“Fitted these tires after my stock hankooks got burned in a storage fire accident. Doing second season on them and find them pretty well-balanced in all summer conditions for non-performance car like mine. They were good...”
Nexen N Blue HD+
The Nexen N Blue HD Plus is a mid-range summer high-performance tire that stands out for quiet, comfortable everyday driving and strong value for money. Owners commonly praise its stable, predictable road manners and reassuring wet-weather behavior in normal use, alongside decent tread life. In professional testing, however, its results are more mixed: it can brake competitively, but tends to fall behind in more demanding wet handling and aquaplaning assessments.
The quick answer
Built from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold for this tire - the evidence is all further down the page. Data updated October 2026.
- 83owner reviews
- 855,032miles driven
- 14professional tests
All Tests
View Test ResultsTested 14 times by independent publications, the Nexen N Blue HD+ has taken 1 test wins with an average finish of 12th.
Finishing position in each test
| Year | Test | Result | Award |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 2021 Auto Bild 16 Inch Summer Tire TestAuto Bild · 205/55 R16 | P20 / 20 | |
| 2021 | 2021 53 Summer Tire Braking TestAuto Bild · 205/55 R16 | P15 / 53 | |
| 2019 | 2019 AMS Summer SUV Tire TestAuto Motor Und Sport · 215/55 R17 | P10 / 11 | |
| 2018 | 2018 Gute Fahrt Summer Tire TestGute Fahrt · 205/55 R16 | P8 / 12 | |
| 2018 | 2018 AutoBild Summer Tire OverviewAuto Bild · 195/65 R15 | P31 / 51 | |
| 2018 | 2018 ADAC Summer Tire Test - 205/55 R16ADAC · 205/55 R16 | P13 / 16 | |
| 2017 | 2017 Mid Range Tire TestMotor · 205/55 R16 | P7 / 10 | |
| 2016 | 2016 AutoBild Summer Tire TestAuto Bild · 205/55 R16 | P13 / 15 | |
| 2016 | 2016 Market Overview - Braking TestAuto Bild · 205/55 R16 | P12 / 50 | |
| 2016 | 2016 ADAC Tire Test - 185/65 R15ADAC · 185/65 R15 | P13 / 16 | |
| 2016 | 2016 ACE Mid Range Summer Tire TestACE · 195/65 R15 | P1 / 10 | |
| 2015 | 2015 Auto Bild Top 18 Summer Tire TestAuto Bild · 185/60 R15 | P4 / 18 | |
| 2015 | 2015 Market Overview - Braking TestAuto Bild · 185/60 R15 | P6 / 54 | |
| 2015 | 2015 ACE Summer Touring Tire TestACE · 205/55 R16 | P10 / 12 |
On the full record: Record by disciplineHead-to-head recordEvery published verdict
Running Costs
View TestIn 205/55 R16, the Nexen N Blue HD Plus is projected to cost €28.86 per 1,000 miles to buy and run - about €722 over 25,000 miles - based on the price, wear and rolling resistance measured in the 2021 Auto Bild 16 Inch Summer Tire Test.
Dimensions & Label Scores
View AllSize Range71 sizes available
145-235Width45-80Profile13-17Rim71-103 T-WLoad/
EU LabelAcross 71 sizes - the grade depends on the size you buy.
Fuel
Wet
Noise
64-72dB A/B
Frequently Asked Questions
How good is the Nexen N Blue HD Plus in the wet?
How good is the Nexen N Blue HD Plus in the dry?
How fuel efficient is the Nexen N Blue HD Plus?
How many miles does the Nexen N Blue HD Plus last?
What do owners say about the Nexen N Blue HD Plus?
More questions about the Nexen N Blue HD Plus (9)
How much does the Nexen N Blue HD Plus cost to run?
What is the Nexen N Blue HD Plus's EU tire label rating?
How comfortable and quiet are the Nexen N Blue HD Plus?
How well do the Nexen N Blue HD Plus wear, according to owners?
Would owners buy the Nexen N Blue HD Plus again?
