Test Charts / ADAC
2024 ADAC 17 inch Winter Tire Test
Compare each discipline in the tested size. See the measured result, position and gap to the best tire, then read the verdict for the trade-offs behind the finishing order.
- Tested size
- 215/55 R17
- Tires tested
- 16
- Disciplines
- 10
Read the measurements, not just the rank
Lower is better for braking distances and lap times; higher is better for subjective scores and aquaplaning speed. Bars start at zero. Read the gap alongside the position: adjacent tires can be separated by very different margins.
Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tires does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.
Focus on your tires
Select tires to highlight them throughout the charts.
Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tires does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.
Dry
1Dry Braking
Dry braking in feet (62 - 0 mph)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 138 ft | Best | 0 mph | |
| 141 ft | +3 ft | 11 mph | |
| 141 ft | +3 ft | 11 mph | |
| 143 ft | +5 ft | 15 mph | |
| 143 ft | +5 ft | 15 mph | |
| 144 ft | +6 ft | 16 mph | |
| 144 ft | +6 ft | 16 mph | |
| 145 ft | +7 ft | 17 mph | |
| 145 ft | +7 ft | 18 mph | |
| 146 ft | +8 ft | 19 mph | |
| 146 ft | +8 ft | 19 mph | |
| 147 ft | +9 ft | 19 mph | |
| 148 ft | +10 ft | 20 mph | |
| 149 ft | +11 ft | 22 mph | |
| 150 ft | +12 ft | 22 mph | |
| 150 ft | +12 ft | 22 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 8.6% (12 ft ≈ 0.8 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Firestone Winterhawk 4 would still be travelling at 22 mph when the Kumho Winter Craft WP52 had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
Wet
4Wet Braking
Wet braking in feet (80 - 0 )
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 112 ft | Best | 0 mph | |
| 114 ft | +2 ft | 9 mph | |
| 114 ft | +2 ft | 9 mph | |
| 114 ft | +2 ft | 10 mph | |
| 115 ft | +3 ft | 13 mph | |
| 116 ft | +4 ft | 15 mph | |
| 117 ft | +5 ft | 16 mph | |
| 118 ft | +6 ft | 17 mph | |
| 120 ft | +8 ft | 20 mph | |
| 120 ft | +8 ft | 21 mph | |
| 122 ft | +10 ft | 22 mph | |
| 122 ft | +10 ft | 23 mph | |
| 126 ft | +14 ft | 26 mph | |
| 135 ft | +23 ft | 33 mph | |
| 135 ft | +23 ft | 33 mph | |
| 135 ft | +23 ft | 33 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 20.8% (23 ft ≈ 1.6 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Davanti Wintoura+ would still be travelling at 33 mph when the Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2 had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
Wet Braking - Concrete
Wet braking on Concrete in feet (50 - 0 mph)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 123 ft | Best | 0 mph | |
| 124 ft | +1 ft | 4 mph | |
| 125 ft | +2 ft | 10 mph | |
| 126 ft | +3 ft | 12 mph | |
| 129 ft | +6 ft | 17 mph | |
| 129 ft | +6 ft | 17 mph | |
| 131 ft | +8 ft | 19 mph | |
| 132 ft | +9 ft | 20 mph | |
| 133 ft | +10 ft | 21 mph | |
| 134 ft | +11 ft | 22 mph | |
| 135 ft | +12 ft | 24 mph | |
| 136 ft | +13 ft | 24 mph | |
| 140 ft | +17 ft | 28 mph | |
| 143 ft | +20 ft | 30 mph | |
| 146 ft | +23 ft | 32 mph | |
| 154 ft | +31 ft | 35 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 24.5% (31 ft ≈ 2 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Davanti Wintoura+ would still be travelling at 35 mph when the Dunlop Winter Sport 5 had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
Straight Aqua
Float Speed in mph
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 50.0 mph | Best | |
| 48.9 mph | -1.1 mph | |
| 48.8 mph | -1.2 mph | |
| 48.1 mph | -1.9 mph | |
| 48.0 mph | -2.0 mph | |
| 47.7 mph | -2.3 mph | |
| 47.5 mph | -2.5 mph | |
| 47.1 mph | -2.9 mph | |
| 47.0 mph | -3.0 mph | |
| 46.8 mph | -3.2 mph | |
| 46.4 mph | -3.6 mph | |
| 45.7 mph | -4.3 mph | |
| 44.5 mph | -5.5 mph | |
| 43.2 mph | -6.8 mph | |
| 42.5 mph | -7.5 mph | |
| 42.4 mph | -7.6 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 15.2% (7.6 mph).
Curved Aquaplaning
Remaining lateral acceleration
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 11.2 ft/s² | Best | |
| 11.2 ft/s² | Best | |
| 10.8 ft/s² | -0.4 ft/s² | |
| 10.8 ft/s² | -0.4 ft/s² | |
| 10.2 ft/s² | -1.0 ft/s² | |
| 10.2 ft/s² | -1.0 ft/s² | |
| 10.2 ft/s² | -1.0 ft/s² | |
| 9.8 ft/s² | -1.4 ft/s² | |
| 9.8 ft/s² | -1.4 ft/s² | |
| 9.5 ft/s² | -1.7 ft/s² | |
| 8.9 ft/s² | -2.3 ft/s² | |
| 7.9 ft/s² | -3.3 ft/s² | |
| 7.9 ft/s² | -3.3 ft/s² | |
| 7.2 ft/s² | -4.0 ft/s² | |
| 6.9 ft/s² | -4.3 ft/s² | |
| 6.2 ft/s² | -5.0 ft/s² |
The difference between best and worst was 44.1% (5 ft/s²).
