If you're planning on undertaking a massive Nordic friction and studded winter tire test, having the right facilities to conduct the test in is key. Fortunately for Test World, they own one of the best independent arctic testing facilities in the world which is why we're super excited to see this 21 tire test, covering all the key friction studless and studded winter tires on the market.
All tires are in the popular 205/55 R16, and were tested using a VW Golf. There were some interesting new tires in the test, including the first test of the studless Michelin X-Ice Snow.
Many of the premium brands included have both studless friction and studded winter tires in the test, which is why you'll see them twice in the data, so as you're going through the results looking at your favorite tire make sure you're looking at the right version of it.
Overall, the usual contenders in the winter segment came out top. Continental, who dominate the European winter tire tests, joint won the test alongside Michelin.
The studded Continental IceContact 3 proved to have an excellent all round ability, with no huge weakness for a studded tire, and the new studded Michelin X-Ice North 4 dominated on ice, and performed well in nearly all other criteria, showing only a slight weakness during wet handling testing.
Winter specialists Nokian aren't having the best time in the European winter segment at the moment, but they'll be happy with third place for their studded Nokian Hakkapeliitta 9 tire, and even happier as the winning studless friction tire on test being awarded to the Nokian Hakkapeliitta R3.
One other interesting point for European readers, you'll notice some of the best tires in the dry and wet are rated as some of the worst tires overall in this test. This serves as a nice reminder that friction and studded tires are tires designed for climates that see extreme winters, which mean snow and ice on the ground for many months constantly. None of these tires are suitable for a central European winter, where dry and wet is the dominant weather, so don't try fitting them in climates like the UK.
Dry
In the dry the budget Petlas Glacier W661 narrowly beat the Michelin X-Ice North 4. Sadly there was no objective dry handling data, the subjective data can be found in the overall results below.
Dry Braking
Dry braking in feet
Lower is better ↓Central European Winter Tires
| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 97 ft | Best | |
| 98 ft | +1 ft | |
| 98 ft | +1 ft |
Nordic Friction Winter Tires
| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 95 ft | Best | |
| 96 ft | +1 ft | |
| 98 ft | +3 ft | |
| 98 ft | +3 ft | |
| 99 ft | +4 ft | |
| 99 ft | +4 ft | |
| 99 ft | +4 ft | |
| 101 ft | +6 ft | |
| 102 ft | +7 ft | |
| 103 ft | +8 ft | |
| 104 ft | +9 ft | |
| 105 ft | +10 ft |
Studded Winter Tires
| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 96 ft | Best | |
| 98 ft | +2 ft | |
| 98 ft | +2 ft | |
| 100 ft | +4 ft | |
| 103 ft | +7 ft |
The difference between best and worst was 10.7% (10 ft ≈ 0.7 Car Lengths).
Wet
The Petlas also proved best during wet testing, winning wet braking and wet handling.
Wet Braking
Wet braking in feet
Lower is better ↓Central European Winter Tires
| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 107 ft | Best | |
| 122 ft | +15 ft | |
| 133 ft | +26 ft |
Nordic Friction Winter Tires
| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 97 ft | Best | |
| 120 ft | +23 ft | |
| 120 ft | +23 ft | |
| 122 ft | +25 ft | |
| 125 ft | +28 ft | |
| 126 ft | +29 ft | |
| 126 ft | +29 ft | |
| 127 ft | +30 ft | |
| 127 ft | +30 ft | |
| 127 ft | +30 ft | |
| 128 ft | +31 ft | |
| 129 ft | +32 ft |
Studded Winter Tires
| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 110 ft | Best | |
| 114 ft | +4 ft | |
| 118 ft | +8 ft | |
| 120 ft | +10 ft | |
| 123 ft | +13 ft |
The difference between best and worst was 36% (36 ft ≈ 2.4 Car Lengths).
