Sadly Tire Reviews isn't performing an SUV summer tire test this year, but luckily the German publication AutoBild once again have us covered if you want to know what the best tire is for your SUV!
This year AutoBild tested twelve SUV tires for the crossover SUV segment in the 225/65 R17 tire size.
As usual, all the tires were tested in the dry and wet, and had their rolling resistance and noise / comfort levels graded, but as this category of tire is also intended for some "light off-roading" they tested the twelve SUV tires in mud, sand, dirt and even on wet grass! This means this really is the best test this year you show you what the best tire is for your SUV!
There's a LOT of data from this test, so we won't preface anymore - This is how the best twelve SUV tires fared in the dry, wet, gravel, mud, dirt and sand!
Test setup & methodology
The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.
Recorded test conditions
Recorded test conditions
- Dry Braking
- 62.1 → 0.0 mph
- Wet Braking
- 62.1 → 0.0 mph
Wet
Wet braking was led by the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV. The Michelin looks a little out of place in this test, the Pilot Sport 4 SUV is an ultra high performance summer tire, and all the other tires in the test are more touring / comfort bias tires. Perhaps the Michelin Primacy 4 would have been a better match for the test, but this does give us an excellent insight into the differences between the two categories of tires.
It should come as no surprise that the Aplus A919 in last place was the cheapest tire on test, but it might be a surprise that the Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport also struggled to stop the car.
Wet Braking
Wet braking in feet (62 - 0 mph)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 164 ft | Best | 0 mph | |
| 171 ft | +7 ft | 16 mph | |
| 171 ft | +7 ft | 17 mph | |
| 173 ft | +9 ft | 18 mph | |
| 174 ft | +10 ft | 19 mph | |
| 174 ft | +10 ft | 19 mph | |
| 176 ft | +12 ft | 21 mph | |
| 177 ft | +13 ft | 22 mph | |
| 179 ft | +15 ft | 24 mph | |
| 180 ft | +16 ft | 24 mph | |
| 200 ft | +36 ft | 34 mph | |
| 209 ft | +45 ft | 37 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 27.5% (45 ft ≈ 3 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Aplus A919 would still be travelling at 37 mph when the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
The Michelin was also the fastest around the wet handling lap, beating the new Bridgestone Turanza 6.
Wet Handling
Wet Handling Average Speed
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 53.9 mph | Best | |
| 53.7 mph | -0.2 mph | |
| 53.3 mph | -0.6 mph | |
| 53.1 mph | -0.8 mph | |
| 53.1 mph | -0.8 mph | |
| 52.9 mph | -1.0 mph | |
| 52.8 mph | -1.1 mph | |
| 52.7 mph | -1.2 mph | |
| 52.4 mph | -1.5 mph | |
| 52.4 mph | -1.5 mph | |
| 52.2 mph | -1.7 mph | |
| 51.3 mph | -2.6 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 5% (2.6 mph).
The Michelin also had the best straight aquaplaning resistance, significantly ahead of all the tires bar the Uniroyal RainSport 5, which usually wins the deep water tests!
Straight Aqua
Float Speed in mph
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 59.6 mph | Best | |
| 58.7 mph | -0.9 mph | |
| 56.5 mph | -3.1 mph | |
| 56.5 mph | -3.1 mph | |
| 56.0 mph | -3.6 mph | |
| 55.3 mph | -4.3 mph | |
| 54.6 mph | -5.0 mph | |
| 54.6 mph | -5.0 mph | |
| 54.1 mph | -5.5 mph | |
| 53.6 mph | -6.0 mph | |
| 52.1 mph | -7.5 mph | |
| 52.1 mph | -7.5 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 12.6% (7.5 mph).
Dry
The Pirelli Cinturato P7 managed to beat the Michelin to be best in dry braking, with the Aplus once again trailing the field buy a significant margin.
