Menu
BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2 View Gallery (3)
30-325/9-85 R15-20 52 sizes 2014 Winter rated
Tested by Tire Reviews View Test »

BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2

BFGoodrich Tires All Terrain and Off Road All Season Next

The BFGoodrich All Terrain T/A KO2 is a rugged, dependable all-terrain tire that's at its best when the road ends. Driver feedback and independent testing agree it delivers standout traction on loose surfaces and in snow, backed up by a tough carcass and strong puncture resistance. On tarmac it's generally stable and predictable for an aggressive A/T, but its biggest compromise is wet-road grip and braking.

8.1
Tire Reviews Score Based on Professional Tests & User Reviews
High Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
82%
Wet Grip
66%
Road Feedback
70%
Handling
72%
Wear
84%
Comfort
72%
Buy again
70%
Snow Grip
81%
Ice Grip
63%
38 Reviews
73% Average
830,040 miles driven
3 Tests (avg: 4th)
BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2

BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2

All Season Mid-Range
BETA
8.1 / 10
Based on Professional Tests & User Reviews · High Confidence · Updated 23 Feb 2026

The Tire Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tire scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Category Scores
Snow
95.6
1.38x / 6 tests
Off road
91.9
0.68x / 7 tests
Comfort
70
0.32x / 3 tests
Wet
58
1.93x / 9 tests
Value
49
0.42x / 2 tests
Dry
46
1.5x / 6 tests
Cross-Category Performance

Cross-category scores are derived metrics that combine data from multiple test disciplines to evaluate real-world performance characteristics.

Traction
87.3
4 tests
Braking
75.3
7 tests
Handling
68.3
12 tests
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 3
Publications: 3
Period: 2017 - 2024
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 38
Avg Rating: 73.3%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 0.32
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tire tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.9 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 12 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.75 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
combined_penalty_floor 0.2
Data Sources
TestPublicationDateSizePositionMetrics
The BEST All Terrain Tire for 2025 Tire Reviews 2024 35x12.5R17 2/5 16 metrics
Best All Terrain Tires Tested On Road, Off Road and Snow [2024] Pro Mobil 2024 255/55 R18 7/7 17 metrics
2017 Drive Out Off Road 4x4 Tire Test Drive Out 2017 265/65 R17 2/7 0 metrics

Videos

I Tested the BEST All Terrain Tires in the Dry, Wet, Snow, and Dirt!

I Tested the BEST All Terrain Tires in the Dry, Wet, Snow, and Dirt!

In Depth Tire Comparisons
BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2 vs Goodyear Wrangler All Terrain Adventure
BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2 vs Goodyear Wrangler All Terrain Adventure
BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2 vs General Grabber AT3
BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2 vs General Grabber AT3
Awards
Recommended
The BEST All Terrain Tire for 2025
2024 · 35x12.5R17
All Tests
View Test Results
3
Tests
4th
Average
2nd
Best
7th
Worst
Latest Tire Test Results
The BEST All Terrain Tire for 2025
35x12.5R17 • 2024
2nd/5
The BFGoodrich KO2 showed excellent grip off-road, setting the fastest dirt handling time. It performed particularly well in snow conditions, leading the snow braking test and finishing second in snow handling. The tire maintained good noise levels until higher speeds and offered strong aquaplaning resistance.
The KO2's firm carcass made it harder to control through bumps and undulations, both off-road and on-road. It had the longest dry braking distance of the group and showed significant understeer in wet handling.
Despite being one of the older designs in the test, the KO2 remains competitive, particularly excelling in off-road and snow performance. While its on-road manners weren't class-leading, it delivered a well-rounded package that balanced off-road capability with acceptable road behavior.
Best All Terrain Tires Tested On Road, Off Road and Snow [2024]
255/55 R18 • 2024
7th/7
BF Goodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 produces some concerning results on paved roads. Its dry performance showed significant weaknesses with long braking distances, sluggish steering response and unstable behavior during emergency maneuvers. Wet performance was particularly problematic, with the longest braking distances in the test and poor cornering grip, making it one of the least safe tires on wet roads. However, it redeemed itself with excellent snow performance, providing strong traction, good braking and stable handling. Offroad capabilities were impressive, especially in mud and on gravel where it showed good bite and predictable behavior. The downsides were significant though - it had the highest rolling resistance in the test at 10.7 kg/t which will impact fuel economy, and was also the loudest tire tested at 73.4 dB. Comfort was notably poor with noticeable vibrations transmitted through the steering wheel.
2017 Drive Out Off Road 4x4 Tire Test
265/65 R17 • 2017
2nd/7
View Test Results