What do owners say about the Nexen N Blue HD Plus's wet grip?
What do owners say about the Nexen N Blue HD Plus's road noise?
What do owners say about the Nexen N Blue HD Plus's dry grip?
What sizes does the Nexen N Blue HD Plus come in?
Owner Questions (3)
Ask a questionQuestions and Answers for the Nexen N Blue HD Plus
Show all questions (3)
I am thinking of buying these Nexen tires for my 1 yr old Suzuki Vitara (new model) would you recommend buying XL or 'reinforced' types as opposed to the normal… Show more I am thinking of buying these Nexen tires for my 1 yr old Suzuki Vitara (new model) would you recommend buying XL or 'reinforced' types as opposed to the normal tires. There is no indication in the car's handbook as to which to buy. I live in the north of England where it rains about half of the year. Also, is there a tire more suitable without spending a lot more as it is just used as a family runabout? Thought about Uniroyal as they seem to score higher for wet roads but wear out quite a lot faster and their dry performance is somewhat questionable. PS the car is the petrol model which has firmer suspension than the diesel (supported by Suzuki) Show less
I have just purchased the Nexen N Blue HD 255/55/R17 for my VW Tiguan to replace the worn out Purelli. I was told to keep both the front and back infalted at 32. Show more I have just purchased the Nexen N Blue HD 255/55/R17 for my VW Tiguan to replace the worn out Purelli. I was told to keep both the front and back infalted at 32. However when I exceed a certain speed, say 60mph, they tend to become rather noisy, giving that 'unsafe' feeling. Moreover they give the impression that they are a bit 'flat'. I inflated them up to 36, both front and back, and the noise, though still audible, decreased a lot. Any idea whether it is ok to have them inflated at 36, and whether they can give a better performance if inflated a bit more, say 38 front and 40 back? Show less
Nexen N Blue HD Plus Owner Reviews
Review this tireWhat owners say summarised from 70 reviews
Across 70 reviews, the Nexen N Blue HD Plus is most often described as a strong value summer/touring tire with notably low road noise, good comfort, and stable, predictable handling for everyday driving. Many drivers report confident wet-weather performance (including heavy-rain stability and aquaplaning resistance) and respectable longevity, with several citing 40,000-80,000+ km of use. The main recurring drawbacks are soft sidewalls that can reduce steering precision and, for some users, wet grip/braking that worsens as the tire wears or when pushed hard (especially in standing water or high heat).
What owners mention most counted across 71 reviews
Tap one to read only the reviews that mention it.
Owner ratings averaged from 83 ratings
- Owner score 79%
- Dry Grip 83%
- Comfort 83%
- Wet Grip 78%
- Wear 78%
- Road Feedback 77%
- Handling 76%
Featured reviews
“Grip in both wet and dry seem acceptable but significant cracking on tire shoulder is a real worry. Tires have a date code that suggest they are 3.5 years old. They have covered about 10k miles and have about 4mm tread...”
“Came stock on my 2018 Kia Rio EX, so I've been on them for 5 years and 80,000km or 50,000mi. No complains so far, wet grip is as expected, never had a moment even though I like to drive fast, almost always above the...”
All 72 Nexen N Blue HD Plus reviews
- Citroën C Elysee
- 195/60 R15
- 10,563 miles
There's no need to pay double the money for percentages where you won't feel balanced in any aspect.
- Fiat Panda
- 155/80 R13
- 12,427 miles
- Mercedes Benz
- 205/70 R14
- 25 miles
The Nexen tire is even quieter and more stable and comfortable than my previous Yokohama S306, New tires fitted last week so not a long experience with the tire but it is promising so far!
Which tires do you drive?
Researching the Nexen N Blue HD Plus? Rate the tires you actually drive - and help the next buyer choose.
