Menu

Federal Evoluzion ST 1 Test Results

Tire Reviews tests: 1 Tested 2019 to 2023 3 publications

Tested 5 times by independent publications, the Federal Evoluzion ST 1 averages a finish of 22nd. Its strongest discipline is Dry Braking, beating 54% of the field across 5 tests; its weakest is Wet Braking, at 34% across 5 tests.

  • 5Independent tests
  • 0Test wins
  • 0Podium finishes
  • 22ndAverage finish
  • 27%Field beaten on average
  • 3Publications

Record by discipline

Where the Federal Evoluzion ST 1 finished in each measured discipline, across every test that measured it against at least two other tires. Field beaten is the share of the other tires it outranked in that measurement.

Record by discipline
Discipline Tests Avg finish Field beaten Firsts
Dry
Dry Braking Strong 5 P14.6 of 32.4 54% -
Dry Handling 1 P9 of 10 11% -
Wet
Wet Braking Weak 5 P21.8 of 32.4 34% -
Wet Handling 2 P8.5 of 10 17% -
Straight Aqua 2 P8.5 of 10 17% -
Curved Aquaplaning 1 P10 of 10 0% -
Comfort
Subj. Comfort 2 P6 of 10 44% -
Noise 1 P2 of 10 89% -
Tire Weight 1 P6 of 10 44% -
Value
Rolling Resistance 2 P6 of 10 44% -

Head-to-head record

Overall finishing position against the tires that have most often shared a test with the Federal Evoluzion ST 1. Only tires tested alongside it at least three times are listed.

Head-to-head record
Rival Shared tests Ahead Behind Level Finished ahead
Kumho Ecsta PS71 4 shared: 0 ahead, 4 behind 4 0 4 - 0%
Imperial Ecosport 2 3 shared: 3 ahead, 0 behind 3 3 0 - 100%
Matador MP 47 Hectorra 3 3 shared: 2 ahead, 1 behind 3 2 1 - 67%
Firestone RoadHawk 3 shared: 1 ahead, 2 behind 3 1 2 - 33%
Kleber Dynaxer UHP 3 shared: 0 ahead, 3 behind 3 0 3 - 0%
Sava Intensa UHP 2 3 shared: 0 ahead, 3 behind 3 0 3 - 0%
Continental Premium Contact 6 3 shared: 0 ahead, 3 behind 3 0 3 - 0%
Fulda SportControl 2 3 shared: 0 ahead, 3 behind 3 0 3 - 0%
Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2 3 shared: 0 ahead, 3 behind 3 0 3 - 0%
Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3 3 shared: 0 ahead, 3 behind 3 0 3 - 0%

Performance Analysis

Drawn from 5 tests. Updated October 29, 2026.

The Federal Evoluzion ST 1 has generally struggled more with wet handling and aquaplaning than with dry braking. It was last of ten in the 2022 Tire Reviews UUHP Summer Tire Test and eighth of ten in the 2020 Teknikens summer test. Both criticised wet handling; Tire Reviews placed it last, 21.5% slower than the best, and called wet braking dangerously long. Straight aquaplaning was ninth of ten in 2022 and eighth of ten in 2020. Dry handling was also weak in 2022, ninth of ten, while external noise was a positive at second of ten and the purchase price was low.

Wet braking varies considerably. Fourth of ten and only 4.9% behind the best in the 2020 Teknikens test was unusually strong compared with last of ten and a 27.8% gap in 2022, or 47th of 49 and a 37.3% gap in Auto Bild's 2020 braking test. Auto Bild's 2023 overview was less severe, 24th of 48 for wet braking, but still 16.9% behind the best. Dry braking was nearer mid-field or better in several comparisons, including fifth of ten in 2022 and 17th of 48 in 2023. That stopping ability and low noise do not remove the handling weaknesses; the 2022 verdict was not recommended.

Performance Strengths

  • Road noise Minor in 1 of 2 tests
    Details
    • Second of ten for external noise in the 2022 Tire Reviews UUHP test.
  • Value for money Minor
    Details
    • Low purchase price noted in the 2022 Tire Reviews test, although the tire was not recommended.

