Menu

Kormoran UHP

The Kormoran UHP is a High Performance Summer tire designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars.

4.7
Tire Reviews Score Based on Professional Tests & User Reviews
Limited Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
83%
Wet Grip
69%
Road Feedback
76%
Handling
73%
Wear
78%
Comfort
79%
Buy again
71%
38 Reviews
76% Average
278,409 miles driven
1 Tests (avg: 38th)
Kormoran Kormoran UHP

Kormoran Kormoran UHP

Summer Economy
BETA
4.7 / 10
Based on Professional Tests & User Reviews · Limited Confidence · Updated 23 Feb 2026

The Tire Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tire scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Dry
75.5
1.8x / 1 test
Wet
52.9
2x / 1 test

Cross-category scores are derived metrics that combine data from multiple test disciplines to evaluate real-world performance characteristics.

Braking
63.4
2 tests
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 1
Publications: 1
Period: 2019
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 38
Avg Rating: 75.7%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 0.88
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tire tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.9 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 12 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.75 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
combined_penalty_floor 0.2
Data Sources
TestPublicationDateSizePositionMetrics
2019 Summer 53 Tire Braking Shootout Auto Bild 2019 225/45 R17 38/45 2 metrics
1
Tests
38th
Average
38th
Best
38th
Worst
Latest Tire Test Results
38th/45

Questions and Answers for the Kormoran UHP

Ask a question
Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the Kormoran UHP. Why not submit a question to our tire experts using the form below!
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

Review Summary

Based on 37 user reviews

Most drivers rate the Kormoran Kormoran UHP highly for its strong value, confident dry grip and handling, comfortable/quiet ride, and generally good tread life. Several high-scoring reviews even compare it favorably to more expensive brands for everyday driving. However, a notable minority report weaker wet performance-especially after 1-2 years or higher mileage-and a soft sidewall feel that can dull steering response. Overall, it's a great budget-to-mid option if you prioritize dry-road performance and comfort over ultimate wet grip.

Strengths
  • Excellent value for money
  • Strong dry grip and handling
  • Comfortable and relatively quiet ride
  • Good durability/tread life
Areas for Improvement
  • Wet grip degradation over time/when worn
  • Soft sidewalls causing vague steering response

Top 3 Kormoran UHP Reviews

Given 24% while driving a Alfa Romeo 156 SW 1.9 JTD (235/40 R19) on mostly town for 6,000 average miles
Stood on the car when i bought it. Drove theese for 1,5 summer season. Three words; Do Not Buy!

My background is a tire nerd. And experience from only the best tires. So this tire came as a shock.

- Wear, terrible. From 3mm to the cords at 8000km.

- Road noise, extremely hugh and boomy. Passangers thought wheel bearing where gone.

- wet grip. Borderline dangerous. A lot of understeer and terrible wet braking.

- dry grip. Ok. But the same time this is the only tire i've lost grip on spritited but controlled driving.

- driving feel. Not consistent. Sometimes good, and sometimes it feels like the sidewall desintegrates.

Later changed to Hankook Evo Prime. And the difference is night and day in every terms!

Dont save hundred dollars on the difference between safe and unsafe tires!
June 6, 2025
Given 62% while driving a BMW 316d (225/50 R17) on mostly country roads for 25,000 average miles
The performance was adequate and fuel economy was better with these tires than the ones I had before. The tread wear was fairly ok, the rears (On RWD car) lasted 20k miles and the fronts lasted 25k and still had tread on them however all the tires were showing signs of cracking well before the tread was used up which is disappointing from 3 year old tires.
July 1, 2025
Given 33% while driving a Ford S Max (235/55 R17) on mostly country roads for 10,000 easy going miles
As a new tire, the Kormoran UHP 235/55R17 is really good, but after just one year and 15,000 km with a remaining tread depth of 6 mm, the tire is a disaster and very dangerous to drive on in the rain. Buy cheap, buy twice.
April 17, 2025

How would you rate the Kormoran UHP?

Click a star to start your review

Latest Kormoran UHP Reviews

Initial Impressions Review
Given 100% while driving a Hyundai I30N (235/35 R19) on for 1,000 miles
My previous tires were Pirelli PZ4 which were awful/noisy/slippery, as you felt/heard every bit of road noise, unless driven on smooth tarmac.
The Kormoran KO Summer3 XL are much more superior. 'B rated' fuel/wet grip, great handling performance, smoother, quieter with excellent wet/dry braking and minimal tire wear so far.
Definitely recommend these tires or even Saillun Altrezzo if on offer!
January 12, 2026
Given 70% while driving a Lexus IS200 (225/45 R17) on mostly motorways for 25,000 average miles
RWD Lexus IS, mostly fully loaded, mostly highways, 40k kms in 2 years.

These tires were a great improvement over Nokian Hakka Blue both in terms of noise and ride comfort. I used both models for touring and city, and I liked Kormoran much better.

The tires are lightweight. Despite the thin sidewalls they are quite strong against potholes. However you might want to put a little more air into these tires for better response.

The grip is great on wet and dry when new. After 15-20kk kms, however, they start to feel more rigid and prone to slipping. There was no significant wear. Grip on wet was still good, but not so much on dry. On polished Balkan city roads ABS could kick in while stopping from 20km/h and flooring the pedal (city traffic situation). Although, no problems on high speeds even in cold weather slightly above 0 C. A bit controversial behaviour, though, still predictable if you learn it. This tire is just not the best choice for hot countries with tarmac roads. Tarmac roads in hot climates are naturally more slippery than in colder climates. This tire works better on grippier roads.

