Menu
Michelin Latitude Cross View Gallery (1)
185-285/50-85 R15-18 45 sizes 2009

Michelin Latitude Cross

The Michelin Latitude Cross is a Touring All Season tire designed to be fitted to SUV and 4x4s.

8.0
Tire Reviews Score Based on User Reviews
Limited Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
86%
Wet Grip
84%
Road Feedback
78%
Handling
76%
Wear
89%
Comfort
82%
Buy again
88%
Snow Grip
74%
Ice Grip
71%
59 Reviews
81% Average
908,551 miles driven
Michelin Latitude Cross

Michelin Latitude Cross

All Season Premium
BETA
8 / 10
Based on User Reviews · Limited Confidence · Updated 23 Feb 2026

The Tire Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tire scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 0
Publications: 0
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 59
Avg Rating: 81%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 3.18
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tire tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.9 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 12 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.75 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
combined_penalty_floor 0.2
All Tests

Sorry, we don't currently have any magazine tire tests for the Michelin Latitude Cross

Alternative Tires

7.5/10
83% 10 reviews
7.2/10
74% 27 reviews
7.0/10
76% 8 reviews
6.9/10
79% 6 reviews
6.6/10
80% 14 reviews
72% 4 reviews
Size Fuel Wet Noise
15 inch
185/65R15 92 T XL C C 71
235/75R15 109 H XL C C 71
16 inch
215/70R16 104 H XL C C 71
17 inch
265/70R17 115 H C C 72
235/65R17 108 V XL C C 71
265/70R17 115 T C C 72
265/65R17 112 H C C 71
235/65R17 108 H XL C C 71
18 inch
235/60R18 107 V XL C C 71
235/60R18 107 H XL C C 71
View All Sizes and EU Label Scores for the Michelin Latitude Cross >>

Questions and Answers for the Michelin Latitude Cross

Ask a question
August 10, 2019

some Michelin Latitude Cross tires have an extra 'DT' designation. What does that mean?

DT stands for different tread. The difference could be a slight tuning for grip or to manage a wear pattern. The tire might look different or it might be very difficult to spot the difference. There are some other similar markings such as S1.
September 9, 2023

What is the treadwear rating on your Michelin Latitude Cross?

Unfortunately we do not store treadwear data for the Michelin Latitude Cross, but any online retailer or Michelin themselves will be able to tell you the treadwear rating your size.
March 5, 2024

I couldn’t find any info about the weight of 205/70 r15 latitude cross. Do you know ?

Sorry we don't have the weight of that tire in our database.
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

Size Price Range  
Available in 1 tire sizes - View all.

Review Summary

Based on 50 user reviews

Drivers largely praise the Michelin Latitude Cross for strong wet grip, confident light off-road traction (gravel, grass, muddy fields), snow competence for an all-season, long tread life, and overall comfort/low noise versus many OEM A/T rivals. A minority report downsides such as higher road noise and fuel use than pure road tires, faster wear or softer compound in some cases, and occasional sidewall/puncture vulnerability. Overall sentiment is clearly positive, with many noting it as a balanced on/off-road choice.

Strengths
  • Wet grip
  • Light off-road traction
  • Snow/slush performance for all-season
  • Tread life/wear
  • Comfort and stability
  • Reduced noise vs some oem a/t
  • Damage resistance on rough roads
Areas for Improvement
  • Higher noise than road tires
  • Slightly higher fuel consumption
  • Sidewall/puncture vulnerability

Top 3 Michelin Latitude Cross Reviews

Given 92% while driving a Land Rover Freelander 2 (235/65 R17) on mostly country roads for 3,000 easy going miles
Put these on my freelander 2 always had goodyear wrangler all weather but these michelin have transformed the car, cornering much better feed back on steering much better and look great, used them on rocky roads forest tracks ect but not in mud yet would definitely buy again seem a great tyrr
August 16, 2025
Given 89% while driving a Toyota Hilux 2.8 (265/60 R18) on mostly country roads for 15,000 spirited miles
Used commercially for towing and off road work, they grip very well on road, relatively well off road (but they're not bfg at equivalent).. they do seem a little soft, they wear quickly and seem to puncture easily. More of a road tire that can go off road well than an off road tire. I do like the tire, a good compromise
August 20, 2025
Given 81% while driving a Mitsubishi Pajero (265/60 R18) on a combination of roads for 30 spirited miles
I wear this tire for the last 20 years on my gen3 3.5V6 and gen4 3.8V6 Mitsubishi Pajeros with only two 6-12 month intervals during which I tried the Maxxis M/T, thinking they were more appropriate for my off road adventures. Said that I never had any issues before going off road and without having anything more to expect from a tire going on road. Long story short I had the worst experience ever when driving on the wet without any significant off road gain plus a silly accident which costed me a huge by all means car damage and some serious rib fractures. I wouldn’t take in consideration the comparison between the Latitude Cross and the MT Maxxis as they come from a completely different perspective. But I haven’t tried any other tires so far. Anyway driving about 40-60.000 km/year between long distances on the highway, long distances off road and towing my RIB through any possible path for 20 years is because I still can’t find any concrete downside for my tires to take the risk of trying any other tire.
August 7, 2025

