2018 Gute Fahrt Summer Tire Test
Very Good.
Where the Bridgestone Turanza T001 finished in each measured discipline, across every test that measured it against at least two other tires. Field beaten is the share of the other tires it outranked in that measurement.
| Discipline | Tests | Avg finish | Field beaten | Firsts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry | ||||
| Dry Braking | 1 | P6 of 12 | 55% | - |
| Wet | ||||
| Wet Braking | 1 | P1 of 12 | 100% | 1 |
| Straight Aqua | 1 | P1 of 12 | 100% | 1 |
| Value | ||||
| Rolling Resistance | 1 | P10 of 12 | 18% | - |
Overall finishing position against the tires that have most often shared a test with the Bridgestone Turanza T001. Only tires tested alongside it at least three times are listed.
| Rival | Shared tests | Ahead | Behind | Level | Finished ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19 | 2 | 17 | - | 11% | |
| 17 | 1 | 15 | 1 | 6% | |
| 17 | 1 | 16 | - | 6% | |
| 14 | 4 | 10 | - | 29% | |
| 14 | 4 | 10 | - | 29% | |
| 10 | 7 | 3 | - | 70% | |
| 10 | 6 | 4 | - | 60% | |
| 10 | 4 | 6 | - | 40% | |
| 9 | 5 | 4 | - | 56% | |
| 8 | 2 | 6 | - | 25% | |
| 8 | 0 | 8 | - | 0% | |
| 8 | 0 | 8 | - | 0% | |
| 7 | 6 | 1 | - | 86% | |
| 7 | 6 | 1 | - | 86% | |
| 6 | 6 | 0 | - | 100% | |
| 6 | 5 | 1 | - | 83% | |
| 6 | 5 | 1 | - | 83% | |
| 6 | 2 | 4 | - | 33% | |
| 6 | 1 | 5 | - | 17% | |
| 5 | 5 | 0 | - | 100% |
The same record for the tire it replaced and the tire that replaced it.
| Tire | Tests | Wins | Avg finish | Field beaten |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bridgestone Turanza ER300 Predecessor | 3 | 1 | 2nd | 78% |
| Bridgestone Turanza T001 This tire | 28 | 0 | 8th | 46% |
| Bridgestone Turanza T001 Evo Successor | 8 | 0 | 4th | 71% |
Drawn from 28 tests. Updated October 15, 2025.
Across 28 summer tests, the Bridgestone Turanza T001 delivers mid-pack overall performance with standout wet safety in select evaluations but inconsistent results elsewhere. It peaks with class-leading wet braking and aquaplaning in 2018 (3rd overall, 1st wet braking, 1st straight aquaplaning) and posts several top-6 overall finishes (2015-2013), yet is frequently relegated to lower-mid positions, especially in SUV and some premium touring comparisons. Rolling resistance and wear occasionally undermine its ranking, and wet performance varies notably by size and test context.
Excellent resistance to aquaplaning- 2016 AutoBild Summer Tire Test (2016)
Best for curved aquaplaning- 2015 Auto Bild Top 18 Summer Tire Test (2015)
Resistance to aquaplaning- 2015 Auto Review Summer Tire Test (2015)
Good resistance to aquaplaning- 2015 AMS Performance Tire Test (2015)
good safety reserves to aquaplaning- 2014 Auto Bild Top 15 Summer Tire Test (2014)
good results on a dry road- 2017 AZ Summer Tire Test (2017)
good handling and feel- 2015 AMS Performance Tire Test (2015)
Very balanced summer tires, especially good in the dry and wet- 2015 European Tire Test 205/55 R16 (2015)
Plus points in dry handling through direct and accurate steering- 2014 AMS Summer Tire Test - 205/55 R16 (2014)
very well balanced tire- 2013 Auto Zeitung Summer Tire Test (2013)
good wet grip- 2018 Gute Fahrt Summer Tire Test (2018)
Good traction on wet roads- 2015 AZ 225/40 R18 Summer Tire Test (2015)
Very balanced summer tires, especially good in the dry and wet- 2015 European Tire Test 205/55 R16 (2015)
Top marks on dry roads, especially good on wet- 2014 ADAC 195/65 R15 Summer Tire Test (2014)
Good performance on a wet track- 2014 Auto Bild Top 15 Summer Tire Test (2014)
Precise steering- 2018 Gute Fahrt Summer Tire Test (2018)
precise steering response- 2016 AutoBild Summer Tire Test (2016)
straight steering response on dry road- 2015 AZ 225/40 R18 Summer Tire Test (2015)
Plus points in dry handling through direct and accurate steering- 2014 AMS Summer Tire Test - 205/55 R16 (2014)
Poor handling and braking performance on wet surfaces- 2017 AZ Summer Tire Test (2017)
Long braking distances and slow steering response in the wet- 2015 AMS Performance Tire Test (2015)