Wet Handling
Wet handling time in seconds
Lower is better ↓Central European Winter Tires
| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 34.9 s | Best | |
| 35.2 s | +0.30 s | |
| 35.3 s | +0.40 s |
Nordic Friction Winter Tires
| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 33.7 s | Best | |
| 34.1 s | +0.40 s | |
| 34.5 s | +0.80 s | |
| 34.5 s | +0.80 s | |
| 34.6 s | +0.90 s | |
| 34.7 s | +1.00 s | |
| 34.7 s | +1.00 s | |
| 34.8 s | +1.10 s | |
| 34.8 s | +1.10 s | |
| 35 s | +1.30 s | |
| 35 s | +1.30 s | |
| 35.2 s | +1.50 s |
Studded Winter Tires
| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 34.8 s | Best | |
| 34.9 s | +0.10 s | |
| 35.1 s | +0.30 s | |
| 35.2 s | +0.40 s | |
| 35.4 s | +0.60 s |
The difference between best and worst was 5% (1.7 s).
Snow
Colder testing reversed the fortunes of the Petlas tire, finishing at the back of the pack in all the snow and ice testing.
Continental dominated snow braking, taking first place with the studless VikingContact and second place with the studded IceContact 3
Snow Braking
Snow braking in feet
Lower is better ↓Central European Winter Tires
| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 167 ft | Best | |
| 169 ft | +2 ft | |
| 176 ft | +9 ft |
Nordic Friction Winter Tires
| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 165 ft | Best | |
| 165 ft | 0 ft | |
| 166 ft | +1 ft | |
| 167 ft | +2 ft | |
| 167 ft | +2 ft | |
| 168 ft | +3 ft | |
| 168 ft | +3 ft | |
| 170 ft | +5 ft | |
| 170 ft | +5 ft | |
| 171 ft | +6 ft | |
| 171 ft | +6 ft | |
| 175 ft | +10 ft |
Studded Winter Tires
| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 165 ft | Best | |
| 166 ft | +1 ft | |
| 166 ft | +1 ft | |
| 166 ft | +1 ft | |
| 169 ft | +4 ft |
The difference between best and worst was 6.8% (11 ft ≈ 0.8 Car Lengths).
Continental again took the top two spots during snow traction testing, this time with the studded tire ahead of the studless.
Snow Traction
Snow acceleration time
Lower is better ↓Central European Winter Tires
| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 6.1 s | Best | |
| 6.2 s | +0.10 s | |
| 6.5 s | +0.40 s |
Nordic Friction Winter Tires
| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 5.9 s | Best | |
| 6 s | +0.10 s | |
| 6 s | +0.10 s | |
| 6 s | +0.10 s | |
| 6 s | +0.10 s | |
| 6.1 s | +0.20 s | |
| 6.1 s | +0.20 s | |
| 6.1 s | +0.20 s | |
| 6.1 s | +0.20 s | |
| 6.2 s | +0.30 s | |
| 6.2 s | +0.30 s | |
| 6.2 s | +0.30 s |
Studded Winter Tires
| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 5.9 s | Best | |
| 5.9 s | Best | |
| 6 s | +0.10 s | |
| 6 s | +0.10 s | |
| 6.1 s | +0.20 s |
The difference between best and worst was 10.2% (0.6 s).
Snow handling testing brought a little advantage to the studless tires, with the VikingContact again proving best, and the Nokian Hakkapeliitta R3 finishing second.
Snow Handling
Snow handling time in seconds
Lower is better ↓Central European Winter Tires
| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 48.7 s | Best | |
| 49.5 s | +0.80 s | |
| 53.2 s | +4.50 s |
Nordic Friction Winter Tires
| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 48.3 s | Best | |
| 48.4 s | +0.10 s | |
| 48.7 s | +0.40 s | |
| 48.8 s | +0.50 s | |
| 49.1 s | +0.80 s | |
| 49.3 s | +1.00 s | |
| 49.4 s | +1.10 s | |
| 49.6 s | +1.30 s | |
| 49.8 s | +1.50 s | |
| 50 s | +1.70 s | |
| 50.8 s | +2.50 s | |
| 50.9 s | +2.60 s |
Studded Winter Tires
| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 48.8 s | Best | |
| 48.8 s | Best | |
| 49 s | +0.20 s | |
| 49 s | +0.20 s | |
| 49.3 s | +0.50 s |
The difference between best and worst was 10.1% (4.9 s).
Ice
Ice testing naturally brings the advantage back to studded tires, with the Michelin X-Ice North 4 matching the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 9 as the best during ice braking.
