P18 of 32
Beat 45% of the field
BFGoodrich g Grip All Season 2 Test Results
Tested 2017 to 2021
3 publications
Tested 8 times by independent publications, the BFGoodrich g Grip All Season 2 averages a finish of 11th. Its strongest discipline is Dry Braking, beating 49% of the field across 7 tests; its weakest is Wet Braking, at 34% across 7 tests.
- 8Independent tests
- 0Test wins
- 1Podium finishes
- 11thAverage finish
- 46%Field beaten on average
- 3Publications
8 tests, 2017 to 2021
- Test win
- Second
- Third
- Average 46%
Record by discipline
Where the BFGoodrich g Grip All Season 2 finished in each measured discipline, across every test that measured it against at least two other tires. Field beaten is the share of the other tires it outranked in that measurement.
| Discipline | Tests | Avg finish | Field beaten | Firsts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry | ||||
| Dry Braking Strong | 7 | P10.7 of 20.9 | 49% | - |
| Dry Handling | 4 | P8.3 of 12 | 36% | - |
| Wet | ||||
| Wet Braking Weak | 7 | P13.6 of 20.9 | 34% | - |
| Wet Handling | 4 | P8.5 of 12 | 33% | - |
| Straight Aqua | 4 | P8 of 12 | 37% | - |
| Snow | ||||
| Snow Braking | 4 | P2.8 of 12 | 83% | 2 |
| Snow Handling | 4 | P3.5 of 12 | 76% | - |
| Comfort | ||||
| Noise | 4 | P2.8 of 12 | 85% | 2 |
| Value | ||||
| Wear | 2 | P5.5 of 13 | 65% | 1 |
| Value | 2 | P7 of 13 | 53% | - |
| Rolling Resistance | 4 | P4.5 of 12 | 69% | - |
Head-to-head record
Overall finishing position against the tires that have most often shared a test with the BFGoodrich g Grip All Season 2. Only tires tested alongside it at least three times are listed.
| Rival | Shared tests | Ahead | Behind | Level | Finished ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 Continental AllSeasonContact
7 shared: 0 ahead, 7 behind
|
7 | 0 | 7 | - | 0% |
 Nexen N Blue 4 Season
6 shared: 2 ahead, 4 behind
|
6 | 2 | 4 | - | 33% |
 Kleber Quadraxer 2
6 shared: 2 ahead, 4 behind
|
6 | 2 | 4 | - | 33% |
 Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210
6 shared: 1 ahead, 5 behind
|
6 | 1 | 5 | - | 17% |
 Maxxis Premitra All Season AP3
5 shared: 2 ahead, 3 behind
|
5 | 2 | 3 | - | 40% |
 Michelin CrossClimate+
5 shared: 0 ahead, 5 behind
|
5 | 0 | 5 | - | 0% |
 Hankook Kinergy 4S2
5 shared: 0 ahead, 5 behind
|
5 | 0 | 5 | - | 0% |
 Toyo Celsius
4 shared: 3 ahead, 1 behind
|
4 | 3 | 1 | - | 75% |
 Viking FourTech
4 shared: 3 ahead, 1 behind
|
4 | 3 | 1 | - | 75% |
 Fulda MultiControl
4 shared: 3 ahead, 1 behind
|
4 | 3 | 1 | - | 75% |
 Nokian WeatherProof
4 shared: 2 ahead, 2 behind
|
4 | 2 | 2 | - | 50% |
 Uniroyal AllSeasonExpert 2
4 shared: 1 ahead, 3 behind
|
4 | 1 | 3 | - | 25% |
 Goodyear Vector 4 Seasons Gen 2
4 shared: 0 ahead, 4 behind
|
4 | 0 | 4 | - | 0% |
 Apollo Alnac 4G All Season
3 shared: 3 ahead, 0 behind
|
3 | 3 | 0 | - | 100% |
 General Altimax 365AW
3 shared: 2 ahead, 1 behind
|
3 | 2 | 1 | - | 67% |
 Vredestein Quatrac 5
3 shared: 2 ahead, 1 behind
|
3 | 2 | 1 | - | 67% |
 Kumho Solus 4S HA32
3 shared: 1 ahead, 2 behind
|
3 | 1 | 2 | - | 33% |
 Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO
3 shared: 1 ahead, 2 behind
|
3 | 1 | 2 | - | 33% |
 Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
3 shared: 0 ahead, 3 behind
|
3 | 0 | 3 | - | 0% |
 Vredestein Quatrac Pro
3 shared: 0 ahead, 3 behind
|
3 | 0 | 3 | - | 0% |
Against its own line
The same record for the tire it replaced and the tire that replaced it.
| Tire | Tests | Wins | Avg finish | Field beaten |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BFGoodrich g Grip All Season Predecessor | 0 | - | - | - |
| BFGoodrich g Grip All Season 2 This tire | 8 | 0 | 11th | 46% |
Performance Analysis
Drawn from 8 tests. Updated October 29, 2026.
