Overall, the new Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 was a good step forward when compared to the Asymmetric 3 in all key areas, and on par with the Continental PremiumContact 6. The gap between the Continental and the Goodyear is now so close, that in a different tire size to this (225/40 R18), some of the test results might be flipped.
Dry
During dry braking, the Asymmetric 3 took a surprise win, beating the Asymmetric 5 and PremiumContact 6.
Dry Braking
Dry braking in feet
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 110 ft | Best | |
| 111 ft | +1 ft | |
| 112 ft | +2 ft |
All the tires in the Dry Braking test finished less than 3% apart.
During dry handling the Continental was the fastest tire on test, with the Asymmetric 5 and PremiumContact 6 both having an excellent subjective balance.
Dry Handling
Dry handling time in seconds
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 94 s | Best | |
| 95.12 s | +1.12 s | |
| 96.3 s | +2.30 s |
All the tires in the Dry Handling test finished less than 3% apart.
Subj. Dry Handling
Subjective Dry Handling Score
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Points | Best | |
| 9 Points | Best | |
| 7 Points | -2.00 Points |
The difference between best and worst was 22.2% (2 Points).
Wet
The PremiumContact 6 had a small advantage during wet braking.
Wet Braking
Wet braking in feet
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 115 ft | Best | |
| 117 ft | +2 ft | |
| 119 ft | +4 ft |
The difference between best and worst was 3.4% (4 ft).
The Asymmetric 5 and PremiumContact 6 posted exactly the same laptimes, with the Goodyear providing a slightly better balance.
Wet Handling
Wet handling time in seconds
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 65.29 s | Best | |
| 65.29 s | Best | |
| 66.14 s | +0.85 s |
All the tires in the Wet Handling test finished less than 3% apart.
Subj. Wet Handling
Subjective Wet Handling Score
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Points | Best | |
| 9 Points | -1.00 Points | |
| 9 Points | -1.00 Points |
The difference between best and worst was 10% (1 Points).
The new Asymmetric 5 proved to be best in straight aquaplaning, with the PremiumContact 6 ahead in curved aquaplaning.
Straight Aqua
Float Speed in mph
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 47.5 mph | Best | |
| 47.5 mph | 0.0 mph | |
| 46.9 mph | -0.6 mph |
All the tires in the Straight Aqua test finished less than 3% apart.
Environment
The Asymmetric 5 had both the lowest internal noise and highlest levels of comfort on test, though it was again very close between the Asymmetric 5 and PremiumContact 6.
Noise
External noise in dB
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 67.6 dB | Best | |
| 67.8 dB | +0.20 dB | |
| 69.1 dB | +1.50 dB |
All the tires in the Noise test finished less than 3% apart.
Subj. Comfort
Subjective Comfort Score
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Points | Best | |
| 9 Points | -1.00 Points | |
| 8 Points | -2.00 Points |
The difference between best and worst was 20% (2 Points).
Results
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
225/40 R18
Category scores (% of best)
All discipline results (9)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 2nd / 3 | 111 ft | +1 ft |
| Dry HandlingLower is better | 2nd / 3 | 95.12 s | +1.12 s |
| Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better | 1st / 3 | 9 Points | Best in this discipline |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 2nd / 3 | 117 ft | +2 ft |
| Wet HandlingLower is better | 1st / 3 | 65.29 s | Best in this discipline |
| Subj. Wet HandlingHigher is better | 1st / 3 | 10 Points | Best in this discipline |
| Straight AquaHigher is better | 1st / 3 | 47.5 mph | Best in this discipline |
| Subj. ComfortHigher is better | 1st / 3 | 10 Points | Best in this discipline |
| NoiseLower is better | 1st / 3 | 67.6 dB | Best in this discipline |
Continental Premium Contact 6
225/40 R18
Category scores (% of best)
All discipline results (9)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 3rd / 3 | 112 ft | +2 ft |
| Dry HandlingLower is better | 1st / 3 | 94 s | Best in this discipline |
| Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better | 1st / 3 | 9 Points | Best in this discipline |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 1st / 3 | 115 ft | Best in this discipline |
| Wet HandlingLower is better | 1st / 3 | 65.29 s | Best in this discipline |
| Subj. Wet HandlingHigher is better | 2nd / 3 | 9 Points | -1.00 Points |
| Straight AquaHigher is better | 3rd / 3 | 46.9 mph | -0.6 mph |
| Subj. ComfortHigher is better | 2nd / 3 | 9 Points | -1.00 Points |
| NoiseLower is better | 2nd / 3 | 67.8 dB | +0.20 dB |
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3
225/40 R18
Category scores (% of best)
All discipline results (9)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 1st / 3 | 110 ft | Best in this discipline |
| Dry HandlingLower is better | 3rd / 3 | 96.3 s | +2.30 s |
| Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better | 3rd / 3 | 7 Points | -2.00 Points |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 3rd / 3 | 119 ft | +4 ft |
| Wet HandlingLower is better | 3rd / 3 | 66.14 s | +0.85 s |
| Subj. Wet HandlingHigher is better | 2nd / 3 | 9 Points | -1.00 Points |
| Straight AquaHigher is better | 2nd / 3 | 47.5 mph | 0.0 mph |
| Subj. ComfortHigher is better | 3rd / 3 | 8 Points | -2.00 Points |
| NoiseLower is better | 3rd / 3 | 69.1 dB | +1.50 dB |
Great review, thanks.