Dry Braking
Dry braking in feet (62 - 0 mph)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 114 ft | Best | 0 mph | |
| 115 ft | +1 ft | 10 mph | |
| 116 ft | +2 ft | 11 mph | |
| 116 ft | +2 ft | 13 mph | |
| 117 ft | +3 ft | 14 mph | |
| 119 ft | +5 ft | 17 mph | |
| 120 ft | +6 ft | 18 mph | |
| 120 ft | +6 ft | 19 mph | |
| 122 ft | +8 ft | 21 mph | |
| 122 ft | +8 ft | 21 mph | |
| 124 ft | +10 ft | 24 mph | |
| 132 ft | +18 ft | 30 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 16.5% (18 ft ≈ 1.3 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Aplus A919 would still be travelling at 30 mph when the Pirelli CINTURATO P7 had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
The more comfort bias Pirelli couldn't hold off the more sporty Michelin during the dry handling test.
Dry Handling
Dry Handling Average Speed
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 64.2 mph | Best | |
| 63.8 mph | -0.4 mph | |
| 63.6 mph | -0.6 mph | |
| 63.4 mph | -0.8 mph | |
| 63.2 mph | -1.0 mph | |
| 62.4 mph | -1.8 mph | |
| 62.4 mph | -1.8 mph | |
| 62.4 mph | -1.8 mph | |
| 62.1 mph | -2.1 mph | |
| 61.1 mph | -3.1 mph | |
| 60.8 mph | -3.4 mph | |
| 60.5 mph | -3.7 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 5.7% (3.7 mph).
Off Road
The dirt handling course was led by Pirelli, with the new Hankook Ventus Prime 4 a close second!
Dirt Handling
Dirt handling average speed
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 41.4 mph | Best | |
| 41.3 mph | -0.1 mph | |
| 41.3 mph | -0.1 mph | |
| 41.1 mph | -0.3 mph | |
| 41.1 mph | -0.3 mph | |
| 41.1 mph | -0.3 mph | |
| 41.0 mph | -0.4 mph | |
| 40.9 mph | -0.5 mph | |
| 40.8 mph | -0.6 mph | |
| 40.8 mph | -0.6 mph | |
| 40.6 mph | -0.8 mph | |
| 40.5 mph | -0.9 mph |
All the tires in the Dirt Handling test finished less than 3% apart.
The next three data points are gravel, sand and mud traction tests, measured as a pulling force. It's important to note that offroad testing is some of the hardest testing in the world, none more so than mud, so worry less about the precise order and more about general trends.
These general trends are that the budget Aplus might not be able to grip on wet roads, but is great on wet grass and in mud but not sand. The General Grabber GT Plus was best in sand but poor on grass... it seems even general trends are difficult with offroad testing!
Grass Traction
Pulling Force in pounds-force
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 657 lbf | Best | |
| 600 lbf | -57 lbf | |
| 582 lbf | -75 lbf | |
| 563 lbf | -94 lbf | |
| 556 lbf | -101 lbf | |
| 552 lbf | -105 lbf | |
| 549 lbf | -108 lbf | |
| 547 lbf | -110 lbf | |
| 543 lbf | -114 lbf | |
| 539 lbf | -118 lbf | |
| 524 lbf | -133 lbf | |
| 515 lbf | -142 lbf |
The difference between best and worst was 21.7% (142 lbf).
Sand Traction
Pulling Force in pounds-force
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 1,998 lbf | Best | |
| 1,893 lbf | -105 lbf | |
| 1,888 lbf | -110 lbf | |
| 1,876 lbf | -122 lbf | |
| 1,867 lbf | -131 lbf | |
| 1,821 lbf | -177 lbf | |
| 1,821 lbf | -177 lbf | |
| 1,801 lbf | -197 lbf | |
| 1,798 lbf | -200 lbf | |
| 1,741 lbf | -257 lbf | |
| 1,665 lbf | -333 lbf | |
| 1,625 lbf | -373 lbf |
The difference between best and worst was 18.6% (373 lbf).
Mud Traction
Pulling Force in pounds-force
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 733 lbf | Best | |
| 720 lbf | -13 lbf | |
| 679 lbf | -54 lbf | |
| 659 lbf | -74 lbf | |
| 659 lbf | -74 lbf | |
| 659 lbf | -74 lbf | |
| 645 lbf | -88 lbf | |
| 630 lbf | -103 lbf | |
| 618 lbf | -115 lbf | |
| 578 lbf | -155 lbf | |
| 567 lbf | -166 lbf | |
| 525 lbf | -208 lbf |
The difference between best and worst was 28.3% (208 lbf).
