter reference was quieter than all of them.

Noise

Internal noise in dB

Lower is better ↓
Noise
Position / TireResultGap to best
RefContinental WinterContact TS 870
67.7 dB -0.30 dB
68 dB Best
68.1 dB +0.10 dB
68.1 dB +0.10 dB
68.2 dB +0.20 dB
RefContinental PremiumContact 7
68.3 dB +0.30 dB
68.3 dB +0.30 dB
68.4 dB +0.40 dB
68.5 dB +0.50 dB
68.7 dB +0.70 dB

All the tires in the Noise test finished less than 3% apart.

Derived data. Auto Express publish percentages, not measurements. The gaps between these tires are exact, but no figure in the Auto Express text fixes the scale, and the three tires that also ran in the 2026 Auto Express winter test (the Pirelli and the two references) do not line up with it here, so it is an average of what those three imply. Treat the absolute figures as indicative.

Value

Rolling resistance was measured to industry standards rather than taken from the label. The budget Tomket had the lowest, just ahead of the Michelin, with the Linglong and Nokian next, while the Bridgestone and the winning Pirelli had the highest. Lower rolling resistance means less energy is needed to keep the tire turning, so these results feed straight into running costs.

Rolling Resistance

Rolling resistance in kg t

Lower is better ↓
Rolling Resistance
Position / TireResultGap to bestExtra fuel / year
7.51 kg/t Best $0
7.57 kg/t +0.06 kg/t $2
7.77 kg/t +0.26 kg/t $10
7.79 kg/t +0.28 kg/t $11
7.99 kg/t +0.48 kg/t $19
8.06 kg/t +0.55 kg/t $22
RefContinental WinterContact TS 870
8.21 kg/t +0.70 kg/t $27
RefContinental PremiumContact 7
8.43 kg/t +0.92 kg/t $36
8.72 kg/t +1.21 kg/t $47
8.78 kg/t +1.27 kg/t $50

The difference between best and worst was 16.9% (1.27 kg / t). Over 12,000 miles a year at $3.60/gal, the Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF3 uses about 14 gal ($50) more fuel than the Tomket Allyear 3.

Adjust the assumptions

Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions.

12,000 mi
$3.60/gal
Estimates based on typical driving conditions. Rolling resistance accounts for approximately 20% of IC vehicle fuel consumption and 25% of EV energy consumption. Actual savings vary based on driving style, vehicle weight, road conditions, and tire age. For comparative purposes only. Lifetime savings based on a 40,000km / 25,000 mile tread life.

Derived data. Auto Express publish percentages, not measurements. The gaps between these tires are exact, and the three tires that also ran in the 2026 Auto Express winter test (the Pirelli and the two references) all agree with their figures there to within a hundredth of a kg/t, so this scale is well anchored.

Results

Auto Express weight half of the overall score on wet performance and a fifth each on snow and dry, with the focus on braking and handling, and share the final tenth between the other tests. That suits the Pirelli, which led both of the main wet tests and gave little away anywhere else. Behind it, four tires finished within a point of the winner with quite different strengths: the Michelin is the snow specialist, the Nokian the aquaplaning specialist, the Continental the closest to the Pirelli in the wet and the Bridgestone the most consistent, without winning a performance test. The Falken is a solid mid-field choice and the Linglong a reasonable budget option at the lowest price here, while the Tomket, last in every wet test, shows how much wet grip a budget tire can give away.

1st

Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF3

205/55 R16 94V XL
Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF3
Auto Express Test Winner / 5 stars
The Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF3 won the 2026 Auto Express all-season test, keeping the title it took in their previous one. It won both of the main wet tests, braking and the handling lap, and wet performance makes up half of Auto Express's overall score. It also stayed close to the leaders on snow and in the dry, and it was the tire the testers most enjoyed driving. Its weak point is rolling resistance, the highest in the test.
Dry99.4%
Wet99%
Snow96.5%
Comfort99.9%
Rolling Resistance85.5%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (12)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better1st / 8127 ftBest in this discipline
Dry HandlingLower is better5th / 856.5 s+0.73 s
Wet BrakingLower is better1st / 8105 ftBest in this discipline
Wet HandlingLower is better1st / 886.7 sBest in this discipline
Wet CircleLower is better3rd / 812.36 s+0.05 s
Straight AquaHigher is better2nd / 850.1 mph-1.8 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better2nd / 810.6 ft/s²-0.9 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better8th / 865 ft+3 ft
Snow TractionLower is better3rd / 85.94 s+0.26 s
Snow HandlingLower is better2nd / 890.65 s+1.45 s
NoiseLower is better2nd / 868.1 dB+0.10 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better8th / 88.78 kg/t+1.27 kg/t
EU Label
C/A/72
Price
105.00
2nd

