Continental Premium Contact 6 vs Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
- TR Score
- 9.1/10
- Owners say
- 81% · 139
- TR Score
- 9.2/10
- Owners say
- 86% · 258
In the 17 independent tests that ran both tires, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 finished ahead 9 times and the Premium Contact 6 6 times, with 2 level. The Premium Contact 6 had 5.8% lower rolling resistance; the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 held 12.2% more grip in curved aquaplaning.
Data updated
Which should you buy?
Choose Continental PremiumContact 6 if you value precise steering, sporty dry control, and better fuel economy. Choose Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 if you drive often in rain, want stronger aquaplaning resistance and lower cabin noise, and prefer a better purchase price/value.
Where the Premium Contact 6 is stronger
- Class-leading dry handling and steering precision across sizes
- Consistently low rolling resistance aiding fuel economy
- Strong wet braking performance
Where the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 is stronger
- Excellent wet handling and very high aquaplaning resistance
- Typically lower price with strong overall value
- Low external noise and good comfort
The bullet points are analysis of the shared tests and of owner reviews; the measured wins in each discipline are in the tables below. Where the two disagree, the figures are right.
Premium Contact 6 vs Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 at a glance
| Category | Premium Contact 6 | Gap | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shared tests won17 shared tests | 6 | 2 level | 9 |
| Dry30 measurements | 16 | The Premium Contact 6 lapped the dry handling course 0.6% faster (5 tests) | 7 |
| Wet44 measurements | 14 | The Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 held 12.2% more grip in curved aquaplaning (3 tests) | 27 |
| Off road4 measurements | 1 | 3 | |
| Comfort16 measurements | 3 | The Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 was 1 dB quieter (10 tests) | 10 |
| Value13 measurements | 8 | The Premium Contact 6 had 5.8% lower rolling resistance (10 tests) | 5 |
| Tire Reviews Scoreevery test and review we hold | 9.1/10 | The Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 by 0.1 | 9.2/10 |
| Owner rating139 and 258 reviews | 81% | The Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 by 5 points | 86% |
| Would buy againshare of owners | 73% | The Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 by 11 points | 84% |
| Pricein the 10 tests that listed prices | +7.8% | The Premium Contact 6 was dearer in 9 of 10 | Cheaper |
| Sizes madeEU label registrations | 110 | 44 sizes made in both | 79 |
Wins count every measurement the shared tests recorded for both tires; a tick marks the tire ahead on that line. Subjective driver scores count as wins but are never averaged, because each test uses its own scale.
Head to head in 17 tests, 2019 to 2021
Each row is one published test in which both tires ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | Premium Contact 6 | Field | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 Auto Express Summer Tire Test | P6 of 10 | P5 of 10 | |
| 2021 Camper Van / SUV Tire Test | P2 of 8 | P6 of 8 | |
| 2021 Motor Summer Tire Test | P1 of 10 | P2 of 10 | |
| 2021 Tire Reviews UHP Summer Tire Test | P5 of 14 | P1 of 14 | |
| 2021 Auto Zeitung Summer UHP Tire Test | P2 of 10 | P1 of 10 | |
| 2020 AMS 18 Inch Summer Tire Test | P3 of 11 | P1 of 11 | |
| 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tire Test | P1 of 20 | P1 of 20 | |
| 2020 ADAC 18 Inch Summer Tire Test | P1 of 16 | P3 of 16 | |
| 2020 Tire Market Overview Braking Test | P4 of 50 | P6 of 50 | |
| 2019 EVO Summer Tire Test | P3 of 7 | P6 of 7 | |
| 2019 Auto Express SUV Tire Test | P5 of 8 | P3 of 8 | |
| 2019 Auto Bild Sports Car Tire Test | P3 of 11 | P2 of 11 | |
| Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 VS Asymmetric 3 VS Continental PremiumContact 6 - In depth test | P1 of 3 | P1 of 3 | |
| 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tire Test | P2 of 10 | P1 of 10 | |
| 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tire Test | P5 of 20 | P2 of 20 | |
| 2019 Gute Fahrt Summer 18 Inch Tire Test | P1 of 10 | P2 of 10 | |
| 2019 Summer 53 Tire Braking Shootout | P8 of 53 | P1 of 53 |
Performance profile
14 measurements from the 17 shared tests, each tire shown as its share of the better figure in every test.
Where each is furthest ahead
Premium Contact 6
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 118 ft stop against 112 ft is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it. The scale stops at 92%: a point further in sits on the hub's edge, hollow. 4 measurements recorded in only one shared test are left off; every measurement is in the table further down.
Where each scores higher
Premium Contact 6
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tires of the same season and class: 90 means this tire out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Where owners rate each higher
Premium Contact 6
Not ahead in any category
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
Point at or tap any spoke for both tires' figures.
Owners rate the Premium Contact 6 81% from 139 reviews and the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 86% from 258. Each spoke is one question owners answer out of 10; reviews are vetted by hand before publication.