Did you test asymmetric 3 on runflats or non-runflats?
For my Merc E220d AMG Line estate, I have to replace rear Asymmetric 3 275/35 R19 run flats. I have Pilot Sport 4 on front (non-runflats). Can't get asymmetric 5 or 6 for the back, maybe because of size. Would you recommend Asymmetric 3 runflats or non-runflats as my rear replacements?
I've never tested a runflat tire sadly! Your rear size is very common and it seems you can get the asym 5 and 6 or MPS4/5 in your size in non runflats
https://www.tyrereviews.com...
Whether you want to to to non-runflat is a decision for you. Obviously non-runflat are usually better!
Thanks so much for your helpful and speedy reply. Merc seems to be fitting runflats to all e class for the last few years. They are surprised when I turn up for a service with standard tires and make a point of it!
I see that I can purchase asym 5 or 6 for delivery, but I have not found a tire fitting shop that can order and fit them. Perhaps I wrongly assumed the shops will only fit what they supply?
Most tire shops will install loose tires for a fee, usually around 15-20 a wheel, though if you can order them online any good tire shop should have access to the same stock!
Hi there,
Great video thank you. I have a Jaguar F-Type 2016 with 245/45/R18W and 275/40/R18W Continental Sports Contact 2 tires. They have 4-5 mm of tread left. I have noticed that now the weather has turned, the grip is not great.
I am considering the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5. The issue is that they don't seem to produce the 5 in the larger size. Should I "downgrade" to 4 x Asymmetric 3s of have 5s on the front and 3s on the back.
Alternatively, I watched another of your videos on OEM VS Aftermarket (also great - well done you!).
Should I go for the Continental Sports Contact 6 (available in both sizes).
And finally, what about any other brands. Which tires should I consider from Michelin and Pirelli?
Welcome your advice and any other comments.
I'v'e tests of all those tires, so check out the test videos for the best answer (the BMW M2 full test would be the most useful.)
One word of warning, no summer tire will be great when it's cold and damp with a lot of power
Thanks for your prompt response. I will watch the videos.
Warning noted.
Looking for new front tires 245/45 r18 on a Bmw 535d. Currently have cont sport 3s, so far the Goodyear asylum 5s are my fav choice to replace, any other suggestions? TIA
So many of the BMW boys love the Asym 5, I'm not sure I would go anywhere else!
Is it ok to mix the asy3 on front with asy5 on rear of an Audi S5.
Sure, that's the right way to do it. Burn through the fronts and get the Asym 5 all round :)
It depends what you want from the tire, this video and the latest on the youtube channel should tell you everything you need to know
Thanks for those in-depth tests! I drive a BMW M340i xDrive and would like to fit Asymmetric 5s on my wheels (225/40R19 front, 255/35R19 rear), but those are not available with (*) specification for BMW. I have read a lot about how important it is on xDrive's to only fit (*) tires. Any thoughts on or experience with that? Thank you!
