Test Charts / Auto Zeitung
2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tire Test
Compare each discipline in the tested size. See the measured result, position and gap to the best tire, then read the verdict for the trade-offs behind the finishing order.
- Tested size
- 225/50 R17
- Tires tested
- 20
- Disciplines
- 10
Read the measurements, not just the rank
Lower is better for braking distances and lap times; higher is better for subjective scores and aquaplaning speed. Bars start at zero. Read the gap alongside the position: adjacent tires can be separated by very different margins.
Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tires does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.
Focus on your tires
Select tires to highlight them throughout the charts.
Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tires does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.
Dry
3Dry Braking
Dry braking in feet
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 115 ft | Best | |
| 117 ft | +2 ft | |
| 118 ft | +3 ft | |
| 118 ft | +3 ft | |
| 119 ft | +4 ft | |
| 119 ft | +4 ft | |
| 119 ft | +4 ft | |
| 120 ft | +5 ft | |
| 120 ft | +5 ft | |
| 122 ft | +7 ft | |
| 122 ft | +7 ft | |
| 123 ft | +8 ft | |
| 123 ft | +8 ft | |
| 124 ft | +9 ft | |
| 124 ft | +9 ft | |
| 124 ft | +9 ft | |
| 124 ft | +9 ft | |
| 125 ft | +10 ft | |
| 125 ft | +10 ft | |
| 126 ft | +11 ft |
The difference between best and worst was 9.1% (11 ft ≈ 0.7 Car Lengths).
Dry Handling
Dry handling time in seconds
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 73.8 s | Best | |
| 74 s | +0.20 s | |
| 74.2 s | +0.40 s | |
| 74.2 s | +0.40 s | |
| 74.3 s | +0.50 s | |
| 74.3 s | +0.50 s | |
| 74.3 s | +0.50 s | |
| 74.3 s | +0.50 s | |
| 74.3 s | +0.50 s | |
| 74.6 s | +0.80 s | |
| 74.8 s | +1.00 s | |
| 75 s | +1.20 s | |
| 75.1 s | +1.30 s | |
| 75.2 s | +1.40 s | |
| 75.2 s | +1.40 s | |
| 75.2 s | +1.40 s | |
| 75.5 s | +1.70 s | |
| 75.8 s | +2.00 s | |
| 75.9 s | +2.10 s | |
| 76.1 s | +2.30 s |
The difference between best and worst was 3.1% (2.3 s).
Subj. Dry Handling
Subjective Dry Handling Score
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Points | Best | |
| 28 Points | -2.00 Points | |
| 27 Points | -3.00 Points | |
| 26 Points | -4.00 Points | |
| 26 Points | -4.00 Points | |
| 25 Points | -5.00 Points | |
| 25 Points | -5.00 Points | |
| 24 Points | -6.00 Points | |
| 23 Points | -7.00 Points | |
| 22 Points | -8.00 Points | |
| 21 Points | -9.00 Points | |
| 19 Points | -11.00 Points | |
| 18 Points | -12.00 Points | |
| 17 Points | -13.00 Points | |
| 17 Points | -13.00 Points | |
| 17 Points | -13.00 Points | |
| 15 Points | -15.00 Points | |
| 14 Points | -16.00 Points | |
| 9 Points | -21.00 Points | |
| 8 Points | -22.00 Points |
The difference between best and worst was 73.3% (22 Points).
Wet
4Wet Braking
Wet braking in feet
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 188 ft | Best | |
| 188 ft | Best | |
| 191 ft | +3 ft | |
| 193 ft | +5 ft | |
| 195 ft | +7 ft | |
| 198 ft | +10 ft | |
| 198 ft | +10 ft | |
| 201 ft | +13 ft | |
| 207 ft | +19 ft | |
| 210 ft | +22 ft | |
| 211 ft | +23 ft | |
| 213 ft | +25 ft | |
| 213 ft | +25 ft | |
| 213 ft | +25 ft | |
| 215 ft | +27 ft | |
| 215 ft | +27 ft | |
| 218 ft | +30 ft | |
| 223 ft | +35 ft | |
| 226 ft | +38 ft | |
| 228 ft | +40 ft |
The difference between best and worst was 21.1% (40 ft ≈ 2.7 Car Lengths).
Wet Handling
Wet handling time in seconds
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 88.8 s | Best | |
| 90.8 s | +2.00 s | |
| 91.1 s | +2.30 s | |
| 92.3 s | +3.50 s | |
| 92.7 s | +3.90 s | |
| 93 s | +4.20 s | |
| 93.5 s | +4.70 s | |
| 94.2 s | +5.40 s | |
| 94.3 s | +5.50 s | |
| 95.4 s | +6.60 s | |
| 95.9 s | +7.10 s | |
| 95.9 s | +7.10 s | |
| 96.9 s | +8.10 s | |
| 97.1 s | +8.30 s | |
| 97.6 s | +8.80 s | |
| 97.7 s | +8.90 s | |
| 97.8 s | +9.00 s | |
| 97.9 s | +9.10 s | |
| 98.4 s | +9.60 s | |
| 102.3 s | +13.50 s |
The difference between best and worst was 15.2% (13.5 s).