Every measurement, side by side
Averages of the figures both tires posted in the same tests. The gap is the average of each test's own gap, so figures from different cars and years are never mixed. Open a discipline for its measurements, and a measurement for every test's figure.
| Measurement | Premium Contact 6 | Gap | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 | Wins | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 115 | = | 115 | 5-4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 80.57 | 0.6% | 81.12 | 5-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 69.5 | 0.3% | 69.2 | 3-2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| scored | 6.2% | scored | 3-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 127 | 0.5% | 127 | 6-8 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 73.12 | 0.2% | 73.36 | 2-2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 49.2 | 1.1% | 49.7 | 0-5 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| scored | 14.5% | scored | 1-2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 51.3 | 1.6% | 52.1 | 4-8 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 9.3 | 12.2% | 10.5 | 1-2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 41.8 | 2% | 40.9 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 1,897 | 12.9% | 2,142 | 0-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 1,971 | 8.9% | 2,146 | 0-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 501 | 12.7% | 565 | 0-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| scored | 5.1% | scored | 2-2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 71.69 | 1 dB | 70.71 | 1-8 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 27,920 | 2.3% | 27,521 | 1-2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 8.24 | 5.8% | 8.77 | 7-3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tires shared. "Scored" rows are subjective driver ratings: each test uses its own scale, so only the wins are counted.
Scores beyond the shared tests
On the Tire Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the Premium Contact 6 scores 9.1 and the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 9.2 out of 10.
| Premium Contact 6 | Category | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 87 | Dry | 85 | ||
| 88 | Wet | 94 | ||
| 26 | Comfort | 69 | ||
| 74 | Value | 47 | ||
Category scores are percentiles among tires of the same season and class: 90 means this tire out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
What owners say
| Premium Contact 6 | Category | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8.9 | Dry Grip | 9.3 | ||
| 8.5 | Wet Grip | 8.9 | ||
| 8.3 | Road Feedback | 8.6 | ||
| 8.4 | Handling | 8.8 | ||
| 7.5 | Wear | 7.9 | ||
| 7.8 | Comfort | 8 | ||
Owners rate the Premium Contact 6 81% from 139 reviews and the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 86% from 258. Reviews are vetted by hand before publication; ownership is not verified.
Continental Premium Contact 6
- 81%from 139 reviews
- 73%would buy again
- 1,435,468 milesdriven by reviewers
Owners largely rate the Continental Premium Contact 6 for its strong all-round grip, with around half praising dry grip and a similar share highlighting reassuring wet performance, backed up by positive comments on handling and steering feel. The biggest recurring downsides are refinement and durability: roughly two in five mention road noise (more often as a complaint than a praise), and around a third report faster-than-expected wear. Comfort impressions are mixed but lean positive, with some owners enjoying a plush ride while others find it firm or harsh, particularly on rougher roads.
- Strong dry grip and traction
- Reassuring wet grip
- Comfortable ride for a performance-leaning tire
- Confident dry handling and control
- Noticeable road noise for many owners
- Wears quicker than expected
- Firm/harsh feel linked to sidewall stiffness
Summarised by AI from 118 vetted reviews; the reviews themselves are on the tire page.
All 139 Premium Contact 6 reviewsThe tires were used on a SEAT LEON TDI mostly on highway. Summer tires to a sunny country as Greece worked perfectly. Confidence in all circumstances especially high speed cornering. Economically speaking I wouldn't say so, but that is not my major concern which is safety atll times especially avoiding all kind of obstacles.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
- 86%from 258 reviews
- 84%would buy again
- 2,001,240 milesdriven by reviewers
Owners rate the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 highly overall (83% average), with the vast majority praising its strong grip in both dry and wet conditions and a confident, sporty feel. Comfort also comes through as a real strength for a UHP tire, and many report crisp steering and stable handling. The main reservations are more mixed: around two in five owners mention tread life and road noise, with experiences varying from excellent longevity and refinement to faster wear and a noisier ride, while a smaller group note reduced cold-weather grip.
- Very strong dry grip with high confidence when pushed
- Reassuring wet grip that inspires confidence in the rain
- Comfortable, compliant ride for a performance tire
- Sharp steering feel and good feedback
- Tread life can be disappointing for some owners
- Road noise can be noticeable, especially on coarse surfaces
- Cold-weather grip can drop off in low temperatures
Summarised by AI from 223 vetted reviews; the reviews themselves are on the tire page.
