Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 vs Falken Euroall Season AS220 Pro
- TR Score
- 9.4/10
- Owners say
- 79% · 44
- TR Score
- 8.1/10
- Owners say
- 86% · 3
In the 7 independent tests that ran both tires, the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 finished ahead 7 times and the Euroall Season AS220 Pro not once. The Turanza All Season 6 lasted 54.9% longer in the wear tests.
Data updated
Which should you buy?
Choose the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 if you want the safer, more complete all-season-especially for frequent rain, motorway driving, and lowest long-term running costs (wear + rolling resistance). Consider the Falken Euroall Season AS220 Pro only if it's significantly cheaper and your use is biased toward drier roads (and you're willing to give up wet braking/aquaplaning safety margin for that value and occasional dry-handling advantage).
Where the Turanza All Season 6 is stronger
- Wet safety advantage is consistent: wins wet braking in all shared tests (e.g., AMS 32.0 m vs 33.3 m; Auto Bild 45.0 m vs 46.0 m) and is generally stronger in wet handling and grip
- Stronger aquaplaning resistance almost across the board (e.g., AMS straight aquaplaning 80.3 vs 75.4 km/h; Motor SUV 79.4 vs 74.7 km/h), giving a bigger high-speed rain margin
- Lower running costs where measured: clearly longer predicted wear (Auto Zeitung 50,250 vs 30,500 km; Auto Bild 49,794 vs 34,319 km) and usually lower rolling resistance/fuel use
Where the Euroall Season AS220 Pro is stronger
- Can be competitive in dry handling feel/pace in several tests (wins 3/7 on dry handling metrics), suiting drivers who prioritize steering response on dry roads
- Often slightly quieter on external noise in the shared data (wins 4/7 on noise, though margins are small)
- Shows flashes of winter capability in specific scenarios (e.g., AMS snow traction and slalom wins, plus a strong subjective snow score there), suggesting a more “snow-friendly” setup in some sizes/batches
The bullet points are analysis of the shared tests and of owner reviews; the measured wins in each discipline are in the tables below. Where the two disagree, the figures are right.
Turanza All Season 6 vs Euroall Season AS220 Pro at a glance
| Category | Turanza All Season 6 | Gap | Euroall Season AS220 Pro |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shared tests won7 shared tests | 7 | 0 | |
| Dry16 measurements | 12 | The Turanza All Season 6 stopped 3.3% shorter in the dry (7 tests) | 3 |
| Wet31 measurements | 28 | The Turanza All Season 6 stopped 2.8% shorter in the wet (7 tests) | 3 |
| Snow26 measurements | 21 | The Turanza All Season 6 stopped 5.4% shorter on snow (6 tests) | 4 |
| Comfort10 measurements | 3 | 5 | |
| Value10 measurements | 9 | The Turanza All Season 6 lasted 54.9% longer in the wear tests (2 tests) | 1 |
| Tire Reviews Scoreevery test and review we hold | 9.4/10 | The Turanza All Season 6 by 1.3 | 8.1/10 |
| Owner rating44 and 3 reviews | 79% | The Euroall Season AS220 Pro by 7 points | 86% |
| Pricein the 3 tests that listed prices | +23.9% | The Turanza All Season 6 was dearer in 3 of 3 | Cheaper |
| Sizes madeEU label registrations | 105 | 46 sizes made in both | 61 |
Wins count every measurement the shared tests recorded for both tires; a tick marks the tire ahead on that line. Subjective driver scores count as wins but are never averaged, because each test uses its own scale.
Head to head in 7 tests, 2023 to 2026
Each row is one published test in which both tires ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | Turanza All Season 6 | Field | Euroall Season AS220 Pro |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 AMS All Season Tire Test - 195/55 R16 | P5 of 9 | P9 of 9 | |
| 2026 Auto Zeitung All Season Tire Test | P5 of 10 | P10 of 10 | |
| 2024 Motor SUV All Season Tire Test | P3 of 9 | P5 of 9 | |
| 2024 Sports Car All Season Tire Test | P4 of 11 | P8 of 11 | |
| 2023 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test | P3 of 16 | P16 of 16 | |
| 2023 All Season Tire 35 Set Shootout | P1 of 35 | P6 of 35 | |
| 2023 SUV All Season Tire Test | P1 of 10 | P6 of 10 |
Performance profile
21 measurements from the 7 shared tests, each tire shown as its share of the better figure in every test.
