Suzuki Splash SZ4 Tires

Excellent tire in all conditions, minus snow and ice. V e r y silent and at a great price. Have it in my 3 family cars. I am not certain about the wear, it is still early. Otherwise, fully recomendable

After 3 years and 25.000km, the braking distance has deteriorated and the handling in slippery tarmac needs attention.They haven’t become dangerous, not at all. But It seems that they are a little less durable than the average norm. I read on this site that the Chech made version of this Tire isn’t as good. Since the ones available were Chech made, I finally opted for the Kleber Dynaxer 4.

Had these tires on three different cars, logan,sandero, now a splash,roughly 23000 miles,and still going good in the wet &snow.only gripe noisy.hey no worries,wood buy again. Great value.tc.

Excellent aquaplanning ! Plus, a low noise tire, with top dry grip and breaking ! Wet grip is good ,wet breaking seems average . Feedback is not on par with my previous Michelen Energy Saver + or with Contis . Value for money is excellent. !

VERY durable tire and very reliable . Grips and handles great , ever after almost 4 years use. You pay premium price but the tire is of premium quality as well . I just feel that through time ,the tire has become a bit harder for my (already firm Japanese) suspension .

Put these tires on the car last winter, didn't really have any snow and the weather was fairly mild, so really didn't test the tires in bad conditions, didn't notice much difference in the dry weather, slightly better wet grip, and appeared good on ice as compared to factory fitted all season tires. Petrol consumption did suffer with a loss of approx 5 miles per gallon.

On a small hatchback, driven carefully, front tires lasted less than 14K miles. I had not expected this and was both appalled and very shocked to be told that the front tires were bordering on illegal after so few miles.
No, I will not be buying these again.