BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2 vs Kleber Krisalp HP3
- TR Score
- 8.3/10
- Owners say
- 89% · 30
- TR Score
- 8.1/10
- Owners say
- 84% · 36
In the 20 independent tests that ran both tires, the BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2 finished ahead 13 times and the Krisalp HP3 5 times, with 2 level. The gForce Winter 2 lasted 3.1% longer in the wear tests.
Data updated
Which should you buy?
Pick BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2 for mixed winter climates with frequent wet roads, higher speeds, and long-mile use. Pick Kleber Krisalp HP3 if you drive mostly on snow, value lower upfront cost, and want solid aquaplaning security at a sharper price.
Where the gForce Winter 2 is stronger
- Class-leading wet braking across tests; strong wet handling stability
- Very good snow traction/handling with repeat wins; strong ice braking in ADAC 2023
- Better wear/longevity in multiple tests; consistent durability
Where the Krisalp HP3 is stronger
- Excellent value and lower purchase price across years
- Strong snow performance, often matching or slightly beating in snow braking
- Very good straight-line aquaplaning reserves; quiet ride in several tests
The bullet points are analysis of the shared tests and of owner reviews; the measured wins in each discipline are in the tables below. Where the two disagree, the figures are right.
gForce Winter 2 vs Krisalp HP3 at a glance
| Category | gForce Winter 2 | Gap | Krisalp HP3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shared tests won20 shared tests | 13 | 2 level | 5 |
| Dry19 measurements | 7 | 10 | |
| Wet51 measurements | 28 | The gForce Winter 2 stopped 0.7% shorter in the wet (18 tests) | 18 |
| Snow40 measurements | 18 | Level between the two. | 18 |
| Ice1 measurement | 1 | 0 | |
| Comfort12 measurements | 5 | 4 | |
| Value21 measurements | 11 | The gForce Winter 2 lasted 3.1% longer in the wear tests (10 tests) | 6 |
| Tire Reviews Scoreevery test and review we hold | 8.3/10 | The gForce Winter 2 by 0.2 | 8.1/10 |
| Owner rating30 and 36 reviews | 89% | The gForce Winter 2 by 5 points | 84% |
| Would buy againshare of owners | 100% | The gForce Winter 2 by 29 points | 71% |
| Pricein the 8 tests that listed prices | +9.1% | The gForce Winter 2 was dearer in 8 of 8 | Cheaper |
| Sizes madeEU label registrations | 75 | 75 sizes made in both | 75 |
Wins count every measurement the shared tests recorded for both tires; a tick marks the tire ahead on that line. Subjective driver scores count as wins but are never averaged, because each test uses its own scale.
Head to head in 20 tests, 2017 to 2026
Each row is one published test in which both tires ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
Performance profile
15 measurements from the 20 shared tests, each tire shown as its share of the better figure in every test.
Where each is furthest ahead
gForce Winter 2
Krisalp HP3
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 118 ft stop against 112 ft is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it. The scale stops at 98%: a point further in sits on the hub's edge, hollow. 4 measurements recorded in only one shared test are left off; every measurement is in the table further down.
Where each scores higher
gForce Winter 2
Krisalp HP3
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tires of the same season and class: 90 means this tire out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Where owners rate each higher
gForce Winter 2
Krisalp HP3
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
Owners rate the gForce Winter 2 89% from 30 reviews and the Krisalp HP3 84% from 36. Each spoke is one question owners answer out of 10; reviews are vetted by hand before publication.
Every measurement, side by side
Averages of the figures both tires posted in the same tests. The gap is the average of each test's own gap, so figures from different cars and years are never mixed. Open a discipline for its measurements, and a measurement for every test's figure.
| Measurement | gForce Winter 2 | Gap | Krisalp HP3 | Wins | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 149 | = | 149 | 3-6 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 68.8 | 0.1% | 68.8 | 4-4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 143 | 0.7% | 144 | 11-4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 135 | 1.2% | 133 | 0-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 46.6 | 0.4% | 46.4 | 5-3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 12.75 | 0.3% | 12.71 | 3-3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 53 | 0.3% | 52.8 | 5-4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 9.6 | 0.8% | 9.5 | 4-3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 86 | 0.2% | 86 | 6-9 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 618 | 4.5% | 597 | 4-4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 37.1 | 0.1% | 37.1 | 6-3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 11.1 | 0.1% | 11.1 | 2-2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 69 | 3.7% | 72 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| scored | 4.5% | scored | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 70.66 | 0.1 dB | 70.58 | 4-4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 25,683 | 3.1% | 24,982 | 5-4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 8.48 | 0.8% | 8.54 | 6-2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 5.7 | = | 5.7 | 0-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 56 | = | 56 | 0-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tires shared. "Scored" rows are subjective driver ratings: each test uses its own scale, so only the wins are counted.