Snow
2Snow Braking
Snow braking in feet (19 - 0 mph)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 31 ft | Best | 0 mph | |
| 31 ft | 0 ft | 12 mph | |
| 31 ft | 0 ft | 14 mph | |
| 32 ft | +1 ft | 16 mph | |
| 32 ft | +1 ft | 16 mph | |
| 32 ft | +1 ft | 16 mph | |
| 32 ft | +1 ft | 18 mph | |
| 32 ft | +1 ft | 20 mph | |
| 32 ft | +1 ft | 20 mph | |
| 33 ft | +2 ft | 21 mph | |
| 33 ft | +2 ft | 21 mph | |
| 33 ft | +2 ft | 23 mph | |
| 33 ft | +2 ft | 23 mph | |
| 33 ft | +2 ft | 23 mph | |
| 34 ft | +3 ft | 25 mph | |
| 36 ft | +5 ft | 31 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 18.3% (5 ft ≈ 0.4 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Davanti Wintoura+ would still be travelling at 31 mph when the Kenda Wintergen 2 KR501 had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
Snow Traction
Pulling Force in pounds-force
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 54 lbf | Best | |
| 53 lbf | -1 lbf | |
| 53 lbf | -1 lbf | |
| 53 lbf | -1 lbf | |
| 52 lbf | -2 lbf | |
| 52 lbf | -2 lbf | |
| 52 lbf | -2 lbf | |
| 52 lbf | -2 lbf | |
| 52 lbf | -2 lbf | |
| 51 lbf | -3 lbf | |
| 51 lbf | -3 lbf | |
| 50 lbf | -4 lbf | |
| 50 lbf | -4 lbf | |
| 49 lbf | -5 lbf | |
| 48 lbf | -6 lbf | |
| 45 lbf | -9 lbf |
The difference between best and worst was 15.1% (9 lbf).
Ice
1Ice Braking
Ice braking in feet
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 53 ft | Best | |
| 54 ft | +1 ft | |
| 55 ft | +2 ft | |
| 56 ft | +3 ft | |
| 56 ft | +3 ft | |
| 56 ft | +3 ft | |
| 56 ft | +3 ft | |
| 57 ft | +4 ft | |
| 58 ft | +5 ft | |
| 58 ft | +5 ft | |
| 58 ft | +5 ft | |
| 59 ft | +6 ft | |
| 61 ft | +8 ft | |
| 65 ft | +12 ft | |
| 66 ft | +13 ft | |
| 70 ft | +17 ft |
The difference between best and worst was 31.7% (17 ft ≈ 1.1 Car Lengths).
Value
2Wear
Predicted tread life in KM
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 40,451 miles | Best | |
| 35,729 miles | -4,722 miles | |
| 33,740 miles | -6,711 miles | |
| 33,554 miles | -6,897 miles | |
| 33,243 miles | -7,208 miles | |
| 30,634 miles | -9,817 miles | |
| 29,764 miles | -10,687 miles | |
| 29,391 miles | -11,060 miles | |
| 28,956 miles | -11,495 miles | |
| 28,645 miles | -11,806 miles | |
| 26,905 miles | -13,546 miles | |
| 25,787 miles | -14,664 miles | |
| 25,538 miles | -14,913 miles | |
| 23,674 miles | -16,777 miles | |
| 22,991 miles | -17,460 miles | |
| 22,183 miles | -18,268 miles |
The difference between best and worst was 45.2% (18,268 miles).
Abrasion
Weight of Tire Wear Particles Lost (mg/km/t)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 55 mg/km/t | Best | |
| 56 mg/km/t | +1.00 mg/km/t | |
| 57 mg/km/t | +2.00 mg/km/t | |
| 58 mg/km/t | +3.00 mg/km/t | |
| 59 mg/km/t | +4.00 mg/km/t | |
| 59 mg/km/t | +4.00 mg/km/t | |
| 64 mg/km/t | +9.00 mg/km/t | |
| 64 mg/km/t | +9.00 mg/km/t | |
| 69 mg/km/t | +14.00 mg/km/t | |
| 70 mg/km/t | +15.00 mg/km/t | |
| 71 mg/km/t | +16.00 mg/km/t | |
| 73 mg/km/t | +18.00 mg/km/t | |
| 79 mg/km/t | +24.00 mg/km/t | |
| 82 mg/km/t | +27.00 mg/km/t | |
| 83 mg/km/t | +28.00 mg/km/t | |
| 95 mg/km/t | +40.00 mg/km/t |
The difference between best and worst was 72.7% (40 mg/km/t).
Test setup & methodology
The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.
Recorded test conditions
Recorded test conditions
- Dry Braking
- 62.1 → 0.0 mph
- Wet Braking - Concrete
- 49.7 → 0.0 mph
- Snow Braking
- 18.6 → 0.0 mph
More tire tests
Cross-check this test
Where these tires were tested again, and how the verdict held up.
2023 Winter Tire Test 54 Set Braking Test
225/45 R1854 tires tested
13 of these 16 tires tested again
2022 Winter Tire Market Overview
215/55 R1756 tires tested
12 of these 16 tires tested again
2025 Winter Tire Braking Test - 52 Sets!
225/40 R1851 tires tested
11 of these 16 tires tested again