Questions and Answers for the BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2

Ask a question
March 4, 2022

Is anyone else having out of round (runout) problems with the 235/85/16 new tires balanced perfectly. All terrain TA KO2

I've not seen any reported issues with this.
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

Review Summary

Based on 33 user reviews

BFGoodrich All Terrain T/A KO2 reviews are largely positive, with drivers consistently praising it as a tough, dependable all-terrain tire that excels off-road (rocks, gravel, sand) and resists punctures, while also delivering strong tread life. Many users also report confident performance in snow and generally good dry-road handling for an aggressive AT. The most frequent downside is on-road wet performance-especially wet braking and wet cornering-with multiple reports of reduced grip, and some owners also note increased noise and a firmer ride (often worsening as the tire ages/hardens).

Strengths
  • Excellent off-road traction (rocks
  • Gravel
  • Sand)
  • Strong durability and puncture/sidewall resistance
  • Long tread life / hard wearing
  • Good snow traction for an all-terrain tire
  • Confident dry-road grip/handling for an at
  • Aggressive/rugged appearance
Areas for Improvement
  • Poor wet-road grip and especially wet braking (can feel slippery/lock up)
  • Increased road noise vs highway tires
  • Firm/harsh ride and heavy/less efficient feel (can impact comfort and fuel economy)

Top 3 BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2 Reviews

Given 41% while driving a Toyota hilux (225/45 R17) on mostly town for 42,000 average miles
4 K02's where fitted in September 2022 @ 10700km. I was told to expect 80-100k km life. I do drive many tar roads and do a bit of towing . I found them very noisy and rather a hard ride. Although they have been good in the wet, not so much in the dry .
But most disappointing, after the price tag, they need to be replaced now in January 2025 @ 149000km.
I appreciate that I may be a bit of an aggressive driver but, in my opinion, to only last 42000km is shocking !
Helpful 923
January 9, 2025
Given 86% while driving a Toyota 4runner (345/75 R16) on a combination of roads for 50,000 average miles
I had these on my 4Runner for years. Used in all kinds of weather and terrain. Always gave me complete confidence no matter what : snow, wet, dry, pot holes, dirt.... you name it I was confident these tires could handle it. I would buy again. Also, for a snow/all terrain they were reasonably quiet and comfortable and gave good wear. Keep em aired up and rotate and you will get the warranty wear out of them.
Helpful 967
November 30, 2024
Given 60% while driving a GMC Sierra 1500 AT4 (265/75 R18) on mostly motorways for 30,000 average miles
In order to get even reasonable fuel mileage with these tires, a minimum of 60psi are required, making these tires brutally rough over even the smallest bumps in the road. They grip like glue in dry and wet weather, but sadly I have not had a chance to take them offroad since I got them installed in replacement of the noisy Goodyear Wrangler OEM tires that came on my 2019 GMC AT4. On a smooth highway, these tires disappear and are a dream to drive on. But once the bumps start - things get rough. These are load range E tires, and the high pressures are normal and they love a heavy load, but man you pay a price in rough road comfort. I will probably not buy these again. but instead opt for a load range C tire that can handle lower pressures and swallow up the bumps a bit better.
Helpful 822
November 21, 2024

How would you rate the BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2?

Click a star to start your review

209 reviews submitted this month Earn your Contributor badge No account needed

Latest BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2 Reviews

Initial Impressions Review
Given 73% while driving a Land Rover Discovery 3 (265/60 R18) on for 10,000 miles
These are one of the default AT tires for a reason. I haven't used these off road extensively but they have seen a few rock covered trails and plenty of rough gravel roads with no issues. Mud traction is just OK but of course these aren't mud tires. Snow, slush, and even deep snow traction has been great, but grip on ice and hard packed snow is much less impressive and reminds you these aren't proper winter tires. This might be a compromise most AT tires make, but it's bad enough I wouldn't recommend these for someone who just wants all weather performance for a street driven truck/SUV. If you need a durable do anything on/off road tire, especially in warmer and drier climates, these would be a great option.
Helpful 22
March 26, 2026
Initial Impressions Review
Given 76% while driving a Mitsubishi triton (245/65 R16) on mostly country roads for 20,000 spirited miles
Great tire, leagues ahead of the OEM figment tire on the ute. Didn’t compromise NVH, didn’t compromise wet grip, massively better off-road.

