Data Explorer
2017 Autocenter Studded Winter Tire Test
- Tested size
- 205/55 R16
- Tires tested
- 10
- Disciplines
- 5
Set the weightings
Move a slider. The other categories rebalance automatically to keep the total at 100%.
No test-specific category weights are recorded; this starts with season defaults.
Season defaults
Results
Movement is compared with the default calculation, not the published finishing order. Scores use unrounded totals for ranking.
No ranking for this setup. Give at least one category a positive weight and include a discipline in each active category, or reset the weights.
Filtering never changes the benchmark, scores or positions.
No tires selected. Add tires to your shortlist to focus the ranking.
| ft ↓ | ft ↓ | ft ↓ | ft ↓ | kg/t ↓ | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | 94.72 | 105 | 97.1 | 119 | 87.6 | 58 | 98.9 | 33 | 100.0 | 7.08 | 100.0 | |
StrengthsGood ice grip and handling, low fuel use ConsiderationsNoisy Score contributionCategory score × of overall score Dry97.08 × 20% = 19.42 Wet87.56 × 35% = 30.65 Snow98.87 × 30% = 29.66 Ice100 × 5% = 5 Rolling Resistance100 × 10% = 10 | |||||||||||||
| 2 | 6 | 91.49 | 105 | 97.0 | 124 | 84.3 | 57 | 100.0 | 37 | 91.0 | 8.82 | 80.3 | |
StrengthsGood handling on ice and in the snow, excellent snow grip ConsiderationsAverage dry braking Score contributionCategory score × of overall score Dry97.02 × 20% = 19.4 Wet84.32 × 35% = 29.51 Snow100 × 30% = 30 Ice90.96 × 5% = 4.55 Rolling Resistance80.27 × 10% = 8.03 | |||||||||||||
| 3 | 3 | 93.13 | 103 | 98.4 | 118 | 88.4 | 57 | 99.8 | 35 | 94.8 | 9.02 | 78.5 | |
StrengthsGood handling in the snow, very balanced performance ConsiderationsSlow steering response Score contributionCategory score × of overall score Dry98.41 × 20% = 19.68 Wet88.38 × 35% = 30.93 Snow99.77 × 30% = 29.93 Ice94.78 × 5% = 4.74 Rolling Resistance78.49 × 10% = 7.85 | |||||||||||||
| 4 | 8 | 89.75 | 106 | 95.8 | 125 | 83.9 | 59 | 97.3 | 44 | 76.0 | 8.60 | 82.3 | |
StrengthsExcellent dry handling, good comfort ConsiderationsPoor dry braking Score contributionCategory score × of overall score Dry95.82 × 20% = 19.16 Wet83.89 × 35% = 29.36 Snow97.32 × 30% = 29.2 Ice75.99 × 5% = 3.8 Rolling Resistance82.33 × 10% = 8.23 | |||||||||||||
| 5 | 7 | 90.86 | 103 | 98.7 | 121 | 86.1 | 59 | 96.7 | 45 | 74.3 | 8.60 | 82.3 | |
StrengthsGood snow handling, good dry braking, low fuel use ConsiderationsPoor handling in the dry and wet Score contributionCategory score × of overall score Dry98.69 × 20% = 19.74 Wet86.14 × 35% = 30.15 Snow96.73 × 30% = 29.02 Ice74.32 × 5% = 3.72 Rolling Resistance82.33 × 10% = 8.23 | |||||||||||||
| 6 | 4 | 92.82 | 104 | 97.5 | 109 | 96.3 | 58 | 98.3 | 48 | 68.9 | 10.58 | 66.9 | |
StrengthsGood wet grip and handling ConsiderationsPoor ice grip and handling Score contributionCategory score × of overall score Dry97.48 × 20% = 19.5 Wet96.26 × 35% = 33.69 Snow98.31 × 30% = 29.49 Ice68.88 × 5% = 3.44 Rolling Resistance66.92 × 10% = 6.69 | |||||||||||||
| 7 | 5 | 91.60 | 104 | 98.0 | 118 | 88.5 | 58 | 97.8 | 45 | 74.1 | 8.88 | 79.7 | |
StrengthsVery low noise, good wet grip ConsiderationsPoor on ice and in the dry Score contributionCategory score × of overall score Dry98.04 × 20% = 19.61 Wet88.48 × 35% = 30.97 Snow97.81 × 30% = 29.34 Ice74.11 × 5% = 3.71 Rolling Resistance79.73 × 10% = 7.97 | |||||||||||||
| 8 | 9 | 88.63 | 102 | 100.0 | 124 | 84.7 | 61 | 93.6 | 43 | 78.3 | 10.09 | 70.2 | |
StrengthsExcellent dry braking, good dry handling ConsiderationsPoor handling and grip on ice Score contributionCategory score × of overall score Dry100 × 20% = 20 Wet84.65 × 35% = 29.63 Snow93.56 × 30% = 28.07 Ice78.27 × 5% = 3.91 Rolling Resistance70.17 × 10% = 7.02 | |||||||||||||
| 9 | 10 | 88.06 | 106 | 96.2 | 134 | 78.0 | 58 | 98.8 | 47 | 71.6 | 8.49 | 83.4 | |