Environment
External noise is a much easier test, and the Goodyear EfficientGrip 2 SUV proved to be the quietest tire of the group by a huge margin!
Noise
External noise in dB
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 67.3 dB | Best | |
| 68.3 dB | +1.00 dB | |
| 68.9 dB | +1.60 dB | |
| 69.1 dB | +1.80 dB | |
| 69.3 dB | +2.00 dB | |
| 69.3 dB | +2.00 dB | |
| 69.4 dB | +2.10 dB | |
| 69.6 dB | +2.30 dB | |
| 70.1 dB | +2.80 dB | |
| 70.1 dB | +2.80 dB | |
| 70.2 dB | +2.90 dB | |
| 70.4 dB | +3.10 dB |
The difference between best and worst was 4.6% (3.1 dB).
The new Bridgestone Turanza 6 continued Bridgestones excellent performance in the rolling resistance tests, leading the Hankook and Uniroyal.
Rolling Resistance
Rolling resistance in kg t
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best | Extra fuel / year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7.42 kg/t | Best | $0 | |
| 7.63 kg/t | +0.21 kg/t | $8 | |
| 7.67 kg/t | +0.25 kg/t | $10 | |
| 7.78 kg/t | +0.36 kg/t | $14 | |
| 8.16 kg/t | +0.74 kg/t | $29 | |
| 8.34 kg/t | +0.92 kg/t | $36 | |
| 8.35 kg/t | +0.93 kg/t | $37 | |
| 8.44 kg/t | +1.02 kg/t | $40 | |
| 8.49 kg/t | +1.07 kg/t | $42 | |
| 8.59 kg/t | +1.17 kg/t | $46 | |
| 8.59 kg/t | +1.17 kg/t | $46 | |
| 9.56 kg/t | +2.14 kg/t | $85 |
The difference between best and worst was 28.8% (2.14 kg / t). Over 12,000 miles a year at $3.60/gal, the Aplus A919 uses about 24 gal ($85) more fuel than the Bridgestone Turanza 6.
Adjust the assumptions
Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions.
The Aplus was the cheapest tire on test, but this time the Michelin wasn't the most expensive tire of the group, it was the joint most expensive with Goodyear!
Results
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
225/65 R17 106V XLCategory scores (% of best)
All discipline results (14)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 2nd / 12 | 115 ft | +1 ft |
| Dry HandlingHigher is better | 1st / 12 | 64.2 mph | Best in this discipline |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 1st / 12 | 164 ft | Best in this discipline |
| Wet HandlingHigher is better | 1st / 12 | 53.9 mph | Best in this discipline |
| Wet CircleLower is better | 1st / 12 | 14.41 s | Best in this discipline |
| Straight AquaHigher is better | 1st / 12 | 59.6 mph | Best in this discipline |
| Curved AquaplaningHigher is better | 1st / 12 | 9.7 ft/s² | Best in this discipline |
| Gravel TractionHigher is better | 1st / 12 | 1,858 lbf | Best in this discipline |
| Dirt HandlingHigher is better | 7th / 12 | 41.0 mph | -0.4 mph |
| Sand TractionHigher is better | 10th / 12 | 1,741 lbf | -257 lbf |
| Grass TractionHigher is better | 5th / 12 | 556 lbf | -101 lbf |
| Mud TractionHigher is better | 3rd / 12 | 679 lbf | -54 lbf |
| NoiseLower is better | 3rd / 12 | 68.9 dB | +1.60 dB |
| Rolling ResistanceLower is better | 8th / 12 | 8.44 kg/t | +1.02 kg/t |
- EU Label
- C/A/72
- Price
- 610.00
Bridgestone Turanza 6
225/65 R17 102HCategory scores (% of best)
All discipline results (14)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 8th / 12 | 120 ft | +6 ft |
