Nexen N Blue HD+ - Test Results
Test Statistics
14
Tests Completed12th
Average Position1st
Best Result31st
Worst ResultPerformance Analysis
The Nexen N Blue HD Plus shows mixed, mid-pack performance across 14 summer tests with an average overall position of 11.6. It demonstrates occasional standout results in braking-focused shootouts and achieved a notable win in a 2016 mid-range group test, plus top-tier ratings in 2015, indicating competitive capability in controlled braking scenarios and value-focused comparisons.
However, across full-format tests it frequently trails in dynamic wet and dry handling and aquaplaning, culminating in last place (20/20) in Auto Bild 2021 full test. Rolling resistance and wear results are also inconsistent to weak, limiting its efficiency credentials. Overall, it performs acceptably in simpler braking contests but struggles to maintain competitiveness in comprehensive evaluations.
Performance Strengths
-
Dry Braking
Moderate
Details
• 2nd place dry braking in 2017 Mid Range Tire Test (38.8 m, +0.3% from best)
• 10/53 dry braking in 2021 53 Tire Braking Test (+5% from best)
• 10/20 dry braking in 2021 Auto Bild 16" full test (+5% from best)
-
Value/Price Positioning
Moderate
Details
• Price 2/20 in 2021 Auto Bild 16" full test
• 2016 ACE Mid Range Summer Tire Test: overall winner among mid-range tires, noted as premium-priced within cohort but delivering top result
• 2015 Auto Bild Top 18: received top 'exemplary' rating
-
Initial Braking Shootouts (Combined Wet/Dry)
Moderate
Details
• 6/52 overall in 2015 Market Overview - Braking Test
• 12/50 overall in 2016 Market Overview - Braking Test
• 15/53 overall in 2021 53 Tire Braking Test
Performance Weaknesses
-
Wet Handling and Aquaplaning
Strong
Details
• 19/20 wet handling, +3.6% from best; 20/20 straight aquaplaning, +7.9% from best in 2021 Auto Bild 16" full test
• 10/11 wet handling, +4.7% from best; 10/11 straight aquaplaning, +6.6% from best in 2019 AMS SUV test
-
Overall Performance in Comprehensive Tests
Strong
Details
• 20/20 overall in 2021 Auto Bild 16" full test
• 13/16 in 2018 ADAC 205/55 R16
• 13/15 in 2016 Auto Bild 205/55 R16 full test
• 10/12 in 2015 ACE Summer Touring Tire Test
• 7/10 in 2017 Mid Range Tire Test
-
Rolling Resistance / Efficiency
Moderate
Details
• 16/20 rolling resistance (+30.4% from best) in 2021 Auto Bild 16" full test
• 11/12 rolling resistance (+24.7% from best) in 2018 Gute Fahrt
• 8/11 rolling resistance (+13.2% from best) in 2019 AMS SUV test
-
Wet Braking Consistency
Moderate
Details
• 16/20 wet braking (+8.7% from best) in 2021 Auto Bild 16" full test
• 9/11 wet braking (+8.2% from best) in 2019 AMS SUV test
• 16/53 wet braking (+8.4% from best) in 2021 53 Tire Braking Test
Performance Over Time
Test History
Price
Straight Aqua, Wet Handling
2019 AMS Summer SUV Tire Test
2019
Winner: Nokian WetProof
Straight Aqua, Wet Handling
Rolling Resistance
2017 Mid Range Tire Test
2017
Winner: Bridgestone DriveGuard
Dry Braking
Dry Handling, Wet Handling