StrengthsGood snow braking ConsiderationsPoor handling on ice Score contributionCategory score × of overall score Dry96.15 × 20% = 19.23 Wet77.95 × 35% = 27.28 Snow98.75 × 30% = 29.63 Ice71.6 × 5% = 3.58 Rolling Resistance83.39 × 10% = 8.34 | |||||||||||||
| 10 | 2 | 93.38 | 102 | 99.7 | 105 | 100.0 | 61 | 94.0 | 62 | 54.0 | 9.39 | 75.4 | |
StrengthsGood grip in the wet and dry ConsiderationsVery poor on ice and snow Score contributionCategory score × of overall score Dry99.74 × 20% = 19.95 Wet100 × 35% = 35 Snow93.96 × 30% = 28.19 Ice53.99 × 5% = 2.7 Rolling Resistance75.4 × 10% = 7.54 | |||||||||||||
Raw results do not change when you move the sliders. Scroll horizontally to see every discipline.
Leading with these priorities
Nokian Hakkapeliitta 9
These are calculated scenarios, not new test awards. The published verdict may reflect judgement, close results and factors outside this calculation.
Not ranked: a measurement needed for these weights is missing. Missing results are not treated as zero or redistributed.
Reference tires provide context only. They do not set the benchmark and cannot win the personalised ranking.
Weighting vs real impact
What decides this ranking
The weighting is how much each category counts. The real impact is how much of the difference between the tires it creates: a discipline in which every tire performed about the same barely changes the order, however much it counts.
No weighting is recorded for this test, so the weighting here starts from Tire Reviews’ season defaults, not from the test’s own scoring.
- Dry Weighting 20% Real impact 9%
- Wet Weighting 35% Real impact 38%
- Snow Weighting 30% Real impact 16%
- Ice Weighting 5% Real impact 21%
- Rolling Resistance Weighting 10% Real impact 17%
- Ice Braking counts for 5% of the score but creates 21% of the difference between the tires, because their results in it were far apart.
- Snow Braking counts for 30% of the score but creates only 16% of the difference, because most tires performed about the same in it.
Every discipline 5
| Discipline | Weighting | Real impact |
|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | 20% | 9% |
| Wet Braking | 35% | 38% |
| Snow Braking | 30% | 16% |
| Ice Braking | 5% | 21% |
| Rolling Resistance | 10% | 17% |
How it is worked out: each discipline’s weighting is multiplied by the spread of its results (the gap across the middle half of the tires, as a percentage of the best result), then shared out so that all the disciplines add up to 100%. It estimates what separates the tires; it is not a second set of weights, and it follows the weights you set.
How your ranking is calculated
Each discipline is scored against the best non-reference tire in the full test field: best ÷ result × 100 when lower is better, or result ÷ best × 100 when higher is better. Discipline scores are rounded to two decimal places, then combined using your weights.
Within-category weights divide that category’s share of the overall score. A 50% wet category and 40% wet-braking share give wet braking 20% of the total. A weight is a scoring priority, not a measure of its actual effect on the ranking: the performance gaps matter too. What decides this ranking ↑
Published joint positions are preserved separately. Calculated positions tie only when their underlying scores match; two displayed scores can look equal after rounding.
A zero weight excludes that category or discipline. At least one active discipline is required, and the disciplines in every active category must have a positive total.
More tire tests
Cross-check this test
Where these tires were tested again, and how the verdict held up.
2018 Vi Studded Winter Tire Test
205/55 R168 tires tested
4 of these 10 tires tested again
2019 Studded Winter Tire Test
225/50 R178 tires tested
2 of these 10 tires tested again
2026 Auto Express Winter Tire Test
205/55 R1611 tires tested
Tested in the same size