| Dry HandlingHigher is better | 3rd / 12 | 63.6 mph | -0.6 mph |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 6th / 12 | 174 ft | +10 ft |
| Wet HandlingHigher is better | 2nd / 12 | 53.7 mph | -0.2 mph |
| Wet CircleLower is better | 3rd / 12 | 14.58 s | +0.17 s |
| Straight AquaHigher is better | 6th / 12 | 55.3 mph | -4.3 mph |
| Curved AquaplaningHigher is better | 6th / 12 | 9.1 ft/s² | -0.6 ft/s² |
| Gravel TractionHigher is better | 2nd / 12 | 1,856 lbf | -2 lbf |
| Dirt HandlingHigher is better | 9th / 12 | 40.8 mph | -0.6 mph |
| Sand TractionHigher is better | 4th / 12 | 1,876 lbf | -122 lbf |
| Grass TractionHigher is better | 12th / 12 | 515 lbf | -142 lbf |
| Mud TractionHigher is better | 4th / 12 | 659 lbf | -74 lbf |
| NoiseLower is better | 7th / 12 | 69.4 dB | +2.10 dB |
| Rolling ResistanceLower is better | 1st / 12 | 7.42 kg/t | Best in this discipline |
- EU Label
- B/A/69
- Price
- 570.00
Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
225/65 R17 106H XLCategory scores (% of best)
All discipline results (14)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 6th / 12 | 119 ft | +5 ft |
| Dry HandlingHigher is better | 8th / 12 | 62.4 mph | -1.8 mph |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 5th / 12 | 174 ft | +10 ft |
| Wet HandlingHigher is better | 8th / 12 | 52.7 mph | -1.2 mph |
| Wet CircleLower is better | 11th / 12 | 15.01 s | +0.60 s |
| Straight AquaHigher is better | 3rd / 12 | 56.5 mph | -3.1 mph |
| Curved AquaplaningHigher is better | 4th / 12 | 9.4 ft/s² | -0.3 ft/s² |
| Gravel TractionHigher is better | 4th / 12 | 1,830 lbf | -28 lbf |
| Dirt HandlingHigher is better | 3rd / 12 | 41.3 mph | -0.1 mph |
| Sand TractionHigher is better | 2nd / 12 | 1,893 lbf | -105 lbf |
| Grass TractionHigher is better | 7th / 12 | 549 lbf | -108 lbf |
| Mud TractionHigher is better | 7th / 12 | 645 lbf | -88 lbf |
| NoiseLower is better | 8th / 12 | 69.6 dB | +2.30 dB |
| Rolling ResistanceLower is better | 10th / 12 | 8.59 kg/t | +1.17 kg/t |
- EU Label
- C/A/69
- Price
- 465.00
Goodyear EfficientGrip 2 SUV
225/65 R17 106V XLCategory scores (% of best)
All discipline results (14)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 7th / 12 | 120 ft | +6 ft |
| Dry HandlingHigher is better | 6th / 12 | 62.4 mph | -1.8 mph |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 2nd / 12 | 171 ft | +7 ft |
| Wet HandlingHigher is better | 6th / 12 | 52.9 mph | -1.0 mph |
| Wet CircleLower is better | 6th / 12 | 14.74 s | +0.33 s |
| Straight AquaHigher is better | 5th / 12 | 56.0 mph | -3.6 mph |
| Curved AquaplaningHigher is better | 5th / 12 | 9.3 ft/s² | -0.4 ft/s² |
| Gravel TractionHigher is better | 7th / 12 | 1,769 lbf | -89 lbf |
| Dirt HandlingHigher is better | 6th / 12 | 41.1 mph | -0.3 mph |
| Sand TractionHigher is better | 6th / 12 | 1,821 lbf | -177 lbf |
| Grass TractionHigher is better | 4th / 12 | 563 lbf | -94 lbf |
| Mud TractionHigher is better | 4th / 12 | 659 lbf | -74 lbf |
| NoiseLower is better | 1st / 12 | 67.3 dB | Best in this discipline |
| Rolling ResistanceLower is better | 9th / 12 | 8.49 kg/t | +1.07 kg/t |
- EU Label
- C/A/71
- Price
- 610.00
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