How would you rate the Michelin Latitude Cross?

Click a star to start your review

Latest Michelin Latitude Cross Reviews

Given 80% while driving a Volvo XC70 D5 (235/55 R18) on a combination of roads for 14,000 spirited miles
Been using this tire on two volvo XC70's over the last 10 years and have done probably 80k miles with them (3 sets). They are very sure footed in nearly all situations - the only thing they are not as good as cross climate2's (my XC60) is bump rebound mid bend (on pot holes)- the rear can skip slightly. Really good on gravel wet or dry - mud also good - snow: better than cross climate2 for braking and traction (UK has wet snow and slush) - tho not as good as a proper winter in these conditions.
Ive towed cars out of muddy fields with these tires - bit more difficult when worn down.
Good stability at motorway speeds - but they dont have the ultimate grip of the new all season tires - the design came out in 2009!! and hasn't been changed so pretty impressive .
As I use them on small roads with very rough edges and have to avoid tractors and lorries they are confidence inspiring that they won't damage easily.
Highway they are a bit noisy compared to the cross climate 2 and certainly not as fuel efficient. but for poor road surfaces and some light off roading they are really good with strong sidewalls. cannot get my size now so will have to either change wheels or goto another tire type.
September 11, 2025
Given 90% while driving a Toyota hilux (255/60 R17) on a combination of roads for 10,000 spirited miles
I have had these Latitude Cross fitted on the rear for the past 10,000miles and on the front for the past 5,000miles. Replacing Bridgestone Dueller 'High Terrain' and also 'All Terrain' tires.

My 2019 2.4D Toyota Hilux is usually relatively loaded with tools and equipment giving the vehicle a gross weight of between 2,500kg and 3,000kg.

I predominantly use the vehicle for work travelling between different sites and working off road most days on the electricity network in rural areas. All my colleagues drive either Isuzu D-Max, Ford Rangers or Toyota Hilux's. As you can imagine, with the work that we do, we are often recovering vehicles out the mud. The majority of my colleagues favour the General Grabber which is adequate for off-road driving but really a very poor tire for driving on road, especially in the wet.

What I can in my experience of driving off-road frequently with the Michelin Latitude Cross is that I have only got stuck once which was due to driver error, a 8ton digger was require to rescue me, so it was quite stuck. However, I drive at obstacles such as steep vergers without care. I bounce up curbs at speed. I hit deep potholes without slowing down and I have pulled a stuck Uni-Mog out of a field (whilst appearing to set a smoke grenade off under the Hilux). I like this tire very much, it is strong and predictable, and provided it isn't a complete disaster in the snow I would choose to put it on again. A bonus is the extended wear and hopefully a lower environmental impact.

