Menu

Test source Die Reifentester

2025 Die Reifentester All Season Tire Test - 195/55 R16

Overall test winnerPirelli Cinturato All Season SF3

Die Reifentester, the test team of Dirk Vincken and Joachim Fischer, tested eight all season tires in 195/55 R16, a size many small cars wear from the factory.

Tires tested
8
Tested size
195/55 R16
Test vehicle
VW Polo 1.0 TSI, Skoda Fabia, Seat Ibiza
Disciplines
12

At a glance

Tire shortlist

8 Tires tested

Published finishing positions, with the strengths and considerations from this test. Owner reviews cover other sizes and driving conditions.

1st

Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF3

+The Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF3 stopped shortest in the dry by a clear margin, which is rare for an all season tire. It won both aquaplaning tests, scored second for wet handling, and shared the best snow handling score with the Michelin. It was second for snow braking and snow traction, and it was one of the most comfortable and quietest tires in the test.

−The Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF3 had no real weakness. Its lowest placing was mid-field in dry handling, where the testers found it dependable rather than sharp, and its rolling resistance was only mid-table.

2nd

Michelin CrossClimate 2

+The Michelin CrossClimate 2 was the only tire rated very good in dry handling, with willing turn-in and a sporty, balanced feel. It had the best winter result of the eight: it stopped shortest on snow, shared the top snow handling score with the Pirelli and was third for snow traction. It was also second for dry braking and had the second lowest rolling resistance.

−The Michelin CrossClimate 2 scored lowest for wet handling. The testers found it could not settle between understeer and oversteer, with the rear coming round on a lift. Its wet braking was among the longer distances in the field, and it was in the lower half in both aquaplaning tests.

3rd

Continental AllSeasonContact 2

+The Continental AllSeasonContact 2 stopped shortest in the wet by a clear margin and had by far the strongest snow traction. It also had the lowest rolling resistance in the test and stopped third shortest on snow. The testers found its dry handling predictable.

−The Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was last in both aquaplaning tests and in the bottom three for dry braking. It was the noisiest tire and one of the two least comfortable, and the testers felt it lacked some sparkle in dry handling. Its wet handling score was in the lower half.

Joint4th

Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6

+The Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 was strong in summer conditions. It was one of the four best wet braking tires, the third shortest stopper in the dry and fourth in both aquaplaning tests. It scored well for wet handling and stopped as well as the Goodyear on snow.

−The Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 scored lowest for dry handling, where the testers felt it lacked some precision. On snow it was in the lower half for both traction and handling, and the testers marked it down for its lateral grip and its breakaway at the limit.

Joint4th

Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3

+The Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 scored highest for wet handling, steering accurately and staying stable under braking. It was second for wet braking and in curved aquaplaning, and third in straight aquaplaning. Its snow handling was third best, and it was rated good for comfort and noise.

−The Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 was only mid-field for dry braking, and it had the second highest rolling resistance. Its winter results were satisfactory rather than good: its snow traction was mid-pack and its snow braking in the lower half, and the testers found it slightly behind the leaders for grip on snow.

Joint4th

Vredestein Quatrac

+The Vredestein Quatrac was among the quietest and most comfortable tires in the test, absorbing rough surfaces well. It was third for wet handling and had the third lowest rolling resistance.

−The Vredestein Quatrac stopped longest on snow, and its snow traction and snow handling were only mid-pack. It was among the longer stopping tires in the dry and the wet, and it was in the bottom two in both aquaplaning tests. The testers felt it lacked some precision in dry handling.

7th

Hankook Kinergy 4S2

+The Hankook Kinergy 4S2 was second in straight aquaplaning and third in curved aquaplaning. It was among the better tires for dry braking, and the testers liked its keen turn-in in dry handling, where it scored third best.

−The Hankook Kinergy 4S2 was weakest on snow, with the lowest snow handling score and the lowest snow traction. The testers felt it did not give the driver enough confidence on snow. It was also the least comfortable tire and one of the two noisiest, and its wet braking and wet handling were in the lower half.