225/65 R17 102HCategory scores (% of best)
All discipline results (14)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 4th / 12 | 116 ft | +2 ft |
| Dry HandlingHigher is better | 6th / 12 | 62.4 mph | -1.8 mph |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 4th / 12 | 173 ft | +9 ft |
| Wet HandlingHigher is better | 5th / 12 | 53.1 mph | -0.8 mph |
| Wet CircleLower is better | 5th / 12 | 14.72 s | +0.31 s |
| Straight AquaHigher is better | 10th / 12 | 53.6 mph | -6.0 mph |
| Curved AquaplaningHigher is better | 8th / 12 | 8.4 ft/s² | -1.3 ft/s² |
| Gravel TractionHigher is better | 8th / 12 | 1,753 lbf | -105 lbf |
| Dirt HandlingHigher is better | 2nd / 12 | 41.3 mph | -0.1 mph |
| Sand TractionHigher is better | 5th / 12 | 1,867 lbf | -131 lbf |
| Grass TractionHigher is better | 8th / 12 | 547 lbf | -110 lbf |
| Mud TractionHigher is better | 8th / 12 | 630 lbf | -103 lbf |
| NoiseLower is better | 11th / 12 | 70.2 dB | +2.90 dB |
| Rolling ResistanceLower is better | 2nd / 12 | 7.63 kg/t | +0.21 kg/t |
- EU Label
- B/A/69
- Price
- 485.00
Pirelli CINTURATO P7
225/65 R17 106V XLCategory scores (% of best)
All discipline results (14)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 1st / 12 | 114 ft | Best in this discipline |
| Dry HandlingHigher is better | 2nd / 12 | 63.8 mph | -0.4 mph |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 3rd / 12 | 171 ft | +7 ft |
| Wet HandlingHigher is better | 3rd / 12 | 53.3 mph | -0.6 mph |
| Wet CircleLower is better | 2nd / 12 | 14.46 s | +0.05 s |
| Straight AquaHigher is better | 4th / 12 | 56.5 mph | -3.1 mph |
| Curved AquaplaningHigher is better | 3rd / 12 | 9.5 ft/s² | -0.2 ft/s² |
| Gravel TractionHigher is better | 12th / 12 | 1,605 lbf | -253 lbf |
| Dirt HandlingHigher is better | 1st / 12 | 41.4 mph | Best in this discipline |
| Sand TractionHigher is better | 9th / 12 | 1,798 lbf | -200 lbf |
| Grass TractionHigher is better | 10th / 12 | 539 lbf | -118 lbf |
| Mud TractionHigher is better | 12th / 12 | 525 lbf | -208 lbf |
| NoiseLower is better | 9th / 12 | 70.1 dB | +2.80 dB |
| Rolling ResistanceLower is better | 7th / 12 | 8.35 kg/t | +0.93 kg/t |
- EU Label
- C/A/70
- Price
- 590.00
Uniroyal RainExpert 5
225/65 R17 102HCategory scores (% of best)
All discipline results (14)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 11th / 12 | 124 ft | +10 ft |
| Dry HandlingHigher is better | 11th / 12 | 60.8 mph | -3.4 mph |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 8th / 12 | 177 ft | +13 ft |
| Wet HandlingHigher is better | 7th / 12 | 52.8 mph | -1.1 mph |
| Wet CircleLower is better | 9th / 12 | 14.83 s | +0.42 s |
| Straight AquaHigher is better | 2nd / 12 | 58.7 mph | -0.9 mph |
| Curved AquaplaningHigher is better | 2nd / 12 | 9.6 ft/s² | -0.1 ft/s² |
| Gravel TractionHigher is better | 5th / 12 | 1,822 lbf | -36 lbf |
| Dirt HandlingHigher is better | 4th / 12 | 41.1 mph | -0.3 mph |
| Sand TractionHigher is better | 3rd / 12 | 1,888 lbf | -110 lbf |
| Grass TractionHigher is better | 2nd / 12 | 600 lbf | -57 lbf |
| Mud TractionHigher is better | 2nd / 12 | 720 lbf | -13 lbf |
| NoiseLower is better | 5th / 12 | 69.3 dB | +2.00 dB |