The BFGoodrich g Grip All Season 2 has shown more consistent strengths in snow braking and noise than in wet-road stopping or handling. It led snow braking in both the 2020 Sport Auto and Auto Bild full tests, placing second in snow handling in each. Testers repeatedly praised snow traction. Noise was lowest in the Sport Auto comparison and second lowest in Auto Bild, while rolling resistance was generally in the better half. Wet braking and handling were less competitive: both ranked eighth of nine in Sport Auto, while Auto Bild placed wet braking eleventh of sixteen and wet handling fourteenth.
There are important exceptions. Second of eleven in dry braking and third in wet handling in the 2017 Auto Zeitung all-season-versus-winter comparison were unusually favorable against the later road results, and came in a mixed seasonal field. Auto Bild also praised short dry braking in 2020, despite its measured thirteenth of sixteen placing. Wear and value changed sharply between its full tests: first for wear and second for cost per distance in 2017, but tenth of fourteen and twelfth of fourteen respectively in 2020. The earlier cost advantage is therefore not consistent. Snow handling also drew criticism in the 2017 Auto Zeitung test, despite its stronger 2020 results.
Performance Strengths
-
Snow braking
Strong
in 2 of 4 tests
Details
- First of nine in the 2020 Sport Auto test and first of sixteen in the 2020 Auto Bild full test.
- Testers praised snow braking in both 2020 comparisons.
Very short braking distances and high levels of grip on snow
- 2020 Sport Auto All Season Tire Test (2020)Good acceleration and braking on snow
- 2017 All Season VS Winter Tire Test (2017)
-
Snow traction
Strong
in 4 of 4 tests
Details
- All four tester write-ups praised snow traction or overall snow grip.
Very short braking distances and high levels of grip on snow
- 2020 Sport Auto All Season Tire Test (2020)good traction
- 2020 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test (2020)Good snow performance
- 2017 All Season Tire Test (2017)Good acceleration and braking on snow
- 2017 All Season VS Winter Tire Test (2017)
-
Road noise
Strong
Details
- First of nine in the 2020 Sport Auto test and second of sixteen in the 2020 Auto Bild full test.
- First of eleven in the 2017 Auto Zeitung mixed-season comparison.
-
Rolling resistance
Moderate
in 2 of 4 tests
Details
- Third of nine in the 2020 Sport Auto test and seventh of sixteen in the 2020 Auto Bild full test.
- Fourth of twelve in the 2017 Auto Bild test, with low rolling resistance praised by Auto Zeitung that year.
low rolling resistance
- 2020 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test (2020)low rolling resistance
- 2017 All Season VS Winter Tire Test (2017)
-
Snow handling
Minor
in 1 of 4 tests
Details
- Second in both 2020 full tests.
- Auto Zeitung criticised snow handling in 2017, so the strength was not universal.
Snow professional with excellent cornering
- 2020 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test (2020)
Performance Weaknesses
-
Wet braking
Moderate
in 1 of 4 tests
Details
- Eighth of nine in the 2020 Sport Auto test and eleventh of sixteen in the 2020 Auto Bild full test.
- 23rd of 31 in the 2019 Auto Bild overview and 23rd of 34 in the 2021 overview.
Poor dry and wet braking
- 2020 Sport Auto All Season Tire Test (2020)
-
Wet handling
Moderate
in 1 of 4 tests
Details
- Eighth of nine in the 2020 Sport Auto test and fourteenth of sixteen in the 2020 Auto Bild full test.
- Third of eleven in the 2017 Auto Zeitung mixed-season test was an unusually favorable exception.
Understeer in the wet
- 2020 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test (2020)
-
Dry braking
Minor
in 1 of 4 tests
Details
- Eighth of nine in the 2020 Sport Auto test and thirteenth of sixteen in the 2020 Auto Bild full test.
- Second of eleven in the 2017 Auto Zeitung mixed-season test was an unusually strong exception.
Poor dry and wet braking
- 2020 Sport Auto All Season Tire Test (2020)
Every test, newest first 8
Strong = top two of the field in that measurement. Weak = bottom two.
2021 1 test
2020 3 tests
P6 of 7
Beat 17% of the field
P9 of 14
Beat 38% of the field
P12 of 32
Beat 63% of the field
2019 1 test
P22 of 31
Beat 30% of the field
2018 1 test
P14 of 27
Beat 50% of the field
2017 2 tests
P5 of 10
Beat 56% of the field
P3 of 11
Beat 70% of the field
Back to the BFGoodrich g Grip All Season 2 overview
Owner reviews, sizes and EU label data, comparisons and the Tire Reviews score. All BFGoodrich tires