Overall, I like this tire and might consider buying it again, especially, given the price (better brands cost 1.5-2 as much).
May 12, 2025
Given 83% while driving a Ford Mustang gt (255/40 R19) on a combination of roads for 4,000 easy going miles
Ford Mustang GT 255 40 19.
The tires are a budget option but they give a good grip on dry roads even in lower temperatures. I have not lose any grip so far besides when I push the car. The only problem is the braking in wet conditions, you need to be extra careful. For the price and city conditions is a great choice but not for track or 100% highway driving on no speed limit highways.
April 26, 2025
Given 79% while driving a Mercedes Benz C63 AMG (255/35 R19) on mostly town for 4,000 spirited miles
I use this on my W204 C63 and they are great. Love the thick sidewall and even though some websites say this is a summer tire, I think it handles great in the wet even on London roads. Very comfortable and in the dry they stick well. My car is pushing 520 horsepower to the rear wheels and these grip extremely well. A lot of consumers dont know that KORMORAN is a company owned my Michelin and are not some super budget company. I have been using kormoran on my C63 for the last 4 years and change rears about twice a year. For front tires I change them roughly once every 2 years.

All in all I would highly recommend these tires
April 3, 2025
Given 56% while driving a Volkswagen Golf 7 TDI (225/45 R17) on mostly country roads for 4,000 average miles
I bought this tires for a small car that doesn't drive often thinking they will be all right for the use. I was very wrong. When new they are okay, but after a year the wet handling was horible, as well as the breaking distance. Would not recommend to buy to anyone, as the are quite dangerous to drive after two years old
September 21, 2024
Given 77% while driving a Ford Mondeo Titanium X Sport (235/40 R19) on a combination of roads for 25,000 average miles
Having used these for 25k miles on an almost 2 ton car they have served me really well. Commute is 1/3 country roads, 1/3 A road and 1/3 motorway. After 2 years they are now reaching their wear indicator so very good durability. Dry grip is very good. Wet can be a little sketchy if the roads are greasy but pretty predictable. Resistant to most winter potholes, ie. no real damage after hitting a couple of decent sized craters. Will be replacing these with the same again next month.
August 30, 2024
Given 61% while driving a BMW 316d (225/50 R17) on a combination of roads for 15,000 average miles
2 years and 15000 miles in, my tires are cracked between the tread blocks, still have 3-4mm tread on them, this is really disappointing, won't recommend anyone to buy them
April 19, 2024
Given 97% while driving a Volvo V40 rdesign (225/40 R18) on for 0 miles
Replaced a front pair of Bridgestones, with these budget radials. Shocked at how much of an improvement these Kormoran UHP tires are. Excellent feedback, noticeably quieter ride and great grip. Too early to review wear rate, after a month but looking good so far.
Highly recommend
April 6, 2024
Given 68% while driving a BMW (225/40 R18) on mostly motorways for 1,000 average miles
Bought a full set of these for my 2009 135i. For the money they are fantastic, especially coming from the runflats that had previously been fitted. The ride quality is vastly improved and grip is impressive considering the price but don’t expect these to be as good as premium tires such as ps4. Due to the compliance in the sidewall of the tires themselves they almost have a steering delay/twitch at higher speeds but it may be the suspension set up of the car which is done to compensate for the firmness of rft. This would not put me off from buying them again. Road noise is decent but not particularly quiet. Overall a great tire for the price.
December 24, 2023
Given 60% while driving a Audi A4 Quattro 1.9 TDI Avant (225/50 R17) on a combination of roads for 20,000 average miles
First year ok, second year in rain are not so good.! After 2 season have to change it because too dangerous.
November 26, 2023
Given 100% while driving a Mercedes Benz (245/40 R19) on a combination of roads for 200 spirited miles
I purchased 2 tires after reading the reviews on here and all I can say is what a great tire. I can't comment on wear yet because I've only driven around 200 miles.. They replaced my Michelin Primacy 3, which I found to be very stiff and noisy.
July 19, 2023
Given 69% while driving a Citroën C4 (205/50 R17) on a combination of roads for 22,000 average miles
TL;DR: Overall the tires were fine for a couple of years (~20-25000km).

I drive on the roads of Greece in and out of the city, mainly in a calm pace for gas preservation. I changed from a set of overused Semperit to Kormoran UHP at 5/2020. I scored the tires based on the overall impression and not at how they feel now at the end of their life. At the beginning the tires felt amazing! I used to receive good road feedback and I they gripped very well. I remember noticing that it felt grippier in the wet than in the dry. So for the first year (mid2020-21/0-7000km) the tires were adequate and I was happy about choosing them. The second year (2021->22/7000-19000km) the tires still felt ok, I remember checking for tread wear and I didn't find any observable degradation. In that year I tested for aquaplaning at different speeds and no concerns were raised. In the third year I performed back-to-front tire change. The mechanic didn't observe any excessive wear patterns. However at the end of that year, I noticed I was oversteering at the motorways (2022->23/19000-31000km). Now at ~33500km the tires feel really bad to the point I am very conscious when driving at cruising speeds on roads with consecutive turns. Although they are not completely worn out (the arrow indicator is fully present) some cracks can be observed on the treads as well. To this day the consumption of the car remains at the manufacturer levels, so the tires have not been degraded on this regard. I can't tell about the noise in the cabin b/c my exhaust dampens all other sounds. Also I haven't decided what tires should I fit next.
June 25, 2023
Rate the Kormoran UHP