Where each is furthest ahead
Turanza All Season 6
Euroall Season AS220 Pro
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 118 ft stop against 112 ft is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it. The scale stops at 85%: a point further in sits on the hub's edge, hollow. 6 measurements recorded in only one shared test are left off; every measurement is in the table further down.
Where each scores higher
Turanza All Season 6
Euroall Season AS220 Pro
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tires of the same season and class: 90 means this tire out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Where owners rate each higher
Turanza All Season 6
Euroall Season AS220 Pro
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
Owners rate the Turanza All Season 6 79% from 44 reviews and the Euroall Season AS220 Pro 86% from 3. Each spoke is one question owners answer out of 10; reviews are vetted by hand before publication.
Every measurement, side by side
Averages of the figures both tires posted in the same tests. The gap is the average of each test's own gap, so figures from different cars and years are never mixed. Open a discipline for its measurements, and a measurement for every test's figure.
| Measurement | Turanza All Season 6 | Gap | Euroall Season AS220 Pro | Wins | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 127 | 3.3% | 132 | 7-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 62.58 | 0.1% | 62.58 | 1-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 60.2 | 0.3% | 60.3 | 1-2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| scored | 13.2% | scored | 2-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| scored | 42.9% | scored | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 143 | 2.8% | 147 | 7-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 83.5 | = | 83.5 | 1-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 49.4 | 1.9% | 48.5 | 4-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| scored | 9.1% | scored | 2-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 17.1 | 0.1% | 17.1 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 13.58 | 0.8% | 13.7 | 3-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 50 | 4.7% | 47.8 | 6-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 10.2 | 3.1% | 9.9 | 4-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 84 | 5.4% | 89 | 4-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 8.96 | 13.4% | 10.35 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 412 | 6.3% | 382 | 5-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 80.2 | 3.4% | 83 | 2-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 46.9 | 3.7% | 45.3 | 4-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| scored | 15.9% | scored | 1-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 13.4 | 11.1% | 12 | 4-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| scored | 29.2% | scored | 2-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 72.17 | 0.3 dB | 71.88 | 1-4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 82 | 2.4% | 80 | 0-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 31,082 | 54.9% | 20,138 | 2-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 6.61 | 4.9% | 7 | 5-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 5.46 | 3.2% | 5.64 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 0.1 | 32.4% | 0.15 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tires shared. "Scored" rows are subjective driver ratings: each test uses its own scale, so only the wins are counted.
Scores beyond the shared tests
On the Tire Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the Turanza All Season 6 scores 9.4 and the Euroall Season AS220 Pro 8.1 out of 10.
| Turanza All Season 6 | Category | Euroall Season AS220 Pro | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 96 | Dry | 67 | ||
| 93 | Wet | 26 | ||
| 34 | Comfort | 27 | ||
| 58 | Value | - | ||
| 64 | Snow | 73 | ||
| 21 | Ice | - | ||
Category scores are percentiles among tires of the same season and class: 90 means this tire out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
What owners say
| Turanza All Season 6 | Category | Euroall Season AS220 Pro | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8.8 | Dry Grip | 8.7 | ||
| 8.7 | Wet Grip | 8.7 | ||
| 7.6 | Road Feedback | 8.3 | ||
| 7.9 | Handling | 8 | ||
| 8.4 | Wear | 8 | ||
| 7.7 | Comfort | 8.7 | ||
| 7.6 | Snow Grip | 10 | ||
| 7.3 | Ice Grip | - | ||
Owners rate the Turanza All Season 6 79% from 44 reviews and the Euroall Season AS220 Pro 86% from 3. Reviews are vetted by hand before publication; ownership is not verified.
Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6
- 79%from 44 reviews
- 76%would buy again
- 393,509 milesdriven by reviewers
Owners broadly rate the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 as a very safe, summer-leaning all-season tire, with a clear consensus around strong wet grip (mentioned by over half of reviewers) and similarly impressive dry grip. Snow traction is generally described as capable for occasional winter use, and around a third of owners also report encouraging tread life. The main drawbacks are feel and efficiency: around one in four owners complain of numb steering feedback and a similar share report higher rolling resistance/fuel consumption, while road noise is divisive with near-even praise and criticism.
