Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 vs Continental AllSeasonContact 2
Expect a close contest: Bridgestone frequently tops dry braking charts by 4-8% and resists aquaplaning better in most sizes, while Continental repeatedly wins wet handling, rolls more efficiently, runs quieter, and is notably stronger on snow and ice. The choice largely hinges on your climate and efficiency priorities.
Test Results
Independent comparison tire tests are the best source of data to get tire information from, and the good news is there have been twenty tests which compare both tires directly!
| Tire | Test Wins | Performance |
|---|---|---|
| Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 | six | |
| Continental AllSeasonContact 2 | twelve | |
| two draws in two tests | ||
While it might look like the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 is better than the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 purely based on the higher number of test wins, tires are very complicated objects which means where one tire is better than the other can be more important in real world use.
Let's look at how the two tires compare across multiple tire test categories.
Key Strengths
- Best-in-class dry braking across tests (often 4-8% shorter than Continental)
- Excellent aquaplaning resistance (straight and curved) in most sizes
- Strong wet braking and competitive wet performance
- Often better value/longevity in several tests (lower abrasion, good wear)
- Superior winter performance (snow traction/handling and ice braking)
- Lowest rolling resistance on test (fuel-saving efficiency)
- Consistently strong wet handling and balanced grip
- Lower noise and higher comfort ratings in multiple tests
Dry Braking
Looking at data from nineteen tire tests, the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 was better during eighteen dry braking tests. On average the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 stopped the vehicle in 4.74% less distance than the Continental AllSeasonContact 2.
Best In Dry Braking: Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6
See how the Dry Braking winner was calculated >>
Dry Handling [s]
Looking at data from six tire tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was better during four dry handling [s] tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was 0.13% faster around a lap than the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6.
Best In Dry Handling [s]: Continental AllSeasonContact 2
See how the Dry Handling winner was calculated >>
Dry Handling [Km/H]
Looking at data from eight tire tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was better during five dry handling [km/h] tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was 0.15% faster around a lap than the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6.
Best In Dry Handling [Km/H]: Continental AllSeasonContact 2
See how the Dry Handling winner was calculated >>
Subj. Dry Handling
Looking at data from four tire tests, the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 and Continental AllSeasonContact 2 performed equally well in subj. dry handling tests.
Best In Subj. Dry Handling: Both tires performed equally well
See how the Subj. Dry Handling winner was calculated >>
Wet Braking
Looking at data from nineteen tire tests, the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 was better during eleven wet braking tests. On average the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 stopped the vehicle in 0.8% less distance than the Continental AllSeasonContact 2.
Best In Wet Braking: Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6
See how the Wet Braking winner was calculated >>
Wet Braking - Low Grip
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was better during one wet braking - low grip tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 6.45% than the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6.
Best In Wet Braking - Low Grip: Continental AllSeasonContact 2
See how the Wet Braking - Low Grip winner was calculated >>
Wet Braking - Concrete
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was better during one wet braking - concrete tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 stopped the vehicle in 0.26% less distance than the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6.
Best In Wet Braking - Concrete: Continental AllSeasonContact 2
See how the Wet Braking - Concrete winner was calculated >>
Wet Handling [s]
Looking at data from seven tire tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was better during six wet handling [s] tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was 0.65% faster around a wet lap than the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6.
Best In Wet Handling [s]: Continental AllSeasonContact 2
See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>
Wet Handling [Km/H]
Looking at data from eight tire tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was better during six wet handling [km/h] tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was 1.64% faster around a wet lap than the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6.
Best In Wet Handling [Km/H]: Continental AllSeasonContact 2
See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>
Subj. Wet Handling
Looking at data from four tire tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was better during two subj. wet handling tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 scored 4.14% more points than the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6.
Best In Subj. Wet Handling: Continental AllSeasonContact 2
See how the Subj. Wet Handling winner was calculated >>
Wet Circle
Looking at data from eight tire tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was better during four wet circle tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was 0.37% faster around a wet circle than the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6.
Best In Wet Circle: Continental AllSeasonContact 2
See how the Wet Circle winner was calculated >>
Straight Aqua
Looking at data from sixteen tire tests, the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 was better during fourteen straight aqua tests. On average the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 floated at a 3.48% higher speed than the Continental AllSeasonContact 2.
