Continental PremiumContact 7 vs Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
Goodyear typically edges overall rankings (9 test wins vs 3) thanks to sharper dry performance, aquaplaning strength, lower noise, and standout longevity. Continental counters with class‑leading wet braking consistency, very competitive dry stopping, and often lower rolling resistance—translating to better efficiency and range on EVs. The choice largely comes down to whether you value ultimate sportiness and wear (Goodyear) or wet‑safety confidence and efficiency (Continental).
Test Results
Independent comparison tire tests are the best source of data to get tire information from, and the good news is there have been sixteen tests which compare both tires directly!
| Tire | Test Wins | Performance |
|---|---|---|
| Continental PremiumContact 7 | five | |
| Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 | eleven |
While it might look like the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 is better than the Continental PremiumContact 7 purely based on the higher number of test wins, tires are very complicated objects which means where one tire is better than the other can be more important in real world use.
Let's look at how the two tires compare across multiple tire test categories.
Key Strengths
- Consistently best‑in‑class wet braking (wins 8:1 overall; repeated test tops)
- Lower rolling resistance and energy use; EV range advantage (e.g., −7.8% kWh/100km)
- Predictable, precise wet handling with strong aquaplaning reserves in several tests
- Superior dry performance and subjectively sportier feel (multiple dry wins, handling pace)
- Outstanding longevity and value (e.g., 54,000 km wear, best €/1000 km in major tests)
- Lower noise and strong straight/curved aquaplaning performance across sizes
Dry Braking
Looking at data from fifteen tire tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during eight dry braking tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 stopped the vehicle in 0.12% less distance than the Continental PremiumContact 7.
Best In Dry Braking: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Dry Braking winner was calculated >>
Dry Handling [s]
Looking at data from three tire tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during three dry handling [s] tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was 0.48% faster around a lap than the Continental PremiumContact 7.
Best In Dry Handling [s]: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Dry Handling winner was calculated >>
Dry Handling [Km/H]
Looking at data from five tire tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during four dry handling [km/h] tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was 0.47% faster around a lap than the Continental PremiumContact 7.
Best In Dry Handling [Km/H]: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Dry Handling winner was calculated >>
Subj. Dry Handling
Looking at data from six tire tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during three subj. dry handling tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 scored 3.94% more points than the Continental PremiumContact 7.
Best In Subj. Dry Handling: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Subj. Dry Handling winner was calculated >>
Subj. Fun
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during one subj. fun tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 scored 5.88% more points than the Continental PremiumContact 7.
Best In Subj. Fun: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Subj. Fun winner was calculated >>
Wet Braking
Looking at data from fifteen tire tests, the Continental PremiumContact 7 was better during eleven wet braking tests. On average the Continental PremiumContact 7 stopped the vehicle in 1.82% less distance than the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6.
Best In Wet Braking: Continental PremiumContact 7
See how the Wet Braking winner was calculated >>
Wet Braking - Cool
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Continental PremiumContact 7 was better during one wet braking - cool tests. On average the Continental PremiumContact 7 stopped the vehicle in 11.15% less distance than the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6.
Best In Wet Braking - Cool: Continental PremiumContact 7
See how the Wet Braking - Cool winner was calculated >>
Wet Braking - Worn
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during one wet braking - worn tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 stopped the vehicle in 4.03% less distance than the Continental PremiumContact 7.
Best In Wet Braking - Worn: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Wet Braking - Worn winner was calculated >>
Wet Handling [s]
Looking at data from seven tire tests, the Continental PremiumContact 7 was better during four wet handling [s] tests. On average the Continental PremiumContact 7 was 0.84% faster around a wet lap than the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6.
Best In Wet Handling [s]: Continental PremiumContact 7
See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>
Wet Handling [Km/H]
Looking at data from five tire tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during three wet handling [km/h] tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was 0.29% faster around a wet lap than the Continental PremiumContact 7.
Best In Wet Handling [Km/H]: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>
Subj. Wet Handling
Looking at data from five tire tests, the Continental PremiumContact 7 was better during two subj. wet handling tests. On average the Continental PremiumContact 7 scored 5.95% more points than the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6.
Best In Subj. Wet Handling: Continental PremiumContact 7
See how the Subj. Wet Handling winner was calculated >>
Wet Circle
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during one wet circle tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 had 1.06% higher lateral wet grip than the Continental PremiumContact 7.
Best In Wet Circle: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Wet Circle winner was calculated >>
Straight Aqua
Looking at data from eleven tire tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during six straight aqua tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 floated at a 0.73% higher speed than the Continental PremiumContact 7.
Best In Straight Aqua: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Straight Aqua winner was calculated >>
Curved Aquaplaning
Looking at data from seven tire tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during four curved aquaplaning tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 slipped out at a 3.73% higher speed than the Continental PremiumContact 7.
Best In Curved Aquaplaning: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Curved Aquaplaning winner was calculated >>
Subj. Comfort
Looking at data from eight tire tests, the Continental PremiumContact 7 was better during four subj. comfort tests. On average the Continental PremiumContact 7 scored 3.05% more points than the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6.
Best In Subj. Comfort: Continental PremiumContact 7
See how the Subj. Comfort winner was calculated >>
Subj. Noise
Looking at data from two tire tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during one subj. noise tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 scored 9.09% more points than the Continental PremiumContact 7.
