Menu

Test source Auto Bild Allrad

2023 Best SUV Tires Tested

Overall test winnerMichelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV

Sadly Tire Reviews isn't performing an SUV summer tire test this year, but luckily the German publication AutoBild once again have us covered if you want to know what the best tire is for your SUV!This year AutoBild tested twelve SUV tires…

2023 Best SUV Tyres Tested
225/65 R17 / 2023 View full image
2023 Best SUV Tyres Tested
Tires tested
12
Tested size
225/65 R17
Disciplines
14

At a glance

Tire shortlist

12 Tires tested

Published finishing positions, with the strengths and considerations from this test. Owner reviews cover other sizes and driving conditions.

1st

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV

+Test winner with top driving characteristics on wet and dry roads, exemplary safety reserves in aquaplaning, precise steering behavior, good off-road capability, good comfort.

−None mentioned.

2nd

Bridgestone Turanza 6

+A new tire with well-balanced performance potential, top performance on wet and dry roads, good off-road qualities, safe aquaplaning properties, fuel-saving rolling resistance.

−None mentioned.

3rd

Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun

+Good off-road qualities, dynamic off-road handling, good aquaplaning reserves, safe dry handling, short wet braking distances.

−Average wet cornering grip.

4th

Goodyear EfficientGrip 2 SUV

+Premium profile with well-balanced, safe driving characteristics, good aquaplaning resistance, short wet braking distances, good off-road capability, good comfort.

−Slightly higher price level.

5th

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

+Good off-road qualities, balanced wet and dry handling, sporty steering behavior, short wet braking distances, fuel-saving rolling resistance.

−Moderate aquaplaning resistance.

6th

Pirelli CINTURATO P7

+Sporty, dynamic handling with short braking distances on wet and dry roads, good aquaplaning reserves, agile off-road handling.

−Average mud and gravel traction.

7th

Uniroyal RainExpert 5

+Top performance offroad, very good safety aquaplaning resistance, well-balanced wet qualities, low rolling resistance, fair price.

−Moderate grip in the dry.

8th

Toyo Proxes Comfort

+Balanced safe handling on wet and dry roads, short dry braking distances, low rolling resistance, low price.

−Average aquaplaning performance, average offroad performance.

9th

General Grabber GT Plus

+Strengths Well-balanced off-road qualities, strong off-road traction, low rolling resistance.

−Understeering handling on wet and dry roads, slightly longer dry braking distances.

10th

Nexen N Fera Sport SUV

+Short wet and dry braking distances, good traction on sand and grass, low price level.

−Delayed steering response with significantly understeering handling on wet and dry roads.

11th

Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport

+Dynamic dry handling, good traction on gravel, lower rolling resistance.

−Moderate grip on wet roads, significantly longer wet braking distances, limited protection against aquaplaning.

12th

Aplus A919

+Good off-road qualities, low price.

−Severely limited safety reserves in the wet and aquaplaning, dangerously long wet and dry braking distances, significantly increased rolling resistance.

Tire shortlist

Compare selected tires

2023 Best SUV Tires Tested · 225/65 R17

TireMichelin Pilot Sport 4 SUVBridgestone Turanza 6Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRunGoodyear EfficientGrip 2 SUVHankook Ventus Prime 4Pirelli CINTURATO P7Uniroyal RainExpert 5Toyo Proxes ComfortGeneral Grabber GT PlusNexen N Fera Sport SUVCooper Zeon 4XS SportAplus A919
Position1st2nd3rd4th5th6th7th8th9th10th11th12th
Category scores (% of best)
Dry99.2%96.8%96.4%96%97.4%99.7%93%97.7%94.1%97.4%96%90.1%
Wet100%96.6%96.1%96.7%95.2%97.7%96.6%94.5%93.3%94.7%90.4%88.1%
Off road92.7%92.1%92.9%92.2%91.4%86%96.3%87.6%93%89.6%87.6%97.4%
Comfort97.7%97%96.7%100%95.9%96%97.1%97.1%97.4%98.5%95.6%96%
Rolling Resistance87.9%100%86.4%87.4%97.3%88.9%96.7%90.9%95.4%86.4%89%77.6%
Keep researchingRead owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results

Explore the complete results →

The full test

The evidence behind the verdict

Sadly Tire Reviews isn't performing an SUV summer tire test this year, but luckily the German publication AutoBild once again have us covered if you want to know what the best tire is for your SUV!