All 258 Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 reviewsI’m running the Goodyear in the MO version. Very good durability, excellent dry grip, and very good wet grip. Comfort is also quite good for a UHP tire. I would probably buy it again, but when the time comes,but I’d like to switch to a newer Goodyear Model. Rim Protection is perfekt in a 8j
Sizes, EU label and lineage
From the EU label registrations for each tire: 110 sizes of the Premium Contact 6 and 79 of the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5, 44 of them made in both.
| Category | Premium Contact 6 | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Season | Summer | Summer |
| Sizes made | 110 sizes, 15 to 22 inch | 79 sizes, 17 to 22 inch |
| Made in both | 44 sizes 205/40 R17205/45 R17205/50 R17215/40 R17215/45 R17225/45 R17225/50 R17225/55 R17235/45 R17235/55 R17245/40 R17245/45 R17and 32 more | |
| EU label wet grip | A81%B19% | A67%B32%C1% |
| EU label rolling resistance | C52%B39%A8%D1% | B37%A34%C21%D8% |
| EU label noise | 69-75 dB B99%A1% | 68-73 dB B65%A35% |
| On the market since | - | 2021 |
| Replaced | Continental Premium Contact 5 (2012) | Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 (2021) |
| Replaced by | Continental PremiumContact 7 | Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 |
| Price in the shared tests | The Premium Contact 6 was the dearer tire in 9 of the 10 tests that listed prices, by 7.8% on average. Each test priced the tires in its own market at the time; only the gap is comparable. | |
Label grades are shown as the share of registered sizes carrying each grade, so "B (88%), C (12%)" means most sizes are B. Grades vary by size; check the label for yours.
Reading the results
Written from the test results and owner reviews above. It is analysis, not a measurement: where it and the tables disagree, the tables are right.
This head-to-head pitches two proven summer heavyweights with different briefs: Continental's PremiumContact 6, a premium-touring tire that often behaves like a sporty all-rounder, versus Goodyear's Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5, a max-performance tire known for its balanced grip and value. Across 17 shared tests, both consistently rank near the top, but they trade blows in distinct areas that matter day-to-day.
Expect the Continental to shine with precise steering and class-leading dry pace while keeping fuel use in check. The Goodyear counters with stronger wet lap consistency, excellent aquaplaning resistance, lower noise, and generally sharper pricing. The question becomes: do you prioritize steering precision and efficiency, or wet-weather confidence and comfort at a keener price?
Conclusion
Patterns across multiple tests are clear: the PremiumContact 6 delivers the sportiest dry road feel among touring tires, with frequent wins in dry handling and braking plus notably lower rolling resistance. It's also competitive in wet braking, though its aquaplaning resistance and noise can lag the best. The Asymmetric 5 is the more rounded wet performer with repeat wins in wet handling and aquaplaning, typically quieter, and usually cheaper, though it often carries higher rolling resistance.
For enthusiastic drivers prioritising steering precision, short dry stops, and efficiency, the Continental edges it. For commuters and long-distance users who want strong wet-road reassurance, calmer cabin noise, and better value, the Goodyear is hard to beat. Both are excellent; choose Continental for crisp dynamics and economy, Goodyear for all-weather confidence and comfort at a smarter price.
Premium Contact 6 vs Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5: your questions
Is the Continental Premium Contact 6 or the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 the better tire?
In the 17 independent tests that ran both tires, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 finished ahead 9 times and the Premium Contact 6 6 times, with 2 level. On the Tire Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the Premium Contact 6 scores 9.1 and the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 9.2 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the Premium Contact 6 or the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5?
The Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 led 27 of the 44 wet measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it held 12.2% more grip in curved aquaplaning across 3 tests.
Which is better in the dry?
The Premium Contact 6 led 16 of the 30 dry measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it lapped the dry handling course 0.6% faster across 5 tests.
Which lasts longer and costs less to run?
The Premium Contact 6 had 5.8% lower rolling resistance (10 tests); the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 lasted 2.3% longer in the wear tests (3 tests). Owners rate wear 7.5/10 for the Premium Contact 6 and 7.9/10 for the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5.
Which is quieter and more comfortable?
The Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 was 1 dB quieter (10 tests). Owners rate comfort 7.8/10 for the Premium Contact 6 and 8/10 for the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5.
What do owners say?
Owners rate the Premium Contact 6 81% from 139 reviews and the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 86% from 258. 73% of Premium Contact 6 owners would buy it again, against 84% for the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5.
Which is more expensive?
In the 10 tests that listed prices, the Premium Contact 6 was the dearer tire in 9 of them, by 7.8% on average. Prices are the test's own at the time, in its own market.
Are they available in the same sizes?
The Premium Contact 6 is made in 110 sizes (15 to 22 inch) and the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 in 79 (17 to 22 inch). 44 sizes are available in both. On the EU label the Premium Contact 6 is graded A for wet grip and C for rolling resistance in most sizes; the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 A and B.
More comparisons with these tires
vs 
Continental Premium Contact 6 vs Michelin Pilot Sport 4
5-15 in 21 shared tests
vs
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 vs Michelin Pilot Sport 4
5-5 in 11 shared tests
vs
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental Premium Contact 6
5-26 in 31 shared tests
vs 
Continental Premium Contact 6 vs Falken Azenis FK510
15-7 in 23 shared tests
Every Continental vs Goodyear test → All comparisons → Compare three or more tires →
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tire wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Review the Premium Contact 6 Review the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tires ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tire Reviews Score rates each tire out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tires can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tire Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tires independently since 2007.
Discussion