Menu
Laufenn S Fit AS View Gallery (1)

Laufenn S Fit AS

Laufenn Tires Ultra High Performance All Season

The Laufenn S Fit AS is a Ultra High Performance All Season tire designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars.

7.3
Tire Reviews Score Based on User Reviews
Limited Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
83%
Wet Grip
66%
Road Feedback
80%
Handling
76%
Wear
72%
Comfort
84%
Buy again
69%
Snow Grip
10%
Ice Grip
10%
14 Reviews
61% Average
103,200 miles driven
Laufenn S Fit AS

Laufenn S Fit AS

All Season Economy
BETA
7.3 / 10
Based on User Reviews · Limited Confidence · Updated 23 Feb 2026

The Tire Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tire scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 0
Publications: 0
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 14
Avg Rating: 61%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 2.91
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tire tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.9 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 12 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.75 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
combined_penalty_floor 0.2
All Tests

Sorry, we don't currently have any magazine tire tests for the Laufenn S Fit AS

Questions and Answers for the Laufenn S Fit AS

Ask a question
Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the Laufenn S Fit AS. Why not submit a question to our tire experts using the form below!
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

Review Summary

Based on 12 user reviews

Overall, drivers find the Laufenn S Fit AS to be a strong budget-friendly tire with a notably quiet, smooth ride and good dry-road grip/handling. Many reviews highlight good comfort, braking feel, and overall value versus cheaper alternatives. The main recurring drawback is wet-weather traction, with several users reporting the tire can feel slippery in rain (especially as it wears).

Strengths
  • Excellent value for money
  • Quiet/low road noise
  • Comfortable ride quality
  • Good dry grip and handling
  • Confident braking
Areas for Improvement
  • Wet grip/traction can be weak (sometimes worse as the tire wears)

Top 3 Laufenn S Fit AS Reviews

Given 77% while driving a Volvo Proton Suprima S (215/45 R17) on mostly town for 10,000 average miles
The Laufenn S Fit AS 215/45ZR17 has proven to be a solid tire choice for my Proton Suprima S. It have excellent value for money compared to cheap China tires (please consider this brand before getting china tire). With a price of RM200+ per tire, it handles Malaysian road conditions and weather well, providing decent performance in both dry and wet conditions, good grip, and comfort. The ride is quiet, and the durability has been impressive, even after regular use. It’s a better option for anyone looking for reliable tire without breaking the bank. For those considering cheap alternatives, I’d highly recommend the Laufenn S Fit AS, definitely better than LingLong etc
Helpful 850
April 18, 2025
Given 61% while driving a Tesla Model Y rwd (255/45 R19) on a combination of roads for 7,000 spirited miles
I bought a Tesla Model Y rear wheel drive, 2 years old which had a new pair of these Laufenn on the rear wheels only.
Good in the dry but they lose traction in the wet something crazy, I’m not sure if this is a Tesla thing with the instant high torque but I have to be very cautious when it’s greasy, I will probably swap these with the Hankook’s on the front before next winter here in New Zealand.
Helpful 872
January 4, 2025
Given 62% while driving a Lexus IS250 RWD (225/40 R18) on a combination of roads for 2,000 spirited miles
Quiet and smooth with good grip for dry road driving BUT loose as a goose in the wet breaking traction with only light acceleration out of curves and moderate acceleration in straight line from standing start. These are going back to the retailer!!!
Helpful 651
April 3, 2025

How would you rate the Laufenn S Fit AS?

Click a star to start your review

204 reviews submitted this month Earn your Contributor badge No account needed

Latest Laufenn S Fit AS Reviews

Given 74% while driving a Honda Civic 1.8 (215/45 R17) on mostly town for 28,000 average miles
I've used it around June 2022 and by Jan 2024, 2 front tire got sidewall, one of it was just give minor sign. My first impression first time using it, was quite good, the noise was minimal, the dry&wet grip was also above than average, which I was pretty happy. The downside is only its lifespan. it's pretty quick for me, as this tires just rolling around 45000km only, most of the time using normal city road, maybe normal city road in Malaysia quite rough for it.
Helpful 973
January 27, 2024
Given 87% while driving a (225/60 R17) on mostly motorways for 1,000 average miles
Purchased these for my 2018 Ssangyong Korando Limited. Previous tires were Khumo. The Laufenn are easily as good as the tires I replaced. Very quiet on the road. They have excellent roll while coasting. Braking and handling are excellent with comfortable suspension response.
Helpful 846
December 6, 2023
Given 94% while driving a Mitsubishi Pajero/Montero Sport (265/50 R20) on mostly town for 2,000 average miles
I've been running this tire (265/50r20) for a month (Philippines), dry and wet are great, comfortable and quite. Cant give comment on wear yet.
I got the tires as package on my new wheels, for the price of the tires its working great hopefully will last. Will possibly buy again.
Helpful 825
September 5, 2023
Given 67% while driving a Infiniti Q45 (225/55 R17) on mostly motorways for 8,000 average miles
Got 5 new 225/55ZR17 97W. M&B all 5 same time on a 2002 Infiniti Q45 including spare. RW drive 4.5L will spin taking off from dead stop if traction control isn’t on. 1st year all in all comfortable ride. Then disaster strikes. Summer of year 2 both rear tires suffer sidewall blowouts 4 weeks apart on the freeway coming home. And I don’t mean 1 specific damage site leading to shredding and full delam. It looked like 5+ bubbles spaced throughout the circumference popped simultaneously without any evidence present prior to departure.
The second incident was cause for 1v1 accident on the freeway.
Helpful 945
July 16, 2023
Given 59% while driving a Subaru BRZ (215/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 10,000 spirited miles
I got these tires because they were the cheapest thing at the local tire chain and I was fighting suspension gremlins. I ironed out most of the gremlins but today I found out I still have a bad ball joint because I found that my RF was chording on the inner shoulder. I went back to the tire shop and they pointed out the ball joint. You gotta love warranties. I paid $108 total for 4 new tires installed. They seem to do ok at everything and I've driven them pretty hard including plenty of mountain/canyon runs and and AutoX day. My big concern is the snow/ice/cold. Even before the tires were completely shot they were DANGEROUS in the cold. Even on dry roads I was sliding the rear end going under 20mph. In light snow (
Helpful 949
February 23, 2023
Given 76% while driving a Kia Motors Cerato Forte (215/45 R17) on mostly town for 0 easy going miles
Good budget tire. Comfortable,silent,good grip.
Helpful 854
September 21, 2022
Given 76% while driving a Subaru Legacy 2.5i wagon (225/45 R17) on mostly town for 3,000 average miles
Grips and handling are very good in the dry. But grips in the wet is not so good. Quiet and comfortable. Balanced tires except wet weather performance. Thought good values for the price.
Helpful 749
April 30, 2022
Given 89% while driving a Hyundai Sonata LF 2.0 2016 (235/45 R18) on a combination of roads for 30,000 miles
Great value all round tire at a comparatively low price. Very quiet and comfortable, only slight negative is wet weather performance after 50% wear is relatively poor. Still much better than the majority of Chinese brand tires.
Helpful 768
May 22, 2021
Given 86% while driving a Volvo V50 estate (215/55 R16) on a combination of roads for 1,000 average miles
Bought these budget tires for my Volvo V50 2011, diesel.
Removed a set of hancook tires and thought to try these.
Done about 1000 miles and they are good.very quiet tires,
Also the braking and suspension value is very good.
Has made a positive benefit to the driving experience.
I would reccomend these tires
Helpful 629
April 18, 2017
Rate the Laufenn S Fit AS