This year AutoBild tested twelve SUV tires for the crossover SUV segment in the 225/65 R17 tire size.

As usual, all the tires were tested in the dry and wet, and had their rolling resistance and noise / comfort levels graded, but as this category of tire is also intended for some "light off-roading" they tested the twelve SUV tires in mud, sand, dirt and even on wet grass! This means this really is the best test this year you show you what the best tire is for your SUV!

There's a LOT of data from this test, so we won't preface anymore - This is how the best twelve SUV tires fared in the dry, wet, gravel, mud, dirt and sand!

Test setup & methodology

The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.

Recorded test conditions

Recorded test conditions

Dry Braking
62.1 → 0.0 mph
Wet Braking
62.1 → 0.0 mph

Wet

Wet braking was led by the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV. The Michelin looks a little out of place in this test, the Pilot Sport 4 SUV is an ultra high performance summer tire, and all the other tires in the test are more touring / comfort bias tires. Perhaps the Michelin Primacy 4 would have been a better match for the test, but this does give us an excellent insight into the differences between the two categories of tires.

It should come as no surprise that the Aplus A919 in last place was the cheapest tire on test, but it might be a surprise that the Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport also struggled to stop the car.

Wet Braking

Wet braking in feet (62 - 0 mph)

Lower is better ↓
Wet Braking
Position / TireResultGap to bestResidual speed
164 ft Best 0 mph
171 ft +7 ft 16 mph
171 ft +7 ft 17 mph
173 ft +9 ft 18 mph
174 ft +10 ft 19 mph
174 ft +10 ft 19 mph
176 ft +12 ft 21 mph
177 ft +13 ft 22 mph
179 ft +15 ft 24 mph
180 ft +16 ft 24 mph
200 ft +36 ft 34 mph
209 ft +45 ft 37 mph

The difference between best and worst was 27.5% (45 ft ≈ 3 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Aplus A919 would still be travelling at 37 mph when the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

The Michelin was also the fastest around the wet handling lap, beating the new Bridgestone Turanza 6.

Wet Handling

Wet Handling Average Speed

Higher is better ↑
Wet Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
53.9 mph Best
53.7 mph -0.2 mph
53.3 mph -0.6 mph
53.1 mph -0.8 mph
53.1 mph -0.8 mph
52.9 mph -1.0 mph
52.8 mph -1.1 mph
52.7 mph -1.2 mph
52.4 mph -1.5 mph
52.4 mph -1.5 mph
52.2 mph -1.7 mph
51.3 mph -2.6 mph

The difference between best and worst was 5% (2.6 mph).

The Michelin also had the best straight aquaplaning resistance, significantly ahead of all the tires bar the Uniroyal RainSport 5, which usually wins the deep water tests!

Straight Aqua

Float Speed in mph

Higher is better ↑
Straight Aqua
Position / TireResultGap to best
59.6 mph Best
58.7 mph -0.9 mph
56.5 mph -3.1 mph
56.5 mph -3.1 mph
56.0 mph -3.6 mph
55.3 mph -4.3 mph
54.6 mph -5.0 mph
54.6 mph -5.0 mph
54.1 mph -5.5 mph
53.6 mph -6.0 mph
52.1 mph -7.5 mph
52.1 mph -7.5 mph

The difference between best and worst was 12.6% (7.5 mph).

Dry

The Pirelli Cinturato P7 managed to beat the Michelin to be best in dry braking, with the Aplus once again trailing the field buy a significant margin.

Dry Braking

Dry braking in feet (62 - 0 mph)

Lower is better ↓
Dry Braking
Position / TireResultGap to bestResidual speed
114 ft Best 0 mph
115 ft +1 ft 10 mph
116 ft +2 ft 11 mph
116 ft +2 ft 13 mph
117 ft +3 ft 14 mph
119 ft +5 ft 17 mph
120 ft +6 ft 18 mph
120 ft +6 ft 19 mph
122 ft +8 ft 21 mph
122 ft +8 ft 21 mph
124 ft +10 ft 24 mph
132 ft +18 ft 30 mph

The difference between best and worst was 16.5% (18 ft ≈ 1.3 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Aplus A919 would still be travelling at 30 mph when the Pirelli CINTURATO P7 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

The more comfort bias Pirelli couldn't hold off the more sporty Michelin during the dry handling test.