Best In Subj. Noise: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Subj. Noise winner was calculated >>
Noise
Looking at data from eight tire tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during eight noise tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 measured 2.27% quieter than the Continental PremiumContact 7.
Best In Noise: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Noise winner was calculated >>
Noise
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Continental PremiumContact 7 was better during one noise tests. On average the Continental PremiumContact 7 measured 0.69% quieter than the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6.
Best In Noise: Continental PremiumContact 7
See how the Noise winner was calculated >>
Wear
Looking at data from seven tire tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during six wear tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 is predicted to cover 10.59% miles before reaching 1.6mm than the Continental PremiumContact 7.
Best In Wear: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Wear winner was calculated >>
Value
Looking at data from seven tire tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during five value tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 proved to have a 15.28% better value based on price/1000km than the Continental PremiumContact 7.
Best In Value: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Value winner was calculated >>
Price
Looking at data from two tire tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during one price tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 cost 9.63% less than the Continental PremiumContact 7.
Best In Price: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Price winner was calculated >>
Rolling Resistance
Looking at data from ten tire tests, the Continental PremiumContact 7 was better during seven rolling resistance tests. On average the Continental PremiumContact 7 had a 3.01% lower rolling resistance than the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6.
Best In Rolling Resistance: Continental PremiumContact 7
See how the Rolling Resistance winner was calculated >>
Energy Consumption
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Continental PremiumContact 7 was better during one energy consumption tests. On average the Continental PremiumContact 7 used 7.79% less energy than the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6.
Best In Energy Consumption: Continental PremiumContact 7
See how the Energy Consumption winner was calculated >>
Range
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Continental PremiumContact 7 was better during one range tests. On average the Continental PremiumContact 7 gives the vehicle a range of 4.56% kilometers than the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6.
Best In Range: Continental PremiumContact 7
See how the Range winner was calculated >>
Abrasion
Looking at data from two tire tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 was better during two abrasion tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 wore 11.11% less per 1000km driven than the Continental PremiumContact 7.
Best In Abrasion: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
See how the Abrasion winner was calculated >>
Real World Driver Reviews
Continental PremiumContact 7 Driver Reviews
Across 44 driver reviews, the Continental PremiumContact 7 is most often described as a very high-grip, high-confidence tire with excellent wet and dry braking/handling, making the car feel planted and secure in all conditions. Many owners also praise its predictable, progressive behaviour and overall safety-focused performance. The main recurring downsides are higher-than-expected road noise (especially on coarse surfaces or at speed) and, for a noticeable minority, quicker wear/shorter life than expected for a premium tire; some also note the soft sidewalls can reduce steering sharpness/feedback.
Based on 49 reviews with an average rating of 83%
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 Driver Reviews
Drivers rate the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 very highly overall, most often praising its strong dry and especially wet grip, short braking distances, and predictable/progressive behavior near the limit. Many also report a comfortable, refined ride for a UHP tire with good value versus Michelin/Continental rivals. The main recurring downsides are faster-than-expected tread wear for some users and noticeable roar/rumble on rough asphalt, with a smaller but repeated theme of softer sidewalls or slightly numb turn-in/understeer compared with sharper alternatives.
Based on 177 reviews with an average rating of 86%
I have now had the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5's, Goodyear Eagle F1 Supersports, Michelin PS4 and even some Avon's (for a brief period) on my current car - a Golf GTI Clubsport 40.
I mix up my driving a lot - lots of motorway driving but also lots of hard street driving and B road blasts, I find it massively important to have the best tires possible to allow me to push my car as hard as I can in a safe manner.
I was massively impressed with the Asymmetric 5's, the sheer grip... Continue reading this review using the link below
Conclusion
If you drive spiritedly, prioritise dry grip, aquaplaning reserves, cabin quietness, and long life, Goodyear is the safer bet. If you want maximum wet‑braking security across temperatures, stable manners, and efficiency for fuel or battery range, Continental is the stronger fit. Both are exemplary; pick Goodyear for performance longevity and calm refinement, Continental for wet‑road assurance and economy.
Key Differences
- Wet safety vs. dry sport: Continental dominates wet braking (often 3–5% shorter); Goodyear leads dry braking/handling by small but repeatable margins.
- Efficiency vs. endurance: Continental typically has lower rolling resistance and better EV range; Goodyear delivers markedly longer tread life and lower cost per 1000 km.
- Refinement split: Goodyear is generally quieter; Continental tends to ride well but can be noisier in some tests.
Overall Winner: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
Based on the tire test data and user reviews we have in our database, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 has demonstrated better overall performance in this comparison. However, as you can see from the spider diagram above, each tire has its own strengths which should be considered in your final tire buying choice.Similar Comparisons
Looking for more tire comparisons? Here are other direct comparisons involving these tires:
Continental PremiumContact 7 Top Comparisons
No other comparisons available for this tire.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 Top Comparisons
No other comparisons available for this tire.
Footnote
This page has been developed using tire industry testing best practices. This means we are only comparing tests which have had both tires in the same test.
Why is this important? Tire testing is heavily affected by things like surface grip levels and surface temperature, which means you can only compare values from the same day. During a tire test external condition changes are calculated into the overall results, but it is not possible to calculate this between tire tests performed on different days or at different locations.
As a result you will see other tests on Tire Reviews which feature both the %s and %s, but as they weren't conducted on the same day, the results are not comparable.
Lots of other websites do this sort of tire comparison, Tire Reviews doesn't.