8th

Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210

+The Falken Euroall Season AS210 was the quietest and most comfortable tire in the test. It scored second for dry handling, with keen turn-in, and its snow braking was mid-field.

−The Falken Euroall Season AS210 stopped longest in both the dry and the wet, and it had the highest rolling resistance by a clear margin. On snow it was second to last for traction and handling, with imprecise steering. The testers found its wet handling unsettled, with the rear coming round on a lift.

Tire shortlist

Compare selected tires

2025 Die Reifentester All Season Tire Test - 195/55 R16 · 195/55 R16

TirePirelli Cinturato All Season SF3Michelin CrossClimate 2Continental AllSeasonContact 2Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3Vredestein QuatracHankook Kinergy 4S2Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210
Position1st2nd3rdJoint 4thJoint 4thJoint 4th7th8th
Category scores (% of best)
Dry98.8%95.5%90.6%93.6%90.3%89.8%93.1%87%
Wet97.6%88.7%93.4%93.6%96.7%90%91.4%88.6%
Snow97.1%98.2%97.9%92.6%93.6%91.8%90.9%91.5%
Comfort97.5%95.1%88.3%92.6%93.8%98.8%88.3%100%
Rolling Resistance88.2%93.1%100%87%81.7%89.3%82.7%74.4%
Keep researchingRead owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results

Explore the complete results →

The full test

The evidence behind the verdict

Die Reifentester, the test team of Dirk Vincken and Joachim Fischer, tested eight all season tires in 195/55 R16, a size many small cars wear from the factory. The test cars were a VW Polo, Skoda Fabia and Seat Ibiza. The summer tests were run at Bridgestone's European proving ground at Aprilia near Rome, and the snow tests at Nokian's White Hell facility near Ivalo in Finnish Lapland.

The Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF3 won, and it was the only tire rated very good overall. It stopped shortest in the dry by more than two meters, won both aquaplaning tests and shared the best snow handling score with the Michelin. Its weakest result was fifth place in dry handling. The Michelin CrossClimate 2 was second, with the best winter result of the eight, and the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was third, with the shortest wet braking, the strongest snow traction and the lowest rolling resistance.

Test setup & methodology

The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.

Recorded test conditions

Recorded test conditions

Dry Braking
62.1 → 0.0 mph
Wet Braking
49.7 → 0.0 mph
Snow Braking
31.1 → 0.0 mph

Die Reifentester publish grades rather than total points. The overall grades put the Pirelli alone at the top, five tires on good, and the Hankook and Falken on satisfactory. To separate the five good tires we used the test's own summer and winter grades, which are weighted 75 and 25 per cent. The Michelin is second on its very good winter grade and the Continental third, while the Bridgestone, Goodyear and Vredestein share fourth. The Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 was the test's reference tire. That only means it was the 100 per cent baseline for the percentage figures, and it was graded like the rest. Handling, comfort and noise are the testers' scored assessments, shown here out of 10. Braking, aquaplaning, traction and rolling resistance are measured.

Dry

Dry braking from 62 mph is usually where all season tires give away the most, and the Pirelli stood apart from the field. It stopped in 126 feet, with the Michelin and Bridgestone next and almost level with each other. The Falken needed 148 feet, the longest in the test. For context, Die Reifentester also had a summer tire in 225/45 R17 on an Opel Astra on track at the same time, and it averaged around 118 feet.

Dry Braking

Dry braking in feet (62 - 0 mph)

Lower is better ↓
Dry Braking
Position / TireResultGap to bestResidual speed
126 ft Best 0 mph
133 ft +7 ft 19 mph
133 ft +7 ft 19 mph
136 ft +10 ft 22 mph
140 ft +14 ft 25 mph
140 ft +14 ft 25 mph
141 ft +15 ft 26 mph
148 ft +22 ft 31 mph

The difference between best and worst was 17.5% (22 ft ≈ 1.5 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 would still be travelling at 31 mph when the Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF3 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

The Michelin was the only tire rated very good in dry handling, with a balanced, sporty feel and willing turn-in. The other seven were all rated good and were closely spaced. The Falken and Hankook were next, both keen to turn in, while the Vredestein and Bridgestone were the least precise. All of the testing was done between 15 and 20°C. The testers point out that all season tires tend to go greasy in fast corners above about 25°C.

