Test Charts / Auto Bild Allrad
2022 Auto Bild SUV Winter Tire Test
Compare each discipline in the tested size. See the measured result, position and gap to the best tire, then read the verdict for the trade-offs behind the finishing order.
- Tested size
- 225/45 R19
- Tires tested
- 10
- Disciplines
- 13
Read the measurements, not just the rank
Lower is better for braking distances and lap times; higher is better for subjective scores and aquaplaning speed. Bars start at zero. Read the gap alongside the position: adjacent tires can be separated by very different margins.
Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tires does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.
Focus on your tires
Select tires to highlight them throughout the charts.
Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tires does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.
Dry
2Dry Braking
Dry braking in feet (62 - 0 mph)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 128 ft | Best | 0 mph | |
| 143 ft | +15 ft | 26 mph | |
| 144 ft | +16 ft | 27 mph | |
| 148 ft | +20 ft | 29 mph | |
| 149 ft | +21 ft | 30 mph | |
| 149 ft | +21 ft | 30 mph | |
| 151 ft | +23 ft | 31 mph | |
| 151 ft | +23 ft | 31 mph | |
| 154 ft | +26 ft | 33 mph | |
| 154 ft | +26 ft | 33 mph | |
| 155 ft | +27 ft | 33 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 21% (27 ft ≈ 1.8 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 would still be travelling at 33 mph when the Reference Summer had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
Dry Handling
Dry Handling Average Speed
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 61.3 mph | Best | |
| 60.3 mph | -1.0 mph | |
| 60.1 mph | -1.2 mph | |
| 60.0 mph | -1.3 mph | |
| 59.8 mph | -1.5 mph | |
| 59.8 mph | -1.5 mph | |
| 59.7 mph | -1.6 mph | |
| 59.7 mph | -1.6 mph | |
| 59.4 mph | -1.9 mph | |
| 59.3 mph | -2.0 mph | |
| 58.6 mph | -2.7 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 4.4% (2.7 mph).
Wet
5Wet Braking
Wet braking in feet (62 - 0 mph)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 151 ft | Best | 0 mph | |
| 152 ft | +1 ft | 5 mph | |
| 153 ft | +2 ft | 8 mph | |
| 154 ft | +3 ft | 10 mph | |
| 154 ft | +3 ft | 11 mph | |
| 158 ft | +7 ft | 17 mph | |
| 160 ft | +9 ft | 19 mph | |
| 163 ft | +12 ft | 22 mph | |
| 164 ft | +13 ft | 23 mph | |
| 175 ft | +24 ft | 29 mph | |
| 208 ft | +57 ft | 42 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 37.6% (57 ft ≈ 3.8 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Petlas Explero W671 would still be travelling at 42 mph when the Reference Summer had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
Wet Handling
Wet Handling Average Speed
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 48.8 mph | Best | |
| 48.3 mph | -0.5 mph | |
| 48.3 mph | -0.5 mph | |
| 48.2 mph | -0.6 mph | |
| 48.2 mph | -0.6 mph | |
| 48.0 mph | -0.8 mph | |
| 48.0 mph | -0.8 mph | |
| 47.6 mph | -1.2 mph | |
| 47.5 mph | -1.3 mph | |
| 47.4 mph | -1.4 mph | |
| 45.0 mph | -3.8 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 7.6% (3.8 mph).
Wet Circle
Wet Circle Lap Time in seconds
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 15.39 s | Best | |
| 15.43 s | +0.04 s | |
| 15.55 s | +0.16 s | |
| 15.56 s | +0.17 s | |
| 15.68 s | +0.29 s | |
| 15.8 s | +0.41 s | |
| 15.94 s | +0.55 s | |
| 16.01 s | +0.62 s | |
| 16.21 s | +0.82 s | |
| 16.34 s | +0.95 s | |
| 17.44 s | +2.05 s |
The difference between best and worst was 13.3% (2.05 s).
Straight Aqua
Float Speed in mph
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 47.2 mph | Best | |
| 46.7 mph | -0.5 mph | |
| 46.0 mph | -1.2 mph | |
| 45.9 mph | -1.3 mph | |
| 45.6 mph | -1.6 mph | |
| 45.4 mph | -1.8 mph | |
| 44.1 mph | -3.1 mph | |
| 43.8 mph | -3.4 mph | |
| 43.6 mph | -3.6 mph | |
| 41.6 mph | -5.6 mph | |
| 40.8 mph | -6.4 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 13.6% (6.4 mph).
Curved Aquaplaning
Remaining lateral acceleration
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 15.0 ft/s² | Best | |
| 14.7 ft/s² | -0.3 ft/s² | |
| 14.6 ft/s² | -0.4 ft/s² | |
| 14.3 ft/s² | -0.7 ft/s² | |
| 13.6 ft/s² | -1.4 ft/s² | |
| 13.6 ft/s² | -1.4 ft/s² | |
| 13.4 ft/s² | -1.6 ft/s² | |
| 12.4 ft/s² | -2.6 ft/s² | |
| 12.2 ft/s² | -2.8 ft/s² | |
| 10.7 ft/s² | -4.3 ft/s² | |
| 9.8 ft/s² | -5.2 ft/s² |
The difference between best and worst was 34.6% (5.2 ft/s²).
