Menu

Test Charts / ADAC

2024 ADAC 17 inch Winter Tire Test

Compare each discipline in the tested size. See the measured result, position and gap to the best tire, then read the verdict for the trade-offs behind the finishing order.

Tested size
215/55 R17
Tires tested
16
Disciplines
10

Read the measurements, not just the rank

Lower is better for braking distances and lap times; higher is better for subjective scores and aquaplaning speed. Bars start at zero. Read the gap alongside the position: adjacent tires can be separated by very different margins.

Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tires does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.

Dry

1

Dry Braking

Dry braking in feet (62 - 0 mph)

Lower is better ↓
Dry Braking
Position / TireResultGap to bestResidual speed
138 ft Best 0 mph
141 ft +3 ft 11 mph
141 ft +3 ft 11 mph
143 ft +5 ft 15 mph
143 ft +5 ft 15 mph
144 ft +6 ft 16 mph
144 ft +6 ft 16 mph
145 ft +7 ft 17 mph
145 ft +7 ft 18 mph
146 ft +8 ft 19 mph
146 ft +8 ft 19 mph
147 ft +9 ft 19 mph
148 ft +10 ft 20 mph
149 ft +11 ft 22 mph
150 ft +12 ft 22 mph
150 ft +12 ft 22 mph

The difference between best and worst was 8.6% (12 ft ≈ 0.8 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Firestone Winterhawk 4 would still be travelling at 22 mph when the Kumho Winter Craft WP52 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Wet

4

Wet Braking

Wet braking in feet (80 - 0 )

Lower is better ↓
Wet Braking
Position / TireResultGap to bestResidual speed
112 ft Best 0 mph
114 ft +2 ft 9 mph
114 ft +2 ft 9 mph
114 ft +2 ft 10 mph
115 ft +3 ft 13 mph
116 ft +4 ft 15 mph
117 ft +5 ft 16 mph
118 ft +6 ft 17 mph
120 ft +8 ft 20 mph
120 ft +8 ft 21 mph
122 ft +10 ft 22 mph
122 ft +10 ft 23 mph
126 ft +14 ft 26 mph
135 ft +23 ft 33 mph
135 ft +23 ft 33 mph
135 ft +23 ft 33 mph

The difference between best and worst was 20.8% (23 ft ≈ 1.6 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Davanti Wintoura+ would still be travelling at 33 mph when the Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Wet Braking - Concrete

Wet braking on Concrete in feet (50 - 0 mph)

Lower is better ↓
Wet Braking - Concrete
Position / TireResultGap to bestResidual speed
123 ft Best 0 mph
124 ft +1 ft 4 mph
125 ft +2 ft 10 mph
126 ft +3 ft 12 mph
129 ft +6 ft 17 mph
129 ft +6 ft 17 mph
131 ft +8 ft 19 mph
132 ft +9 ft 20 mph
133 ft +10 ft 21 mph
134 ft +11 ft 22 mph
135 ft +12 ft 24 mph
136 ft +13 ft 24 mph
140 ft +17 ft 28 mph
143 ft +20 ft 30 mph
146 ft +23 ft 32 mph
154 ft +31 ft 35 mph

The difference between best and worst was 24.5% (31 ft ≈ 2 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Davanti Wintoura+ would still be travelling at 35 mph when the Dunlop Winter Sport 5 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Straight Aqua

Float Speed in mph

Higher is better ↑
Straight Aqua
Position / TireResultGap to best
50.0 mph Best
48.9 mph -1.1 mph
48.8 mph -1.2 mph
48.1 mph -1.9 mph
48.0 mph -2.0 mph
47.7 mph -2.3 mph
47.5 mph -2.5 mph
47.1 mph -2.9 mph
47.0 mph -3.0 mph
46.8 mph -3.2 mph
46.4 mph -3.6 mph
45.7 mph -4.3 mph
44.5 mph -5.5 mph
43.2 mph -6.8 mph
42.5 mph -7.5 mph
42.4 mph -7.6 mph

The difference between best and worst was 15.2% (7.6 mph).

Curved Aquaplaning

Remaining lateral acceleration

Higher is better ↑
Curved Aquaplaning
Position / TireResultGap to best
11.2 ft/s² Best
11.2 ft/s² Best
10.8 ft/s² -0.4 ft/s²
10.8 ft/s² -0.4 ft/s²
10.2 ft/s² -1.0 ft/s²
10.2 ft/s² -1.0 ft/s²
10.2 ft/s² -1.0 ft/s²
9.8 ft/s² -1.4 ft/s²
9.8 ft/s² -1.4 ft/s²
9.5 ft/s² -1.7 ft/s²
8.9 ft/s² -2.3 ft/s²
7.9 ft/s² -3.3 ft/s²
7.9 ft/s² -3.3 ft/s²
7.2 ft/s² -4.0 ft/s²
6.9 ft/s² -4.3 ft/s²
6.2 ft/s² -5.0 ft/s²

The difference between best and worst was 44.1% (5 ft/s²).

