Continental Premium Contact 6 vs Falken Azenis FK510
Across the dataset, Continental dominates dry braking (16 wins to 1), subjective handling, rolling resistance, and wear, often translating to top overall finishes (15 test wins vs. 7 for Falken). Falken counters with stronger wet braking (10 wins to 8), better aquaplaning in many sizes, consistently lower noise, and a meaningful price advantage. The result is a classic premium-vs-value split with notable overlap.
Test Results
Independent comparison tire tests are the best source of data to get tire information from, and the good news is there have been twenty-three tests which compare both tires directly!
| Tire | Test Wins | Performance |
|---|---|---|
| Continental Premium Contact 6 | fifteen | |
| Falken Azenis FK510 | seven | |
| one draws in one tests | ||
While it might look like the Continental Premium Contact 6 is better than the Falken Azenis FK510 purely based on the higher number of test wins, tires are very complicated objects which means where one tire is better than the other can be more important in real world use.
Let's look at how the two tires compare across multiple tire test categories.
Key Strengths
- Class-leading dry braking and precise dry handling (wins 16/1 in dry braking, 8/4 in dry handling)
- Low rolling resistance and strong wear (wins 10/0 in RR; 4/0 in wear)
- Consistently high overall rankings and balanced performance across sizes (15 overall wins)
- Good wet capability with stable handling; strong subjective control
- Strong wet braking and frequent aquaplaning wins (wet braking 10/8; straight aqua 7/5)
- Lower purchase price across tests and better external noise scores
- Sporty dynamics for the money; stable wet handling in many sizes
- Competitive results including multiple overall test wins (7) against premium rivals
Dry Braking
Looking at data from seventeen tire tests, the Continental Premium Contact 6 was better during sixteen dry braking tests. On average the Continental Premium Contact 6 stopped the vehicle in 2.62% less distance than the Falken Azenis FK510.
Best In Dry Braking: Continental Premium Contact 6
See how the Dry Braking winner was calculated >>
Dry Handling [s]
Looking at data from five tire tests, the Continental Premium Contact 6 was better during two dry handling [s] tests. On average the Continental Premium Contact 6 was 0.4% faster around a lap than the Falken Azenis FK510.
Best In Dry Handling [s]: Continental Premium Contact 6
See how the Dry Handling winner was calculated >>
Dry Handling [Km/H]
Looking at data from eight tire tests, the Continental Premium Contact 6 was better during six dry handling [km/h] tests. On average the Continental Premium Contact 6 was 0.67% faster around a lap than the Falken Azenis FK510.
Best In Dry Handling [Km/H]: Continental Premium Contact 6
See how the Dry Handling winner was calculated >>
Subj. Dry Handling
Looking at data from five tire tests, the Continental Premium Contact 6 was better during five subj. dry handling tests. On average the Continental Premium Contact 6 scored 18.18% more points than the Falken Azenis FK510.
Best In Subj. Dry Handling: Continental Premium Contact 6
See how the Subj. Dry Handling winner was calculated >>
Wet Braking
Looking at data from eighteen tire tests, the Falken Azenis FK510 was better during ten wet braking tests. On average the Falken Azenis FK510 stopped the vehicle in 1.16% less distance than the Continental Premium Contact 6.
Best In Wet Braking: Falken Azenis FK510
See how the Wet Braking winner was calculated >>
Wet Handling [s]
Looking at data from six tire tests, the Continental Premium Contact 6 was better during four wet handling [s] tests. On average the Continental Premium Contact 6 was 0.39% faster around a wet lap than the Falken Azenis FK510.
Best In Wet Handling [s]: Continental Premium Contact 6
See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>
Wet Handling [Km/H]
Looking at data from eight tire tests, the Continental Premium Contact 6 was better during four wet handling [km/h] tests. On average the Continental Premium Contact 6 was 0.47% faster around a wet lap than the Falken Azenis FK510.
Best In Wet Handling [Km/H]: Continental Premium Contact 6
See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>
Subj. Wet Handling
Looking at data from five tire tests, the Continental Premium Contact 6 was better during four subj. wet handling tests. On average the Continental Premium Contact 6 scored 7.43% more points than the Falken Azenis FK510.
Best In Subj. Wet Handling: Continental Premium Contact 6
See how the Subj. Wet Handling winner was calculated >>
Wet Circle
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Falken Azenis FK510 was better during one wet circle tests. On average the Falken Azenis FK510 was 2.05% faster around a wet circle than the Continental Premium Contact 6.
Best In Wet Circle: Falken Azenis FK510
See how the Wet Circle winner was calculated >>
Straight Aqua
Looking at data from twelve tire tests, the Falken Azenis FK510 was better during seven straight aqua tests. On average the Falken Azenis FK510 floated at a 0.51% higher speed than the Continental Premium Contact 6.
Best In Straight Aqua: Falken Azenis FK510
See how the Straight Aqua winner was calculated >>
Curved Aquaplaning
Looking at data from three tire tests, the Falken Azenis FK510 was better during one curved aquaplaning tests. On average the Falken Azenis FK510 slipped out at a 3.96% higher speed than the Continental Premium Contact 6.