Best In Straight Aqua: Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6
See how the Straight Aqua winner was calculated >>
Curved Aquaplaning
Looking at data from thirteen tire tests, the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 was better during eleven curved aquaplaning tests. On average the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 slipped out at a 5% higher speed than the Continental AllSeasonContact 2.
Best In Curved Aquaplaning: Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6
See how the Curved Aquaplaning winner was calculated >>
Snow Braking
Looking at data from fifteen tire tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was better during ten snow braking tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 stopped the vehicle in 1.38% less distance than the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6.
Best In Snow Braking: Continental AllSeasonContact 2
See how the Snow Braking winner was calculated >>
Snow Traction
Looking at data from five tire tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was better during four snow traction tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 accelerated 3.8% faster than the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6.
Best In Snow Traction: Continental AllSeasonContact 2
See how the Snow Traction winner was calculated >>
Snow Traction
Looking at data from eleven tire tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was better during eight snow traction tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 had 3.3% better snow traction than the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6.
Best In Snow Traction: Continental AllSeasonContact 2
See how the Snow Traction winner was calculated >>
Snow Handling [s]
Looking at data from six tire tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was better during five snow handling [s] tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was 2.02% faster around a lap than the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6.
Best In Snow Handling [s]: Continental AllSeasonContact 2
See how the Snow Handling winner was calculated >>
Snow Handling [Km/H]
Looking at data from eight tire tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was better during seven snow handling [km/h] tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was 1.89% faster around a lap than the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6.
Best In Snow Handling [Km/H]: Continental AllSeasonContact 2
See how the Snow Handling winner was calculated >>
Subj. Snow Handling
Looking at data from three tire tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was better during two subj. snow handling tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 scored 6% more points than the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6.
Best In Subj. Snow Handling: Continental AllSeasonContact 2
See how the Subj. Snow Handling winner was calculated >>
Snow Circle
Looking at data from four tire tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was better during three snow circle tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 provided 3.19% more lateral grip than the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6.
Best In Snow Circle: Continental AllSeasonContact 2
See how the Snow Circle winner was calculated >>
Snow Slalom
Looking at data from five tire tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was better during five snow slalom tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was 2.44% faster through a slalom than the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6.
Best In Snow Slalom: Continental AllSeasonContact 2
See how the Snow Slalom winner was calculated >>
Ice Braking
Looking at data from three tire tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was better during two ice braking tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 stopped the vehicle 2.77% shorter than the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6.
Best In Ice Braking: Continental AllSeasonContact 2
See how the Ice Braking winner was calculated >>
Ice Traction
Looking at data from two tire tests, the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 was better during one ice traction tests. On average the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 accelerated 0.4% faster than the Continental AllSeasonContact 2.
Best In Ice Traction: Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6
See how the Ice Traction winner was calculated >>
Subj. Comfort
Looking at data from four tire tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was better during two subj. comfort tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 scored 5.5% more points than the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6.
Best In Subj. Comfort: Continental AllSeasonContact 2
See how the Subj. Comfort winner was calculated >>
Subj. Noise
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was better during one subj. noise tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 scored 10% more points than the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6.
Best In Subj. Noise: Continental AllSeasonContact 2
See how the Subj. Noise winner was calculated >>
Noise
Looking at data from fourteen tire tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was better during thirteen noise tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 measured 1.19% quieter than the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6.
Best In Noise: Continental AllSeasonContact 2
See how the Noise winner was calculated >>
Tire Weight
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 and Continental AllSeasonContact 2 performed equally well in tire weight tests.
Best In Tire Weight: Both tires performed equally well
See how the Tire Weight winner was calculated >>
Wear
Looking at data from five tire tests, the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 was better during two wear tests. On average the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 is predicted to cover 0.52% miles before reaching 1.6mm than the Continental AllSeasonContact 2.
Best In Wear: Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6
See how the Wear winner was calculated >>
Value
Looking at data from five tire tests, the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 was better during three value tests. On average the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 proved to have a 6.28% better value based on price/1000km than the Continental AllSeasonContact 2.