Dry Handling

Dry Handling Average Speed

Higher is better ↑
Dry Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
64.2 mph Best
63.8 mph -0.4 mph
63.6 mph -0.6 mph
63.4 mph -0.8 mph
63.2 mph -1.0 mph
62.4 mph -1.8 mph
62.4 mph -1.8 mph
62.4 mph -1.8 mph
62.1 mph -2.1 mph
61.1 mph -3.1 mph
60.8 mph -3.4 mph
60.5 mph -3.7 mph

The difference between best and worst was 5.7% (3.7 mph).

Off Road

The dirt handling course was led by Pirelli, with the new Hankook Ventus Prime 4 a close second! 

Dirt Handling

Dirt handling average speed

Higher is better ↑
Dirt Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
41.4 mph Best
41.3 mph -0.1 mph
41.3 mph -0.1 mph
41.1 mph -0.3 mph
41.1 mph -0.3 mph
41.1 mph -0.3 mph
41.0 mph -0.4 mph
40.9 mph -0.5 mph
40.8 mph -0.6 mph
40.8 mph -0.6 mph
40.6 mph -0.8 mph
40.5 mph -0.9 mph

All the tires in the Dirt Handling test finished less than 3% apart.

The next three data points are gravel, sand and mud traction tests, measured as a pulling force. It's important to note that offroad testing is some of the hardest testing in the world, none more so than mud, so worry less about the precise order and more about general trends.

These general trends are that the budget Aplus might not be able to grip on wet roads, but is great on wet grass and in mud but not sand. The General Grabber GT Plus was best in sand but poor on grass... it seems even general trends are difficult with offroad testing!

Grass Traction

Pulling Force in pounds-force

Higher is better ↑
Grass Traction
Position / TireResultGap to best
657 lbf Best
600 lbf -57 lbf
582 lbf -75 lbf
563 lbf -94 lbf
556 lbf -101 lbf
552 lbf -105 lbf
549 lbf -108 lbf
547 lbf -110 lbf
543 lbf -114 lbf
539 lbf -118 lbf
524 lbf -133 lbf
515 lbf -142 lbf

The difference between best and worst was 21.7% (142 lbf).

Sand Traction

Pulling Force in pounds-force

Higher is better ↑
Sand Traction
Position / TireResultGap to best
1,998 lbf Best
1,893 lbf -105 lbf
1,888 lbf -110 lbf
1,876 lbf -122 lbf
1,867 lbf -131 lbf
1,821 lbf -177 lbf
1,821 lbf -177 lbf
1,801 lbf -197 lbf
1,798 lbf -200 lbf
1,741 lbf -257 lbf
1,665 lbf -333 lbf
1,625 lbf -373 lbf

The difference between best and worst was 18.6% (373 lbf).

Mud Traction

Pulling Force in pounds-force

Higher is better ↑
Mud Traction
Position / TireResultGap to best
733 lbf Best
720 lbf -13 lbf
679 lbf -54 lbf
659 lbf -74 lbf
659 lbf -74 lbf
659 lbf -74 lbf
645 lbf -88 lbf
630 lbf -103 lbf
618 lbf -115 lbf
578 lbf -155 lbf
567 lbf -166 lbf
525 lbf -208 lbf

The difference between best and worst was 28.3% (208 lbf).

Environment

External noise is a much easier test, and the Goodyear EfficientGrip 2 SUV proved to be the quietest tire of the group by a huge margin!

Noise

External noise in dB

Lower is better ↓
Noise
Position / TireResultGap to best
67.3 dB Best
68.3 dB +1.00 dB
68.9 dB +1.60 dB
69.1 dB +1.80 dB
69.3 dB +2.00 dB
69.3 dB +2.00 dB
69.4 dB +2.10 dB
69.6 dB +2.30 dB
70.1 dB +2.80 dB
70.1 dB +2.80 dB
70.2 dB +2.90 dB
70.4 dB +3.10 dB

The difference between best and worst was 4.6% (3.1 dB).

