Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs Kleber Krisalp HP3
- TR Score
- 9.5/10
- Owners say
- 90% · 15
- TR Score
- 8.1/10
- Owners say
- 84% · 36
In the 10 independent tests that ran both tires, the Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 finished ahead 8 times and the Krisalp HP3 once, with one level. The UltraGrip Performance 3 lasted 22.9% longer in the wear tests; the Krisalp HP3 stopped 2.2% shorter on snow.
Data updated
Which should you buy?
For most drivers in wet, mixed, and predominantly cleared-winter-road climates, choose the Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3-it's the more balanced tire with clearly superior wet braking and typically stronger longevity. Choose the Kleber Krisalp HP3 if your priority is maximum snow braking/traction in consistently snowy or mountainous use, and you can accept longer wet-road stopping distances as the trade-off.
Where the UltraGrip Performance 3 is stronger
- Consistently shorter wet braking across all shared tests (9/9 wins), often by ~9-10% in key comparisons (e.g., ADAC 2025, Auto Bild 2025)
- Stronger all-round test results and placements (typically top-5, including 1/31 in ADAC 2025; vs Kleber often mid-pack)
- Better dry-road performance (dry braking and dry handling wins across the shared dataset) with more precise, confidence-inspiring dynamics in professional comments
Where the Krisalp HP3 is stronger
- Repeated snow-braking advantage (9/9 snow braking wins), aligning with its “snow specialist” profile
- Often strong snow traction and snow disciplines in testing (notably Auto Bild 2025 traction 2619 N vs 2413 N; and strong snow slalom/handling in several results)
- Generally good straight-line aquaplaning resistance (wins straight aqua in multiple tests and is often noted as strong here)
The bullet points are analysis of the shared tests and of owner reviews; the measured wins in each discipline are in the tables below. Where the two disagree, the figures are right.
UltraGrip Performance 3 vs Krisalp HP3 at a glance
| Category | UltraGrip Performance 3 | Gap | Krisalp HP3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shared tests won10 shared tests | 8 | 1 level | 1 |
| Dry12 measurements | 11 | The UltraGrip Performance 3 stopped 3% shorter in the dry (6 tests) | 1 |
| Wet34 measurements | 29 | The UltraGrip Performance 3 stopped 4.8% shorter in the wet (10 tests) | 5 |
| Snow27 measurements | 6 | The Krisalp HP3 stopped 2.2% shorter on snow (10 tests) | 20 |
| Ice1 measurement | 1 | 0 | |
| Comfort9 measurements | 8 | The UltraGrip Performance 3 was 1 dB quieter (6 tests) | 1 |
| Value12 measurements | 9 | The UltraGrip Performance 3 lasted 22.9% longer in the wear tests (5 tests) | 3 |
| Tire Reviews Scoreevery test and review we hold | 9.5/10 | The UltraGrip Performance 3 by 1.4 | 8.1/10 |
| Owner rating15 and 36 reviews | 90% | The UltraGrip Performance 3 by 6 points | 84% |
| Would buy againshare of owners | 100% | The UltraGrip Performance 3 by 29 points | 71% |
| Pricein the 7 tests that listed prices | +25.9% | The UltraGrip Performance 3 was dearer in 7 of 7 | Cheaper |
| Sizes madeEU label registrations | 175 | 49 sizes made in both | 75 |
Wins count every measurement the shared tests recorded for both tires; a tick marks the tire ahead on that line. Subjective driver scores count as wins but are never averaged, because each test uses its own scale.
Head to head in 10 tests, 2023 to 2026
Each row is one published test in which both tires ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | UltraGrip Performance 3 | Field | Krisalp HP3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 Auto Bild Winter Tire Test | P5 of 20 | P5 of 20 | |
| 2026 Winter Tire Braking Test - 50 Sets | P9 of 50 | P7 of 50 | |
| 2026 Sport Auto Winter Tire Test | P3 of 9 | P8 of 9 | |
| 2025 Autobild Winter Tire Test | P5 of 20 | P14 of 20 | |
| 2025 Winter Tire Braking Test - 52 Sets! | P3 of 51 | P12 of 51 | |
| 2025 ADAC Winter Tire Test | P1 of 31 | P7 of 31 | |
| 2024 Auto Bild Winter Tire Test | P2 of 20 | P8 of 20 | |
| 2024 Winter 55 Tire Braking Test | P9 of 55 | P16 of 55 | |
| 2023 Auto Bild Winter Tire Test | P2 of 20 | P11 of 20 | |
| 2023 Winter Tire Test 54 Set Braking Test | P3 of 54 | P4 of 54 |
Performance profile
16 measurements from the 10 shared tests, each tire shown as its share of the better figure in every test.