Scores beyond the shared tests
On the Tire Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the gForce Winter 2 scores 8.3 and the Krisalp HP3 8.1 out of 10.
| gForce Winter 2 | Category | Krisalp HP3 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 38 | Dry | 34 | ||
| 78 | Wet | 72 | ||
| 62 | Comfort | 55 | ||
| 49 | Value | 51 | ||
| 92 | Snow | 90 | ||
| 15 | Ice | 20 | ||
Category scores are percentiles among tires of the same season and class: 90 means this tire out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
What owners say
| gForce Winter 2 | Category | Krisalp HP3 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8.5 | Dry Grip | 8.5 | ||
| 9 | Wet Grip | 8.5 | ||
| 7.9 | Road Feedback | 8.2 | ||
| 8.5 | Handling | 8.1 | ||
| 8.7 | Wear | 8.4 | ||
| 9.2 | Comfort | 8.8 | ||
| 9.5 | Snow Grip | 8.9 | ||
| 8.8 | Ice Grip | 8 | ||
Owners rate the gForce Winter 2 89% from 30 reviews and the Krisalp HP3 84% from 36. Reviews are vetted by hand before publication; ownership is not verified.
BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2
- 89%from 30 reviews
- 100%would buy again
- 215,300 milesdriven by reviewers
Drivers generally rate the BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2 very highly, with repeated praise for confident traction on snow and ice and strong wet-weather performance with good aquaplaning resistance. Many also highlight excellent value for money, stable behavior in harsh winter conditions, and generally good comfort/quietness for a winter tire. A smaller set of reviews note compromises on dry roads, describing softer handling, reduced steering/on-center response, and occasional higher noise depending on speed and surface.
- Excellent snow traction
- Strong ice grip for a studless winter tire
- Very good wet grip and aquaplaning resistance
- Great price-to-performance/value
- Dry grip/handling is only average (softer feel, more roll than summer tires)
- Reduced steering feedback/on-center response compared with other tires
- Some report increased noise on certain surfaces/speeds (wet roads or above ~90 km/h)
Summarised by AI from 24 vetted reviews; the reviews themselves are on the tire page.
All 30 gForce Winter 2 reviewsI'm using on a Dacia Duster. Before, for winter, on this car I had Michelin Latitude Alpin 1 and Kleber Krisalp HP3 (same as Bf Goodrich). The snow grip was very good for 4 winters (same as Kleber), never let me down. The wet grip was also very good. But what surprised me a lot, was the emergency braking, that was very very good, on wet and dry. The only minus, was that I need to make some corrections on the directions compared with a summer touring tire (michelin primacy 3 or hankook), but the care never lost control with those tires, even if I drove too fast for it. In conclusion I will buy again (bf goodrich or kleber, in function of price).
Kleber Krisalp HP3
- 84%from 36 reviews
- 71%would buy again
- 459,168 milesdriven by reviewers
Most drivers rate the Kleber Krisalp HP3 highly, praising its strong snow and wet performance, low noise/comfort for a winter tire, and decent wear/value. Dry grip and handling precision are adequate for normal driving but can feel soft with noticeable understeer if pushed; several users report a 'jelly/boat-like' feel. A minority mention noise at certain speeds, vibration/manufacturing issues in specific batches, and weaker performance on ice or slush at higher speeds. Overall sentiment is positive with safety and winter capability as standout strengths.
- snow traction and braking
- wet grip and aquaplaning resistance
- low noise/comfort for a winter tire
- good wear and value
- soft sidewalls/boat-like feel; weak handling precision when pushed
- dry grip/cornering weaker vs summer tires
- ice/slush performance can be limited at higher speeds
Summarised by AI from 26 vetted reviews; the reviews themselves are on the tire page.
All 36 Krisalp HP3 reviewsGreat snow and ice grip, much better than any winter tire i had before.
Good durability as well. Dry grip is fine, wet grip not as much and must be kept in mind. Not very noisy for a winter tire either. Would buy again if they are on discount.
Sizes, EU label and lineage
From the EU label registrations for each tire: 75 sizes of the gForce Winter 2 and 75 of the Krisalp HP3, 75 of them made in both.
| Category | gForce Winter 2 | Krisalp HP3 |
|---|---|---|
| Season | Winter | Winter |
| Sizes made | 75 sizes, 14 to 20 inch | 75 sizes, 14 to 20 inch |
| Made in both | 75 sizes 155/65 R14165/65 R14165/70 R14175/65 R14175/70 R14185/55 R14185/60 R14185/65 R14185/70 R14195/65 R14165/60 R15165/65 R15and 63 more | |
| EU label wet grip | B90%C10% | B90%C10% |
| EU label rolling resistance | D50%C48%B3% | D50%C48%B2% |
| EU label noise | 68-71 dB A80%B20% | 68-71 dB A81%B19% |
| Severe snow (3PMSF) sizes | 115 of 115 | 112 of 112 |
| On the market since | 2016 | 2016 |
| Replaced | - | Kleber Krisalp HP2 (2013) |
| Price in the shared tests | The gForce Winter 2 was the dearer tire in 8 of the 8 tests that listed prices, by 9.1% on average. Each test priced the tires in its own market at the time; only the gap is comparable. | |
Label grades are shown as the share of registered sizes carrying each grade, so "B (88%), C (12%)" means most sizes are B. Grades vary by size; check the label for yours.
