Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 vs Yokohama Advan Sport V107
The data reveals a consistent pattern: Yokohama edges more metrics in pure dry stopping and delivers engaging steering feel, while Goodyear dominates in wet grip, aquaplaning resistance, rolling resistance, and wear. Notably, Goodyear converts those advantages into far stronger overall results and value scores, including multiple test wins and standout mileage.
Test Results
Independent comparison tire tests are the best source of data to get tire information from, and the good news is there have been nine tests which compare both tires directly!
| Tire | Test Wins | Performance |
|---|---|---|
| Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 | nine |
While it might look like the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 is better than the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 purely based on the higher number of test wins, tires are very complicated objects which means where one tire is better than the other can be more important in real world use.
Let's look at how the two tires compare across multiple tire test categories.
Key Strengths
- Outstanding wet performance: shorter wet braking and faster wet handling laps (e.g., −10.9% wet braking vs V107 in Auto Bild 2025)
- Excellent aquaplaning resistance and stability in rain (regular wins in straight aqua)
- Class-leading efficiency and longevity (significantly lower rolling resistance and 40-90% higher wear mileage)
- Top value and comfort balance; multiple overall test wins and 'exemplary'/'good' ratings
- Strong dry braking and incisive steering; grippy, engaging character
- Competitive dry handling pace; fun at the limit for spirited driving
- Lower purchase price in some tests/sizes
- Good subjective noise in certain evaluations
Dry Braking
Looking at data from nine tire tests, the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 was better during six dry braking tests. On average the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 stopped the vehicle in 0.44% less distance than the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6.
Best In Dry Braking: Yokohama Advan Sport V107
See how the Dry Braking winner was calculated >>
Dry Handling [s]
Looking at data from two tire tests, the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 was better during two dry handling [s] tests. On average the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 was 0.28% faster around a lap than the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6.
Best In Dry Handling [s]: Yokohama Advan Sport V107
See how the Dry Handling winner was calculated >>
Dry Handling [Km/H]
Looking at data from three tire tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during two dry handling [km/h] tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was 0.5% faster around a lap than the Yokohama Advan Sport V107.
Best In Dry Handling [Km/H]: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Dry Handling winner was calculated >>
Subj. Dry Handling
Looking at data from two tire tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during one subj. dry handling tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 scored 6.76% more points than the Yokohama Advan Sport V107.
Best In Subj. Dry Handling: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Subj. Dry Handling winner was calculated >>
Subj. Fun
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 was better during one subj. fun tests. On average the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 scored 15% more points than the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6.
Best In Subj. Fun: Yokohama Advan Sport V107
See how the Subj. Fun winner was calculated >>
Wet Braking
Looking at data from nine tire tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during six wet braking tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 stopped the vehicle in 5.92% less distance than the Yokohama Advan Sport V107.
Best In Wet Braking: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Wet Braking winner was calculated >>
Wet Braking - Cool
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during one wet braking - cool tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 stopped the vehicle in 2.79% less distance than the Yokohama Advan Sport V107.
Best In Wet Braking - Cool: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Wet Braking - Cool winner was calculated >>
Wet Braking - Concrete
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during one wet braking - concrete tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 stopped the vehicle in 5.04% less distance than the Yokohama Advan Sport V107.
Best In Wet Braking - Concrete: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Wet Braking - Concrete winner was calculated >>
Wet Handling [s]
Looking at data from two tire tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during two wet handling [s] tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was 1.78% faster around a wet lap than the Yokohama Advan Sport V107.
Best In Wet Handling [s]: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>
Wet Handling [Km/H]
Looking at data from three tire tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during three wet handling [km/h] tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was 1.51% faster around a wet lap than the Yokohama Advan Sport V107.
Best In Wet Handling [Km/H]: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>
Subj. Wet Handling
Looking at data from two tire tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during two subj. wet handling tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 scored 9.91% more points than the Yokohama Advan Sport V107.
Best In Subj. Wet Handling: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Subj. Wet Handling winner was calculated >>
Wet Circle
Looking at data from three tire tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during two wet circle tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was 1.64% faster around a wet circle than the Yokohama Advan Sport V107.
Best In Wet Circle: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Wet Circle winner was calculated >>
Straight Aqua
Looking at data from six tire tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during six straight aqua tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 floated at a 2.63% higher speed than the Yokohama Advan Sport V107.
Best In Straight Aqua: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Straight Aqua winner was calculated >>
Curved Aquaplaning
Looking at data from six tire tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during four curved aquaplaning tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 slipped out at a 4.8% higher speed than the Yokohama Advan Sport V107.
Best In Curved Aquaplaning: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Curved Aquaplaning winner was calculated >>
Subj. Comfort
Looking at data from three tire tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during three subj. comfort tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 scored 10.22% more points than the Yokohama Advan Sport V107.
Best In Subj. Comfort: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Subj. Comfort winner was calculated >>
Subj. Noise
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 was better during one subj. noise tests. On average the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 scored 4.55% more points than the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6.