Where each is furthest ahead
UltraGrip Performance 3
Krisalp HP3
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 118 ft stop against 112 ft is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it. The scale stops at 95%: a point further in sits on the hub's edge, hollow. 7 measurements recorded in only one shared test are left off; every measurement is in the table further down.
Where each scores higher
UltraGrip Performance 3
Krisalp HP3
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tires of the same season and class: 90 means this tire out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Where owners rate each higher
UltraGrip Performance 3
Krisalp HP3
Not ahead in any category
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
Owners rate the UltraGrip Performance 3 90% from 15 reviews and the Krisalp HP3 84% from 36. Each spoke is one question owners answer out of 10; reviews are vetted by hand before publication.
Every measurement, side by side
Averages of the figures both tires posted in the same tests. The gap is the average of each test's own gap, so figures from different cars and years are never mixed. Open a discipline for its measurements, and a measurement for every test's figure.
| Measurement | UltraGrip Performance 3 | Gap | Krisalp HP3 | Wins | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 144 | 3% | 149 | 6-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 69.9 | 0.5% | 69.5 | 4-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| scored | 29.9% | scored | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 140 | 4.8% | 147 | 10-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 120 | 10.1% | 134 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 50.1 | 3.7% | 48.3 | 5-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| scored | 50% | scored | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 12.2 | 9.2% | 11.5 | 2-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 12.37 | 2.4% | 12.67 | 4-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 52 | 1.1% | 52.6 | 2-4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 9.4 | 1% | 9.3 | 4-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 89 | 2.2% | 87 | 0-10 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 496 | 1.6% | 507 | 2-4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 40.3 | 0.3% | 40.1 | 2-3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| scored | 25% | scored | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 10.9 | 2% | 11.1 | 1-3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 55 | 0.6% | 55 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| scored | 18.2% | scored | 3-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 69.67 | 1 dB | 70.65 | 5-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 34,648 | 22.9% | 28,297 | 5-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 8.49 | 0.3% | 8.5 | 3-2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 5.8 | 1.7% | 5.7 | 0-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 50 | 21.9% | 64 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tires shared. "Scored" rows are subjective driver ratings: each test uses its own scale, so only the wins are counted.
Scores beyond the shared tests
On the Tire Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the UltraGrip Performance 3 scores 9.5 and the Krisalp HP3 8.1 out of 10.
| UltraGrip Performance 3 | Category | Krisalp HP3 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 89 | Dry | 34 | ||
| 95 | Wet | 72 | ||
| 85 | Comfort | 55 | ||
| 70 | Value | 51 | ||
| 87 | Snow | 90 | ||
| 22 | Ice | 20 | ||
Category scores are percentiles among tires of the same season and class: 90 means this tire out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
What owners say
| UltraGrip Performance 3 | Category | Krisalp HP3 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8.6 | Dry Grip | 8.5 | ||
| 8.8 | Wet Grip | 8.5 | ||
| 8.6 | Road Feedback | 8.2 | ||
| 8.1 | Handling | 8.1 | ||
| 9 | Wear | 8.4 | ||
| 8.8 | Comfort | 8.8 | ||
| 9.5 | Snow Grip | 8.9 | ||
| 8.1 | Ice Grip | 8 | ||
Owners rate the UltraGrip Performance 3 90% from 15 reviews and the Krisalp HP3 84% from 36. Reviews are vetted by hand before publication; ownership is not verified.
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3
- 90%from 15 reviews
- 100%would buy again
- 62,800 milesdriven by reviewers
Drivers rate the Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 very highly, praising its excellent grip and braking on dry and wet roads, strong traction in snow, and a quiet, comfortable, and predictable ride. Handling is often described as stable and confidence-inspiring, with several noting good highway manners. A minority mention weaker performance on pure ice and a softer, less sporty steering feel at the limit. Overall sentiment is strongly positive with only a few caveats.
