Menu

Test Charts / Auto Bild Allrad

2025 Autobild SUV All Season Tire Test

Compare each discipline in the tested size. See the measured result, position and gap to the best tire, then read the verdict for the trade-offs behind the finishing order.

Tested size
215/55 R17
Tires tested
11
Disciplines
14
Test vehicle
VW T-Roc

Read the measurements, not just the rank

Lower is better for braking distances and lap times; higher is better for subjective scores and aquaplaning speed. Bars start at zero. Read the gap alongside the position: adjacent tires can be separated by very different margins.

Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tires does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.

Dry

2

Dry Braking

Dry braking in feet (62 - 0 mph)

Lower is better ↓
Dry Braking
Position / TireResultGap to bestResidual speed
RefReference Summer
115 ft -6 ft 0 mph
121 ft Best 0 mph
123 ft +2 ft 10 mph
125 ft +4 ft 14 mph
126 ft +5 ft 15 mph
126 ft +5 ft 16 mph
129 ft +8 ft 19 mph
132 ft +11 ft 22 mph
133 ft +12 ft 24 mph
135 ft +14 ft 26 mph
136 ft +15 ft 26 mph
136 ft +15 ft 27 mph
RefReference Winter
142 ft +21 ft 31 mph

The difference between best and worst was 24.1% (27 ft ≈ 1.9 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Viking Fourtech Plus would still be travelling at 27 mph when the Linglong Sport Master 4S had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Dry Handling

Dry Handling Average Speed

Higher is better ↑
Dry Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
RefReference Summer
59.8 mph +1.8 mph
58.0 mph Best
57.8 mph -0.2 mph
57.5 mph -0.5 mph
57.4 mph -0.6 mph
57.3 mph -0.7 mph
57.2 mph -0.8 mph
57.1 mph -0.9 mph
57.0 mph -1.0 mph
57.0 mph -1.0 mph
56.9 mph -1.1 mph
56.6 mph -1.4 mph
RefReference Winter
55.9 mph -2.1 mph

The difference between best and worst was 6.5% (3.9 mph).

Wet

5

Wet Braking

Wet braking in feet (62 - 0 mph)

Lower is better ↓
Wet Braking
Position / TireResultGap to bestResidual speed
RefReference Summer
180 ft -10 ft 0 mph
190 ft Best 0 mph
198 ft +8 ft 16 mph
200 ft +10 ft 18 mph
201 ft +11 ft 19 mph
201 ft +11 ft 19 mph
RefReference Winter
202 ft +12 ft 19 mph
204 ft +14 ft 21 mph
205 ft +15 ft 21 mph
205 ft +15 ft 21 mph
206 ft +16 ft 22 mph
214 ft +24 ft 26 mph
256 ft +66 ft 41 mph

The difference between best and worst was 41.8% (76 ft ≈ 5.1 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Arivo Carlorful AS would still be travelling at 41 mph when the Vredestein Quatrac had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Wet Handling

Wet Handling Average Speed

Higher is better ↑
Wet Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
RefReference Summer
52.8 mph +1.0 mph
51.8 mph Best
50.6 mph -1.2 mph
50.6 mph -1.2 mph
50.5 mph -1.3 mph
RefReference Winter
50.2 mph -1.6 mph
50.0 mph -1.8 mph
49.6 mph -2.2 mph
49.6 mph -2.2 mph
49.6 mph -2.2 mph
49.0 mph -2.8 mph
48.2 mph -3.6 mph
45.0 mph -6.8 mph

The difference between best and worst was 14.8% (7.8 mph).

Wet Circle

Wet Circle Lap Time in seconds

Lower is better ↓
Wet Circle
Position / TireResultGap to best
RefReference Summer
15.27 s -0.87 s
16.14 s Best
16.19 s +0.05 s
16.31 s +0.17 s
16.32 s +0.18 s
16.34 s +0.20 s
RefReference Winter
16.35 s +0.21 s
16.35 s +0.21 s
16.36 s +0.22 s
16.37 s +0.23 s
16.47 s +0.33 s
16.51 s +0.37 s
16.97 s +0.83 s

The difference between best and worst was 11.1% (1.7 s).