Snow
4Snow Braking
Snow braking in feet (31 - 0 mph)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 79 ft | Best | 0 mph | |
| 80 ft | +1 ft | 9 mph | |
| 82 ft | +3 ft | 14 mph | |
| 82 ft | +3 ft | 15 mph | |
| 82 ft | +3 ft | 15 mph | |
| 83 ft | +4 ft | 17 mph | |
| 84 ft | +5 ft | 19 mph | |
| 84 ft | +5 ft | 19 mph | |
| 85 ft | +6 ft | 22 mph | |
| 87 ft | +8 ft | 24 mph | |
| 193 ft | +114 ft | 61 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 144% (114 ft ≈ 7.7 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Reference Summer would still be travelling at 61 mph when the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
Snow Traction
Pulling Force in pounds-force
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 868 lbf | Best | |
| 857 lbf | -11 lbf | |
| 845 lbf | -23 lbf | |
| 843 lbf | -25 lbf | |
| 843 lbf | -25 lbf | |
| 841 lbf | -27 lbf | |
| 841 lbf | -27 lbf | |
| 830 lbf | -38 lbf | |
| 814 lbf | -54 lbf | |
| 800 lbf | -68 lbf | |
| 153 lbf | -715 lbf |
The difference between best and worst was 82.4% (715 lbf).
Snow Handling
Snow handling average speed
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 42.7 mph | Best | |
| 42.0 mph | -0.7 mph | |
| 41.8 mph | -0.9 mph | |
| 41.6 mph | -1.1 mph | |
| 41.6 mph | -1.1 mph | |
| 41.4 mph | -1.3 mph | |
| 41.1 mph | -1.6 mph | |
| 40.6 mph | -2.1 mph | |
| 40.4 mph | -2.3 mph | |
| 40.3 mph | -2.4 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 5.5% (2.4 mph).
Snow Slalom
Lateral acceleration
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 15.4 ft/s² | Best | |
| 14.6 ft/s² | -0.8 ft/s² | |
| 14.6 ft/s² | -0.8 ft/s² | |
| 14.6 ft/s² | -0.8 ft/s² | |
| 14.5 ft/s² | -0.9 ft/s² | |
| 14.2 ft/s² | -1.2 ft/s² | |
| 13.9 ft/s² | -1.5 ft/s² | |
| 13.5 ft/s² | -1.9 ft/s² | |
| 13.5 ft/s² | -1.9 ft/s² | |
| 13.4 ft/s² | -2.0 ft/s² | |
| 5.0 ft/s² | -10.4 ft/s² |
The difference between best and worst was 67.7% (10.4 ft/s²).
Comfort
1Noise
External noise in dB
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 69.5 dB | Best | |
| 69.9 dB | +0.40 dB | |
| 70.1 dB | +0.60 dB | |
| 70.6 dB | +1.10 dB | |
| 70.7 dB | +1.20 dB | |
| 71.1 dB | +1.60 dB | |
| 71.2 dB | +1.70 dB | |
| 71.3 dB | +1.80 dB | |
| 71.6 dB | +2.10 dB | |
| 73.5 dB | +4.00 dB | |
| 74.9 dB | +5.40 dB |
The difference between best and worst was 7.8% (5.4 dB).
Value
1Rolling Resistance
Rolling resistance in kg t
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best | Extra fuel / year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6.89 kg/t | Best | $0 | |
| 7.11 kg/t | +0.22 kg/t | $9 | |
| 7.38 kg/t | +0.49 kg/t | $21 | |
| 7.5 kg/t | +0.61 kg/t | $26 | |
| 7.77 kg/t | +0.88 kg/t | $38 | |
| 8.07 kg/t | +1.18 kg/t | $50 | |
| 8.47 kg/t | +1.58 kg/t | $67 | |
| 8.94 kg/t | +2.05 kg/t | $87 | |
| 9.15 kg/t | +2.26 kg/t | $96 | |
| 9.24 kg/t | +2.35 kg/t | $100 | |
| 9.39 kg/t | +2.50 kg/t | $107 |
The difference between best and worst was 36.3% (2.5 kg / t). Over 12,000 miles a year at $3.60/gal, the Falken Eurowinter HS01 uses about 30 gal ($107) more fuel than the Nokian Snowproof P.
Adjust the assumptions
Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions. These calculators use the full test field, independently of your tire selection above.
Test setup & methodology
The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.
Recorded test conditions
Recorded test conditions
- Dry Braking
- 62.1 → 0.0 mph
- Wet Braking
- 62.1 → 0.0 mph
- Snow Braking
- 31.1 → 0.0 mph
More tire tests
Cross-check this test
Where these tires were tested again, and how the verdict held up.
2022 Winter Tire Market Overview
215/55 R1756 tires tested
8 of these 10 tires tested again
2023 Auto Bild Winter Tire Test
225/45 R1820 tires tested
7 of these 10 tires tested again
2023 Winter Tire Test 54 Set Braking Test
225/45 R1854 tires tested
7 of these 10 tires tested again