Subj. Dry Handling

Subjective Dry Handling Score

Higher is better ↑
Subj. Dry Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
8.2 Points Best
7.9 Points -0.30 Points
7.8 Points -0.40 Points
7.7 Points -0.50 Points
7.6 Points -0.60 Points
7.5 Points -0.70 Points
7.5 Points -0.70 Points
7.4 Points -0.80 Points

The difference between best and worst was 9.8% (0.8 Points).

Wet

Wet braking from 50 mph went to the Continental at 112 feet, with the Goodyear, Pirelli and Bridgestone within two meters of it. The Vredestein, Hankook and Michelin were grouped together about three meters behind the Continental, and the Falken was longest at 126 feet.

Wet Braking

Wet braking in feet (50 - 0 mph)

Lower is better ↓
Wet Braking
Position / TireResultGap to bestResidual speed
112 ft Best 0 mph
116 ft +4 ft 14 mph
116 ft +4 ft 15 mph
118 ft +6 ft 17 mph
123 ft +11 ft 23 mph
123 ft +11 ft 24 mph
123 ft +11 ft 24 mph
126 ft +14 ft 26 mph

The difference between best and worst was 12.1% (14 ft ≈ 0.9 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 would still be travelling at 26 mph when the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

The Goodyear scored highest for wet handling, steering accurately and staying stable under braking with a calm rear end. The Pirelli was second and the Vredestein and Bridgestone followed. The Michelin scored lowest, and the testers found it and the Falken could not settle between understeer and oversteer, with the rear tending to come round on a lift.

Subj. Wet Handling

Subjective Wet Handling Score

Higher is better ↑
Subj. Wet Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
8.4 Points Best
8.1 Points -0.30 Points
7.9 Points -0.50 Points
7.8 Points -0.60 Points
7.4 Points -1.00 Points
7.3 Points -1.10 Points
7.2 Points -1.20 Points
7 Points -1.40 Points

The difference between best and worst was 16.7% (1.4 Points).

The Pirelli won both aquaplaning tests. In a straight line it held on to 54.0 mph, a clear margin over the Hankook, Goodyear and Bridgestone, which were almost level with each other. On the curve the Goodyear and Hankook were closest to it. The Continental was last in both tests.

Straight Aqua

Float Speed in mph

Higher is better ↑
Straight Aqua
Position / TireResultGap to best
54.0 mph Best
50.3 mph -3.7 mph
50.2 mph -3.8 mph
50.1 mph -3.9 mph
49.0 mph -5.0 mph
48.1 mph -5.9 mph
47.9 mph -6.1 mph
46.7 mph -7.3 mph

The difference between best and worst was 13.5% (7.3 mph).

The curved aquaplaning figure is the highest cornering speed the car could hold through 7 mm of standing water.

Curved Aquaplaning

Remaining lateral acceleration

Higher is better ↑
Curved Aquaplaning
Position / TireResultGap to best
231.3 ft/s² Best
223.8 ft/s² -7.5 ft/s²
219.8 ft/s² -11.5 ft/s²
204.7 ft/s² -26.6 ft/s²
200.5 ft/s² -30.8 ft/s²
195.5 ft/s² -35.8 ft/s²
187.7 ft/s² -43.6 ft/s²
186.0 ft/s² -45.3 ft/s²

The difference between best and worst was 19.6% (45.3 ft/s²).

Snow

The snow tests were run on hard-packed snow. Snow braking from 31 mph was close: the Michelin stopped shortest, and the next six were all within 1.2 meters of it. The Vredestein was longest.