- strong dry grip and braking
- excellent wet grip and braking
- very good snow traction
- quiet and comfortable ride
- limited grip on pure ice compared to some rivals
- softer steering feel and less sporty lateral grip at high speeds
Summarised by AI from 12 vetted reviews; the reviews themselves are on the tire page.
All 15 UltraGrip Performance 3 reviewsThis is exceptional tire in winter i swapped it now with Michelin PA 5 which is even better on snow but lucks a bit on wet. But you cant go wrong with niether of those. I cant wait Michelin s to worn out so i can try pirelli.
Kleber Krisalp HP3
- 84%from 36 reviews
- 71%would buy again
- 459,168 milesdriven by reviewers
Most drivers rate the Kleber Krisalp HP3 highly, praising its strong snow and wet performance, low noise/comfort for a winter tire, and decent wear/value. Dry grip and handling precision are adequate for normal driving but can feel soft with noticeable understeer if pushed; several users report a 'jelly/boat-like' feel. A minority mention noise at certain speeds, vibration/manufacturing issues in specific batches, and weaker performance on ice or slush at higher speeds. Overall sentiment is positive with safety and winter capability as standout strengths.
- snow traction and braking
- wet grip and aquaplaning resistance
- low noise/comfort for a winter tire
- good wear and value
- soft sidewalls/boat-like feel; weak handling precision when pushed
- dry grip/cornering weaker vs summer tires
- ice/slush performance can be limited at higher speeds
Summarised by AI from 26 vetted reviews; the reviews themselves are on the tire page.
All 36 Krisalp HP3 reviewsGreat snow and ice grip, much better than any winter tire i had before.
Good durability as well. Dry grip is fine, wet grip not as much and must be kept in mind. Not very noisy for a winter tire either. Would buy again if they are on discount.
Sizes, EU label and lineage
From the EU label registrations for each tire: 175 sizes of the UltraGrip Performance 3 and 75 of the Krisalp HP3, 49 of them made in both.
| Category | UltraGrip Performance 3 | Krisalp HP3 |
|---|---|---|
| Season | Winter | Winter |
| Sizes made | 175 sizes, 14 to 23 inch | 75 sizes, 14 to 20 inch |
| Made in both | 49 sizes 175/65 R14175/65 R15185/60 R15185/65 R15195/60 R15195/65 R15195/55 R16195/60 R16205/45 R16205/55 R16205/60 R16215/55 R16and 37 more | |
| EU label wet grip | B60%C39%D0%A0% | B90%C10% |
| EU label rolling resistance | C74%B16%D9%A1%E0% | D50%C48%B2% |
| EU label noise | 69-74 dB B87%A13% | 68-71 dB A81%B19% |
| Severe snow (3PMSF) sizes | 415 of 415 | 112 of 112 |
| On the market since | - | 2016 |
| Replaced | - | Kleber Krisalp HP2 (2013) |
| Awards | Commended: Best Winter Tire (DriverReviews, 2025/26) | - |
| Price in the shared tests | The UltraGrip Performance 3 was the dearer tire in 7 of the 7 tests that listed prices, by 25.9% on average. Each test priced the tires in its own market at the time; only the gap is comparable. | |
Label grades are shown as the share of registered sizes carrying each grade, so "B (88%), C (12%)" means most sizes are B. Grades vary by size; check the label for yours.
Reading the results
Written from the test results and owner reviews above. It is analysis, not a measurement: where it and the tables disagree, the tables are right.
Goodyear's UltraGrip Performance 3 and Kleber's Krisalp HP3 are both mainstream European-style winter tires, but they're tuned for different priorities. The Goodyear is positioned as an Ultra-High-Performance winter tire-aimed at drivers who still want crisp road manners and high wet-road safety-while the Kleber is a more touring-oriented option that repeatedly shows a stronger “snow-first” bias in independent testing.
Across nine shared tests (spanning 205/45 R17 up to 245/45 R19), the pattern is remarkably consistent: Goodyear dominates wet and dry metrics and usually finishes much higher overall, whereas Kleber keeps beating Goodyear on snow braking and often looks like the better choice if your winter is frequently white rather than merely cold and rainy. The interesting twist is that both tires can look “right” depending on where and how you drive-because their biggest performance gaps sit exactly where winter conditions diverge most: wet asphalt versus snow traction and braking.