Best In Subj. Noise: Yokohama Advan Sport V107
See how the Subj. Noise winner was calculated >>
Noise
Looking at data from four tire tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during four noise tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 measured 2.68% quieter than the Yokohama Advan Sport V107.
Best In Noise: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Noise winner was calculated >>
Noise
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during one noise tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 measured 0.69% quieter than the Yokohama Advan Sport V107.
Best In Noise: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Noise winner was calculated >>
Wear
Looking at data from five tire tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during five wear tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 is predicted to cover 34.03% miles before reaching 1.6mm than the Yokohama Advan Sport V107.
Best In Wear: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Wear winner was calculated >>
Value
Looking at data from five tire tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during five value tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 proved to have a 28.16% better value based on price/1000km than the Yokohama Advan Sport V107.
Best In Value: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Value winner was calculated >>
Price
Looking at data from two tire tests, the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 was better during two price tests. On average the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 cost 2.4% less than the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6.
Best In Price: Yokohama Advan Sport V107
See how the Price winner was calculated >>
Rolling Resistance
Looking at data from five tire tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during five rolling resistance tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 had a 16.73% lower rolling resistance than the Yokohama Advan Sport V107.
Best In Rolling Resistance: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Rolling Resistance winner was calculated >>
Fuel Consumption
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during one fuel consumption tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 used 1.75% less fuel than the Yokohama Advan Sport V107.
Best In Fuel Consumption: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Fuel Consumption winner was calculated >>
Abrasion
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during one abrasion tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 lost 18.9% less particle wear matter than the Yokohama Advan Sport V107.
Best In Abrasion: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Abrasion winner was calculated >>
Real World Driver Reviews
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 Driver Reviews
Drivers rate the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 very highly overall, most often praising its strong dry and especially wet grip, short braking distances, and predictable/progressive behavior near the limit. Many also report a comfortable, refined ride for a UHP tire with good value versus Michelin/Continental rivals. The main recurring downsides are faster-than-expected tread wear for some users and noticeable roar/rumble on rough asphalt, with a smaller but repeated theme of softer sidewalls or slightly numb turn-in/understeer compared with sharper alternatives.
Based on 174 reviews with an average rating of 85%
Yokohama Advan Sport V107 Driver Reviews
Drivers report the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 delivers strong dry grip, sharp handling, and confident wet performance when warm, with several high-scoring reviews praising its sporty feel and feedback (including on EVs). However, many note high road noise on coarse surfaces and notably fast tread wear, making it less ideal for daily comfort or longevity-focused use.
Based on 19 reviews with an average rating of 73%
I have now had the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5's, Goodyear Eagle F1 Supersports, Michelin PS4 and even some Avon's (for a brief period) on my current car - a Golf GTI Clubsport 40.
I mix up my driving a lot - lots of motorway driving but also lots of hard street driving and B road blasts, I find it massively important to have the best tires possible to allow me to push my car as hard as I can in a safe manner.
I was massively impressed with the Asymmetric 5's, the sheer grip... Continue reading this review using the link below
Conclusion
The Advan Sport V107's appeal is its dry focus: quick steering, strong dry braking, and a playful balance that drivers may prefer on a warm back road or occasional track day. However, its higher rolling resistance, shorter mileage and weaker wet performance limit its all-weather road suitability. For most buyers, Goodyear is the safer, cheaper-to-own choice; for enthusiasts prioritising steering feel in the dry, Yokohama has a niche advantage.
Key Differences
- Wet safety: Goodyear consistently stops shorter and handles faster in the wet (often ~3-11% advantage)
- Aquaplaning: Goodyear typically leads in straight aquaplaning; Yokohama occasionally edges curved tests
- Efficiency: Goodyear has much lower rolling resistance (≈15-20% better), improving fuel economy
- Wear/longevity: Goodyear delivers substantially higher mileage (commonly +40-90%)
- Value: Goodyear's cost per 1,000 km is markedly lower despite similar or slightly higher purchase price
- Dry focus: Yokohama often edges dry braking and offers sharper steering/'fun' feel; Goodyear is more neutral and composed
Overall Winner: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
Based on the tire test data and user reviews we have in our database, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 has demonstrated better overall performance in this comparison. However, as you can see from the spider diagram above, each tire has its own strengths which should be considered in your final tire buying choice.Similar Comparisons
Looking for more tire comparisons? Here are other direct comparisons involving these tires:
Footnote
This page has been developed using tire industry testing best practices. This means we are only comparing tests which have had both tires in the same test.
Why is this important? Tire testing is heavily affected by things like surface grip levels and surface temperature, which means you can only compare values from the same day. During a tire test external condition changes are calculated into the overall results, but it is not possible to calculate this between tire tests performed on different days or at different locations.
As a result you will see other tests on Tire Reviews which feature both the %s and %s, but as they weren't conducted on the same day, the results are not comparable.
Lots of other websites do this sort of tire comparison, Tire Reviews doesn't.