Snow Braking

Snow braking in feet (31 - 0 mph)

Lower is better ↓
Snow Braking
Position / TireResultGap to bestResidual speed
82 ft Best 0 mph
84 ft +2 ft 13 mph
85 ft +3 ft 14 mph
85 ft +3 ft 16 mph
86 ft +4 ft 16 mph
86 ft +4 ft 17 mph
86 ft +4 ft 17 mph
88 ft +6 ft 21 mph

The difference between best and worst was 7.2% (6 ft ≈ 0.4 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Vredestein Quatrac would still be travelling at 21 mph when the Michelin CrossClimate 2 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Snow traction was measured as the average pulling force while accelerating to 22 mph. The Continental led clearly, with the Pirelli and Michelin almost level behind it. The Falken and Hankook were last, and close together.

Snow Traction

Pulling Force in pounds-force

Higher is better ↑
Snow Traction
Position / TireResultGap to best
534 lbf Best
512 lbf -22 lbf
509 lbf -25 lbf
484 lbf -50 lbf
480 lbf -54 lbf
475 lbf -59 lbf
467 lbf -67 lbf
466 lbf -68 lbf

The difference between best and worst was 12.8% (68 lbf).

No tire was rated very good for snow handling. The Michelin and Pirelli shared the top score, with good lateral grip and a predictable balance. The Goodyear was a little behind them on traction, and the Continental and Vredestein were close behind the Goodyear. The Bridgestone was lower again. The Falken and Hankook were last, and the testers felt neither gave the driver enough confidence.

Subj. Snow Handling

Subjective Snow Handling Score

Higher is better ↑
Subj. Snow Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
7.6 Points Best
7.6 Points Best
7.3 Points -0.30 Points
7.2 Points -0.40 Points
7.2 Points -0.40 Points
6.9 Points -0.70 Points
6.6 Points -1.00 Points
6.4 Points -1.20 Points

The difference between best and worst was 15.8% (1.2 Points).

Comfort

The Falken was the most comfortable tire and the quietest. The Vredestein was just behind it in both tests, and the Pirelli matched the Vredestein for comfort. The Continental and Hankook were the noisiest and the least comfortable, with more drumming and vibration on rough roads.

Subj. Comfort

Subjective Comfort Score

Higher is better ↑
Subj. Comfort
Position / TireResultGap to best
8.1 Points Best
8 Points -0.10 Points
8 Points -0.10 Points
7.7 Points -0.40 Points
7.6 Points -0.50 Points
7.5 Points -0.60 Points
7.2 Points -0.90 Points
7.1 Points -1.00 Points

The difference between best and worst was 12.3% (1 Points).

Subj. Noise

Subjective in car noise levels

Higher is better ↑
Subj. Noise
Position / TireResultGap to best
8.1 Points Best
8 Points -0.10 Points
7.8 Points -0.30 Points
7.7 Points -0.40 Points
7.6 Points -0.50 Points
7.5 Points -0.60 Points
7.2 Points -0.90 Points
7.1 Points -1.00 Points

The difference between best and worst was 12.3% (1 Points).

Rolling Resistance

The Continental had the lowest rolling resistance by a clear margin, followed by the Michelin. The Falken was highest, with the Goodyear second highest. In the high-speed test every tire completed its speed rating.

Rolling Resistance

Rolling resistance in kg t

Lower is better ↓
Rolling Resistance
Position / TireResultGap to bestExtra fuel / year
6.7 kg/t Best $0
7.2 kg/t +0.50 kg/t $22
7.5 kg/t +0.80 kg/t $35
7.6 kg/t +0.90 kg/t $39
7.7 kg/t +1.00 kg/t $44
8.1 kg/t +1.40 kg/t $61
8.2 kg/t +1.50 kg/t $66
9 kg/t +2.30 kg/t $101

The difference between best and worst was 34.3% (2.3 kg / t). Over 12,000 miles a year at $3.60/gal, the Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 uses about 28 gal ($101) more fuel than the Continental AllSeasonContact 2.