- Fiat Panda
- 155/80 R13
- 10,000 miles
- Mostly Town
- Average
- Peugeot 308 1.6 HDi
- 205/55 R16
- 5,000 miles
- A Combination of Roads
- Average
- Fiat Panda
- 155/80 R13
- 8,000 miles
- A Combination of Roads
- Easy Going
- Volkswagen Polo 6R 1.2 TSI MT
- 195/50 R16
- 16,000 miles
- Mostly Motorways
- Average
Grip/Response/Feedback: A couple of times i got the chance to push them a little the feedback on dry was good. You feel what they're rolling over and when they're close to their limit.
Steering response was crisp. No delays, no vagueness. Grip on the dry was good but so is for most tires of that price.
The grip on wet is what matters and it was very good. Much better than the Goodyear Excellence they replaced. ZERO aquaplaning, ZERO loss of grip even at heavy rainfall on the slippery roads of Greece. Very safe feeling.
Two or three times i had to do emergency braking and they performed good. Saved me from a couple of crashes but eventually the driver i share it with did crash the car at the rear of another car, but i don't know the circumstances because i wasn't there. He might have been tailgating him while being distracted. Old men shouldn't drive.
Wear: Like i said, didn't drive that much but after around 16000 miles (26000 kilometers) they still have PLENTY of tread left and despite their age (7 years old) they still feel safe. Still have short braking distance, good response and feeback. The tread doesn't feel hard. The sidewalls are still in good shape. The only cracks i noticed is on the very edges of the tread, at the very top of the sidewall, which i think is normal. No bits and pieces missing.
Comfort: This is where they kinda let me down, although maybe it was a mistake to fit them on a 7J rim. They were borderline stretched. But anyway, on spec pressure (car specs) the ride was rough. They felt more rough than the 45 profile Goodyears. But the response and feedback was better than the 45s. I used to run them on slightly lower pressures to get a better ride.
Would i buy them again? Maybe, but if i do i will go for the 205 or 215, although i'd much rather get rid of the 16x7J rims. Too wide for the car in general.
I have now replaced them with Kleber HP5s and let me tell you that the 205 Kleber is as wide as the 215 Goodyear was. Even the tire fitter was surprised at how wide they are for 205. Very beefy tires and more comfortable than the Nexens, even at spec pressures. We'll see how they will perform because i just fitted them so now they feel great, like all tires feel when brand new and fresh. But they're a PERFECT match for the 16x7J rims.
- Chevrolet Spark
- 165/65 R14
- 8,000 miles
- A Combination of Roads
- Average
- SEAT ibiza 1.4
- 185/60 R14
- 15,000 miles
- A Combination of Roads
- Average
Since I live in an area where it doesn't rain that much, I chose them again in 2022 after one of the tires got punctured. I would've had to change them anyway because of their age and low tread depth, I had covered 66k km with them so pretty satisfied with the wear. As of now, I've covered 19k km with them and all is fine. Definitely recommend them because of their high price/performance ratio, 4 tires were 210€ here in Italy.
- Kia Motors Picanto
- 195/45 R16
- 30,000 miles
- A Combination of Roads
- Spirited
- Renault megane 4 hb
- 225/45 R17
- 20,000 miles
- Mostly Town
- Easy Going
- Opel Meriva B 1.4 LPG
- 205/55 R16
- 30,000 miles
- A Combination of Roads
- Spirited
Best choice for the price. Comfort is very good and noise is low. Wet grip is very good, dry grip is much better than its price range.
When its wet, I force the car on turns to test the limits, I can't even let it lose grip. I used to buy only premium tires like Continental or Michelin but after using those Nexens I don't think I will pay 2x more for premium tires ever again.
No reviews match those filters.
Find your next tire
All tire testsThe latest Tire Reviews tests
- Oct 2026The BEST All Weather Tires for 2026/27 →
- Oct 2026All Season vs All Terrain Tires Tested: Do You Actually Need an All Terrain? →
- Oct 2026The BEST Winter Tires for 2026/27 →
Summer Tires
All Season Tires
Winter Tires
SUV and All Terrain Tires
Track Tires
Which tires do you drive?
You're reading real-world reviews from other drivers - add yours and help the next buyer choose the right tires.