Conclusion
If you drive mostly on cold wet roads (typical of much of Western/Central Europe), the Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 is the safer, more confidence-inspiring pick and the better all-rounder in the shared data. It wins wet braking in all 9/9 shared comparisons, often by meaningful margins-e.g., in ADAC 2025: 31.7 m vs 35.0 m (≈9.4% shorter), and in Auto Bild 2025: 50.9 m vs 56.6 m (≈10.1% shorter). It also consistently beats the Kleber on dry braking/handling and tends to be quieter, while repeatedly showing stronger predicted wear/mileage (e.g., ADAC 2025: 76,500 km vs 52,700 km).
The Kleber Krisalp HP3's core argument is snow: it wins snow braking in 9/9 shared datasets, sometimes by a small margin (often ~0.3-3%), and sometimes by more decisive gaps (Auto Bild 2025: 27.1 m vs 28.5 m, ≈4.9%). In the tests' qualitative notes, it's repeatedly described as a strong snow specialist with good reserves on snow and good aquaplaning-in-a-straight, but it gives away too much on wet braking and wet handling to consistently rank near the top overall-most starkly in sport auto 2026, where its wet braking was penalized and it finished 8th/9.
Practical takeaway: pick the Goodyear if your winter miles are mostly wet tarmac, mixed conditions, motorway slush, and variable temperatures-its wet stopping distances and overall balance are the stronger safety net, and it tends to last longer. Choose the Kleber if you genuinely spend a lot of time on packed snow/untreated roads (mountain regions, rural commutes) and you're willing to accept a clear wet-road stopping-distance penalty to gain snow-braking reassurance.
UltraGrip Performance 3 vs Krisalp HP3: your questions
Is the Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 or the Kleber Krisalp HP3 the better tire?
In the 10 independent tests that ran both tires, the Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 finished ahead 8 times and the Krisalp HP3 once, with one level. On the Tire Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the UltraGrip Performance 3 scores 9.5 and the Krisalp HP3 8.1 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the UltraGrip Performance 3 or the Krisalp HP3?
The UltraGrip Performance 3 led 29 of the 34 wet measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 4.8% shorter in the wet across 10 tests.
Which is better in the dry?
The UltraGrip Performance 3 led 11 of the 12 dry measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 3% shorter in the dry across 6 tests.
Which is better in snow?
The Krisalp HP3 led 20 of the 27 snow measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 2.2% shorter on snow across 10 tests.
Which lasts longer and costs less to run?
The UltraGrip Performance 3 lasted 22.9% longer in the wear tests (5 tests). Owners rate wear 9/10 for the UltraGrip Performance 3 and 8.4/10 for the Krisalp HP3.
Which is quieter and more comfortable?
The UltraGrip Performance 3 was 1 dB quieter (6 tests). Owners rate comfort 8.8/10 for the UltraGrip Performance 3 and 8.8/10 for the Krisalp HP3.
What do owners say?
Owners rate the UltraGrip Performance 3 90% from 15 reviews and the Krisalp HP3 84% from 36. 100% of UltraGrip Performance 3 owners would buy it again, against 71% for the Krisalp HP3.
Which is more expensive?
In the 7 tests that listed prices, the UltraGrip Performance 3 was the dearer tire in 7 of them, by 25.9% on average. Prices are the test's own at the time, in its own market.
Are they available in the same sizes?
The UltraGrip Performance 3 is made in 175 sizes (14 to 23 inch) and the Krisalp HP3 in 75 (14 to 20 inch). 49 sizes are available in both. On the EU label the UltraGrip Performance 3 is graded B for wet grip and C for rolling resistance in most sizes; the Krisalp HP3 B and D.
More comparisons with these tires
vs
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3
8-16 in 25 shared tests
vs 
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
3-14 in 18 shared tests
vs
Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3
7-16 in 24 shared tests
vs 
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs Michelin Alpin 7
8-4 in 12 shared tests
vs
Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3
10-1 in 11 shared tests
vs 
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs Hankook Winter I cept RS3
11-2 in 13 shared tests
vs
Barum Polaris 6 vs Kleber Krisalp HP3
2-1 in 4 shared tests
vs
Dunlop Winter Sport 5 vs Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3
0-8 in 8 shared tests
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tire wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tires ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tire Reviews Score rates each tire out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tires can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tire Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tires independently since 2007.
Discussion