Adjust the assumptions

Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions.

12,000 mi
$3.60/gal
Estimates based on typical driving conditions. Rolling resistance accounts for approximately 20% of IC vehicle fuel consumption and 25% of EV energy consumption. Actual savings vary based on driving style, vehicle weight, road conditions, and tire age. For comparative purposes only. Lifetime savings based on a 40,000km / 25,000 mile tread life.

Results

The Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF3 is a clear winner. It was the only tire without a weak area, and it was clearly best at dry braking, the test that still separates all season tires from summer tires. The rest of the field split by priorities. The Michelin had the best winter result, and the Continental had the best snow traction as well as the shortest wet braking. The Bridgestone and Goodyear were better in summer conditions than in winter. The Vredestein was a quiet, comfortable all-rounder. The Hankook and Falken fell behind on snow. The full charts, including residual speeds and each tire's percentage against the Goodyear reference, are in Die Reifentester's original test.

1st

Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF3

195/55 R16 91V XL
Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF3
The Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF3 was the clear test winner and the only tire rated very good overall. It was very strong in summer conditions and good throughout the winter tests, and it was the most balanced tire in the field. It is easy to recommend for year-round use.
Dry98.8%
Wet97.6%
Snow97.1%
Comfort97.5%
Rolling Resistance88.2%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (12)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better1st / 8126 ftBest in this discipline
Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better5th / 87.6 Points-0.60 Points
Wet BrakingLower is better3rd / 8116 ft+4 ft
Subj. Wet HandlingHigher is better2nd / 88.1 Points-0.30 Points
Straight AquaHigher is better1st / 854.0 mphBest in this discipline
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better1st / 8231.3 ft/s²Best in this discipline
Snow BrakingLower is better2nd / 884 ft+2 ft
Snow TractionHigher is better2nd / 8512 lbf-22 lbf
Subj. Snow HandlingHigher is better1st / 87.6 PointsBest in this discipline
Subj. ComfortHigher is better2nd / 88 Points-0.10 Points
Subj. NoiseHigher is better3rd / 87.8 Points-0.30 Points
Rolling ResistanceLower is better4th / 87.6 kg/t+0.90 kg/t
Origin
Romania
Weight
5.98 kgs
Tread
7.0 mm
Price
128.00
2nd

Michelin CrossClimate 2

195/55 R16 91V XL
Michelin CrossClimate 2
The Michelin CrossClimate 2 finished second, and it was the best choice here for drivers who see real snow. It was consistently good in summer and winter conditions, held back only by its wet handling, wet braking and aquaplaning.
Dry95.5%
Wet88.7%
Snow98.2%
Comfort95.1%
Rolling Resistance93.1%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (12)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better2nd / 8133 ft+7 ft
Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better1st / 88.2 PointsBest in this discipline
Wet BrakingLower is better6th / 8123 ft+11 ft
Subj. Wet HandlingHigher is better8th / 87 Points-1.40 Points
Straight AquaHigher is better6th / 848.1 mph-5.9 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better6th / 8195.5 ft/s²-35.8 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better1st / 882 ftBest in this discipline
Snow TractionHigher is better3rd / 8509 lbf-25 lbf
Subj. Snow HandlingHigher is better1st / 87.6 PointsBest in this discipline
Subj. ComfortHigher is better4th / 87.7 Points-0.40 Points
Subj. NoiseHigher is better4th / 87.7 Points-0.40 Points
Rolling ResistanceLower is better2nd / 87.2 kg/t+0.50 kg/t
Origin
Italy
Weight
6.32 kgs
Tread
7.0 mm
Price
130.00
3rd