It's totally fine to fit non-* tires, if you can do all 4 at the same time, all the better
Thanks for your answer. Sure, I always change all 4 tires. Have just heard lots of stories about xDrive's transfer box being very sensitive about tires and getting damaged easily.
Yeah, it's true - transfer box could damage, if You fit wrong size of tires.
Hi, I need to replace worn rear tires, currently have Michelin Primacy 3 on all four.
Would it be ok to run Asymmetric 5 at the rear and Primacy 3 on the front wheels, for several month before changing front to Goodyear as well ?
The cars are Mercedes Benz E-Class, R18 245/45 and C class R18 245/40
Also wanted to ask you if there is difference between generic GYF1A5 and GYF1A5 MO (Mercedes fitment) as the latter seem to be a bit more expensive
The mixed setup isn't ideal, but lots of people do it and you'll be find as long as you're mindful.
As for the changes for MO, there probably is some but only goodyear would be able to say what, and that's near impossible information to get.
Thanks, with regards to the MO question what I mean is is it ok to fit non MO tire on Mercedes ?
It certainly is :)
Hi from Greece. I own an AUDI A3 Sportback 160 Ps and i want to replace my tires with a new pare of Assymetric 5 or Pilot sport 4. Do you know if and when are you going to test these tires.
Is it going to be a test between them? I think these are the best in 225/45/17 tire size.
I don't be doing that this year, but EVO did recently. It's on the site, but a very strange test.
Hi, what what would be your tire choice for a 2019 2.0 mazda mx-5 (205/45/17?)? On my volvo s60 (235/40 R18) i'm very happy with the continental premium contact 6, but the mx5 is a different car, maybe the sport contact 6 is a better choice. What do you think?
Asymmetric 5 in that size
After watching this I was sold on the A5s but in Belgium my size (235/45/18) is not available yet (end of august is really too late and they can't guarantee that date either). But the 225/45/18 is available and allowed on my car as well (RCZ hdi). Would the difference in width and height make a big difference and therefor go for the Conti 6 in 235/45/18? A big thanks for your video's!
The Conti is still a great tire, I can't see you being disappointed with it!
I have a Mazda 6 2.2 Sport Nav with 225/45 R19 92W. Bridgestone Turanza. I think for the Mazda they are unacceptably noisy. I notice Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 are 225/45 R19 96W XL, I notice that the XL means extra load and stiffer walls, does this affect the noise rating? Is the best choice for comfort / noise?
It likely won't make any different on comfort and should be a good all round choice.
Thank you for the video, I was looking at new tires for my miata and I am sold on the A5s after watching this. Will let you know how they feel, keep up the good work!
I look forward to your review!
Very interesting test by all means, looks like Goodyear really got it right this time.
Could you do a test featuring 195/45/16 tires please, not forgetting to include the Bridgestone Turanza T005 and Toyo Proxes CF2? That's a dimension that's almost never been in a test - at least not to my knowledge.
Thank you in advance,
Harry
I'm afraid it's unlikely anyone will do that test as it's a very low volume size, sorry!
Thank you for the reply, I appreciate it. Keep up your great work ;)
I wish rolling resistance had a higher prevalence in these tests. Most drivers get nowhere near the limits of their tires during day to day driving. If you're relying on superior tires to get you out of a sticky situation, then you were probably driving too fast in the first place. If you're going to a track fair enough, but 95% of the driving I do is school runs, commutes and boring motorway runs. Rolling resistance is always present no matter what type of driving you do and the difference between a good and poor performing set of tires might be the same as the cost of the tires. At least on the label scores it would appear that the rolling resistance of the Asymmetric 5's is significantly higher than the 3's.
If fuel consumption (rolling resistance) is you priority then you should look for touring tire not for UHP tire in the first place.
Moreover 225/40 R18 is not a typical tire size for "eco-vehicles" therefore if your priority is a fuel consumption you are likely to shop for a car where you can use narrow tires, or at least use the narrowest tires that fit that given vehicle, e.g. 205/50 R 17 is an alternative to the 225/40R18.
It makes no sense to get rather powerful car with UHP tires and only after taking these choices to suddenly start to care about rolling resistance.