The new Bridgestone Turanza 6 continued Bridgestones excellent performance in the rolling resistance tests, leading the Hankook and Uniroyal.

Rolling Resistance

Rolling resistance in kg t

Lower is better ↓
Rolling Resistance
Position / TireResultGap to bestExtra fuel / year
7.42 kg/t Best $0
7.63 kg/t +0.21 kg/t $8
7.67 kg/t +0.25 kg/t $10
7.78 kg/t +0.36 kg/t $14
8.16 kg/t +0.74 kg/t $29
8.34 kg/t +0.92 kg/t $36
8.35 kg/t +0.93 kg/t $37
8.44 kg/t +1.02 kg/t $40
8.49 kg/t +1.07 kg/t $42
8.59 kg/t +1.17 kg/t $46
8.59 kg/t +1.17 kg/t $46
9.56 kg/t +2.14 kg/t $85

The difference between best and worst was 28.8% (2.14 kg / t). Over 12,000 miles a year at $3.60/gal, the Aplus A919 uses about 24 gal ($85) more fuel than the Bridgestone Turanza 6.

Adjust the assumptions

Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions.

12,000 mi
$3.60/gal
Estimates based on typical driving conditions. Rolling resistance accounts for approximately 20% of IC vehicle fuel consumption and 25% of EV energy consumption. Actual savings vary based on driving style, vehicle weight, road conditions, and tire age. For comparative purposes only. Lifetime savings based on a 40,000km / 25,000 mile tread life.

The Aplus was the cheapest tire on test, but this time the Michelin wasn't the most expensive tire of the group, it was the joint most expensive with Goodyear!

Results

1st

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV

225/65 R17 106V XL
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
Exemplary.
Dry99.2%
Wet100%
Off road92.7%
Comfort97.7%
Rolling Resistance87.9%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (14)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better2nd / 12115 ft+1 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better1st / 1264.2 mphBest in this discipline
Wet BrakingLower is better1st / 12164 ftBest in this discipline
Wet HandlingHigher is better1st / 1253.9 mphBest in this discipline
Wet CircleLower is better1st / 1214.41 sBest in this discipline
Straight AquaHigher is better1st / 1259.6 mphBest in this discipline
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better1st / 129.7 ft/s²Best in this discipline
Gravel TractionHigher is better1st / 121,858 lbfBest in this discipline
Dirt HandlingHigher is better7th / 1241.0 mph-0.4 mph
Sand TractionHigher is better10th / 121,741 lbf-257 lbf
Grass TractionHigher is better5th / 12556 lbf-101 lbf
Mud TractionHigher is better3rd / 12679 lbf-54 lbf
NoiseLower is better3rd / 1268.9 dB+1.60 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better8th / 128.44 kg/t+1.02 kg/t
EU Label
C/A/72
Price
610.00
2nd

Bridgestone Turanza 6

225/65 R17 102H
Bridgestone Turanza 6
Exemplary.
Dry96.8%
Wet96.6%
Off road92.1%
Comfort97%
Rolling Resistance100%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (14)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better8th / 12120 ft+6 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better3rd / 1263.6 mph-0.6 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better6th / 12174 ft+10 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better2nd / 1253.7 mph-0.2 mph
Wet CircleLower is better3rd / 1214.58 s+0.17 s
Straight AquaHigher is better6th / 1255.3 mph-4.3 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better6th / 129.1 ft/s²-0.6 ft/s²
Gravel TractionHigher is better2nd / 121,856 lbf-2 lbf
Dirt HandlingHigher is better9th / 1240.8 mph-0.6 mph
Sand TractionHigher is better4th / 121,876 lbf-122 lbf
Grass TractionHigher is better12th / 12515 lbf-142 lbf
Mud TractionHigher is better4th / 12659 lbf-74 lbf
NoiseLower is better7th / 1269.4 dB+2.10 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better1st / 127.42 kg/tBest in this discipline
EU Label
B/A/69
Price
570.00
3rd

Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun

225/65 R17 106H XL
Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
Exemplary.
Dry96.4%
Wet96.1%
Off road92.9%
Comfort96.7%
Rolling Resistance86.4%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (14)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better6th / 12119 ft+5 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better8th / 1262.4 mph-1.8 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better5th / 12174 ft+10 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better8th / 1252.7 mph-1.2 mph
Wet CircleLower is better11th / 1215.01 s+0.60 s
Straight AquaHigher is better3rd / 1256.5 mph-3.1 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better4th / 129.4 ft/s²-0.3 ft/s²
Gravel TractionHigher is better4th / 121,830 lbf-28 lbf
Dirt HandlingHigher is better3rd / 1241.3 mph-0.1 mph
Sand TractionHigher is better2nd / 121,893 lbf-105 lbf
Grass TractionHigher is better7th / 12549 lbf-108 lbf
Mud TractionHigher is better7th / 12645 lbf-88 lbf
NoiseLower is better8th / 1269.6 dB+2.30 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better10th / 128.59 kg/t+1.17 kg/t
EU Label
C/A/69
Price
465.00
4th

Goodyear EfficientGrip 2 SUV

225/65 R17 106V XL
Goodyear EfficientGrip 2 SUV
Exemplary.
Dry96%
Wet96.7%
Off road92.2%
Comfort100%
Rolling Resistance87.4%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (14)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better7th / 12120 ft+6 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better6th / 1262.4 mph-1.8 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better2nd / 12171 ft+7 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better6th / 1252.9 mph-1.0 mph
Wet CircleLower is better6th / 1214.74 s+0.33 s
Straight AquaHigher is better5th / 1256.0 mph-3.6 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better5th / 129.3 ft/s²-0.4 ft/s²
Gravel TractionHigher is better7th / 121,769 lbf-89 lbf
Dirt HandlingHigher is better6th / 1241.1 mph-0.3 mph
Sand TractionHigher is better6th / 121,821 lbf-177 lbf
Grass TractionHigher is better4th / 12563 lbf-94 lbf
Mud TractionHigher is better4th / 12659 lbf-74 lbf
NoiseLower is better1st / 1267.3 dBBest in this discipline
Rolling ResistanceLower is better9th / 128.49 kg/t+1.07 kg/t
EU Label
C/A/71
Price
610.00
5th

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

225/65 R17 102H
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
Exemplary.
Dry97.4%
Wet95.2%
Off road91.4%
Comfort95.9%
Rolling Resistance97.3%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (14)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better4th / 12116 ft+2 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better6th / 1262.4 mph-1.8 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better4th / 12173 ft+9 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better5th / 1253.1 mph-0.8 mph
Wet CircleLower is better5th / 1214.72 s+0.31 s
Straight AquaHigher is better10th / 1253.6 mph-6.0 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better8th / 128.4 ft/s²-1.3 ft/s²
Gravel TractionHigher is better8th / 121,753 lbf-105 lbf
Dirt HandlingHigher is better2nd / 1241.3 mph-0.1 mph
Sand TractionHigher is better5th / 121,867 lbf-131 lbf
Grass TractionHigher is better8th / 12547 lbf-110 lbf
Mud TractionHigher is better8th / 12630 lbf-103 lbf
NoiseLower is better11th / 1270.2 dB+2.90 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better2nd / 127.63 kg/t+0.21 kg/t
EU Label
B/A/69
Price
485.00
6th

Pirelli CINTURATO P7

225/65 R17 106V XL
Pirelli CINTURATO P7
Good.
Dry99.7%
Wet97.7%
Off road86%
Comfort96%
Rolling Resistance88.9%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (14)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better1st / 12114 ftBest in this discipline
Dry HandlingHigher is better2nd / 1263.8 mph-0.4 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better3rd / 12171 ft+7 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better3rd / 1253.3 mph-0.6 mph
Wet CircleLower is better2nd / 1214.46 s+0.05 s
Straight AquaHigher is better4th / 1256.5 mph-3.1 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better3rd / 129.5 ft/s²-0.2 ft/s²
Gravel TractionHigher is better12th / 121,605 lbf-253 lbf
Dirt HandlingHigher is better1st / 1241.4 mphBest in this discipline
Sand TractionHigher is better9th / 121,798 lbf-200 lbf
Grass TractionHigher is better10th / 12539 lbf-118 lbf
Mud TractionHigher is better12th / 12525 lbf-208 lbf
NoiseLower is better9th / 1270.1 dB+2.80 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better7th / 128.35 kg/t+0.93 kg/t
EU Label
C/A/70
Price
590.00
7th

