Menu

Test Charts / Auto Bild Allrad

2022 Auto Bild SUV Winter Tire Test

Compare each discipline in the tested size. See the measured result, position and gap to the best tire, then read the verdict for the trade-offs behind the finishing order.

Tested size
225/45 R19
Tires tested
10
Disciplines
13

Read the measurements, not just the rank

Lower is better for braking distances and lap times; higher is better for subjective scores and aquaplaning speed. Bars start at zero. Read the gap alongside the position: adjacent tires can be separated by very different margins.

Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tires does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.

Dry

2

Dry Braking

Dry braking in feet (62 - 0 mph)

Lower is better ↓
Dry Braking
Position / TireResultGap to bestResidual speed
128 ft Best 0 mph
143 ft +15 ft 26 mph
144 ft +16 ft 27 mph
148 ft +20 ft 29 mph
149 ft +21 ft 30 mph
149 ft +21 ft 30 mph
151 ft +23 ft 31 mph
151 ft +23 ft 31 mph
154 ft +26 ft 33 mph
154 ft +26 ft 33 mph
155 ft +27 ft 33 mph

The difference between best and worst was 21% (27 ft ≈ 1.8 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 would still be travelling at 33 mph when the Reference Summer had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Dry Handling

Dry Handling Average Speed

Higher is better ↑
Dry Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
61.3 mph Best
60.3 mph -1.0 mph
60.1 mph -1.2 mph
60.0 mph -1.3 mph
59.8 mph -1.5 mph
59.8 mph -1.5 mph
59.7 mph -1.6 mph
59.7 mph -1.6 mph
59.4 mph -1.9 mph
59.3 mph -2.0 mph
58.6 mph -2.7 mph

The difference between best and worst was 4.4% (2.7 mph).

Wet

5

Wet Braking

Wet braking in feet (62 - 0 mph)

Lower is better ↓
Wet Braking
Position / TireResultGap to bestResidual speed
151 ft Best 0 mph
152 ft +1 ft 5 mph
153 ft +2 ft 8 mph
154 ft +3 ft 10 mph
154 ft +3 ft 11 mph
158 ft +7 ft 17 mph
160 ft +9 ft 19 mph
163 ft +12 ft 22 mph
164 ft +13 ft 23 mph
175 ft +24 ft 29 mph
208 ft +57 ft 42 mph

The difference between best and worst was 37.6% (57 ft ≈ 3.8 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Petlas Explero W671 would still be travelling at 42 mph when the Reference Summer had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Wet Handling

Wet Handling Average Speed

Higher is better ↑
Wet Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
48.8 mph Best
48.3 mph -0.5 mph
48.3 mph -0.5 mph
48.2 mph -0.6 mph
48.2 mph -0.6 mph
48.0 mph -0.8 mph
48.0 mph -0.8 mph
47.6 mph -1.2 mph
47.5 mph -1.3 mph
47.4 mph -1.4 mph
45.0 mph -3.8 mph

The difference between best and worst was 7.6% (3.8 mph).

Wet Circle

Wet Circle Lap Time in seconds

Lower is better ↓
Wet Circle
Position / TireResultGap to best
15.39 s Best
15.43 s +0.04 s
15.55 s +0.16 s
15.56 s +0.17 s
15.68 s +0.29 s
15.8 s +0.41 s
15.94 s +0.55 s
16.01 s +0.62 s
16.21 s +0.82 s
16.34 s +0.95 s
17.44 s +2.05 s

The difference between best and worst was 13.3% (2.05 s).

Straight Aqua

Float Speed in mph

Higher is better ↑
Straight Aqua
Position / TireResultGap to best
47.2 mph Best
46.7 mph -0.5 mph
46.0 mph -1.2 mph
45.9 mph -1.3 mph
45.6 mph -1.6 mph
45.4 mph -1.8 mph
44.1 mph -3.1 mph
43.8 mph -3.4 mph
43.6 mph -3.6 mph
41.6 mph -5.6 mph
40.8 mph -6.4 mph

The difference between best and worst was 13.6% (6.4 mph).

Curved Aquaplaning

Remaining lateral acceleration

Higher is better ↑
Curved Aquaplaning
Position / TireResultGap to best
15.0 ft/s² Best
14.7 ft/s² -0.3 ft/s²
14.6 ft/s² -0.4 ft/s²
14.3 ft/s² -0.7 ft/s²
13.6 ft/s² -1.4 ft/s²
13.6 ft/s² -1.4 ft/s²
13.4 ft/s² -1.6 ft/s²
12.4 ft/s² -2.6 ft/s²
12.2 ft/s² -2.8 ft/s²
10.7 ft/s² -4.3 ft/s²
9.8 ft/s² -5.2 ft/s²

The difference between best and worst was 34.6% (5.2 ft/s²).