- Very strong wet grip and confidence in heavy rain
- High dry grip that feels close to a summer tire
- Capable snow traction for light to moderate winter conditions
- Good tread life for year-round use
- Numb steering feel and limited feedback near the limit
- Higher rolling resistance and a noticeable fuel economy hit for some
- Road noise can be intrusive on certain surfaces, despite others finding it quiet
Summarised by AI from 43 vetted reviews; the reviews themselves are on the tire page.
All 44 Turanza All Season 6 reviewsNow nearly 2 years and 20k miles in. These tires are still as good as they were new and tread has only dropped to 5-6mm all round, suggesting >40,000 miles a set which is more than the OE Pirelli P7 summer tires managed. Have experienced winter slush and light snow without any grip issues, when the car felt stable and safe, but as I live on the south coast with regular trips to family in Yorkshire, they don’t need to be a dedicated winter tire. Economy unchanged around 45mpg overall, 50mpg on a motorway run. For my use, these have been very impressive and I would be happy to replace them with another set, although there may be even better choices in 3 years when these should be just about done.
Falken Euroall Season AS220 Pro
- 86%from 3 reviews
- 4,000 milesdriven by reviewers
All 3 Euroall Season AS220 Pro reviewsCar handels very well on this tires. It's C5 Aircross.
They are quiet, comfortable and predictable. Grip and braking is very good on dry and wet. Tried them on snow in steep climbs, full throttle in second speed and no wheel spin or traction control activation so excellent grip on snow.
Can't say on ice and can't comment wear because I've got them for two months and 1500 km.
Overall they are little more expensive than Kleber quadraxler or Kumho all season tires but I think it's worth it because of comfort, handling and noise they offer.
Sizes, EU label and lineage
From the EU label registrations for each tire: 105 sizes of the Turanza All Season 6 and 61 of the Euroall Season AS220 Pro, 46 of them made in both.
| Category | Turanza All Season 6 | Euroall Season AS220 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Season | All Season | All Season |
| Sizes made | 105 sizes, 16 to 21 inch | 61 sizes, 17 to 21 inch |
| Made in both | 46 sizes 225/45 R17225/50 R17235/45 R17235/55 R17235/60 R17235/65 R17245/45 R17225/40 R18225/45 R18225/55 R18225/60 R18235/40 R18and 34 more | |
| EU label wet grip | B100% | B100% |
| EU label rolling resistance | C73%B16%D11% | C73%D24%B3% |
| EU label noise | 70-72 dB B100% | 71-74 dB B100% |
| Severe snow (3PMSF) sizes | 163 of 166 | 63 of 63 |
| On the market since | 2023 | 2023 |
| Replaced | Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO (2020) | - |
| Awards | Highly Recommended: Best All Season Tires for SUVs (DriverReviews, 2026/27) | - |
| Price in the shared tests | The Turanza All Season 6 was the dearer tire in 3 of the 3 tests that listed prices, by 23.9% on average. Each test priced the tires in its own market at the time; only the gap is comparable. | |
Label grades are shown as the share of registered sizes carrying each grade, so "B (88%), C (12%)" means most sizes are B. Grades vary by size; check the label for yours.
Reading the results
Written from the test results and owner reviews above. It is analysis, not a measurement: where it and the tables disagree, the tables are right.
This is a comparison between two very different takes on the European all-season brief: the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 (a premium-touring, comfort-and-safety oriented all-season) and the Falken Euroall Season AS220 Pro (positioned more as an ultra-high-performance all-season with a value angle). Across seven shared professional tests, they've been evaluated on the full spread of real-world priorities-dry and wet stopping, handling, aquaplaning, winter traction, efficiency, noise, and in some tests, wear and running costs.
What stands out immediately in the results is not a “close call” pattern: the Bridgestone repeatedly lands mid-pack to podium or outright wins in overall rankings (including 1st/10 and 1st/35 in two tests), while the Falken frequently finishes near the back (including 16th/16, 10th/10 and 9th/9). The nuance is where those gaps come from: the Falken can look lively in some dry handling metrics and often measures slightly quieter, but the Bridgestone builds its advantage where all-seasons most often get caught out-wet braking, aquaplaning security, and (in most tests) winter traction and controllability.
