Test Charts /
2017 Autocenter Studded Winter Tire Test
Compare each discipline in the tested size. See the measured result, position and gap to the best tire, then read the verdict for the trade-offs behind the finishing order.
- Tested size
- 205/55 R16
- Tires tested
- 10
- Disciplines
- 5
Read the measurements, not just the rank
Lower is better for braking distances and lap times; higher is better for subjective scores and aquaplaning speed. Bars start at zero. Read the gap alongside the position: adjacent tires can be separated by very different margins.
Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tires does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.
Focus on your tires
Select tires to highlight them throughout the charts.
Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tires does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.
Dry
1Dry Braking
Dry braking in feet
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 102 ft | Best | |
| 102 ft | 0 ft | |
| 103 ft | +1 ft | |
| 103 ft | +1 ft | |
| 104 ft | +2 ft | |
| 104 ft | +2 ft | |
| 105 ft | +3 ft | |
| 105 ft | +3 ft | |
| 106 ft | +4 ft | |
| 106 ft | +4 ft |
The difference between best and worst was 4.4% (4 ft ≈ 0.3 Car Lengths).
Wet
1Wet Braking
Wet braking in feet
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 105 ft | Best | |
| 109 ft | +4 ft | |
| 118 ft | +13 ft | |
| 118 ft | +13 ft | |
| 119 ft | +14 ft | |
| 121 ft | +16 ft | |
| 124 ft | +19 ft | |
| 124 ft | +19 ft | |
| 125 ft | +20 ft | |
| 134 ft | +29 ft |
The difference between best and worst was 28.3% (29 ft ≈ 2 Car Lengths).
Snow
1Snow Braking
Snow braking in feet
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 57 ft | Best | |
| 57 ft | 0 ft | |
| 58 ft | +1 ft | |
| 58 ft | +1 ft | |
| 58 ft | +1 ft | |
| 58 ft | +1 ft | |
| 59 ft | +2 ft | |
| 59 ft | +2 ft | |
| 61 ft | +4 ft | |
| 61 ft | +4 ft |
The difference between best and worst was 6.9% (4 ft).
Ice
1Ice Braking
Ice braking in feet
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 33 ft | Best | |
| 35 ft | +2 ft | |
| 37 ft | +4 ft | |
| 43 ft | +10 ft | |
| 44 ft | +11 ft | |
| 45 ft | +12 ft | |
| 45 ft | +12 ft | |
| 47 ft | +14 ft | |
| 48 ft | +15 ft | |
| 62 ft | +29 ft |
The difference between best and worst was 85.2% (29 ft ≈ 1.9 Car Lengths).
Value
1Rolling Resistance
Rolling resistance in kg t
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best | Extra fuel / year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7.08 kg/t | Best | $0 | |
| 8.49 kg/t | +1.41 kg/t | $59 | |
| 8.6 kg/t | +1.52 kg/t | $63 | |
| 8.6 kg/t | +1.52 kg/t | $63 | |
| 8.82 kg/t | +1.74 kg/t | $72 | |
| 8.88 kg/t | +1.80 kg/t | $75 | |
| 9.02 kg/t | +1.94 kg/t | $81 | |
| 9.39 kg/t | +2.31 kg/t | $96 | |
| 10.09 kg/t | +3.01 kg/t | $125 | |
| 10.58 kg/t | +3.50 kg/t | $145 |
The difference between best and worst was 49.4% (3.5 kg / t). Over 12,000 miles a year at $3.60/gal, the Cooper WeatherMaster WSC uses about 40 gal ($145) more fuel than the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 9.
Adjust the assumptions
Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions. These calculators use the full test field, independently of your tire selection above.
More tire tests
Cross-check this test
Where these tires were tested again, and how the verdict held up.
2018 Vi Studded Winter Tire Test
205/55 R168 tires tested
4 of these 10 tires tested again
2019 Studded Winter Tire Test
225/50 R178 tires tested
2 of these 10 tires tested again
2026 Auto Express Winter Tire Test
205/55 R1611 tires tested
Tested in the same size