Uniroyal RainExpert 5

225/65 R17 102H
Uniroyal RainExpert 5
Good.
Dry93%
Wet96.6%
Off road96.3%
Comfort97.1%
Rolling Resistance96.7%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (14)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better11th / 12124 ft+10 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better11th / 1260.8 mph-3.4 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better8th / 12177 ft+13 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better7th / 1252.8 mph-1.1 mph
Wet CircleLower is better9th / 1214.83 s+0.42 s
Straight AquaHigher is better2nd / 1258.7 mph-0.9 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better2nd / 129.6 ft/s²-0.1 ft/s²
Gravel TractionHigher is better5th / 121,822 lbf-36 lbf
Dirt HandlingHigher is better4th / 1241.1 mph-0.3 mph
Sand TractionHigher is better3rd / 121,888 lbf-110 lbf
Grass TractionHigher is better2nd / 12600 lbf-57 lbf
Mud TractionHigher is better2nd / 12720 lbf-13 lbf
NoiseLower is better5th / 1269.3 dB+2.00 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better3rd / 127.67 kg/t+0.25 kg/t
EU Label
C/A/71
Price
475.00
8th

Toyo Proxes Comfort

225/65 R17 106V XL
Toyo Proxes Comfort
Good.
Dry97.7%
Wet94.5%
Off road87.6%
Comfort97.1%
Rolling Resistance90.9%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (14)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better5th / 12117 ft+3 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better5th / 1263.2 mph-1.0 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better9th / 12179 ft+15 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better4th / 1253.1 mph-0.8 mph
Wet CircleLower is better4th / 1214.64 s+0.23 s
Straight AquaHigher is better9th / 1254.1 mph-5.5 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better9th / 128.4 ft/s²-1.3 ft/s²
Gravel TractionHigher is better10th / 121,691 lbf-167 lbf
Dirt HandlingHigher is better12th / 1240.5 mph-0.9 mph
Sand TractionHigher is better11th / 121,665 lbf-333 lbf
Grass TractionHigher is better3rd / 12582 lbf-75 lbf
Mud TractionHigher is better11th / 12567 lbf-166 lbf
NoiseLower is better5th / 1269.3 dB+2.00 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better5th / 128.16 kg/t+0.74 kg/t
EU Label
C/A/70
Price
430.00
9th

General Grabber GT+

225/65 R17 102H
General Grabber GT Plus
Fair.
Dry94.1%
Wet93.3%
Off road93%
Comfort97.4%
Rolling Resistance95.4%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (14)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better10th / 12122 ft+8 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better10th / 1261.1 mph-3.1 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better10th / 12180 ft+16 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better10th / 1252.4 mph-1.5 mph
Wet CircleLower is better10th / 1214.9 s+0.49 s
Straight AquaHigher is better7th / 1254.6 mph-5.0 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better10th / 128.1 ft/s²-1.6 ft/s²
Gravel TractionHigher is better9th / 121,743 lbf-115 lbf
Dirt HandlingHigher is better8th / 1240.9 mph-0.5 mph
Sand TractionHigher is better1st / 121,998 lbfBest in this discipline
Grass TractionHigher is better9th / 12543 lbf-114 lbf
Mud TractionHigher is better4th / 12659 lbf-74 lbf
NoiseLower is better4th / 1269.1 dB+1.80 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better4th / 127.78 kg/t+0.36 kg/t
EU Label
C/A/71
Price
510.00
10th

