Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 vs Yokohama Advan Sport V107
- TR Score
- 9.7/10
- Owners say
- 86% · 228
- TR Score
- 8.8/10
- Owners say
- 73% · 25
In the 9 independent tests that ran both tires, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 finished ahead 9 times and the Advan Sport V107 not once. The Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 lasted 50.5% longer in the wear tests.
Data updated
Which should you buy?
Choose the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 for the best all-round summer performance: stronger wet safety, better aquaplaning security, lower rolling resistance and dramatically better wear/value. Choose the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 if your priority is dry-road sharpness and strong dry braking/driver engagement (including occasional track-day style use), and you're willing to trade off wet margins and higher running costs.
Where the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 is stronger
- Consistently stronger wet braking and wet handling; often a multi-meter advantage in wet stops (e.g., 42.9 m vs 47.9 m in Auto Bild 2026)
- Excellent aquaplaning resistance in a straight line across tests (e.g., 94.7 vs 93.0 km/h in Auto Bild 2026; 79.4 vs 75.9 km/h in ADAC 2025)
- Outstanding longevity and low wear/abrasion; routinely 40-90% more projected mileage in Auto Bild/ADAC datasets
Where the Advan Sport V107 is stronger
- Very strong dry braking performance across the shared tests; wins dry braking in the majority of comparisons (6 vs 3)
- Sporty, responsive dry dynamics with strong subjective “fun”/feedback reported in performance testing
- Can be fractionally quicker in certain dry handling measures (small margins)
The bullet points are analysis of the shared tests and of owner reviews; the measured wins in each discipline are in the tables below. Where the two disagree, the figures are right.
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 vs Advan Sport V107 at a glance
| Category | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 | Gap | Advan Sport V107 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shared tests won9 shared tests | 9 | 0 | |
| Dry17 measurements | 6 | 11 | |
| Wet34 measurements | 28 | The Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 stopped 5.4% shorter in the wet (9 tests) | 3 |
| Comfort9 measurements | 8 | The Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was 1.7 dB quieter (5 tests) | 1 |
| Value14 measurements | 14 | The Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 lasted 50.5% longer in the wear tests (5 tests) | 0 |
| Tire Reviews Scoreevery test and review we hold | 9.7/10 | The Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 by 0.9 | 8.8/10 |
| Owner rating228 and 25 reviews | 86% | The Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 by 13 points | 73% |
| Would buy againshare of owners | 83% | The Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 by 29 points | 54% |
| Pricein the 5 tests that listed prices | +8.9% | The Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was dearer in 5 of 5 | Cheaper |
| Sizes madeEU label registrations | 130 | 90 sizes made in both | 137 |
Wins count every measurement the shared tests recorded for both tires; a tick marks the tire ahead on that line. Subjective driver scores count as wins but are never averaged, because each test uses its own scale.
Head to head in 9 tests, 2023 to 2026
Each row is one published test in which both tires ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 | Field | Advan Sport V107 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 Autobild Summer Tire Test | P2 of 20 | P13 of 20 | |
| 2026 Summer Braking Super Tire Test - How do 52 Tires Perform in Wet and Dry Braking? | P8 of 50 | P18 of 50 | |
| 2025 Auto Express Summer Tire Test | P6 of 9 | P7 of 9 | |
| 2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tire Test | P1 of 20 | P19 of 20 | |
| 2025 ADAC Summer Tire Test | P4 of 18 | P6 of 18 | |
| 2025 Summer Tire Test Shootout | P6 of 52 | P14 of 52 | |
| The BEST Performance Tires Tested | P3 of 6 | P6 of 6 | |
| 2023 AutoBild UHP Summer Tire Test | P1 of 20 | P15 of 20 | |
| 2023 Summer Tire Market Overview | P2 of 50 | P4 of 50 |
Performance profile
16 measurements from the 9 shared tests, each tire shown as its share of the better figure in every test.
Where each is furthest ahead
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
Advan Sport V107
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 118 ft stop against 112 ft is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it. The scale stops at 85%: a point further in sits on the hub's edge, hollow. 7 measurements recorded in only one shared test are left off; every measurement is in the table further down.