Ice Braking
Ice braking in feet
Lower is better ↓Central European Winter Tires
| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 130 ft | Best | |
| 148 ft | +18 ft | |
| 179 ft | +49 ft |
Nordic Friction Winter Tires
| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 139 ft | Best | |
| 140 ft | +1 ft | |
| 142 ft | +3 ft | |
| 142 ft | +3 ft | |
| 142 ft | +3 ft | |
| 143 ft | +4 ft | |
| 144 ft | +5 ft | |
| 151 ft | +12 ft | |
| 155 ft | +16 ft | |
| 156 ft | +17 ft | |
| 158 ft | +19 ft | |
| 166 ft | +27 ft |
Studded Winter Tires
| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 124 ft | Best | |
| 124 ft | Best | |
| 128 ft | +4 ft | |
| 130 ft | +6 ft | |
| 137 ft | +13 ft |
The difference between best and worst was 44.4% (55 ft ≈ 3.7 Car Lengths).
Michelin, Continental and Nokian also took the top three sports during ice traction.
Ice Traction
Ice acceleration time
Lower is better ↓Central European Winter Tires
| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 3.9 s | Best | |
| 5.6 s | +1.70 s | |
| 5.7 s | +1.80 s |
Nordic Friction Winter Tires
| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 5.3 s | Best | |
| 5.4 s | +0.10 s | |
| 5.5 s | +0.20 s | |
| 5.5 s | +0.20 s | |
| 5.6 s | +0.30 s | |
| 5.7 s | +0.40 s | |
| 5.9 s | +0.60 s | |
| 5.9 s | +0.60 s | |
| 6.2 s | +0.90 s | |
| 6.5 s | +1.20 s | |
| 6.6 s | +1.30 s | |
| 6.9 s | +1.60 s |
Studded Winter Tires
| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 3.7 s | Best | |
| 3.8 s | +0.10 s | |
| 3.8 s | +0.10 s | |
| 3.9 s | +0.20 s | |
| 4 s | +0.30 s |
The difference between best and worst was 86.5% (3.2 s).
Michelin rounded out the ice testing with anoher win for the X Ice North 4.
Ice Handling
Ice handling time in seconds
Lower is better ↓Central European Winter Tires
| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 61.8 s | Best | |
| 62 s | +0.20 s | |
| 72 s | +10.20 s |
Nordic Friction Winter Tires
| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 60.7 s | Best | |
| 60.8 s | +0.10 s | |
| 61 s | +0.30 s | |
| 61 s | +0.30 s | |
| 61.2 s | +0.50 s | |
| 61.5 s | +0.80 s | |
| 61.7 s | +1.00 s | |
| 63.3 s | +2.60 s | |
| 64 s | +3.30 s | |
| 65.1 s | +4.40 s | |
| 67.3 s | +6.60 s | |
| 70.8 s | +10.10 s |
Studded Winter Tires
| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 57.3 s | Best | |
| 58.6 s | +1.30 s | |
| 58.8 s | +1.50 s | |
| 60.2 s | +2.90 s | |
| 61.6 s | +4.30 s |
The difference between best and worst was 25.7% (14.7 s).
Environment
The tires were rated subjectively for noise, with seven of the tires on test finishing joint top.
Subj. Noise
Subjective in car noise levels
Higher is better ↑Central European Winter Tires
| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Points | Best | |
| 7 Points | -2.00 Points | |
| 7 Points | -2.00 Points |
Nordic Friction Winter Tires
| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Points | Best | |
| 9 Points | Best | |
| 9 Points | Best | |
| 9 Points | Best | |
| 9 Points | Best | |
| 9 Points | Best | |
| 8 Points | -1.00 Points | |
| 8 Points | -1.00 Points | |
| 8 Points | -1.00 Points | |
| 8 Points | -1.00 Points | |
| 8 Points | -1.00 Points | |
| 8 Points | -1.00 Points |
Studded Winter Tires
| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Points | Best | |
| 6 Points | -1.00 Points | |
| 6 Points | -1.00 Points | |
| 6 Points | -1.00 Points | |
| 6 Points | -1.00 Points |
The difference between best and worst was 33.3% (3 Points).