Continental AllSeasonContact 2

195/55 R16 91V XL
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
The Continental AllSeasonContact 2 finished third. It leans towards winter. It is a strong wet braker with excellent snow traction and low rolling resistance, but it gave ground in the dry, in aquaplaning and on comfort. It suits drivers who rate winter grip above summer sharpness.
Dry90.6%
Wet93.4%
Snow97.9%
Comfort88.3%
Rolling Resistance100%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (12)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better6th / 8140 ft+14 ft
Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better4th / 87.7 Points-0.50 Points
Wet BrakingLower is better1st / 8112 ftBest in this discipline
Subj. Wet HandlingHigher is better6th / 87.3 Points-1.10 Points
Straight AquaHigher is better8th / 846.7 mph-7.3 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better8th / 8186.0 ft/s²-45.3 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better3rd / 885 ft+3 ft
Snow TractionHigher is better1st / 8534 lbfBest in this discipline
Subj. Snow HandlingHigher is better4th / 87.2 Points-0.40 Points
Subj. ComfortHigher is better7th / 87.2 Points-0.90 Points
Subj. NoiseHigher is better8th / 87.1 Points-1.00 Points
Rolling ResistanceLower is better1st / 86.7 kg/tBest in this discipline
Origin
Romania
Weight
6.24 kgs
Tread
8.0 mm
Price
131.00
Joint 4th

Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6

195/55 R16 91V XL
Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6
The Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 shared fourth place. It was rated good overall, with summer results ahead of its winter ones. It is a sound choice for spring, summer, autumn and mild winters.
Dry93.6%
Wet93.6%
Snow92.6%
Comfort92.6%
Rolling Resistance87%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (12)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better3rd / 8133 ft+7 ft
Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better8th / 87.4 Points-0.80 Points
Wet BrakingLower is better4th / 8118 ft+6 ft
Subj. Wet HandlingHigher is better4th / 87.8 Points-0.60 Points
Straight AquaHigher is better4th / 850.1 mph-3.9 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better4th / 8204.7 ft/s²-26.6 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better6th / 886 ft+4 ft
Snow TractionHigher is better5th / 8480 lbf-54 lbf
Subj. Snow HandlingHigher is better6th / 86.9 Points-0.70 Points
Subj. ComfortHigher is better6th / 87.5 Points-0.60 Points
Subj. NoiseHigher is better6th / 87.5 Points-0.60 Points
Rolling ResistanceLower is better5th / 87.7 kg/t+1.00 kg/t
Origin
Spain
Weight
6.18 kgs
Tread
7.0 mm
Price
113.00
Joint 4th

Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3

195/55 R16 91V XL
Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3
The Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 shared fourth place. It was rated good overall and was among the best tires in the wet, but it was less convincing in winter. It is a summer-leaning all season tire with excellent wet handling.
Dry90.3%
Wet96.7%
Snow93.6%
Comfort93.8%
Rolling Resistance81.7%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (12)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better5th / 8140 ft+14 ft
Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better6th / 87.5 Points-0.70 Points
Wet BrakingLower is better2nd / 8116 ft+4 ft
Subj. Wet HandlingHigher is better1st / 88.4 PointsBest in this discipline
Straight AquaHigher is better3rd / 850.2 mph-3.8 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better2nd / 8223.8 ft/s²-7.5 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better6th / 886 ft+4 ft
Snow TractionHigher is better4th / 8484 lbf-50 lbf
Subj. Snow HandlingHigher is better3rd / 87.3 Points-0.30 Points
Subj. ComfortHigher is better5th / 87.6 Points-0.50 Points
Subj. NoiseHigher is better5th / 87.6 Points-0.50 Points
Rolling ResistanceLower is better7th / 88.2 kg/t+1.50 kg/t
Origin
France
Weight
6.34 kgs
Tread
8.0 mm
Price
131.00
Joint 4th