Subj. Wet Handling
Subjective Wet Handling Score
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 45 Points | Best | |
| 42 Points | -3.00 Points | |
| 40 Points | -5.00 Points | |
| 33 Points | -12.00 Points | |
| 30 Points | -15.00 Points | |
| 28 Points | -17.00 Points | |
| 26 Points | -19.00 Points | |
| 22 Points | -23.00 Points | |
| 22 Points | -23.00 Points | |
| 19 Points | -26.00 Points | |
| 17 Points | -28.00 Points | |
| 16 Points | -29.00 Points | |
| 13 Points | -32.00 Points | |
| 13 Points | -32.00 Points | |
| 12 Points | -33.00 Points | |
| 12 Points | -33.00 Points | |
| 11 Points | -34.00 Points | |
| 11 Points | -34.00 Points | |
| 9 Points | -36.00 Points | |
| 4 Points | -41.00 Points |
The difference between best and worst was 91.1% (41 Points).
Straight Aqua
Float Speed in mph
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 63.6 mph | Best | |
| 58.5 mph | -5.1 mph | |
| 58.3 mph | -5.3 mph | |
| 57.8 mph | -5.8 mph | |
| 56.9 mph | -6.7 mph | |
| 56.6 mph | -7.0 mph | |
| 56.5 mph | -7.1 mph | |
| 56.4 mph | -7.2 mph | |
| 56.1 mph | -7.5 mph | |
| 55.7 mph | -7.9 mph | |
| 55.4 mph | -8.2 mph | |
| 55.3 mph | -8.3 mph | |
| 55.2 mph | -8.4 mph | |
| 55.2 mph | -8.4 mph | |
| 55.1 mph | -8.5 mph | |
| 54.9 mph | -8.7 mph | |
| 54.8 mph | -8.8 mph | |
| 54.8 mph | -8.8 mph | |
| 54.7 mph | -8.9 mph | |
| 54.2 mph | -9.4 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 14.8% (9.4 mph).
Comfort
2Subj. Comfort
Subjective Comfort Score
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Points | Best | |
| 8 Points | Best | |
| 8 Points | Best | |
| 7 Points | -1.00 Points | |
| 7 Points | -1.00 Points | |
| 7 Points | -1.00 Points | |
| 7 Points | -1.00 Points | |
| 7 Points | -1.00 Points | |
| 7 Points | -1.00 Points | |
| 7 Points | -1.00 Points | |
| 7 Points | -1.00 Points | |
| 7 Points | -1.00 Points | |
| 6 Points | -2.00 Points | |
| 6 Points | -2.00 Points | |
| 6 Points | -2.00 Points | |
| 6 Points | -2.00 Points | |
| 6 Points | -2.00 Points | |
| 6 Points | -2.00 Points | |
| 6 Points | -2.00 Points | |
| 6 Points | -2.00 Points |
The difference between best and worst was 25% (2 Points).
Noise
External noise in dB
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 70 dB | Best | |
| 70 dB | Best | |
| 71 dB | +1.00 dB | |
| 71 dB | +1.00 dB | |
| 71 dB | +1.00 dB | |
| 71 dB | +1.00 dB | |
| 71 dB | +1.00 dB | |
| 71 dB | +1.00 dB | |
| 71 dB | +1.00 dB | |
| 71 dB | +1.00 dB | |
| 72 dB | +2.00 dB | |
| 72 dB | +2.00 dB | |
| 72 dB | +2.00 dB | |
| 72 dB | +2.00 dB | |
| 72 dB | +2.00 dB | |
| 72 dB | +2.00 dB | |
| 72 dB | +2.00 dB | |
| 72 dB | +2.00 dB | |
| 72 dB | +2.00 dB | |
| 72 dB | +2.00 dB |
All the tires in the Noise test finished less than 3% apart.
Value
1Rolling Resistance
Rolling resistance in kg t
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best | Extra fuel / year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6.33 kg/t | Best | $0 | |
| 6.89 kg/t | +0.56 kg/t | $26 | |
| 7.27 kg/t | +0.94 kg/t | $44 | |
| 7.29 kg/t | +0.96 kg/t | $45 | |
| 7.45 kg/t | +1.12 kg/t | $52 | |
| 7.82 kg/t | +1.49 kg/t | $69 | |
| 7.84 kg/t | +1.51 kg/t | $70 | |
| 7.93 kg/t | +1.60 kg/t | $74 | |
| 8 kg/t | +1.67 kg/t | $78 | |
| 8.08 kg/t | +1.75 kg/t | $81 | |
| 8.09 kg/t | +1.76 kg/t | $82 | |
| 8.1 kg/t | +1.77 kg/t | $82 | |
| 8.34 kg/t | +2.01 kg/t | $93 | |
| 8.37 kg/t | +2.04 kg/t | $95 | |
| 8.52 kg/t | +2.19 kg/t | $102 | |
| 8.57 kg/t | +2.24 kg/t | $104 | |
| 8.61 kg/t | +2.28 kg/t | $106 | |
| 8.65 kg/t | +2.32 kg/t | $108 | |
| 8.97 kg/t | +2.64 kg/t | $123 | |
| 9.08 kg/t | +2.75 kg/t | $128 |
The difference between best and worst was 43.4% (2.75 kg / t). Over 12,000 miles a year at $3.60/gal, the Nankang Noble Sport NS20 uses about 35 gal ($128) more fuel than the Pirelli Cinturato P7 Blue.
Adjust the assumptions
Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions. These calculators use the full test field, independently of your tire selection above.
More tire tests
Cross-check this test
Where these tires were tested again, and how the verdict held up.
2021 53 Summer Tire Braking Test
205/55 R1653 tires tested
8 of these 20 tires tested again
2021 Auto Bild 16 Inch Summer Tire Test
205/55 R1620 tires tested
7 of these 20 tires tested again
2022 ADAC 16" SUV Summer Tire Test
215/60 R1618 tires tested
6 of these 20 tires tested again
Continental Premium Contact 6 / Michelin Primacy 4
This test’s winner finished 1st there