Straight Aqua

Float Speed in mph

Higher is better ↑
Straight Aqua
Position / TireResultGap to best
RefReference Summer
51.3 mph +3.1 mph
RefReference Winter
49.3 mph +1.1 mph
48.2 mph Best
47.9 mph -0.3 mph
47.5 mph -0.7 mph
47.4 mph -0.8 mph
46.4 mph -1.8 mph
46.2 mph -2.0 mph
45.7 mph -2.5 mph
45.4 mph -2.8 mph
44.7 mph -3.5 mph
44.2 mph -4.0 mph
43.7 mph -4.5 mph

The difference between best and worst was 14.8% (7.6 mph).

Curved Aquaplaning

Remaining lateral acceleration

Higher is better ↑
Curved Aquaplaning
Position / TireResultGap to best
RefReference Summer
10.8 ft/s² +0.4 ft/s²
RefReference Winter
10.6 ft/s² +0.2 ft/s²
10.4 ft/s² Best
9.1 ft/s² -1.3 ft/s²
8.8 ft/s² -1.6 ft/s²
8.6 ft/s² -1.8 ft/s²
8.5 ft/s² -1.9 ft/s²
8.4 ft/s² -2.0 ft/s²
8.0 ft/s² -2.4 ft/s²
7.9 ft/s² -2.5 ft/s²
7.8 ft/s² -2.6 ft/s²
7.7 ft/s² -2.7 ft/s²
7.4 ft/s² -3.0 ft/s²

The difference between best and worst was 31.5% (3.4 ft/s²).

Snow

4

Snow Braking

Snow braking in feet (31 - 0 mph)

Lower is better ↓
Snow Braking
Position / TireResultGap to bestResidual speed
RefReference Winter
73 ft 0 ft 0 mph
73 ft Best 0 mph
73 ft Best 0 mph
75 ft +2 ft 11 mph
75 ft +2 ft 13 mph
75 ft +2 ft 13 mph
76 ft +3 ft 15 mph
77 ft +4 ft 18 mph
78 ft +5 ft 19 mph
79 ft +6 ft 21 mph
82 ft +9 ft 26 mph
85 ft +12 ft 30 mph
RefReference Summer
154 ft +81 ft 58 mph

The difference between best and worst was 112.7% (81 ft ≈ 5.5 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Linglong Sport Master 4S would still be travelling at 30 mph when the Vredestein Quatrac had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Snow Traction

Pulling Force in pounds-force

Higher is better ↑
Snow Traction
Position / TireResultGap to best
RefReference Winter
806 lbf +17 lbf
789 lbf Best
789 lbf Best
788 lbf -1 lbf
777 lbf -12 lbf
774 lbf -15 lbf
757 lbf -32 lbf
750 lbf -39 lbf
747 lbf -42 lbf
746 lbf -43 lbf
742 lbf -47 lbf
712 lbf -77 lbf
RefReference Summer
356 lbf -433 lbf

The difference between best and worst was 55.8% (450 lbf).

Snow Handling

Snow handling average speed

Higher is better ↑
Snow Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
64.7 mph Best
RefReference Winter
64.0 mph -0.7 mph
63.8 mph -0.9 mph
63.8 mph -0.9 mph
63.3 mph -1.4 mph
62.4 mph -2.3 mph
62.1 mph -2.6 mph
62.1 mph -2.6 mph
61.3 mph -3.4 mph
61.2 mph -3.5 mph
60.3 mph -4.4 mph
59.7 mph -5.0 mph
RefReference Summer
40.2 mph -24.5 mph

The difference between best and worst was 37.8% (24.5 mph).