Rolling resistance scores were based on the best tire (Nokian Hakkapeliitta R3) being set at zero, then other the tires ratings being how much more fuel they would use represented as a percentage.
Results
Central European Winter Tires
Linglong Green Max Winter Grip 2
205/55 R16All discipline results (14)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Result |
|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 97 ft |
| Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better | 6 Points |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 122 ft |
| Wet HandlingLower is better | 34.9 s |
| Subj. Wet HandlingHigher is better | 6 Points |
| Snow BrakingLower is better | 167 ft |
| Snow TractionLower is better | 6.2 s |
| Snow HandlingLower is better | 49.5 s |
| Subj. Snow HandlingHigher is better | 8 Points |
| Ice BrakingLower is better | 130 ft |
| Ice TractionLower is better | 3.9 s |
| Ice HandlingLower is better | 61.8 s |
| Subj. Ice HandlingHigher is better | 7 Points |
| Subj. NoiseHigher is better | 7 Points |
Linglong Winter Unicorn
205/55 R16All discipline results (14)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Result |
|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 98 ft |
| Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better | 6 Points |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 133 ft |
| Wet HandlingLower is better | 35.3 s |
| Subj. Wet HandlingHigher is better | 7 Points |
| Snow BrakingLower is better | 169 ft |
| Snow TractionLower is better | 6.1 s |
| Snow HandlingLower is better | 48.7 s |
| Subj. Snow HandlingHigher is better | 8 Points |
| Ice BrakingLower is better | 148 ft |
| Ice TractionLower is better | 5.7 s |
| Ice HandlingLower is better | 62 s |
| Subj. Ice HandlingHigher is better | 7 Points |
| Subj. NoiseHigher is better | 9 Points |
Sunny SN3860
205/55 R16All discipline results (14)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Result |
|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 98 ft |
| Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better | 8 Points |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 107 ft |
| Wet HandlingLower is better | 35.2 s |
| Subj. Wet HandlingHigher is better | 7 Points |
| Snow BrakingLower is better | 176 ft |
| Snow TractionLower is better | 6.5 s |
| Snow HandlingLower is better | 53.2 s |
| Subj. Snow HandlingHigher is better | 5 Points |
| Ice BrakingLower is better | 179 ft |
| Ice TractionLower is better | 5.6 s |
| Ice HandlingLower is better | 72 s |
| Subj. Ice HandlingHigher is better | 5 Points |
| Subj. NoiseHigher is better | 7 Points |
Nordic Friction Winter Tires
Nokian Hakkapeliitta R3
205/55 R16All discipline results (14)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Result |
|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 96 ft |
| Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better | 8 Points |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 122 ft |
| Wet HandlingLower is better | 34.5 s |
| Subj. Wet HandlingHigher is better | 8 Points |
| Snow BrakingLower is better | 168 ft |
| Snow TractionLower is better | 6.1 s |
| Snow HandlingLower is better | 48.4 s |
| Subj. Snow HandlingHigher is better | 9 Points |
| Ice BrakingLower is better | 139 ft |
| Ice TractionLower is better | 5.4 s |
| Ice HandlingLower is better | 60.8 s |
| Subj. Ice HandlingHigher is better | 8 Points |
| Subj. NoiseHigher is better | 9 Points |
Continental VikingContact 7
205/55 R16All discipline results (14)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Result |
|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 99 ft |
| Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better | 7 Points |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 126 ft |
| Wet HandlingLower is better | 34.7 s |
| Subj. Wet HandlingHigher is better | 8 Points |
| Snow BrakingLower is better | 165 ft |
| Snow TractionLower is better | 5.9 s |
| Snow HandlingLower is better | 48.3 s |
| Subj. Snow HandlingHigher is better | 9 Points |
| Ice BrakingLower is better | 142 ft |
| Ice TractionLower is better | 5.5 s |
| Ice HandlingLower is better | 61 s |
| Subj. Ice HandlingHigher is better | 8 Points |
| Subj. NoiseHigher is better | 9 Points |
Michelin X Ice Snow
205/55 R16All discipline results (14)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Result |
|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 102 ft |
| Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better | 8 Points |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 127 ft |
| Wet HandlingLower is better | 35 s |
| Subj. Wet HandlingHigher is better | 8 Points |
| Snow BrakingLower is better | 165 ft |
| Snow TractionLower is better | 6 s |
| Snow HandlingLower is better | 48.7 s |
| Subj. Snow HandlingHigher is better | 9 Points |
| Ice BrakingLower is better | 140 ft |
| Ice TractionLower is better | 5.3 s |
| Ice HandlingLower is better | 61 s |
| Subj. Ice HandlingHigher is better | 7 Points |
| Subj. NoiseHigher is better | 8 Points |
Pirelli Ice Zero FR
205/55 R16All discipline results (14)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Result |
|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 98 ft |
| Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better | 7 Points |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 129 ft |
| Wet HandlingLower is better | 34.8 s |
| Subj. Wet HandlingHigher is better | 7 Points |
| Snow BrakingLower is better | 167 ft |
| Snow TractionLower is better | 6 s |
| Snow HandlingLower is better | 49.4 s |
| Subj. Snow HandlingHigher is better | 8 Points |
| Ice BrakingLower is better | 144 ft |
| Ice TractionLower is better | 5.6 s |
| Ice HandlingLower is better | 60.7 s |
| Subj. Ice HandlingHigher is better | 7 Points |
| Subj. NoiseHigher is better | 9 Points |
Goodyear UltraGrip Ice 2
205/55 R16All discipline results (14)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Result |
|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 101 ft |
| Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better | 8 Points |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 120 ft |
| Wet HandlingLower is better | 34.1 s |
| Subj. Wet HandlingHigher is better | 9 Points |
| Snow BrakingLower is better | 166 ft |
| Snow TractionLower is better | 6.1 s |
| Snow HandlingLower is better | 49.8 s |
| Subj. Snow HandlingHigher is better | 7 Points |
| Ice BrakingLower is better | 142 ft |
| Ice TractionLower is better | 5.5 s |
| Ice HandlingLower is better | 63.3 s |
| Subj. Ice HandlingHigher is better | 7 Points |
| Subj. NoiseHigher is better | 8 Points |
Hankook Winter I cept iZ2 W616
205/55 R16All discipline results (14)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Result |
|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 99 ft |
| Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better | 9 Points |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 126 ft |
| Wet HandlingLower is better | 34.5 s |
| Subj. Wet HandlingHigher is better | 8 Points |
| Snow BrakingLower is better | 168 ft |
| Snow TractionLower is better | 6.1 s |
| Snow HandlingLower is better | 49.1 s |
| Subj. Snow HandlingHigher is better | 8 Points |
| Ice BrakingLower is better | 143 ft |
| Ice TractionLower is better | 5.9 s |
| Ice HandlingLower is better | 64 s |
| Subj. Ice HandlingHigher is better | 6 Points |
| Subj. NoiseHigher is better | 8 Points |
Sava Eskimo Ice
205/55 R16All discipline results (14)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Result |
|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 105 ft |
| Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better | 9 Points |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 127 ft |
| Wet HandlingLower is better | 34.6 s |
| Subj. Wet HandlingHigher is better | 7 Points |
| Snow BrakingLower is better | 171 ft |
| Snow TractionLower is better | 6 s |
| Snow HandlingLower is better | 49.6 s |
| Subj. Snow HandlingHigher is better | 8 Points |
| Ice BrakingLower is better | 142 ft |
| Ice TractionLower is better | 5.7 s |
| Ice HandlingLower is better | 61.7 s |
| Subj. Ice HandlingHigher is better | 6 Points |
| Subj. NoiseHigher is better | 9 Points |
Bridgestone Blizzak Ice
205/55 R16All discipline results (14)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Result |
|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 99 ft |
| Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better | 8 Points |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 127 ft |
| Wet HandlingLower is better | 35 s |
| Subj. Wet HandlingHigher is better | 6 Points |
| Snow BrakingLower is better | 171 ft |
| Snow TractionLower is better | 6.2 s |
| Snow HandlingLower is better | 50.8 s |
| Subj. Snow HandlingHigher is better | 8 Points |
| Ice BrakingLower is better | 151 ft |
| Ice TractionLower is better | 5.9 s |
| Ice HandlingLower is better | 61.2 s |
| Subj. Ice HandlingHigher is better | 7 Points |
