Menu

Radar Renegade A/T 5

The Radar Renegade AT 5 is a All Terrain and Off Road All Season tire designed to be fitted to SUV and 4x4s.

6.9
Tire Reviews Score Based on User Reviews
Limited Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
87%
Wet Grip
82%
Road Feedback
80%
Handling
78%
Wear
68%
Comfort
54%
Buy again
67%
Snow Grip
100%
Ice Grip
95%
7 Reviews
79% Average
100,100 miles driven
Radar Renegade AT 5

Radar Renegade AT 5

All Season Economy
BETA
6.9 / 10
Based on User Reviews · Limited Confidence · Updated 23 Feb 2026

The Tire Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tire scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 0
Publications: 0
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 7
Avg Rating: 79%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 2.75
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tire tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.9 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 12 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.75 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
combined_penalty_floor 0.2
All Tests

Sorry, we don't currently have any magazine tire tests for the Radar Renegade AT 5

Questions and Answers for the Radar Renegade AT 5

Ask a question
Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the Radar Renegade AT 5. Why not submit a question to our tire experts using the form below!
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

Top 3 Radar Renegade AT 5 Reviews

Given 57% while driving a Volkswagen (B8) 1.4 TSI (150 Hp) DSG ACT (285/50 R20) on mostly country roads for 8,000 average miles
I bought an Amarok with a brand new set. I have done 8,000 miles and reckon I will have to change the out at 11,000 miles if not sooner.
September 26, 2024
Given 80% while driving a Mercedes Benz ML (255/70 R16) on mostly country roads for 3,000 average miles
Very impressed. Even if never tested on snow or ice. only a little louder on the road. fuel consumption is a bit higher than before. anyway will buy it again.
November 12, 2024
Given 10% while driving a Toyota Land cruiser prado (265/65 R17) on mostly motorways for 100 easy going miles
just put a set on my 2006 toyota prado.can not drive it at a 100kph on the highway as the tire noise from them is so bad that you cant even talk to the other person in the car.i have only had them a week and iam going to buy new tires on the week end and they wont be radar tires.
September 7, 2023

How would you rate the Radar Renegade AT 5?

Click a star to start your review

Latest Radar Renegade AT 5 Reviews

Given 85% while driving a Suzuki Suzuki Grand Vitara 1.9 DDiS (245/70 R16) on a combination of roads for 4,000 average miles
I was looking for an all-terrain tire that had a 3PMSF stamp and a good reputation for winter conditions, even though several have warned me against all-terrains in winter weather. I must say, I am very surprised (of course in a positive way). Radar Renegade AT5 have completely outdone my old "ordinary" Hankook winter tires from last winter. The car brakes far better on snow now, than it did last winter and it just kicks the snow away, when I get into the deep snow. A bit noisy on the highway if you're driving faster than 110 kph, but it's not louder than the radio. All in all, these are simply the best tires I've ever bought. You get so darn much for the money!
December 8, 2022
Given 83% while driving a Jeep Grand Cherokee CRD (265/50 R20) on mostly country roads for 25,000 spirited miles
Just finished Gibb River Road towing a 3 ton caravan. Tires at 70 % when. We started. No punctures or cuts from the stones. Very impressed!!
July 24, 2022
Given 60% while driving a Jeep Grand Cherokee (265/50 R20 V) on a combination of roads for 12,000 average miles
Good for the money but to hard right feel every bump that’s the worst thing about them not that confidence in the wet not worn down done 12000 on the fronts 3 to 4 mill left not bad off road for a a/t tire goin to try something else next thou mainly because of the ride and noise just like BFGoodrich to hard a ride and to noisey
December 15, 2020
Given 98% while driving a Land Rover Discovery 3 (245/65 R17 H) on mostly motorways for 48,000 average miles
I bought a set of these tires, about 2 years ago i doo 2000 miles per month to work every day I got 48,000miles out of my last set I have a discovery 3 which as you know is a heavy 4x4 these tires a brilliant in the snow Great off roading never once had a puncture no damage to the tire walls just worn down through to my tracking was out I bet I would of got 60,000miles to a set of these easy, I'm running gt radial adventura atm shocking we do offroading at a 4x4 course and these are bad don't buy gt radial for your 4x4 dangerous tires, definitely just waiting on my new set of 4 renegade at5's to turn up they are an amazing not over priced well worth the money....
December 1, 2019
Rate the Radar Renegade AT 5