Best In Curved Aquaplaning: Falken Azenis FK510
See how the Curved Aquaplaning winner was calculated >>
Subj. Comfort
Looking at data from four tire tests, the Continental Premium Contact 6 was better during two subj. comfort tests. On average the Continental Premium Contact 6 scored 14.09% more points than the Falken Azenis FK510.
Best In Subj. Comfort: Continental Premium Contact 6
See how the Subj. Comfort winner was calculated >>
Noise
Looking at data from ten tire tests, the Falken Azenis FK510 was better during ten noise tests. On average the Falken Azenis FK510 measured 1.58% quieter than the Continental Premium Contact 6.
Best In Noise: Falken Azenis FK510
See how the Noise winner was calculated >>
Wear
Looking at data from four tire tests, the Continental Premium Contact 6 was better during four wear tests. On average the Continental Premium Contact 6 is predicted to cover 17.15% miles before reaching 1.6mm than the Falken Azenis FK510.
Best In Wear: Continental Premium Contact 6
See how the Wear winner was calculated >>
Value
Looking at data from two tire tests, the Falken Azenis FK510 was better during one value tests. On average the Falken Azenis FK510 proved to have a 1.15% better value based on price/1000km than the Continental Premium Contact 6.
Best In Value: Falken Azenis FK510
See how the Value winner was calculated >>
Price
Looking at data from nine tire tests, the Falken Azenis FK510 was better during nine price tests. On average the Falken Azenis FK510 cost 17.65% less than the Continental Premium Contact 6.
Best In Price: Falken Azenis FK510
See how the Price winner was calculated >>
Rolling Resistance
Looking at data from ten tire tests, the Continental Premium Contact 6 was better during ten rolling resistance tests. On average the Continental Premium Contact 6 had a 5.78% lower rolling resistance than the Falken Azenis FK510.
Best In Rolling Resistance: Continental Premium Contact 6
See how the Rolling Resistance winner was calculated >>
Real World Driver Reviews
Continental Premium Contact 6 Driver Reviews
Drivers largely praise the Continental Premium Contact 6 for outstanding dry and wet grip, strong braking, and confident, stable handling that inspires trust at speed. Many highlight precise road feedback and enjoyable, sporty dynamics for everyday and spirited driving. The most frequent drawbacks are higher road noise, a firmer ride, and faster-than-hoped wear, with several noting reduced wet performance/aquaplaning resistance as tread wears and slightly soft sidewalls affecting initial turn-in. Overall sentiment is strongly positive given the high share of top scores.
Based on 128 reviews with an average rating of 81%
Falken Azenis FK510 Driver Reviews
Drivers largely praise the Falken Azenis FK510 for excellent wet grip, strong dry traction, and a notably comfortable, quiet ride (especially as a replacement for run-flats), all at a compelling price. Many report stable, confidence-inspiring handling and good aquaplaning resistance. The most consistent drawbacks are faster-than-expected wear and softer sidewalls that can reduce steering precision; several users also note grip dropping off as the tire wears or in colder conditions. Overall sentiment is solidly positive for a value-focused UHP tire.
Based on 150 reviews with an average rating of 81%
Conclusion
The Azenis FK510 shines for drivers who want confident wet-road braking and aquaplaning resistance at a lower purchase price, with generally lower exterior noise. It can outscore Conti in wet-biased tests and delivers sporty feel for the money, though it trails in dry stopping, efficiency, and wear. In short: Continental for all-weather balance and lifecycle value; Falken for wet-leaning performance and upfront savings.
Key Differences
- Dry safety: Continental stops shorter in the dry by meaningful margins in many tests (e.g., −7-8% in 245/45 R18).
- Wet profile: Falken often brakes shorter in the wet and resists aquaplaning better, though Continental is usually close and sometimes leads.
- Efficiency: Continental has markedly lower rolling resistance (10 category wins) aiding fuel economy.
- Longevity: Continental wears slower and maintains performance longer (multiple wear wins).
- Noise and comfort: Falken tends to be quieter externally; Continental scores better in subjective comfort/steering feel.
- Value: Falken's upfront price is typically 15-25% lower; Continental often delivers stronger lifecycle value via wear and economy.
Overall Winner: Continental Premium Contact 6
Based on the tire test data and user reviews we have in our database, the Continental Premium Contact 6 has demonstrated better overall performance in this comparison. However, as you can see from the spider diagram above, each tire has its own strengths which should be considered in your final tire buying choice.Similar Comparisons
Looking for more tire comparisons? Here are other direct comparisons involving these tires:
Continental Premium Contact 6 Top Comparisons
No other comparisons available for this tire.
Falken Azenis FK510 Top Comparisons
No other comparisons available for this tire.
Footnote
This page has been developed using tire industry testing best practices. This means we are only comparing tests which have had both tires in the same test.
Why is this important? Tire testing is heavily affected by things like surface grip levels and surface temperature, which means you can only compare values from the same day. During a tire test external condition changes are calculated into the overall results, but it is not possible to calculate this between tire tests performed on different days or at different locations.
As a result you will see other tests on Tire Reviews which feature both the %s and %s, but as they weren't conducted on the same day, the results are not comparable.
Lots of other websites do this sort of tire comparison, Tire Reviews doesn't.