| Subj. NoiseHigher is better | 9 Points |
Nankang Ice Activa 2
205/55 R16All discipline results (14)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Result |
|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 104 ft |
| Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better | 6 Points |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 125 ft |
| Wet HandlingLower is better | 34.7 s |
| Subj. Wet HandlingHigher is better | 7 Points |
| Snow BrakingLower is better | 170 ft |
| Snow TractionLower is better | 6 s |
| Snow HandlingLower is better | 48.8 s |
| Subj. Snow HandlingHigher is better | 8 Points |
| Ice BrakingLower is better | 156 ft |
| Ice TractionLower is better | 6.2 s |
| Ice HandlingLower is better | 61.5 s |
| Subj. Ice HandlingHigher is better | 7 Points |
| Subj. NoiseHigher is better | 9 Points |
Nexen Winguard Ice+ WH43
205/55 R16All discipline results (14)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Result |
|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 103 ft |
| Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better | 8 Points |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 128 ft |
| Wet HandlingLower is better | 35.2 s |
| Subj. Wet HandlingHigher is better | 6 Points |
| Snow BrakingLower is better | 170 ft |
| Snow TractionLower is better | 6.1 s |
| Snow HandlingLower is better | 50 s |
| Subj. Snow HandlingHigher is better | 7 Points |
| Ice BrakingLower is better | 155 ft |
| Ice TractionLower is better | 6.9 s |
| Ice HandlingLower is better | 65.1 s |
| Subj. Ice HandlingHigher is better | 6 Points |
| Subj. NoiseHigher is better | 8 Points |
Petlas Glacier W661
205/55 R16All discipline results (14)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Result |
|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 95 ft |
| Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better | 10 Points |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 97 ft |
| Wet HandlingLower is better | 33.7 s |
| Subj. Wet HandlingHigher is better | 9 Points |
| Snow BrakingLower is better | 175 ft |
| Snow TractionLower is better | 6.2 s |
| Snow HandlingLower is better | 50.9 s |
| Subj. Snow HandlingHigher is better | 6 Points |
| Ice BrakingLower is better | 166 ft |
| Ice TractionLower is better | 6.6 s |
| Ice HandlingLower is better | 70.8 s |
| Subj. Ice HandlingHigher is better | 4 Points |
| Subj. NoiseHigher is better | 8 Points |
Toyo OBSERVE GSI 6 HP
205/55 R16All discipline results (14)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Result |
|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 98 ft |
| Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better | 8 Points |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 120 ft |
| Wet HandlingLower is better | 34.8 s |
| Subj. Wet HandlingHigher is better | 7 Points |
| Snow BrakingLower is better | 167 ft |
| Snow TractionLower is better | 6.2 s |
| Snow HandlingLower is better | 49.3 s |
| Subj. Snow HandlingHigher is better | 7 Points |
| Ice BrakingLower is better | 158 ft |
| Ice TractionLower is better | 6.5 s |
| Ice HandlingLower is better | 67.3 s |
| Subj. Ice HandlingHigher is better | 5 Points |
| Subj. NoiseHigher is better | 8 Points |
Studded Winter Tires
Michelin X Ice North 4
205/55 R16All discipline results (14)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Result |
|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 96 ft |
| Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better | 8 Points |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 118 ft |
| Wet HandlingLower is better | 35.4 s |
| Subj. Wet HandlingHigher is better | 7 Points |
| Snow BrakingLower is better | 166 ft |
| Snow TractionLower is better | 6 s |
| Snow HandlingLower is better | 49 s |
| Subj. Snow HandlingHigher is better | 9 Points |
| Ice BrakingLower is better | 124 ft |
| Ice TractionLower is better | 3.7 s |
| Ice HandlingLower is better | 57.3 s |
| Subj. Ice HandlingHigher is better | 10 Points |
| Subj. NoiseHigher is better | 6 Points |
Continental IceContact 3
205/55 R16All discipline results (14)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Result |
|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 98 ft |
| Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better | 9 Points |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 110 ft |
| Wet HandlingLower is better | 34.9 s |
| Subj. Wet HandlingHigher is better | 8 Points |
| Snow BrakingLower is better | 165 ft |