Where each scores higher
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
Advan Sport V107
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tires of the same season and class: 90 means this tire out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Where owners rate each higher
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
Advan Sport V107
Not ahead in any category
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
Owners rate the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 86% from 228 reviews and the Advan Sport V107 73% from 25. Each spoke is one question owners answer out of 10; reviews are vetted by hand before publication.
Every measurement, side by side
Averages of the figures both tires posted in the same tests. The gap is the average of each test's own gap, so figures from different cars and years are never mixed. Open a discipline for its measurements, and a measurement for every test's figure.
| Measurement | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 | Gap | Advan Sport V107 | Wins | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 112 | 0.4% | 112 | 3-6 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 78.41 | 0.3% | 78.19 | 0-2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 70.9 | 0.5% | 70.5 | 2-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| scored | = | scored | 1-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| scored | 17.6% | scored | 0-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 109 | 5.4% | 116 | 6-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 103 | 2.8% | 106 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 117 | 5% | 124 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 133 | 9.8% | 147 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 91.54 | 1.8% | 93.2 | 2-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 48 | 1.6% | 47.3 | 3-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| scored | 10.4% | scored | 2-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 19.23 | 2.1% | 19.55 | 2-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 54.4 | 2.7% | 53 | 6-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 11.6 | 4.2% | 11.1 | 4-2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| scored | 13.7% | scored | 3-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| scored | 4.8% | scored | 0-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 71.78 | 1.7 dB | 73.46 | 5-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 32,051 | 50.5% | 21,145 | 5-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 8.31 | 16.7% | 9.98 | 5-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 5.6 | 1.8% | 5.7 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 73.3 | 21.6% | 93.5 | 2-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 1,455 | 18.9% | 1,794 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tires shared. "Scored" rows are subjective driver ratings: each test uses its own scale, so only the wins are counted.
Scores beyond the shared tests
On the Tire Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 scores 9.7 and the Advan Sport V107 8.8 out of 10.
| Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 | Category | Advan Sport V107 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 95 | Dry | 97 | ||
| 93 | Wet | 76 | ||
| 83 | Comfort | 14 | ||
| 69 | Value | 5 | ||
Category scores are percentiles among tires of the same season and class: 90 means this tire out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
What owners say
| Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 | Category | Advan Sport V107 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9.3 | Dry Grip | 8.7 | ||
| 9 | Wet Grip | 7.4 | ||
| 8.8 | Road Feedback | 8.5 | ||
| 8.9 | Handling | 8.4 | ||
| 7.6 | Wear | 5.5 | ||
| 8.3 | Comfort | 6.3 | ||
Owners rate the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 86% from 228 reviews and the Advan Sport V107 73% from 25. Reviews are vetted by hand before publication; ownership is not verified.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
- 86%from 228 reviews
- 83%would buy again
- 1,941,005 milesdriven by reviewers
Owners rate the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 highly overall (84.8% average), most consistently praising its strong dry and wet grip, with many also noting reassuring handling. Around half of reviewers who mention it say it's noticeably quieter than what they replaced, and comfort is commonly described as a step up for a UHP tire. Longevity is the main talking point: tread life feedback is genuinely split, with a similar number reporting strong mileage as those seeing faster wear. A smaller but recurring complaint is a softer, less supported feel (and occasional extra noise on coarse surfaces) for drivers wanting a firmer, more precise response.
- Excellent dry grip with lots of confidence
- Very strong wet grip for a summer UHP tire
- Lower road noise than many rivals and OEM fitments
- Comfortable ride for everyday use
- Tread life is inconsistent: some see great mileage, others rapid wear
- Can be noisy on rough or coarse asphalt for a noticeable minority
- Soft sidewall feel can reduce precision and make responses feel less supported
Summarised by AI from 204 vetted reviews; the reviews themselves are on the tire page.