In soft sand it sat a little lower, there was slightly more resistance but you are able to apply power much more effectively and so you can drive through the resistance much more easily.

No flats! I had two flats in 15,000kms on the stock tires (off-road across/ around Australia trip) and never had a flat since.

Moved to the Maxxis RAZR AT811 which is a little better in mud, but cannot go wrong with a BFG AT KO2!
Helpful 141
January 6, 2026
Given 74% while driving a Suzuki grand vitara (225/65 R17) on a combination of roads for 30,000 average miles
An excellent AT tire in my opinion - it doesn't feel useless in any situation. I have been impressed with my KO2s in snow and in light offroad. Grip is great in both. I have driven over a few rocks and never felt there was a risk of a puncture. For any potential buyers, keep in mind there is a trade off on road. In the dry the tires can squeal in bends, especially if it is hot (tire pressure is correct). In the wet there is a higher risk of straight aquaplaning. The tires are noisier than regular road tires but I haven't felt any negative effects in comfort. In terms of wear I haven't noticed any decline in performance in the 4+ years I've been using them. One final though - when I ordered them, I didn't know there was an option w/o white lettering and this is what I got. A bit of a shame since my car is black and the RWL would have looked awesome.
BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2 image BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2 additional image BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2 additional image
Helpful 265
December 1, 2025
Given 43% while driving a Toyota Tacoma (265/75 R16) on a combination of roads for 20,000 average miles
Initially these work great but the rubber hardens up over time and any type of cold or wet weather turns them into hockey pucks.
Helpful 848
October 5, 2024
Given 56% while driving a Toyota Landcruiser (185/60 R18) on a combination of roads for 120,000 average miles
Very noisey after a few years of constant use. Apparently the rubber goes hard and the become noisy as sand tires
Helpful 812
March 29, 2024
Given 72% while driving a Toyota Landcruiser (275/70 R16) on mostly country roads for 5,000 average miles
Great AT tire that is very hard wearing. Wet grip and braking I found was a little poor.
Off road it is excellent.
Helpful 853
October 9, 2023
Given 64% while driving a Nissan patrol (285/70 R17) on a combination of roads for 20 average miles
Toooo much noise and the seller says if there’s noise before 50k return it and he never answer me
Helpful 848
March 27, 2023
Given 63% while driving a Mercedes Benz Sprinter Van (265/70 R17) on a combination of roads for 10,000 easy going miles
No doubt these tires are tough and last. They are good in gravel and sand and average in mud. Good for rock crawling although Ginny do too much of this in a 6m sprinter. However, wet handling was scary at times. Any wet white line or expansion joint caused a loss of traction and some scary moments. Wet braking on tarmac was also really poor. Sadly in the U.K. the choice of AT tires is limited with most of the best not being imported….BUT if 80% plus of your time is on tarmac I would look elsewhere.
Helpful 928
March 18, 2023
Given 71% while driving a Ford F350 (275/65 R20) on mostly country roads for 20 average miles
Bought this tire primarily for winter (deep snow) and off road use. It was great for that.
Helpful 995
December 23, 2022
Given 79% while driving a Land Rover (245/70 R16) on mostly town for 20,000 average miles
Very aggressive and good looking but with a big lack of comfort
Helpful 889
October 30, 2022
Given 76% while driving a Nissan (265/65 R16) on a combination of roads for 10,000 average miles
Good in dry road as off road as well with excellent handling and braking Good braking in wet asphalt road less during turn accelerations After 10000 kmh they became very hard, therefore the comfort became so hard that i needed to replace them Good in mud but not deep thick mud
Helpful 1141
October 15, 2022
Given 59% while driving a Land Rover Defender (265/75 R16) on mostly country roads for 20,000 spirited miles
These tires are dual compound and once the initial softer rubber wears away the remaining compound is much harder resulting in poor wet weather grip. Have had the last 3 generations of BFG AT’s and these are the worst in wet conditions.
Helpful 837
September 13, 2022
Rate the BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2