Snow

4

Snow Braking

Snow braking in feet (31 - 0 mph)

Lower is better ↓
Snow Braking
Position / TireResultGap to bestResidual speed
79 ft Best 0 mph
80 ft +1 ft 9 mph
82 ft +3 ft 14 mph
82 ft +3 ft 15 mph
82 ft +3 ft 15 mph
83 ft +4 ft 17 mph
84 ft +5 ft 19 mph
84 ft +5 ft 19 mph
85 ft +6 ft 22 mph
87 ft +8 ft 24 mph
193 ft +114 ft 61 mph

The difference between best and worst was 144% (114 ft ≈ 7.7 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Reference Summer would still be travelling at 61 mph when the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Snow Traction

Pulling Force in pounds-force

Higher is better ↑
Snow Traction
Position / TireResultGap to best
868 lbf Best
857 lbf -11 lbf
845 lbf -23 lbf
843 lbf -25 lbf
843 lbf -25 lbf
841 lbf -27 lbf
841 lbf -27 lbf
830 lbf -38 lbf
814 lbf -54 lbf
800 lbf -68 lbf
153 lbf -715 lbf

The difference between best and worst was 82.4% (715 lbf).

Snow Handling

Snow handling average speed

Higher is better ↑
Snow Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
42.7 mph Best
42.0 mph -0.7 mph
41.8 mph -0.9 mph
41.6 mph -1.1 mph
41.6 mph -1.1 mph
41.4 mph -1.3 mph
41.1 mph -1.6 mph
40.6 mph -2.1 mph
40.4 mph -2.3 mph
40.3 mph -2.4 mph

The difference between best and worst was 5.5% (2.4 mph).

Snow Slalom

Lateral acceleration

Higher is better ↑
Snow Slalom
Position / TireResultGap to best
15.4 ft/s² Best
14.6 ft/s² -0.8 ft/s²
14.6 ft/s² -0.8 ft/s²
14.6 ft/s² -0.8 ft/s²
14.5 ft/s² -0.9 ft/s²
14.2 ft/s² -1.2 ft/s²
13.9 ft/s² -1.5 ft/s²
13.5 ft/s² -1.9 ft/s²
13.5 ft/s² -1.9 ft/s²
13.4 ft/s² -2.0 ft/s²
5.0 ft/s² -10.4 ft/s²

The difference between best and worst was 67.7% (10.4 ft/s²).

Comfort

1

Noise

External noise in dB

Lower is better ↓
Noise
Position / TireResultGap to best
69.5 dB Best
69.9 dB +0.40 dB
70.1 dB +0.60 dB
70.6 dB +1.10 dB
70.7 dB +1.20 dB
71.1 dB +1.60 dB
71.2 dB +1.70 dB
71.3 dB +1.80 dB
71.6 dB +2.10 dB
73.5 dB +4.00 dB
74.9 dB +5.40 dB

The difference between best and worst was 7.8% (5.4 dB).

Value

1

Rolling Resistance

Rolling resistance in kg t

Lower is better ↓
Rolling Resistance
Position / TireResultGap to bestExtra fuel / year
6.89 kg/t Best $0
7.11 kg/t +0.22 kg/t $9
7.38 kg/t +0.49 kg/t $21
7.5 kg/t +0.61 kg/t $26
7.77 kg/t +0.88 kg/t $38
8.07 kg/t +1.18 kg/t $50
8.47 kg/t +1.58 kg/t $67
8.94 kg/t +2.05 kg/t $87
9.15 kg/t +2.26 kg/t $96
9.24 kg/t +2.35 kg/t $100
9.39 kg/t +2.50 kg/t $107

The difference between best and worst was 36.3% (2.5 kg / t). Over 12,000 miles a year at $3.60/gal, the Falken Eurowinter HS01 uses about 30 gal ($107) more fuel than the Nokian Snowproof P.

Adjust the assumptions

Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions. These calculators use the full test field, independently of your tire selection above.

12,000 mi
$3.60/gal
Estimates based on typical driving conditions. Rolling resistance accounts for approximately 20% of IC vehicle fuel consumption and 25% of EV energy consumption. Actual savings vary based on driving style, vehicle weight, road conditions, and tire age. For comparative purposes only. Lifetime savings based on a 40,000km / 25,000 mile tread life.

Test setup & methodology

The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.

Recorded test conditions

Recorded test conditions

Dry Braking
62.1 → 0.0 mph
Wet Braking
62.1 → 0.0 mph
Snow Braking
31.1 → 0.0 mph

More tire tests

Cross-check this test

All tire tests

Where these tires were tested again, and how the verdict held up.

Rate your tires

My tires

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tires

Save tires from a tire page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tires. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.