Menu

Test Charts / Die Reifentester

2025 Die Reifentester All Season Tire Test - 195/55 R16

Compare each discipline in the tested size. See the measured result, position and gap to the best tire, then read the verdict for the trade-offs behind the finishing order.

Tested size
195/55 R16
Tires tested
8
Disciplines
12
Test vehicle
VW Polo 1.0 TSI, Skoda Fabia, Seat Ibiza

Read the measurements, not just the rank

Lower is better for braking distances and lap times; higher is better for subjective scores and aquaplaning speed. Bars start at zero. Read the gap alongside the position: adjacent tires can be separated by very different margins.

Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tires does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.

Dry

2

Dry Braking

Dry braking in feet (62 - 0 mph)

Lower is better ↓
Dry Braking
Position / TireResultGap to bestResidual speed
126 ft Best 0 mph
133 ft +7 ft 19 mph
133 ft +7 ft 19 mph
136 ft +10 ft 22 mph
140 ft +14 ft 25 mph
140 ft +14 ft 25 mph
141 ft +15 ft 26 mph
148 ft +22 ft 31 mph

The difference between best and worst was 17.5% (22 ft ≈ 1.5 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 would still be travelling at 31 mph when the Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF3 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Subj. Dry Handling

Subjective Dry Handling Score

Higher is better ↑
Subj. Dry Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
8.2 Points Best
7.9 Points -0.30 Points
7.8 Points -0.40 Points
7.7 Points -0.50 Points
7.6 Points -0.60 Points
7.5 Points -0.70 Points
7.5 Points -0.70 Points
7.4 Points -0.80 Points

The difference between best and worst was 9.8% (0.8 Points).

Wet

4

Wet Braking

Wet braking in feet (50 - 0 mph)

Lower is better ↓
Wet Braking
Position / TireResultGap to bestResidual speed
112 ft Best 0 mph
116 ft +4 ft 14 mph
116 ft +4 ft 15 mph
118 ft +6 ft 17 mph
123 ft +11 ft 23 mph
123 ft +11 ft 24 mph
123 ft +11 ft 24 mph
126 ft +14 ft 26 mph

The difference between best and worst was 12.1% (14 ft ≈ 0.9 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 would still be travelling at 26 mph when the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Subj. Wet Handling

Subjective Wet Handling Score

Higher is better ↑
Subj. Wet Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
8.4 Points Best
8.1 Points -0.30 Points
7.9 Points -0.50 Points
7.8 Points -0.60 Points
7.4 Points -1.00 Points
7.3 Points -1.10 Points
7.2 Points -1.20 Points
7 Points -1.40 Points

The difference between best and worst was 16.7% (1.4 Points).

Straight Aqua

Float Speed in mph

Higher is better ↑
Straight Aqua
Position / TireResultGap to best
54.0 mph Best
50.3 mph -3.7 mph
50.2 mph -3.8 mph
50.1 mph -3.9 mph
49.0 mph -5.0 mph
48.1 mph -5.9 mph
47.9 mph -6.1 mph
46.7 mph -7.3 mph

The difference between best and worst was 13.5% (7.3 mph).

Curved Aquaplaning

Remaining lateral acceleration

Higher is better ↑
Curved Aquaplaning
Position / TireResultGap to best
231.3 ft/s² Best
223.8 ft/s² -7.5 ft/s²
219.8 ft/s² -11.5 ft/s²
204.7 ft/s² -26.6 ft/s²
200.5 ft/s² -30.8 ft/s²
195.5 ft/s² -35.8 ft/s²
187.7 ft/s² -43.6 ft/s²
186.0 ft/s² -45.3 ft/s²

The difference between best and worst was 19.6% (45.3 ft/s²).

Snow

3

Snow Braking

Snow braking in feet (31 - 0 mph)

Lower is better ↓
Snow Braking
Position / TireResultGap to bestResidual speed
82 ft Best 0 mph
84 ft +2 ft 13 mph
85 ft +3 ft 14 mph
85 ft +3 ft 16 mph
86 ft +4 ft 16 mph
86 ft +4 ft 17 mph
86 ft +4 ft 17 mph
88 ft +6 ft 21 mph

The difference between best and worst was 7.2% (6 ft ≈ 0.4 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Vredestein Quatrac would still be travelling at 21 mph when the Michelin CrossClimate 2 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Snow Traction

Pulling Force in pounds-force

Higher is better ↑
Snow Traction
Position / TireResultGap to best
534 lbf Best
512 lbf -22 lbf
509 lbf -25 lbf
484 lbf -50 lbf
480 lbf -54 lbf
475 lbf -59 lbf
467 lbf -67 lbf
466 lbf -68 lbf

The difference between best and worst was 12.8% (68 lbf).

Subj. Snow Handling

Subjective Snow Handling Score

Higher is better ↑
Subj. Snow Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
7.6 Points Best
7.6 Points Best
7.3 Points -0.30 Points
7.2 Points -0.40 Points
7.2 Points -0.40 Points
6.9 Points -0.70 Points
6.6 Points -1.00 Points
6.4 Points -1.20 Points

The difference between best and worst was 15.8% (1.2 Points).

Comfort

2

Subj. Comfort

Subjective Comfort Score

Higher is better ↑
Subj. Comfort
Position / TireResultGap to best
8.1 Points Best
8 Points -0.10 Points
8 Points -0.10 Points
7.7 Points -0.40 Points
7.6 Points -0.50 Points
7.5 Points -0.60 Points
7.2 Points -0.90 Points
7.1 Points -1.00 Points

The difference between best and worst was 12.3% (1 Points).

Subj. Noise

Subjective in car noise levels

Higher is better ↑
Subj. Noise
Position / TireResultGap to best
8.1 Points Best
8 Points -0.10 Points
7.8 Points -0.30 Points
7.7 Points -0.40 Points
7.6 Points -0.50 Points
7.5 Points -0.60 Points
7.2 Points -0.90 Points
7.1 Points -1.00 Points

The difference between best and worst was 12.3% (1 Points).

Value

1

Rolling Resistance

Rolling resistance in kg t

Lower is better ↓
Rolling Resistance
Position / TireResultGap to bestExtra fuel / year
6.7 kg/t Best $0
7.2 kg/t +0.50 kg/t $22
7.5 kg/t +0.80 kg/t $35
7.6 kg/t +0.90 kg/t $39
7.7 kg/t +1.00 kg/t $44
8.1 kg/t +1.40 kg/t $61
8.2 kg/t +1.50 kg/t $66
9 kg/t +2.30 kg/t $101

The difference between best and worst was 34.3% (2.3 kg / t). Over 12,000 miles a year at $3.60/gal, the Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 uses about 28 gal ($101) more fuel than the Continental AllSeasonContact 2.

Adjust the assumptions

Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions. These calculators use the full test field, independently of your tire selection above.

12,000 mi
$3.60/gal
Estimates based on typical driving conditions. Rolling resistance accounts for approximately 20% of IC vehicle fuel consumption and 25% of EV energy consumption. Actual savings vary based on driving style, vehicle weight, road conditions, and tire age. For comparative purposes only. Lifetime savings based on a 40,000km / 25,000 mile tread life.

Test setup & methodology

The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.

Recorded test conditions

Recorded test conditions

Dry Braking
62.1 → 0.0 mph
Wet Braking
49.7 → 0.0 mph
Snow Braking
31.1 → 0.0 mph

More tire tests

Cross-check this test

All tire tests

Where these tires were tested again, and how the verdict held up.

Rate your tires

My tires

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tires

Save tires from a tire page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tires. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.