Michelin CrossClimate 3

205/55 R16 94V XL
Michelin CrossClimate 3
The Michelin CrossClimate 3 finished second overall, a fraction of a point behind the winner, as Michelin returned to Auto Express's all-season test after a few years away. It beat the Pirelli in every snow test but finished behind it in all five wet tests, which makes it the pick of this group for drivers who see regular snow.
Dry97.1%
Wet96%
Snow100%
Comfort99%
Rolling Resistance99.2%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (12)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better3rd / 8133 ft+6 ft
Dry HandlingLower is better7th / 856.73 s+0.96 s
Wet BrakingLower is better6th / 8111 ft+6 ft
Wet HandlingLower is better3rd / 887.31 s+0.61 s
Wet CircleLower is better7th / 812.6 s+0.29 s
Straight AquaHigher is better4th / 848.7 mph-3.2 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better5th / 89.8 ft/s²-1.7 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better1st / 862 ftBest in this discipline
Snow TractionLower is better1st / 85.68 sBest in this discipline
Snow HandlingLower is better1st / 889.2 sBest in this discipline
NoiseLower is better8th / 868.7 dB+0.70 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better2nd / 87.57 kg/t+0.06 kg/t
EU Label
B/B/72
Price
110.00
3rd

Continental AllSeasonContact 2

205/55 R16 94V XL
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
The Continental AllSeasonContact 2 took third place, a fraction of a point behind the winner. Its strength is cold, wet grip: it was at or near the front in wet braking, on the wet circle and on the wet handling lap, and it backed that up with a fast dry lap. It gives a little away on snow and in dry braking, so it suits drivers who see far more rain than snow.
Dry96.6%
Wet98.4%
Snow96.5%
Comfort99.3%
Rolling Resistance93.2%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (12)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better5th / 8136 ft+9 ft
Dry HandlingLower is better2nd / 855.94 s+0.17 s
Wet BrakingLower is better2nd / 8105 ft0 ft
Wet HandlingLower is better2nd / 886.79 s+0.09 s
Wet CircleLower is better1st / 812.31 sBest in this discipline
Straight AquaHigher is better5th / 847.7 mph-4.2 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better4th / 810.0 ft/s²-1.5 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better6th / 864 ft+2 ft
Snow TractionLower is better5th / 85.99 s+0.31 s
Snow HandlingLower is better5th / 891.49 s+2.29 s
NoiseLower is better7th / 868.5 dB+0.50 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better6th / 88.06 kg/t+0.55 kg/t
EU Label
B/B/71
Price
115.00
4th

Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6

205/55 R16 94V XL
Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6
The Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 finished fourth, missing the podium by the narrowest of margins in a very close top five. It placed in the top three in most of the tests without winning any of the performance tests, and it was the quietest all-season tire in the cabin. A very consistent all-rounder with no real weakness beyond economy.
Dry98%
Wet98.1%
Snow97.3%
Comfort100%
Rolling Resistance86.1%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (12)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better2nd / 8131 ft+4 ft
Dry HandlingLower is better4th / 856.33 s+0.56 s
Wet BrakingLower is better2nd / 8105 ft0 ft
Wet HandlingLower is better5th / 888.2 s+1.50 s
Wet CircleLower is better3rd / 812.36 s+0.05 s
Straight AquaHigher is better3rd / 849.5 mph-2.4 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better3rd / 810.1 ft/s²-1.4 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better2nd / 863 ft+1 ft
Snow TractionLower is better2nd / 85.93 s+0.25 s
Snow HandlingLower is better3rd / 891.02 s+1.82 s
NoiseLower is better1st / 868 dBBest in this discipline
Rolling ResistanceLower is better7th / 88.72 kg/t+1.21 kg/t
EU Label
C/B/70
Price
110.00
5th

Nokian Seasonproof 2

205/55 R16 91V
Nokian Seasonproof 2
The Nokian Seasonproof 2 finished fifth, only a small margin short of the podium in a very close top five. It is the best tire here for resisting aquaplaning and very capable in the wet generally, and its snow results were closer to the leaders than its placings suggest. Its dry performance is what holds it back.
Dry95%
Wet98.2%
Snow96.3%
Comfort99.7%
Rolling Resistance96.4%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (12)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better7th / 8137 ft+10 ft
Dry HandlingLower is better8th / 857.55 s+1.78 s
Wet BrakingLower is better4th / 8110 ft+5 ft
Wet HandlingLower is better4th / 888.02 s+1.32 s
Wet CircleLower is better2nd / 812.33 s+0.02 s
Straight AquaHigher is better1st / 851.9 mphBest in this discipline
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better1st / 811.5 ft/s²Best in this discipline
Snow BrakingLower is better7th / 864 ft+2 ft
Snow TractionLower is better6th / 86.04 s+0.36 s
Snow HandlingLower is better4th / 891.11 s+1.91 s
NoiseLower is better4th / 868.2 dB+0.20 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better4th / 87.79 kg/t+0.28 kg/t
EU Label
B/A/70
Price
99.00
6th

