Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 vs Continental AllSeasonContact 2

If your priority is the shortest stopping distances in mixed UK/EU climates and the strongest aquaplaning reserves, the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 delivers, frequently topping dry braking (13/13 category wins in shared data) and often leading wet braking and aquaplaning. It also shows attractive value in some wear/cost metrics. However, it's noisier on average and usually trails in rolling resistance, so fuel economy and cabin refinement aren't its strong suits.

The Continental AllSeasonContact 2 is the safer all-round pick for varied seasons including regular snow/ice. It tends to win overall tests thanks to superior wet and snow/ice handling consistency, lower noise, excellent efficiency (dominant in rolling resistance), and strong wear/value outcomes. Its main weaknesses are average aquaplaning reserves and longer dry stops versus Bridgestone. In short: choose Bridgestone for stopping power and heavy rain security; choose Continental for year-round balance, winter confidence, and lower running costs.

Similar Comparisons

Looking for more tire comparisons? Here are other direct comparisons involving these tires:

---

Footnote

This page has been developed using tire industry testing best practices. This means we are only comparing tests which have had both tires in the same test.

Why is this important? Tire testing is heavily affected by things like surface grip levels and surface temperature, which means you can only compare values from the same day. During a tire test external condition changes are calculated into the overall results, but it is not possible to calculate this between tire tests performed on different days or at different locations.

As a result you will see other tests on Tire Reviews which feature both the %s and %s, but as they weren't conducted on the same day, the results are not comparable.

Lots of other websites do this sort of tire comparison, Tire Reviews doesn't.