Vredestein Quatrac

195/55 R16 91V XL
Vredestein Quatrac
The Vredestein Quatrac shared fourth place with a good overall rating. It was balanced and refined rather than outstanding anywhere, and it suits drivers who mostly see wet and dry roads and value a quiet ride.
Dry89.8%
Wet90%
Snow91.8%
Comfort98.8%
Rolling Resistance89.3%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (12)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better7th / 8141 ft+15 ft
Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better6th / 87.5 Points-0.70 Points
Wet BrakingLower is better5th / 8123 ft+11 ft
Subj. Wet HandlingHigher is better3rd / 87.9 Points-0.50 Points
Straight AquaHigher is better7th / 847.9 mph-6.1 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better7th / 8187.7 ft/s²-43.6 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better8th / 888 ft+6 ft
Snow TractionHigher is better6th / 8475 lbf-59 lbf
Subj. Snow HandlingHigher is better4th / 87.2 Points-0.40 Points
Subj. ComfortHigher is better2nd / 88 Points-0.10 Points
Subj. NoiseHigher is better2nd / 88 Points-0.10 Points
Rolling ResistanceLower is better3rd / 87.5 kg/t+0.80 kg/t
Origin
Hungary
Weight
6.32 kgs
Tread
7.5 mm
Price
110.00
7th

Hankook Kinergy 4S2

195/55 R16 91H XL
Hankook Kinergy 4S2
The Hankook Kinergy 4S2 finished seventh, rated satisfactory overall. Its summer results were good, but its weak winter results pulled it down. It is better suited to drivers who rarely see snow.
Dry93.1%
Wet91.4%
Snow90.9%
Comfort88.3%
Rolling Resistance82.7%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (12)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better4th / 8136 ft+10 ft
Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better3rd / 87.8 Points-0.40 Points
Wet BrakingLower is better6th / 8123 ft+11 ft
Subj. Wet HandlingHigher is better5th / 87.4 Points-1.00 Points
Straight AquaHigher is better2nd / 850.3 mph-3.7 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better3rd / 8219.8 ft/s²-11.5 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better5th / 886 ft+4 ft
Snow TractionHigher is better8th / 8466 lbf-68 lbf
Subj. Snow HandlingHigher is better8th / 86.4 Points-1.20 Points
Subj. ComfortHigher is better8th / 87.1 Points-1.00 Points
Subj. NoiseHigher is better7th / 87.2 Points-0.90 Points
Rolling ResistanceLower is better6th / 88.1 kg/t+1.40 kg/t
Origin
South Korea
Weight
6.54 kgs
Tread
7.0 mm
Price
108.00
8th

Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210

195/55 R16 91V XL
Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210
The Falken Euroall Season AS210 finished last, rated satisfactory overall. It was comfortable and quiet, and good in dry handling, but its braking, rolling resistance and snow results put it behind the rest of the field.
Dry87%
Wet88.6%
Snow91.5%
Comfort100%
Rolling Resistance74.4%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (12)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better8th / 8148 ft+22 ft
Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better2nd / 87.9 Points-0.30 Points
Wet BrakingLower is better8th / 8126 ft+14 ft
Subj. Wet HandlingHigher is better7th / 87.2 Points-1.20 Points
Straight AquaHigher is better5th / 849.0 mph-5.0 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better5th / 8200.5 ft/s²-30.8 ft/s²
Snow BrakingLower is better4th / 885 ft+3 ft
Snow TractionHigher is better7th / 8467 lbf-67 lbf
Subj. Snow HandlingHigher is better7th / 86.6 Points-1.00 Points
Subj. ComfortHigher is better1st / 88.1 PointsBest in this discipline
Subj. NoiseHigher is better1st / 88.1 PointsBest in this discipline
Rolling ResistanceLower is better8th / 89 kg/t+2.30 kg/t
Origin
Turkey
Weight
7.24 kgs
Tread
8.0 mm
Price
105.00

More tire tests

Cross-check this test

All tire tests

Where these tires were tested again, and how the verdict held up.

Discussion

  1. No comments yet — be the first.
Rate your tires

My tires

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tires

Save tires from a tire page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tires. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.