Menu

Goodyear UltraGrip Ice Arctic Test Results

Tested 2017 to 2019 2 publications

Tested 3 times by independent publications, the Goodyear UltraGrip Ice Arctic averages a finish of 4th.

  • 3Independent tests
  • 0Test wins
  • 2Podium finishes
  • 4thAverage finish
  • 59%Field beaten on average
  • 2Publications

3 tests, 2017 to 2019

Share of the field beaten in each test, oldest to newest. Hover or tap a point for the test.
  • Test win
  • Second
  • Third
  • Average 59%
The latest test

2019 Studded Winter Tire Test P6 of 8

Smallest number of spikes on test at 130, which was an issue on ice. Good in the wet and dry.

Strong: Subj. Dry Handling, Wet Braking, Wet Handling, Straight Aqua Weak: Snow Handling, Ice Handling Winner: Continental IceContact 3

Record by discipline

Where the Goodyear UltraGrip Ice Arctic finished in each measured discipline, across every test that measured it against at least two other tires. Field beaten is the share of the other tires it outranked in that measurement.

Record by discipline
Discipline Tests Avg finish Field beaten Firsts
Dry
Dry Braking 3 P3.7 of 8.7 65% -
Subj. Dry Handling 1 P2 of 8 86% -
Wet
Wet Braking 3 P2.3 of 8.7 84% 1
Wet Handling 1 P2 of 8 86% -
Straight Aqua 1 P2 of 8 86% -
Snow
Snow Braking 3 P4 of 8.7 58% -
Snow Traction 2 P5.5 of 8 36% -
Snow Handling 2 P5.5 of 8 36% -
Ice
Ice Braking 3 P3.7 of 8.7 63% -
Ice Traction 2 P6 of 8 29% -
Ice Handling 2 P6 of 8 29% -
Value
Rolling Resistance 2 P7 of 9 24% -

Head-to-head record

Overall finishing position against the tires that have most often shared a test with the Goodyear UltraGrip Ice Arctic. Only tires tested alongside it at least three times are listed.

Head-to-head record
Rival Shared tests Ahead Behind Level Finished ahead
Nokian Hakkapeliitta 9 3 shared: 0 ahead, 3 behind 3 0 3 - 0%

Performance Analysis

Drawn from 3 tests. Updated October 29, 2026.

The Goodyear UltraGrip Ice Arctic is generally stronger on wet and dry roads than in lateral grip on ice and snow within its studded winter class. Wet braking was first of eight in the 2018 Vi Bilagare test and second of eight in 2019, when wet handling and straight-line aquaplaning resistance were also second. Dry braking stayed respectable, third of eight in 2019 and fourth in both 2018 and the 2017 Autocenter test. Efficiency was weaker, with rolling resistance seventh of eight in 2018 and seventh of ten in 2017; the 2019 testers also criticised it.

The 2017 Autocenter result was unusually strong on ice and snow beside the later tests: ice and snow braking were both second of ten, with praise for snow handling. Vi Bilagare instead noted understeer on ice and snow in 2018 and weak lateral stability on both in 2019, when ice and snow handling were each seventh of eight. Its 2019 ice braking was fifth, 25.4% longer than the best. Overall it finished third of ten in 2017, third of eight in 2018 and sixth of eight in 2019. Good road performance therefore coexists with variable winter grip, rather than a consistent advantage in severe conditions.

Performance Strengths

  • Wet braking Moderate in 1 of 3 tests
    Details
    • First of eight, 2018 Vi Bilagare test
    • Second of eight, 3.5% longer than best, 2019 Vi Bilagare test
    • Fourth of ten, 13.1% longer than best, 2017 Autocenter test
  • Dry braking Moderate in 1 of 3 tests
    Details
    • Third of eight, 2019 Vi Bilagare test
    • Fourth of eight, 1.5% longer than best, 2018 Vi Bilagare test
    • Fourth of ten, 1.6% longer than best, 2017 Autocenter test
  • Wet handling Minor
    Details
    • Second of eight, 0.9% slower than best, 2019 Vi Bilagare test
  • Aquaplaning resistance Minor
    Details
    • Second of eight in straight-line aquaplaning, 2019 Vi Bilagare test
  • Wet grip Strong in 2 of 3 tests
    Details

Performance Weaknesses

  • Rolling resistance Moderate in 1 of 3 tests
    Details
    • Seventh of eight, 2018 Vi Bilagare test
    • Seventh of ten, 2017 Autocenter test
    • High rolling resistance criticised, 2019 Vi Bilagare test
  • Ice grip Minor in 1 of 3 tests
    Details
    • Ice handling seventh of eight and weak lateral stability criticised, 2019 Vi Bilagare test
    • Ice traction sixth of eight, 28.5% behind best, 2018 Vi Bilagare test
    • Ice braking second of ten, 2017 Autocenter test, unusually strong against later results
  • Snow handling Minor in 1 of 3 tests
    Details
    • Seventh of eight and weak lateral stability criticised, 2019 Vi Bilagare test
    • Understeer criticised, 2018 Vi Bilagare test
    • Snow handling praised, 2017 Autocenter test, contrasting with later criticism

Every test, newest first 3

Strong = top two of the field in that measurement. Weak = bottom two.

2019 1 test
P6 of 8 Beat 29% of the field

2019 Studded Winter Tire Test

Vi Bilagare 225/50 R17

Smallest number of spikes on test at 130, which was an issue on ice. Good in the wet and dry.

StrongSubj. Dry HandlingWet BrakingWet HandlingStraight Aqua WeakSnow HandlingIce Handling WinnerContinental IceContact 3

2018 1 test
P3 of 8 Beat 71% of the field

2018 Vi Studded Winter Tire Test

Vi Bilagare 205/55 R16

StrongWet Braking WeakSnow TractionRolling Resistance WinnerContinental IceContact 2

2017 1 test
P3 of 10 Beat 78% of the field

2017 Autocenter Studded Winter Tire Test

Autocenter 205/55 R16

The Goodyear UltraGrip Ice Arctic is excellent in the snow, strong on ice and good on wet roads. It could only finish mid-pack for dry performance but was still close enough to be an excellent all round tire

StrongSnow BrakingIce Braking WinnerNokian Hakkapeliitta 9

Back to the Goodyear UltraGrip Ice Arctic overview

Owner reviews, sizes and EU label data, comparisons and the Tire Reviews score. All Goodyear tires

Overview

Rate your tires

My tires

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tires

Save tires from a tire page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tires. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.