finishing last in wet handling, braking and cornering- 2015 Auto Express Tire Test (2015)
Relatively long braking distances on wet surfaces- 2015 AZ 225/40 R18 Summer Tire Test (2015)
Long braking distances and the low driving safety on wet roads damaged the result of the Bridgestone Turanza T001- 2014 Auto Zeitung Summer Tire Test (2014)
Poor wear- 2016 AutoBild Summer Tire Test (2016)
failed early in the impact test- 2015 Auto Review Summer Tire Test (2015)
wear rate only satisfactory- 2015 Auto Bild Top 18 Summer Tire Test (2015)
Very high wear- 2014 Auto Bild Top 15 Summer Tire Test (2014)
Relatively high wear- 2014 ADAC 195/65 R15 Summer Tire Test (2014)
Average rolling resistance- 2018 Gute Fahrt Summer Tire Test (2018)
high rolling resistance- 2015 AMS Performance Tire Test (2015)
Increased rolling resistance- 2015 Auto Bild Top 18 Summer Tire Test (2015)
restricted economy- 2014 Auto Bild Top 15 Summer Tire Test (2014)
dry braking- 2015 Auto Review Summer Tire Test (2015)
ended up last in both dry and wet braking- 2014 Auto Express Summer Tire Test (2014)
Long braking distances and the low driving safety on wet roads damaged the result of the Bridgestone Turanza T001- 2014 Auto Zeitung Summer Tire Test (2014)
Every tester write-up on the Bridgestone Turanza T001 (18 tests) and 80 owner reviews were tagged for the aspects they judge. Where both have spoken, this is how they line up.
Strong = top two of the field in that measurement. Weak = bottom two.
Very Good.
Satisfactory
Again, the worlds biggest tire maker ends a test with a disappointing result. The T001 had the worst wet grip on test, finishing last in wet handling, braking and cornering, and felt subjectively weak too. An update is due for this tire soon, and it's well needed.
Bridgestones reputation has been somewhat saved by Dunlop, as the Bridgestone T001 proved to be average in nearly all areas. Slow in the dry and wet, the only good result was in the aquaplaning test. Despite being loud and uncomfortable, the Bridgestone also failed early in the impact test. Not good value for money.
Bridgestone are due to update the T001 soon, and it's showing. While it managed a respectable fourth in the rolling resistance tests, the tire ended up last in both dry and wet braking. Joint third during the dry handling test, and some of the best aquaplaning scores in the group left the Bridgestone mid pack
A year ago, tires Bridgestone Potenza S001 showed good results in the comparative test tires UHP class . But more mass model Turanza T001, the hopes of a good result were dashed. Major problems - on the asphalt. Even on the long circle, where with other tires the car comes to an easy slide on the front wheels, on Bridgestone tires it breaks into a skid, which we have to adjust the wheel! Not impressed and behavior in the dry either. The tires irritate with increased noise on rough pavement and excessive rigidity on uneven surfaces. The latter can be explained by high-capacity (XL), the carcass of tires Bridgestone Turanza T001 dual layer, while major competitors have a single-layer frame structure. Hopefully, the second layer will provide increased strength when hit in potholes or driving over obstacles.
Long braking distances and the low driving safety on wet roads damaged the result of the Bridgestone Turanza T001
Bridgestone became the main disappointment of this test. These tires are not enough good in wet conditions for the product of such a major manufacturer, and the situation on dry pavement isn't much better. Bridgestone is slow to respond to steering and can dramatically lose traction, causing the vehicle control requires more attention. The advantages - excellent resistance to aquaplaning and low noise.
The Turanza T001 is a very well balanced tire and very close to the Vredestein
The new Bridgestone T001 was the strongest tire in the dry handling test, but its relatively inconsistent wet performance left it down in 7th place
Owner reviews, sizes and EU label data, comparisons and the Tire Reviews score. All Bridgestone tires