Snow Slalom

Lateral acceleration

Higher is better ↑
Snow Slalom
Position / TireResultGap to best
RefReference Summer
13.9 ft/s² +0.5 ft/s²
13.4 ft/s² Best
13.3 ft/s² -0.1 ft/s²
13.3 ft/s² -0.1 ft/s²
13.3 ft/s² -0.1 ft/s²
12.9 ft/s² -0.5 ft/s²
12.8 ft/s² -0.6 ft/s²
12.7 ft/s² -0.7 ft/s²
12.5 ft/s² -0.9 ft/s²
12.5 ft/s² -0.9 ft/s²
12.3 ft/s² -1.1 ft/s²
12.1 ft/s² -1.3 ft/s²
RefReference Winter
6.3 ft/s² -7.1 ft/s²

The difference between best and worst was 54.6% (7.6 ft/s²).

Comfort

2

Subj. Comfort

Subjective Comfort Score

Higher is better ↑
Subj. Comfort
Position / TireResultGap to best
8 Points Best
7.3 Points -0.70 Points
7.3 Points -0.70 Points
7.3 Points -0.70 Points
7.3 Points -0.70 Points
7.3 Points -0.70 Points
7 Points -1.00 Points
7 Points -1.00 Points
7 Points -1.00 Points
7 Points -1.00 Points
5.3 Points -2.70 Points

The difference between best and worst was 33.8% (2.7 Points).

Noise

External noise in dB

Lower is better ↓
Noise
Position / TireResultGap to best
70.4 dB Best
70.5 dB +0.10 dB
71.1 dB +0.70 dB
71.6 dB +1.20 dB
71.8 dB +1.40 dB
72.2 dB +1.80 dB
72.2 dB +1.80 dB
72.4 dB +2.00 dB
72.6 dB +2.20 dB
72.8 dB +2.40 dB
RefReference Winter
73.1 dB +2.70 dB
73.7 dB +3.30 dB
RefReference Summer
73.9 dB +3.50 dB

The difference between best and worst was 5% (3.5 dB).

Value

1

Rolling Resistance

Rolling resistance in kg t

Lower is better ↓
Rolling Resistance
Position / TireResultGap to bestExtra fuel / year
7.31 kg/t Best $0
7.44 kg/t +0.13 kg/t $5
7.44 kg/t +0.13 kg/t $5
7.51 kg/t +0.20 kg/t $8
7.59 kg/t +0.28 kg/t $11
7.67 kg/t +0.36 kg/t $14
7.71 kg/t +0.40 kg/t $16
7.82 kg/t +0.51 kg/t $21
7.85 kg/t +0.54 kg/t $22
7.89 kg/t +0.58 kg/t $23
8.06 kg/t +0.75 kg/t $30
RefReference Winter
8.37 kg/t +1.06 kg/t $43
RefReference Summer
8.38 kg/t +1.07 kg/t $43

The difference between best and worst was 14.6% (1.07 kg / t). Over 12,000 miles a year at $3.60/gal, the Linglong Sport Master 4S uses about 8 gal ($30) more fuel than the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3.

Adjust the assumptions

Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions. These calculators use the full test field, independently of your tire selection above.

12,000 mi
$3.60/gal
Estimates based on typical driving conditions. Rolling resistance accounts for approximately 20% of IC vehicle fuel consumption and 25% of EV energy consumption. Actual savings vary based on driving style, vehicle weight, road conditions, and tire age. For comparative purposes only. Lifetime savings based on a 40,000km / 25,000 mile tread life.

Test setup & methodology

The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.

Recorded test conditions

Recorded test conditions

Dry Braking
62.1 → 0.0 mph
Wet Braking
62.1 → 0.0 mph
Snow Braking
31.1 → 0.0 mph

More tire tests

Cross-check this test

All tire tests

Where these tires were tested again, and how the verdict held up.

Rate your tires

My tires

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tires

Save tires from a tire page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tires. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.