If you have sportscar that can not get over 10mpg no matter how you drive you might as well get proper sticky tires right ? No point even considering rolling resistance differences in that case. Of course if you drive your shitbox golf diesel then of course get eco tires.
Thank you for the review!
There is something I quite don't understand about the noise values inside the cabin.
Asymmetric 3 external noise value is 67 dB on the label for 225/40 R18 92Y, Asymmetric 5 is 72 dB external noise on the label for the same size.
How come the cabin is quieter when Asymmetric 5 is equipped on the car?
Can you provide info about how the measurement is done?
Thanks.
The label scores are pass by scores and we measured internal cabin noise. They're often different
Still doesnt make sense. If the value is higher, it means the tire generates moire noise, so if you test both sets of tires on the same car, you should get a higher rating with the Asymmetric 5. My guess is, that the test wasnt conducted on the same road surface.
Surface does make a difference, but internal and external noise values can be different as tire manufacturers can direct the sound from tires either out of the car, or into the wheel well, producing different results
Great review! It's a pity that PS4 is excluded. Can you please share load and speed index of all tires used in this test? Thank you!
All 92Y
If you've uprated shocks and springs I've be looking at the sportier segment of tire, so the PS4, A5 etc!
And about fuel consumption what's the best? i'm undecided about Dunlop Sport MAXX RT2 and this new Eagle Asymmetric 5..in Italy the EF1A5 cost about 70€ plus and i'm not sure the difference between the two is worth the price..
All three tires average C in EU rolling resistance label, so are all fairly close!
Great :)
and about the tire wear what's the best of the 3?
That's at the end of the video
I had the GY F1 asimm 3 20” in a 540d touring. Excellent tire on dry and wet. Then I replaced with the Dunlop sport maxx and it was a really bad experience: not special on dry, terrible on wet. I‘m just returned to the GY F1 asimm.3 and I’m happy again. Much better tire, too much difference. You cannot compare them, they play in two complete different leagues.
Thanks for the vid!! It's a really great explanation about these 3 tires. I've got some PS4 now, I'm thinking of changing them for the new Asymmetric 5. My PS4 got 3 years and about 30.000km..could I keep them for another year?
I guess it depends on the tread depth remaining...
Thank you for the reply! Yeah, I definitely checked the tread depth and is above 4mm. But I don’t know, I feel that the rubber is more tough. Do you think it could be possible after three years? (I checked the manufacturing date on the shoulder).
Rubber will start to harden up with age, it's not unusual for a bit of grip drop off after three years but they should sitll be better than a lot of tires on the road!
Thank you, really ;) Maybe I'll keep them for another year, then I'll test these magnificent Asymmetric 5.
When getting a new tire, how old tires (not fitted, just stored at the re-seller) would you consider old, and rather to avoid?
Ummm..that's a cool question. I always ask to the reseller the age of the tires, and I always fitted tires produced in 4 or 5 months.
Great test video! Really like you go into detail, and appreciate all the effort you have to put into it.
Just an idea for an article/video - it might be "stupid" but would be great if you did explenation on what you might find on tires (various indexes etc) - which is out there already, but again go into bit more detail, explaining how exactly it would translate into performance/behavior - for example having WAY higher load index than you need, would that translate in better steering feel? Similarly with speed index, how will it influence the tire behavior. Basically something about that :)
Thanks and again, love and appreciate what you do!
Good idea, but the problem is you would have to test every combination of tire and size to give a good overview, as sometimes a 91 and 97 XL tire are exactly the same, and sometimes they aren't!
true, but at least some "general" suggestion? what it can result in, not necessarily it will? (at least will people some idea, if they have option to chose from - what in theory could work for them the best, dependent on driving style/mileage or whatever they want to prefer)
In which size were the tires tested?
225/40 R18. I'll add that to the article.
how would you feel the PS4 compares here?
As mentioned in the video, all three tires are now extremely close, and looking at other testing it would be on a very similar level to the Goodyear and Conti.
They are around the same in performance, but is it the same about comfort and silence?
The PS4 has often been rated 1st in 225/45R17, with the CPC6 quite away. So if the Asy5 is only marginally better than the CPC6 on comfort/silence, I would guess that it is still behind than the PS4. Or not?
How about 225/45/18? CPC6 vs PS4