Nexen N Fera Sport SUV

225/65 R17 102H
Nexen N Fera Sport SUV
Fair.
Dry97.4%
Wet94.7%
Off road89.6%
Comfort98.5%
Rolling Resistance86.4%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (14)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better3rd / 12116 ft+2 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better9th / 1262.1 mph-2.1 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better7th / 12176 ft+12 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better9th / 1252.4 mph-1.5 mph
Wet CircleLower is better8th / 1214.79 s+0.38 s
Straight AquaHigher is better7th / 1254.6 mph-5.0 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better7th / 128.7 ft/s²-1.0 ft/s²
Gravel TractionHigher is better11th / 121,686 lbf-172 lbf
Dirt HandlingHigher is better11th / 1240.6 mph-0.8 mph
Sand TractionHigher is better6th / 121,821 lbf-177 lbf
Grass TractionHigher is better6th / 12552 lbf-105 lbf
Mud TractionHigher is better9th / 12618 lbf-115 lbf
NoiseLower is better2nd / 1268.3 dB+1.00 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better10th / 128.59 kg/t+1.17 kg/t
EU Label
D/A/71
Price
350.00
11th

Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport

225/65 R17 102H
Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport
Conditionally recommended.
Dry96%
Wet90.4%
Off road87.6%
Comfort95.6%
Rolling Resistance89%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (14)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better9th / 12122 ft+8 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better4th / 1263.4 mph-0.8 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better11th / 12200 ft+36 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better11th / 1252.2 mph-1.7 mph
Wet CircleLower is better7th / 1214.77 s+0.36 s
Straight AquaHigher is better12th / 1252.1 mph-7.5 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better11th / 127.9 ft/s²-1.8 ft/s²
Gravel TractionHigher is better3rd / 121,852 lbf-6 lbf
Dirt HandlingHigher is better10th / 1240.8 mph-0.6 mph
Sand TractionHigher is better12th / 121,625 lbf-373 lbf
Grass TractionHigher is better11th / 12524 lbf-133 lbf
Mud TractionHigher is better10th / 12578 lbf-155 lbf
NoiseLower is better12th / 1270.4 dB+3.10 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better6th / 128.34 kg/t+0.92 kg/t
EU Label
C/A/70
Price
420.00
12th

Aplus A919

225/65 R17 102H
Aplus A919
Not recommended.
Dry90.1%
Wet88.1%
Off road97.4%
Comfort96%
Rolling Resistance77.6%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (14)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better12th / 12132 ft+18 ft
Dry HandlingHigher is better12th / 1260.5 mph-3.7 mph
Wet BrakingLower is better12th / 12209 ft+45 ft
Wet HandlingHigher is better12th / 1251.3 mph-2.6 mph
Wet CircleLower is better12th / 1215.23 s+0.82 s
Straight AquaHigher is better11th / 1252.1 mph-7.5 mph
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better12th / 127.7 ft/s²-2.0 ft/s²
Gravel TractionHigher is better6th / 121,814 lbf-44 lbf
Dirt HandlingHigher is better4th / 1241.1 mph-0.3 mph
Sand TractionHigher is better8th / 121,801 lbf-197 lbf
Grass TractionHigher is better1st / 12657 lbfBest in this discipline
Mud TractionHigher is better1st / 12733 lbfBest in this discipline
NoiseLower is better9th / 1270.1 dB+2.80 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better12th / 129.56 kg/t+2.14 kg/t
EU Label
E/C/71
Price
300.00

More tire tests

Cross-check this test

All tire tests

Where these tires were tested again, and how the verdict held up.

Discussion

4 comments
  1. Jacopo archived

    These are cool tests, but I don't see why sand, dirt, mud, grass tractions are relevant to SUVs on summer tires. People who buys jeep and stick to road tires have little to no intention to venture offroad. Or if they do, they are deluding themselves. Just my (unpopular) opinion.

    #8747
    1. TireReviews Jacopo archived

      I don't disagree, but also people who are doing research into an suv kind of expect it. Grass and gravel do have real world applications. Mud is the craziest one really, a summer tire has zero mud ability and mud testing is REALLY difficult to get trends even with MT tires.

      #8753
  2. 4cvg archived

    A rare A.B. test with no Conti contender.

    #8746
    1. TireReviews 4cvg archived

      I hadn't even noticed that! I assume they were testing in the difficult period between PC6 rundown and PC7 ram up!

      #8752
Rate your tires

My tires

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tires

Save tires from a tire page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tires. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.