Snow

2

Snow Braking

Snow braking in feet (19 - 0 mph)

Lower is better ↓
Snow Braking
Position / TireResultGap to bestResidual speed
31 ft Best 0 mph
31 ft 0 ft 12 mph
31 ft 0 ft 14 mph
32 ft +1 ft 16 mph
32 ft +1 ft 16 mph
32 ft +1 ft 16 mph
32 ft +1 ft 18 mph
32 ft +1 ft 20 mph
32 ft +1 ft 20 mph
33 ft +2 ft 21 mph
33 ft +2 ft 21 mph
33 ft +2 ft 23 mph
33 ft +2 ft 23 mph
33 ft +2 ft 23 mph
34 ft +3 ft 25 mph
36 ft +5 ft 31 mph

The difference between best and worst was 18.3% (5 ft ≈ 0.4 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Davanti Wintoura+ would still be travelling at 31 mph when the Kenda Wintergen 2 KR501 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Snow Traction

Pulling Force in pounds-force

Higher is better ↑
Snow Traction
Position / TireResultGap to best
54 lbf Best
53 lbf -1 lbf
53 lbf -1 lbf
53 lbf -1 lbf
52 lbf -2 lbf
52 lbf -2 lbf
52 lbf -2 lbf
52 lbf -2 lbf
52 lbf -2 lbf
51 lbf -3 lbf
51 lbf -3 lbf
50 lbf -4 lbf
50 lbf -4 lbf
49 lbf -5 lbf
48 lbf -6 lbf
45 lbf -9 lbf

The difference between best and worst was 15.1% (9 lbf).

Ice

1

Ice Braking

Ice braking in feet

Lower is better ↓
Ice Braking
Position / TireResultGap to best
53 ft Best
54 ft +1 ft
55 ft +2 ft
56 ft +3 ft
56 ft +3 ft
56 ft +3 ft
56 ft +3 ft
57 ft +4 ft
58 ft +5 ft
58 ft +5 ft
58 ft +5 ft
59 ft +6 ft
61 ft +8 ft
65 ft +12 ft
66 ft +13 ft
70 ft +17 ft

The difference between best and worst was 31.7% (17 ft ≈ 1.1 Car Lengths).

Value

2

Wear

Predicted tread life in KM

Higher is better ↑
Wear
Position / TireResultGap to best
40,451 miles Best
35,729 miles -4,722 miles
33,740 miles -6,711 miles
33,554 miles -6,897 miles
33,243 miles -7,208 miles
30,634 miles -9,817 miles
29,764 miles -10,687 miles
29,391 miles -11,060 miles
28,956 miles -11,495 miles
28,645 miles -11,806 miles
26,905 miles -13,546 miles
25,787 miles -14,664 miles
25,538 miles -14,913 miles
23,674 miles -16,777 miles
22,991 miles -17,460 miles
22,183 miles -18,268 miles

The difference between best and worst was 45.2% (18,268 miles).

Abrasion

Weight of Tire Wear Particles Lost (mg/km/t)

Lower is better ↓
Abrasion
Position / TireResultGap to best
55 mg/km/t Best
56 mg/km/t +1.00 mg/km/t
57 mg/km/t +2.00 mg/km/t
58 mg/km/t +3.00 mg/km/t
59 mg/km/t +4.00 mg/km/t
59 mg/km/t +4.00 mg/km/t
64 mg/km/t +9.00 mg/km/t
64 mg/km/t +9.00 mg/km/t
69 mg/km/t +14.00 mg/km/t
70 mg/km/t +15.00 mg/km/t
71 mg/km/t +16.00 mg/km/t
73 mg/km/t +18.00 mg/km/t
79 mg/km/t +24.00 mg/km/t
82 mg/km/t +27.00 mg/km/t
83 mg/km/t +28.00 mg/km/t
95 mg/km/t +40.00 mg/km/t

The difference between best and worst was 72.7% (40 mg/km/t).

Test setup & methodology

The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.

Recorded test conditions

Recorded test conditions

Dry Braking
62.1 → 0.0 mph
Wet Braking - Concrete
49.7 → 0.0 mph
Snow Braking
18.6 → 0.0 mph

More tire tests

Cross-check this test

All tire tests

Where these tires were tested again, and how the verdict held up.

Rate your tires

My tires

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tires

Save tires from a tire page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tires. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.