Reading the results
Written from the test results and owner reviews above. It is analysis, not a measurement: where it and the tables disagree, the tables are right.
Two closely related winter specialists from Michelin's stable go head to head: BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2 versus Kleber Krisalp HP3. Across 18 shared tests from 2017-2025, both consistently excel when temperatures plunge, but they trade blows on price, wet balance, and refinement. The BFGoodrich positions itself as the sharper all-round winter performer with stronger wet security and durability, while the Kleber leans into value and fuel economy without losing its snow-first character.
Recent big-field results underline the pattern: in Auto Bild 2025 (225/40 R18), BFGoodrich placed 12/22 to Kleber's 14/22, edging dry and wet braking and comfort, while Kleber fought back with marginal wins in wet circle, curved aquaplaning, and snow braking/traction. In the 2024 and 2023 tests, BFGoodrich repeatedly gained ground in wet braking and handling and often wore slower, whereas Kleber kept costs down and remained highly competitive on snow and aquaplaning.
Conclusion
Overall, BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2 is the safer bet for mixed winter use: it dominates wet braking (11 category wins vs 3), holds more wet-handling wins, and typically delivers better wear and lower rolling resistance, giving confidence on slushy motorways and variable shoulder seasons. It also posts more test wins overall (13 vs 3) and frequently scores higher in comfort and consistency across sizes.
Kleber Krisalp HP3 counters with compelling value and thrift. It more often wins on sticker price and value metrics (7 category wins vs 1) and keeps pace on snow, occasionally topping snow braking in recent tests. For buyers in reliably snowy, mountainous regions who prioritize price and strong snow safety-and can accept slightly longer wet stops at times-the Kleber is a smart, economical pick.
Practical takeaway: choose BFGoodrich for broader winter security and longevity in mixed conditions; choose Kleber to maximize value in predominantly snowy climates without breaking the bank.
gForce Winter 2 vs Krisalp HP3: your questions
Is the BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2 or the Kleber Krisalp HP3 the better tire?
In the 20 independent tests that ran both tires, the BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2 finished ahead 13 times and the Krisalp HP3 5 times, with 2 level. On the Tire Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the gForce Winter 2 scores 8.3 and the Krisalp HP3 8.1 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the gForce Winter 2 or the Krisalp HP3?
The gForce Winter 2 led 28 of the 51 wet measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 0.7% shorter in the wet across 18 tests.
Which is better in the dry?
The Krisalp HP3 led 10 of the 19 dry measurements the shared tests recorded.
Which is better in snow?
Across the shared tests the snow measurements are split 18-18 between the gForce Winter 2 and the Krisalp HP3.
Which lasts longer and costs less to run?
The gForce Winter 2 lasted 3.1% longer in the wear tests (10 tests) and had 0.8% lower rolling resistance (9 tests). Owners rate wear 8.7/10 for the gForce Winter 2 and 8.4/10 for the Krisalp HP3.
Which is quieter and more comfortable?
Owners rate comfort 9.2/10 for the gForce Winter 2 and 8.8/10 for the Krisalp HP3.
What do owners say?
Owners rate the gForce Winter 2 89% from 30 reviews and the Krisalp HP3 84% from 36. 100% of gForce Winter 2 owners would buy it again, against 71% for the Krisalp HP3.
Which is more expensive?
In the 8 tests that listed prices, the gForce Winter 2 was the dearer tire in 8 of them, by 9.1% on average. Prices are the test's own at the time, in its own market.
Are they available in the same sizes?
The gForce Winter 2 is made in 75 sizes (14 to 20 inch) and the Krisalp HP3 in 75 (14 to 20 inch). 75 sizes are available in both. On the EU label the gForce Winter 2 is graded B for wet grip and D for rolling resistance in most sizes; the Krisalp HP3 B and D.
More comparisons with these tires
vs
Barum Polaris 6 vs Kleber Krisalp HP3
2-1 in 4 shared tests
vs
Firestone Winterhawk 4 vs Kleber Krisalp HP3
5-10 in 15 shared tests
vs
Hankook Winter I cept RS3 vs Kleber Krisalp HP3
6-0 in 6 shared tests
vs
Hankook Winter i cept evo3 vs Kleber Krisalp HP3
5-3 in 8 shared tests
vs 
Kleber Krisalp HP3 vs Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
0-11 in 11 shared tests
vs
BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2 vs Hankook Winter i cept evo3
5-3 in 8 shared tests
vs
Fulda Kristall Control HP2 vs Kleber Krisalp HP3
4-18 in 22 shared tests
vs
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs Kleber Krisalp HP3
8-1 in 10 shared tests
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tire wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tires ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tire Reviews Score rates each tire out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tires can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tire Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tires independently since 2007.
Discussion