Performance Weaknesses

  • Wet handling Strong in 2 of 2 tests
    Details
    • Last of ten, 21.5% slower than the best, in the 2022 Tire Reviews test.
    • Seventh of ten in 2020, with poor wet handling criticised by Teknikens.
  • Aquaplaning resistance Strong in 1 of 2 tests
    Details
    • Ninth of ten straight and last in bends in the 2022 Tire Reviews test.
    • Eighth of ten for straight aquaplaning in the 2020 Teknikens test.
    • Extremely low grip in the wet with long wet braking distances and difficult to control handling, low aquaplaning resistance, low grip in the dry with poor handling - 2022 Tire Reviews UUHP Summer Tire Test (2022)
  • Wet braking Moderate in 1 of 2 tests
    Details
    • Last of ten, 27.8% behind the best, in the 2022 Tire Reviews test.
    • 47th of 49, 37.3% behind the best, in the 2020 Auto Bild braking test.
    • Unusually strong fourth of ten, 4.9% behind the best, in the 2020 Teknikens test contrasts with those results.
    • Extremely low grip in the wet with long wet braking distances and difficult to control handling, low aquaplaning resistance, low grip in the dry with poor handling - 2022 Tire Reviews UUHP Summer Tire Test (2022)
  • Dry handling Minor in 2 of 2 tests
    Details
    • Ninth of ten, 4.6% slower than the best, with poor handling criticised in the 2022 Tire Reviews test.
  • High-speed stability Minor
    Details
    • Worst moose-test result in the 2020 Teknikens summer test.
  • Dry grip Strong in 1 of 2 tests
    Details
    • Extremely low grip in the wet with long wet braking distances and difficult to control handling, low aquaplaning resistance, low grip in the dry with poor handling - 2022 Tire Reviews UUHP Summer Tire Test (2022)
  • Wet grip Strong in 1 of 2 tests
    Details
    • Extremely low grip in the wet with long wet braking distances and difficult to control handling, low aquaplaning resistance, low grip in the dry with poor handling - 2022 Tire Reviews UUHP Summer Tire Test (2022)

Do owners agree with the tests?

Every tester write-up on the Federal Evoluzion ST 1 (2 tests) and 24 owner reviews were tagged for the aspects they judge. Where both have spoken, this is how they line up.

Where owners and testers agree

  • Road noise strength in 1 of 2 tests 10 praise, 2 criticise of 24 reviews · Read those reviews
  • Dry braking strength in 1 of 2 tests 5 praise, 0 criticise of 24 reviews · Read those reviews

Where they disagree

  • Dry grip weakness in 1 of 2 tests 17 praise, 0 criticise of 24 reviews · Read those reviews
  • Dry handling weakness in 2 of 2 tests 8 praise, 2 criticise of 24 reviews · Read those reviews
  • Wet grip weakness in 1 of 2 tests 8 praise, 1 criticise of 24 reviews · Read those reviews

Raised by owners, not by any test of this tire

  • Value for money no test mentions it 7 praise, 0 criticise of 24 reviews · Read those reviews
  • Tread life no test mentions it 5 praise, 1 criticise of 24 reviews · Read those reviews
  • Ride comfort no test mentions it 5 praise, 0 criticise of 24 reviews · Read those reviews
  • Steering feel no test mentions it 1 praise, 4 criticise of 24 reviews · Read those reviews
  • Behavior at the limit no test mentions it 3 praise, 1 criticise of 24 reviews · Read those reviews

Every test, newest first 5

Strong = top two of the field in that measurement. Weak = bottom two.

2023 1 test
2022 1 test
P10 of 10 Beat 0% of the field

2022 Tire Reviews UUHP Summer Tire Test

Tire Reviews 255/35 R19 Tested by Tire Reviews

The Federal Evolution ST-1 has poor grip in every condition, and dangerously long wet braking distances. Not recommended.

StrongNoise WeakDry HandlingWet BrakingWet HandlingStraight AquaCurved Aquaplaning WinnerContinental SportContact 7

2020 2 tests
2019 1 test

Back to the Federal Evoluzion ST 1 overview

Owner reviews, sizes and EU label data, comparisons and the Tire Reviews score. All Federal tires

Overview

Rate your tires

My tires

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tires

Save tires from a tire page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tires. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.