All 228 Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 reviewsFirstly I'd like to correct/add to something I said in a review about the Mich PS4 where I mentioned the Asy 6s didn't seem to be doing much better. It seems the last bit of tread in the Asy 6s last much longer!, going from 3mm @12.6k to 1.7mm (a bit close!) @21k, so they last much longer than the PS4 tires on the rear! (The PS4 tires only lasted 13.2k miles!!).
For a BMW 330d 2010.
Yokohama Advan Sport V107
- 73%from 25 reviews
- 54%would buy again
- 140,521 milesdriven by reviewers
Owners most consistently praise the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 for strong dry performance, with around three in five highlighting excellent dry grip and many also noting sharp steering and confident dry handling. Wet grip is generally rated as decent, though opinions are more mixed, with a small but notable group (around one in seven) finding it weaker, particularly in colder conditions. The biggest drawback is longevity: around two in five owners complain of very fast wear. Noise is another frequent issue, with around one in three reporting higher road roar, especially on rougher surfaces.
- Outstanding dry grip and confidence under power
- Very capable dry handling with strong feedback
- Direct, responsive steering feel
- Stiff, sporty sidewalls that support hard driving
- Very short tread life and rapid wear
- Noticeable road noise/roar, especially on coarse surfaces
- Needs heat or a bedding-in period to feel at its best
Summarised by AI from 24 vetted reviews; the reviews themselves are on the tire page.
All 25 Advan Sport V107 reviewsAmazing feel and handling, decent dry grip.
Awful comfort and wear rate.
Sizes, EU label and lineage
From the EU label registrations for each tire: 130 sizes of the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 and 137 of the Advan Sport V107, 90 of them made in both.
| Category | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 | Advan Sport V107 |
|---|---|---|
| Season | Summer | Summer |
| Sizes made | 130 sizes, 17 to 23 inch | 137 sizes, 16 to 24 inch |
| Made in both | 90 sizes 225/40 R18225/45 R18225/50 R18225/60 R18235/40 R18235/45 R18245/35 R18245/40 R18245/45 R18255/35 R18255/40 R18255/45 R18and 78 more | |
| EU label wet grip | A93%B7% | A94%B6% |
| EU label rolling resistance | C40%A33%B26%D1% | D71%C22%A7% |
| EU label noise | 68-73 dB A59%B41% | 66-73 dB B76%A24% |
| On the market since | - | 2018 |
| Replaced | Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 (2021) | Yokohama Advan Sport V105 (2010) |
| Awards | Recommended: Best Tires for Hot Hatches (Compact Sports Cars) (DriverReviews, 2026/27) Winner: SUV Tire of the Year (WhatTire, 2024) Winner: Performance Tire of the Year (WhatTire, 2023) | - |
| Price in the shared tests | The Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was the dearer tire in 5 of the 5 tests that listed prices, by 8.9% on average. Each test priced the tires in its own market at the time; only the gap is comparable. | |
Label grades are shown as the share of registered sizes carrying each grade, so "B (88%), C (12%)" means most sizes are B. Grades vary by size; check the label for yours.
Reading the results
Written from the test results and owner reviews above. It is analysis, not a measurement: where it and the tables disagree, the tables are right.
This is a straight fight between two modern premium summer performance tires that often land on the same shopping list: the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 (max-performance summer road tire with an efficiency tilt) and the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 (ultra-high-performance tire with a more “sport/feel” character). Across 9 shared professional tests, they show a consistent split in priorities: Yokohama frequently nicks the headline dry braking numbers, while Goodyear builds its advantage through wet safety, efficiency and running costs.
The results are also unusually clear on outcomes, not just individual metrics. In big group tests the Goodyear repeatedly finishes near the top (e.g., 2/20 in the 2026 Auto Bild test; 1/21 in Auto Bild 2025 and 2023), while the Yokohama tends to sit mid-to-lower pack (e.g., 13/20 in 2026 Auto Bild; 19/21 in Auto Bild 2025; 15/21 in Auto Bild 2023). The data suggests the V107 can feel very sporty and can be strong on a warm, dry road-yet it gives back too much in wet performance and ownership costs to win overall comparisons consistently.