| Snow TractionLower is better | 5.9 s |
| Snow HandlingLower is better | 48.8 s |
| Subj. Snow HandlingHigher is better | 9 Points |
| Ice BrakingLower is better | 128 ft |
| Ice TractionLower is better | 3.8 s |
| Ice HandlingLower is better | 60.2 s |
| Subj. Ice HandlingHigher is better | 8 Points |
| Subj. NoiseHigher is better | 7 Points |
Nokian Hakkapeliitta 9
205/55 R16All discipline results (14)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Result |
|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 98 ft |
| Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better | 7 Points |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 120 ft |
| Wet HandlingLower is better | 35.1 s |
| Subj. Wet HandlingHigher is better | 7 Points |
| Snow BrakingLower is better | 166 ft |
| Snow TractionLower is better | 6 s |
| Snow HandlingLower is better | 49 s |
| Subj. Snow HandlingHigher is better | 9 Points |
| Ice BrakingLower is better | 124 ft |
| Ice TractionLower is better | 3.8 s |
| Ice HandlingLower is better | 58.8 s |
| Subj. Ice HandlingHigher is better | 9 Points |
| Subj. NoiseHigher is better | 6 Points |
Bridgestone Noranza 001
205/55 R16All discipline results (14)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Result |
|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 103 ft |
| Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better | 7 Points |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 123 ft |
| Wet HandlingLower is better | 35.2 s |
| Subj. Wet HandlingHigher is better | 6 Points |
| Snow BrakingLower is better | 169 ft |
| Snow TractionLower is better | 5.9 s |
| Snow HandlingLower is better | 48.8 s |
| Subj. Snow HandlingHigher is better | 9 Points |
| Ice BrakingLower is better | 130 ft |
| Ice TractionLower is better | 3.9 s |
| Ice HandlingLower is better | 58.6 s |
| Subj. Ice HandlingHigher is better | 9 Points |
| Subj. NoiseHigher is better | 6 Points |
Hankook Winter i pike RS2
205/55 R16All discipline results (14)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Result |
|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 100 ft |
| Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better | 8 Points |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 114 ft |
| Wet HandlingLower is better | 34.8 s |
| Subj. Wet HandlingHigher is better | 7 Points |
| Snow BrakingLower is better | 166 ft |
| Snow TractionLower is better | 6.1 s |
| Snow HandlingLower is better | 49.3 s |
| Subj. Snow HandlingHigher is better | 8 Points |
| Ice BrakingLower is better | 137 ft |
| Ice TractionLower is better | 4 s |
| Ice HandlingLower is better | 61.6 s |
| Subj. Ice HandlingHigher is better | 8 Points |
| Subj. NoiseHigher is better | 6 Points |


Thank you for adding this to your impressive data library. But there is no mention, or link, as to who commissioned this test, only that it was conducted at the Test World facility in Finland?
I believe it was a test run by test world themselves
Thanks for the prompt response.
Would love to see the Michelin CrossClimate Plus and the Bridgestone Weather Control A005 tested on ice against these since, year round, ice always comes first, during and after the snow. I consider that ice performance on an All Season or Winter tire is the most important safety item because, unlike the snow, you can't really see the ice most of the times, either day or night. You can only feel it, which can be, sometimes, too late, depending on the tires you have...
All season tires don't usually get put through extreme winter testing, as the climates they're suitable for don't really see that kind of weather. When you get to lots of ice on the road, it's a winter market.
That said, Auto Bild sometimes include ice testing in their tests which an be found here
So far, I noticed that ADAC is the only tester that tests ice performance on All Season tires. On Winter tires, and on the past 3 years, I just found ice testing at ADAC (studless tires), Auto Center (2017 and 2019 - studded tires), Vi Bilagare (2018 and 2019 - studded tires), Auto Centrum - AC (2017 - studless), and you (Tire Reviews in 2019 - with a fantastic cross range of tires and videos - congratulations!). We could extrapolate the results for the Crossclimate Plus and the Bridgestone WC A005 but it would be better to have them both properly ice tested against winter and studded tires just to have an idea of how much can they replace a winter tire in a not so harsh winter climate.