What would be good to see is Tire Reviews to carry out a UK based review of 'premium and popular' All-Terrain tires. Goodyear Wrangler, Continental Cross Contact, Michelin Latitude Cross, General Grabber, Cooper Discovery, Bridgestone Dueller are all very popular choices in the UK but no real impartial testing.
August 5, 2024
Given 100% while driving a Kia Motors sorento (245/70 R16) on for 15,000 miles
I had the opportunity to use the tires I have been using for 2 years on snowy, wet and off-road conditions. It is an ideal tire in terms of driving comfort, braking on different road types, and road holding.
July 4, 2024
Given 80% while driving a Mitsubishi L200 Strakar Sport (265/70 R16) on mostly country roads for 0 easy going miles
Installed at the rear, really good tires on the road and off road! I was really impressed with the off road grip! Even at 2WD, on mud it handles really well! Buying a 2nd pair for the front in 2 weeks after a meh time with the Ovation Ecovision VI-286 A/T
April 28, 2024
Given 84% while driving a Hyundai Santa Fe (235/60 R18) on mostly country roads for 15,000 average miles
Used on Hyundai Santa Fe for 6 months. Good throughout summer and autumn. Wear well and not noisey given tread. Works extremely well on wet and very wet grass which is why I got them. No real experience on snow but I think they will be much better than summer tires.
November 2, 2023
Given 81% while driving a Fiat Panda 4 x4 (185/65 R15) on mostly country roads for 5 spirited miles
Fitted these to my Panda Cross 4x4 to improve off road use without ruining on road driving. It’s a good compromise. A bit less grippy than the full road tires fitted from factory (despite being 185, rather than the 175 they replaced). In the dry it still grips well and the handling is predictable and balanced although there’s a bit less feedback on the tarmac. In the wet it’s excellent, no discernible difference to the full on road tires. Off road it’s excellent, a big improvement on the miles of forest track, soft road and occasional full off road I need to drive. The car feels much more planted and secure in these conditions. I’ve yet to encounter snow and it’s not 3MPSF rated but the presence of a number if sipes give me confidence it will work in the occasional snow we encounter. Ride quality is an improvement, possibly helped by the slightly taller sidewall (65% of 185 plays 65% of 175) and comfort is great. No appreciable noise difference to the original road tires. Wear - we will have to see.

A really good switch that suits the car for my driving mix.
July 19, 2023
Given 71% while driving a Mitsubishi Outlander (215/70 R16) on a combination of roads for 0 spirited miles
I have found these tires to be very predictable in both wet and dry. When pushed hard the weight of the PHEV and the high profile of the tire contribute to the car understeering in both wet and dry conditions. I find these tire quite comfortable. In winter I drive up windy mountain roads to the snow. On snow these have been the best cornering and breaking SUV tires I've ever had. I can't comment regarding ice as I have minimal time in those conditions. They are predictably noisier than a road tire but the only time it is really noticeable is when speaking hands free on the phone. I'm on my second set and will buy again if I don't go to a winter specific tire next time. I travelled about 45,000km on my last set and I'm experiencing a similar wear rate this time. Apart from enhanced grip in mud and snow I bought these tires due to the robust side walls to use on dirt roads and tracks, they have not let me down and have reduced my anxiety of tire damage when travelling in out of the way places without a spare.
June 20, 2022
Given 73% while driving a Jeep cherokee sport (245/70 R16) on mostly country roads for 12,000 spirited miles
The tires have excellent wet weather grip on hot mix up and down hills. on road / gravel road performance is good for SUV / 4x4 vehicle. With the grip available the wear isn't that good. If you are only doing 10 -15k km's per year or two, worth the money.
May 14, 2022
Given 90% while driving a Mitsubishi L200 (205/80 R16) on mostly motorways for 92,000 spirited miles
Put them on about 10 years ago as the Bridgestone Dueller wore out of excessive dryness (yes indeed) in only a few years of use and disappointed badly overall. Up until now I have thrown the book at these Michelins; off roading, trailer pulling, snow drifting, beach donuts and still going out is never limited with these. Most surprisingly is the lack of thread wear, the side wall dryness and cracking is making these tires in need of replacement sooner, especially on the front, and that is the only real negative thing I can say about these. Front lasted 6 years Rears lasting 10 years and still looking ok
December 25, 2021
Given 80% while driving a Suzuki vitara s 1,4 boosterjet (215/60 R17) on mostly country roads for 15,000 average miles
I use them on fire trails and rocky roads so far so good. No punctures, good grip. On hightway speeds they are quiet and feel almost as good as the continental ecocontact5 that came from factory. I see some sipes for snow but I did not have the oppurtunity to test them on snow yet.
November 30, 2021
Given 56% while driving a Land Rover Defender (235/85 R16) on mostly country roads for 4,000 miles
Replaced the 15 Yr old budget AT tires on my 90 with these 3 years ago. Really disappointed with these Michelins. They are only an improvement in terms of tire noise (quieter). In all other respects the same as the 15yr old Power guards, apart from body roll, which is sadly increased. Expected much much more from a premium new tire.
August 26, 2021
Given 44% while driving a Mitsubishi Pajero (265/70 R16) on mostly motorways for 250 easy going miles
After 400 Km (250 miles) and 2 weeks of use, I had the first puncture. It was caused by a 9mm diameter wood stick on the inside tread limit. These tires are weak and It will be hard to trust them.
August 30, 2020
Rate the Michelin Latitude Cross