Best In Value: Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6
See how the Value winner was calculated >>
Price
Looking at data from two tire tests, the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 was better during two price tests. On average the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 cost 9.35% less than the Continental AllSeasonContact 2.
Best In Price: Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6
See how the Price winner was calculated >>
Rolling Resistance
Looking at data from fifteen tire tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was better during fourteen rolling resistance tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 had a 8.05% lower rolling resistance than the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6.
Best In Rolling Resistance: Continental AllSeasonContact 2
See how the Rolling Resistance winner was calculated >>
Fuel Consumption
Looking at data from three tire tests, the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 was better during two fuel consumption tests. On average the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 used 0.37% less fuel than the Continental AllSeasonContact 2.
Best In Fuel Consumption: Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6
See how the Fuel Consumption winner was calculated >>
Abrasion
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 and Continental AllSeasonContact 2 performed equally well in abrasion tests.
Best In Abrasion: Both tires performed equally well
See how the Abrasion winner was calculated >>
Real World Driver Reviews
Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 Driver Reviews
Drivers generally report the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 as a confident, “summer-ish” all-season tire with strong dry and especially wet grip, good aquaplaning resistance, and a comfortable, often quiet ride. Many also note very good wear/longevity and good value versus rival premium all-seasons, making it a popular choice for mild, wet climates. The most repeated drawbacks are reduced steering feel (numbness) and slightly higher rolling resistance/fuel use, and several users caution that ice/deeper-winter performance is only average compared with a true winter tire.
Based on 34 reviews with an average rating of 79%
Continental AllSeasonContact 2 Driver Reviews
Drivers generally describe the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 as a very capable, confidence-inspiring all-season tire with standout wet grip, strong cold-weather traction, and reassuring light-snow performance, often paired with good comfort and low noise. Many high-scoring reviews also report stable, predictable behaviour across a wide temperature range and, in some cases, excellent tread life. The most repeated downside is a softer, less precise steering feel (on-centre vagueness/response delay), especially when driven hard in warm, dry conditions. A smaller but notable group also reports faster-than-expected wear on some vehicles/axles.
Based on 48 reviews with an average rating of 81%
Conclusion
If your winters are real-or you care about fuel economy and comfort-the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 is the more rounded year-rounder. It repeatedly finishes higher overall, wins most wet handling and nearly all snow/ice metrics, is quieter, and has the lowest rolling resistance on test, translating to lower fuel use. The practical takeaway: Bridgestone for milder climates and heavy rain confidence; Continental for colder regions and efficiency without obvious weaknesses.
Key Differences
- Bridgestone stops shorter on dry in virtually every test; Continental concedes dry braking but remains safe.
- Continental is stronger on snow and ice (traction, handling, and braking); Bridgestone is mid-pack on snow.
- Wet handling favors Continental; wet braking is usually a wash, with Bridgestone often marginally quicker.
- Aquaplaning resistance clearly favors Bridgestone (both straight and curved) in most sizes.
- Rolling resistance and cabin noise favor Continental (noticeably lower RR; quieter subjectively).
- Value and wear trade-offs: Bridgestone often shows lower abrasion and better price-per-1000 km; Continental sometimes posts higher predicted mileage but at a higher purchase price.
Overall Winner: Continental AllSeasonContact 2
Based on the tire test data and user reviews we have in our database, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 has demonstrated better overall performance in this comparison. However, as you can see from the spider diagram above, each tire has its own strengths which should be considered in your final tire buying choice.Similar Comparisons
Looking for more tire comparisons? Here are other direct comparisons involving these tires:
Footnote
This page has been developed using tire industry testing best practices. This means we are only comparing tests which have had both tires in the same test.
Why is this important? Tire testing is heavily affected by things like surface grip levels and surface temperature, which means you can only compare values from the same day. During a tire test external condition changes are calculated into the overall results, but it is not possible to calculate this between tire tests performed on different days or at different locations.
As a result you will see other tests on Tire Reviews which feature both the %s and %s, but as they weren't conducted on the same day, the results are not comparable.
Lots of other websites do this sort of tire comparison, Tire Reviews doesn't.
Discussion
- No comments yet — be the first.