Conclusion
Across the seven shared tests, the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 is the clearly stronger, more complete all-season. It wins every shared dry-braking and wet-braking comparison (7/7 in both categories), and it repeatedly delivers higher aquaplaning speeds (e.g., AMS straight aquaplaning 80.3 vs 75.4 km/h; Auto Bild 79.8 vs 76.1 km/h; Motor SUV 79.4 vs 74.7 km/h). Those are not “paper” differences-on real roads, they translate directly into shorter stopping distances in the rain and a larger safety margin through standing water, which is exactly where all-season tires most need to be trustworthy.
The Falken Euroall Season AS220 Pro's best argument is that it can feel/measure competitive in certain dry handling tests (it takes several dry-handling wins on time/speed) and it often posts slightly lower external noise. However, its recurring weakness is wet safety: in AMS it is last in wet braking and last in both aquaplaning disciplines, and this “water in every form” theme is echoed elsewhere by weaker wet scores and confidence at the limit. Add to that the durability and cost story from Auto Zeitung and Auto Bild-Bridgestone's predicted wear advantage is large (e.g., 50,250 vs 30,500 km in Auto Zeitung; 49,794 vs 34,319 km in Auto Bild) along with better rolling resistance-and the Turanza All Season 6 becomes the more rational long-term buy even before you factor in its wet-weather edge.
Practical takeaway: if you want one tire to leave on year-round without constantly thinking about weather changes, the Bridgestone is the safer, more rounded choice and typically the cheaper-to-run one. The Falken only makes sense if the price is compelling and your driving is biased toward drier conditions-because in heavy rain and highway standing-water scenarios, its test pattern shows the exact weaknesses you least want in an all-season.
Turanza All Season 6 vs Euroall Season AS220 Pro: your questions
Is the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 or the Falken Euroall Season AS220 Pro the better tire?
In the 7 independent tests that ran both tires, the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 finished ahead 7 times and the Euroall Season AS220 Pro not once. On the Tire Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the Turanza All Season 6 scores 9.4 and the Euroall Season AS220 Pro 8.1 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the Turanza All Season 6 or the Euroall Season AS220 Pro?
The Turanza All Season 6 led 28 of the 31 wet measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 2.8% shorter in the wet across 7 tests.
Which is better in the dry?
The Turanza All Season 6 led 12 of the 16 dry measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 3.3% shorter in the dry across 7 tests.
Which is better in snow?
The Turanza All Season 6 led 21 of the 26 snow measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 5.4% shorter on snow across 6 tests.
Which lasts longer and costs less to run?
The Turanza All Season 6 lasted 54.9% longer in the wear tests (2 tests) and had 4.9% lower rolling resistance (6 tests). Owners rate wear 8.4/10 for the Turanza All Season 6 and 8/10 for the Euroall Season AS220 Pro.
Which is quieter and more comfortable?
Owners rate comfort 7.7/10 for the Turanza All Season 6 and 8.7/10 for the Euroall Season AS220 Pro.
What do owners say?
Owners rate the Turanza All Season 6 79% from 44 reviews and the Euroall Season AS220 Pro 86% from 3.
Which is more expensive?
In the 3 tests that listed prices, the Turanza All Season 6 was the dearer tire in 3 of them, by 23.9% on average. Prices are the test's own at the time, in its own market.
Are they available in the same sizes?
The Turanza All Season 6 is made in 105 sizes (16 to 21 inch) and the Euroall Season AS220 Pro in 61 (17 to 21 inch). 46 sizes are available in both. On the EU label the Turanza All Season 6 is graded B for wet grip and C for rolling resistance in most sizes; the Euroall Season AS220 Pro B and C.
More comparisons with these tires
vs 
Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 vs Continental AllSeasonContact 2
9-18 in 30 shared tests
vs 
Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
8-5 in 15 shared tests
vs 
Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 vs Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF3
5-23 in 29 shared tests
vs 
Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 vs Michelin CrossClimate 3
4-6 in 10 shared tests
vs 
Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 vs Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3
14-7 in 21 shared tests
vs 
Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 vs Goodyear Vector All Season 4
1-6 in 7 shared tests
vs 
Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 vs Hankook Kinergy 4S2
8-3 in 13 shared tests
vs 
Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 vs Michelin CrossClimate 3 Sport
1-5 in 6 shared tests
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tire wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Review the Turanza All Season 6 Review the Euroall Season AS220 Pro
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tires ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tire Reviews Score rates each tire out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tires can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tire Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tires independently since 2007.
Discussion