Falken Euroall Season AS220

205/55 R16 91V
Falken Euroall Season AS220
The Falken Euroall Season AS220 finished sixth, a solid result a step behind the leading five. It has no serious weakness and is easy to drive in all conditions, with its best results in the dry. Aquaplaning is where it falls furthest behind the best tires here.
Dry97.2%
Wet94.9%
Snow96.5%
Comfort99.9%
Rolling Resistance94%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (12)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better4th / 8134 ft+7 ft
Dry HandlingLower is better3rd / 856.16 s+0.39 s
Wet BrakingLower is better5th / 8110 ft+5 ft
Wet HandlingLower is better6th / 888.74 s+2.04 s
Wet CircleLower is better5th / 812.47 s+0.16 s
Straight AquaHigher is better6th / 845.9 mph-6.0 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better6th / 88.6 ft/s²-2.9 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better4th / 863 ft+1 ft
Snow TractionLower is better4th / 85.98 s+0.30 s
Snow HandlingLower is better6th / 892.34 s+3.14 s
NoiseLower is better2nd / 868.1 dB+0.10 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better5th / 87.99 kg/t+0.48 kg/t
EU Label
C/B/68
Price
100.00
7th

Linglong Sport Master 4S

205/55 R16 91V
Linglong Sport Master 4S
The Linglong Sport Master 4S finished seventh, well clear of the last-placed tire but a step behind the mid-field brands. Wet grip is its main shortfall, while its dry handling, snow braking and low rolling resistance are genuine strengths, which makes it a sensible budget option at the lowest price in the test.
Dry96.7%
Wet93.6%
Snow95.6%
Comfort99.6%
Rolling Resistance96.7%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (12)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better5th / 8136 ft+9 ft
Dry HandlingLower is better1st / 855.77 sBest in this discipline
Wet BrakingLower is better7th / 8112 ft+7 ft
Wet HandlingLower is better7th / 888.92 s+2.22 s
Wet CircleLower is better5th / 812.47 s+0.16 s
Straight AquaHigher is better7th / 844.4 mph-7.5 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better7th / 87.6 ft/s²-3.9 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better3rd / 863 ft+1 ft
Snow TractionLower is better7th / 86.07 s+0.39 s
Snow HandlingLower is better7th / 893.8 s+4.60 s
NoiseLower is better5th / 868.3 dB+0.30 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better3rd / 87.77 kg/t+0.26 kg/t
EU Label
D/B/69
Price
85.00
8th

Tomket Allyear 3

205/55 R16 94V XL
Tomket Allyear 3
The Tomket Allyear 3 finished last by a wide margin. Its wet braking and wet handling fall far short of every other tire in the test, which makes it hard to recommend even as a budget choice, particularly as it was not the cheapest tire here. Low rolling resistance is its only notable strength.
Dry92.8%
Wet84.8%
Snow95.1%
Comfort99.4%
Rolling Resistance100%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (12)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better8th / 8146 ft+19 ft
Dry HandlingLower is better6th / 856.56 s+0.79 s
Wet BrakingLower is better8th / 8136 ft+31 ft
Wet HandlingLower is better8th / 896.55 s+9.85 s
Wet CircleLower is better8th / 813.12 s+0.81 s
Straight AquaHigher is better8th / 842.3 mph-9.6 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better8th / 87.3 ft/s²-4.2 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better5th / 863 ft+1 ft
Snow TractionLower is better8th / 86.09 s+0.41 s
Snow HandlingLower is better8th / 894.49 s+5.29 s
NoiseLower is better6th / 868.4 dB+0.40 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better1st / 87.51 kg/tBest in this discipline
EU Label
C/C/72
Price
86.00
Reference Tire

Continental WinterContact TS 870

205/55 R16 91H
Continental WinterContact TS 870
The Continental WinterContact TS 870, winner of Auto Express's 2026 winter test, was run as a reference and is not ranked here. It shows how close the best all-season tires have come on snow: it was roughly level with the Michelin there, while giving ground to the best all-season tires in wet braking and a great deal more in dry braking.
All discipline results (12)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestResult
Dry BrakingLower is better146 ft
Dry HandlingLower is better57.55 s
Wet BrakingLower is better108 ft
Wet HandlingLower is better87.14 s
Wet CircleLower is better12.1 s
Straight AquaHigher is better51.4 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better11.0 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better61 ft
Snow TractionLower is better5.91 s
Snow HandlingLower is better89.2 s
NoiseLower is better67.7 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better8.21 kg/t
EU Label
C/B/70
Price
135.00
Reference Tire

Continental PremiumContact 7

205/55 R16 91V
Continental PremiumContact 7
The Continental PremiumContact 7 ran as Auto Express's summer reference and is not ranked. It remains the benchmark on wet and dry roads even at these low temperatures, but on snow it is in a different category altogether, which is exactly the trade-off an all-season tire is designed to avoid.
All discipline results (12)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestResult
Dry BrakingLower is better117 ft
Dry HandlingLower is better55.22 s
Wet BrakingLower is better90 ft
Wet HandlingLower is better84.75 s
Wet CircleLower is better11.76 s
Straight AquaHigher is better47.5 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better10.9 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better143 ft
Snow TractionLower is better17.59 s
Snow HandlingLower is better137.65 s
NoiseLower is better68.3 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better8.43 kg/t
EU Label
C/A/71
Price
113.00

More tire tests

Cross-check this test

All tire tests

Where these tires were tested again, and how the verdict held up.

Discussion

  1. No comments yet — be the first.
Rate your tires

My tires

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tires

Save tires from a tire page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tires. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.