Menu

2017 Autocenter Studded Winter Tire Test

Jonathan Benson
Data analyzed and reviewed by Jonathan Benson
5 min read Updated
Contents
  1. Introduction
  2. Braking Data
  3. Full Results
  4. Nokian Hakkapeliitta 9
  5. Continental IceContact 2
  6. Goodyear UltraGrip Ice Arctic
  7. Gislaved Nord Frost 200
  8. Formula Formula Ice
  9. Cooper WeatherMaster WSC
  10. Matador MP 30 Sibir Ice 2
  11. Marshal WinterCraft Ice Wi31
  12. Viatti Brina Nordico V 522
  13. Minerva Eco Stud

Test Summary
Wet Braking Marshal WinterCraft Ice Wi31
Dry Braking Minerva Eco Stud
Wet Handling Continental IceContact 2
Goodyear UltraGrip Ice Arctic
Wear Nokian Hakkapeliitta 9
Rolling Resistance Nokian Hakkapeliitta 9
Noise Nokian Hakkapeliitta 9
Continental IceContact 2
Straight Aqua Nokian Hakkapeliitta 9
Snow Handling Gislaved Nord Frost 200
While studded tires aren't suitable for the UK climate, they are the best way of staying mobile in extreme winter conditions. Each tire can have hundreds of studs, which bite into ice with far more grip than a studless friction winter tire can give. There are of course drawbacks to studded tires, they're very noisy, and they give up a lot of dry and wet performance when compared to a European winter tire, but in climates such as Russia and the Nordic countries where you are likely to be driving on ice for weeks at a time, there's little alternative.


The Russian magazine Auto Center have tested ten studded winter tires in 205/55 R16 across dry, wet, snow and ice testing using a VW Golf. When looking at the final results, it's worth keeping in mind that this is a test for extreme winters, which means ice and snow performance takes 60% of the overall result, with wet taking 20% and dry just 15%.

 

Braking Data

Ice Braking

Spread: 8.66 M (85.2%)|Avg: 13.35 M
Ice braking in meters (Lower is better)
Ice Braking: Safety Impact: Best vs Worst Tire

Snow Braking

Spread: 1.20 M (6.9%)|Avg: 17.88 M
Snow braking in meters (Lower is better)
Snow Braking: Safety Impact: Best vs Worst Tire

Wet Braking

Spread: 9.02 M (28.3%)|Avg: 36.49 M
Wet braking in meters (Lower is better)
Wet Braking: Safety Impact: Best vs Worst Tire

Dry Braking

Spread: 1.35 M (4.4%)|Avg: 31.65 M
Dry braking in meters (Lower is better)
Dry Braking: Safety Impact: Best vs Worst Tire

Full Results

1st

Nokian Hakkapeliitta 9

205/55 R16
Nokian Hakkapeliitta 9
Total: 138.9
Dry 14
Wet 23
Snow 28
Ice 40
Comfort 10
Rolling Resistance 10
Noise 5
Overall 8.9
2nd

Continental IceContact 2

205/55 R16
Continental IceContact 2
Total: 140.7
Dry 15
Wet 23
Snow 30
Ice 38
Comfort 10
Rolling Resistance 8
Noise 8
Overall 8.7
Goodyear UltraGrip Ice Arctic
Total: 135.6
Dry 15
Wet 25
Snow 30
Ice 33
Comfort 7
Rolling Resistance 8
Noise 9
Overall 8.6
4th

Gislaved Nord Frost 200

205/55 R16
Gislaved Nord Frost 200
Total: 132.9
Dry 16
Wet 24
Snow 24
Ice 33
Comfort 9
Rolling Resistance 9
Noise 10
Overall 7.9
5th

Formula Formula Ice

205/55 R16
Formula Formula Ice
Total: 119.6
Dry 14
Wet 21
Snow 24
Ice 31
Comfort 7
Rolling Resistance 9
Noise 6
Overall 7.6
6th

Cooper WeatherMaster WSC

205/55 R16
Cooper WeatherMaster WSC
Total: 117.3
Dry 16
Wet 28
Snow 20
Ice 25
Comfort 7
Rolling Resistance 7
Noise 7
Overall 7.3
7th

Matador MP 30 Sibir Ice 2

205/55 R16
Matador MP 30 Sibir Ice 2
Total: 124.3
Dry 12
Wet 24
Snow 29
Ice 27
Comfort 8
Rolling Resistance 8
Noise 9
Overall 7.3
Marshal WinterCraft Ice Wi31
Total: 116.3
Dry 19
Wet 23
Snow 20
Ice 26
Comfort 5
Rolling Resistance 7
Noise 9
Overall 7.3
Viatti Brina Nordico V 522
Total: 112.8
Dry 12
Wet 17
Snow 26
Ice 30
Comfort 6
Rolling Resistance 9
Noise 6
Overall 6.8
10th

Minerva Eco Stud

205/55 R16
Minerva Eco Stud
Total: 109.6
Dry 17
Wet 30
Snow 17
Ice 18
Comfort 6
Rolling Resistance 8
Noise 7
Overall 6.6

comments powered by Disqus