| Rolling ResistanceLower is better | 3rd / 12 | 7.67 kg/t | +0.25 kg/t |
- EU Label
- C/A/71
- Price
- 475.00
Toyo Proxes Comfort
225/65 R17 106V XLCategory scores (% of best)
All discipline results (14)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 5th / 12 | 117 ft | +3 ft |
| Dry HandlingHigher is better | 5th / 12 | 63.2 mph | -1.0 mph |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 9th / 12 | 179 ft | +15 ft |
| Wet HandlingHigher is better | 4th / 12 | 53.1 mph | -0.8 mph |
| Wet CircleLower is better | 4th / 12 | 14.64 s | +0.23 s |
| Straight AquaHigher is better | 9th / 12 | 54.1 mph | -5.5 mph |
| Curved AquaplaningHigher is better | 9th / 12 | 8.4 ft/s² | -1.3 ft/s² |
| Gravel TractionHigher is better | 10th / 12 | 1,691 lbf | -167 lbf |
| Dirt HandlingHigher is better | 12th / 12 | 40.5 mph | -0.9 mph |
| Sand TractionHigher is better | 11th / 12 | 1,665 lbf | -333 lbf |
| Grass TractionHigher is better | 3rd / 12 | 582 lbf | -75 lbf |
| Mud TractionHigher is better | 11th / 12 | 567 lbf | -166 lbf |
| NoiseLower is better | 5th / 12 | 69.3 dB | +2.00 dB |
| Rolling ResistanceLower is better | 5th / 12 | 8.16 kg/t | +0.74 kg/t |
- EU Label
- C/A/70
- Price
- 430.00
General Grabber GT+
225/65 R17 102HCategory scores (% of best)
All discipline results (14)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 10th / 12 | 122 ft | +8 ft |
| Dry HandlingHigher is better | 10th / 12 | 61.1 mph | -3.1 mph |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 10th / 12 | 180 ft | +16 ft |
| Wet HandlingHigher is better | 10th / 12 | 52.4 mph | -1.5 mph |
| Wet CircleLower is better | 10th / 12 | 14.9 s | +0.49 s |
| Straight AquaHigher is better | 7th / 12 | 54.6 mph | -5.0 mph |
| Curved AquaplaningHigher is better | 10th / 12 | 8.1 ft/s² | -1.6 ft/s² |
| Gravel TractionHigher is better | 9th / 12 | 1,743 lbf | -115 lbf |
| Dirt HandlingHigher is better | 8th / 12 | 40.9 mph | -0.5 mph |
| Sand TractionHigher is better | 1st / 12 | 1,998 lbf | Best in this discipline |
| Grass TractionHigher is better | 9th / 12 | 543 lbf | -114 lbf |
| Mud TractionHigher is better | 4th / 12 | 659 lbf | -74 lbf |
| NoiseLower is better | 4th / 12 | 69.1 dB | +1.80 dB |
| Rolling ResistanceLower is better | 4th / 12 | 7.78 kg/t | +0.36 kg/t |
- EU Label
- C/A/71
- Price
- 510.00
Nexen N Fera Sport SUV
225/65 R17 102HCategory scores (% of best)
All discipline results (14)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 3rd / 12 | 116 ft | +2 ft |
| Dry HandlingHigher is better | 9th / 12 | 62.1 mph | -2.1 mph |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 7th / 12 | 176 ft | +12 ft |
| Wet HandlingHigher is better | 9th / 12 | 52.4 mph | -1.5 mph |
| Wet CircleLower is better | 8th / 12 | 14.79 s | +0.38 s |
| Straight AquaHigher is better | 7th / 12 | 54.6 mph | -5.0 mph |
| Curved AquaplaningHigher is better | 7th / 12 | 8.7 ft/s² | -1.0 ft/s² |
| Gravel TractionHigher is better | 11th / 12 | 1,686 lbf | -172 lbf |
| Dirt HandlingHigher is better | 11th / 12 | 40.6 mph | -0.8 mph |
| Sand TractionHigher is better | 6th / 12 | 1,821 lbf | -177 lbf |
| Grass TractionHigher is better | 6th / 12 | 552 lbf | -105 lbf |