Conclusion
Across the shared tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 is the more complete and “easier to live with” performance summer tire. It repeatedly posts shorter wet braking (for example 42.9 m vs 47.9 m in Auto Bild 2026, and 27.5 m vs 30.6 m in the 2026 braking test), stronger wet handling/aquaplaning margins (e.g., 94.7 vs 93.0 km/h straight aquaplaning in Auto Bild 2026, and 79.4 vs 75.9 km/h in ADAC 2025), and it dominates the environmental/running-cost metrics: materially lower rolling resistance (often ~15-20% lower) and dramatically longer projected wear (e.g., 63,830 km vs 45,630 km in Auto Bild 2026; 54,020 vs 35,890 km in Auto Bild 2025; 63,200 vs 33,600 km in Auto Bild 2023). Those advantages are exactly why it keeps scoring top overall positions and wins “Eco/Green” style awards.
The Yokohama Advan Sport V107's case is narrower but real: it is very often excellent in dry braking and can be slightly quicker/keener in dry handling feel, with some tests highlighting higher “fun” and sharper feedback at the limit. It also can be a touch cheaper to buy (it wins the “price” metric in multiple tests). The problem is that its weak spot aligns with real-world risk and cost: wet stopping/traction gaps can be meaningful, and its rolling resistance is repeatedly among the worst in the field-penalising fuel/energy use and total cost per kilometer.
Practical takeaway: if you want one tire that works brilliantly in mixed summer weather, racks up miles, stays quiet and keeps consumption down, the Goodyear is the smarter, safer buy. The Yokohama makes most sense for drivers prioritising a more lively, track-day-friendly feel and strong dry braking-provided they accept higher running costs and less wet security.
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 vs Advan Sport V107: your questions
Is the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 or the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 the better tire?
In the 9 independent tests that ran both tires, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 finished ahead 9 times and the Advan Sport V107 not once. On the Tire Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 scores 9.7 and the Advan Sport V107 8.8 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 or the Advan Sport V107?
The Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 led 28 of the 34 wet measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 5.4% shorter in the wet across 9 tests.
Which is better in the dry?
The Advan Sport V107 led 11 of the 17 dry measurements the shared tests recorded.
Which lasts longer and costs less to run?
The Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 lasted 50.5% longer in the wear tests (5 tests), had 16.7% lower rolling resistance (5 tests) and shed 21.6% less rubber in the abrasion test (2 tests). Owners rate wear 7.6/10 for the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 and 5.5/10 for the Advan Sport V107.
Which is quieter and more comfortable?
The Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was 1.7 dB quieter (5 tests). Owners rate comfort 8.3/10 for the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 and 6.3/10 for the Advan Sport V107.
What do owners say?
Owners rate the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 86% from 228 reviews and the Advan Sport V107 73% from 25. 83% of Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 owners would buy it again, against 54% for the Advan Sport V107.
Which is more expensive?
In the 5 tests that listed prices, the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was the dearer tire in 5 of them, by 8.9% on average. Prices are the test's own at the time, in its own market.
Are they available in the same sizes?
The Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 is made in 130 sizes (17 to 23 inch) and the Advan Sport V107 in 137 (16 to 24 inch). 90 sizes are available in both. On the EU label the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 is graded A for wet grip and C for rolling resistance in most sizes; the Advan Sport V107 A and D.
More comparisons with these tires
vs 
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 vs Michelin Pilot Sport 5
8-5 in 16 shared tests
vs
Continental PremiumContact 7 vs Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
5-11 in 16 shared tests
vs
Continental SportContact 7 vs Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
5-2 in 8 shared tests
vs 
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 vs Hankook Ventus Evo
1-5 in 6 shared tests
vs 
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 vs Michelin Primacy 5
2-1 in 3 shared tests
vs 
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 vs Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
3-0 in 4 shared tests
vs 
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 vs Pirelli P Zero PZ5
0-2 in 2 shared tests
vs 
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 vs Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3
8-1 in 9 shared tests
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tire wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Review the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 Review the Advan Sport V107
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tires ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tire Reviews Score rates each tire out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tires can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tire Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tires independently since 2007.
Discussion