| Mud TractionHigher is better | 9th / 12 | 618 lbf | -115 lbf |
| NoiseLower is better | 2nd / 12 | 68.3 dB | +1.00 dB |
| Rolling ResistanceLower is better | 10th / 12 | 8.59 kg/t | +1.17 kg/t |
- EU Label
- D/A/71
- Price
- 350.00
Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport
225/65 R17 102HCategory scores (% of best)
All discipline results (14)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 9th / 12 | 122 ft | +8 ft |
| Dry HandlingHigher is better | 4th / 12 | 63.4 mph | -0.8 mph |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 11th / 12 | 200 ft | +36 ft |
| Wet HandlingHigher is better | 11th / 12 | 52.2 mph | -1.7 mph |
| Wet CircleLower is better | 7th / 12 | 14.77 s | +0.36 s |
| Straight AquaHigher is better | 12th / 12 | 52.1 mph | -7.5 mph |
| Curved AquaplaningHigher is better | 11th / 12 | 7.9 ft/s² | -1.8 ft/s² |
| Gravel TractionHigher is better | 3rd / 12 | 1,852 lbf | -6 lbf |
| Dirt HandlingHigher is better | 10th / 12 | 40.8 mph | -0.6 mph |
| Sand TractionHigher is better | 12th / 12 | 1,625 lbf | -373 lbf |
| Grass TractionHigher is better | 11th / 12 | 524 lbf | -133 lbf |
| Mud TractionHigher is better | 10th / 12 | 578 lbf | -155 lbf |
| NoiseLower is better | 12th / 12 | 70.4 dB | +3.10 dB |
| Rolling ResistanceLower is better | 6th / 12 | 8.34 kg/t | +0.92 kg/t |
- EU Label
- C/A/70
- Price
- 420.00
Aplus A919
225/65 R17 102HCategory scores (% of best)
All discipline results (14)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 12th / 12 | 132 ft | +18 ft |
| Dry HandlingHigher is better | 12th / 12 | 60.5 mph | -3.7 mph |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 12th / 12 | 209 ft | +45 ft |
| Wet HandlingHigher is better | 12th / 12 | 51.3 mph | -2.6 mph |
| Wet CircleLower is better | 12th / 12 | 15.23 s | +0.82 s |
| Straight AquaHigher is better | 11th / 12 | 52.1 mph | -7.5 mph |
| Curved AquaplaningHigher is better | 12th / 12 | 7.7 ft/s² | -2.0 ft/s² |
| Gravel TractionHigher is better | 6th / 12 | 1,814 lbf | -44 lbf |
| Dirt HandlingHigher is better | 4th / 12 | 41.1 mph | -0.3 mph |
| Sand TractionHigher is better | 8th / 12 | 1,801 lbf | -197 lbf |
| Grass TractionHigher is better | 1st / 12 | 657 lbf | Best in this discipline |
| Mud TractionHigher is better | 1st / 12 | 733 lbf | Best in this discipline |
| NoiseLower is better | 9th / 12 | 70.1 dB | +2.80 dB |
| Rolling ResistanceLower is better | 12th / 12 | 9.56 kg/t | +2.14 kg/t |
- EU Label
- E/C/71
- Price
- 300.00



These are cool tests, but I don't see why sand, dirt, mud, grass tractions are relevant to SUVs on summer tires. People who buys jeep and stick to road tires have little to no intention to venture offroad. Or if they do, they are deluding themselves. Just my (unpopular) opinion.
I don't disagree, but also people who are doing research into an suv kind of expect it. Grass and gravel do have real world applications. Mud is the craziest one really, a summer tire has zero mud ability and mud testing is REALLY difficult to get trends even with MT tires.
A rare A.B. test with no Conti contender.
I hadn't even noticed that! I assume they were testing in the difficult period between PC6 rundown and PC7 ram up!