Menu

Falken EUROALL SEASON AS200 Test Results

Tested 2013 to 2018 5 publications

Tested 9 times by independent publications, the Falken EUROALL SEASON AS200 averages a finish of 5th.

  • 9Independent tests
  • 0Test wins
  • 3Podium finishes
  • 5thAverage finish
  • 36%Field beaten on average
  • 5Publications
Falken EUROALL SEASON AS200

9 tests, 2013 to 2018

0%50%100%201320142015201620172018Average 36%2013 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test (2013): P2 of 9, Beat 88% of the field2013 Winter Tire Buying Guide (2013): P3 of 9, Beat 0% of the field2014 All Season Tire Test (2014): P6 of 10, Beat 44% of the field2015 Auto Bild SUV All Season Tire Test (2015): P3 of 6, Beat 60% of the field2016 GF All Season Tire Test (2016): P8 of 11, Beat 30% of the field2017 Auto Bild All Season Tire Test (2017): P7 of 8, Beat 14% of the field2017 All Season VS Winter Tire Test (2017): P7 of 11, Beat 30% of the field2017 Auto Express All Season Tire Test (2017): P5 of 8, Beat 43% of the field2018 Auto Express All Season Tire Test (2018): P5 of 8, Beat 14% of the field
Share of the field beaten in each test, oldest to newest. Hover or tap a point for the test.
  • Test win
  • Second
  • Third
  • Average 36%
The latest test

2018 Auto Express All Season Tire Test P5 of 8

Excellent in the snow, but lacking in the dry and wet.

Winner: Continental AllSeasonContact

Record by discipline

Where the Falken EUROALL SEASON AS200 finished in each measured discipline, across every test that measured it against at least two other tires. Field beaten is the share of the other tires it outranked in that measurement.

Discipline Tests Avg finish Field beaten Firsts
Dry
Dry Braking 2 P9 of 10.5 16% -
Dry Handling 2 P4.5 of 10.5 64% -
Wet
Wet Braking 2 P5.5 of 10.5 52% -
Wet Handling 2 P5 of 10.5 57% -
Straight Aqua 1 P8 of 11 30% -
Snow
Snow Braking 2 P9 of 10.5 16% -
Snow Handling 2 P8 of 10.5 26% -
Comfort
Noise 1 P1 of 11 100% 1
Value
Rolling Resistance 2 P9.5 of 10.5 11% -

Head-to-head record

Overall finishing position against the tires that have most often shared a test with the Falken EUROALL SEASON AS200. Only tires tested alongside it at least three times are listed.

Rival Shared tests Ahead Behind Level Finished ahead
Uniroyal AllSeasonExpert 5 shared: 1 ahead, 4 behind 5 1 4 - 20%
Goodyear Vector 4 Seasons Gen 2 5 shared: 0 ahead, 5 behind 5 0 5 - 0%
Nokian WeatherProof 5 shared: 0 ahead, 5 behind 5 0 5 - 0%
Pirelli Cinturato AllSeason 4 shared: 2 ahead, 2 behind 4 2 2 - 50%
Vredestein Quatrac 5 4 shared: 1 ahead, 3 behind 4 1 3 - 25%
Nexen N Priz 4S 3 shared: 3 ahead, 0 behind 3 3 0 - 100%
Hankook Kinergy 4S 3 shared: 2 ahead, 1 behind 3 2 1 - 67%
Michelin CrossClimate 3 shared: 0 ahead, 3 behind 3 0 3 - 0%
Goodyear Vector 4Seasons 3 shared: 0 ahead, 2 behind 3 0 2 1 0%

Against its own line

The same record for the tire it replaced and the tire that replaced it.

Tire Tests Wins Avg finish Field beaten
Falken EUROALL SEASON AS200 This tire 9 0 5th 36%
Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210 Successor 21 0 7th 46%

Performance Analysis

Drawn from 8 tests. Updated December 1, 2025.

The Falken EUROALL SEASON AS200 delivers mid-pack overall performance across eight tests, with occasional highs early in its lifecycle and weaker showings in later, more demanding benchmarks. It shows competent wet handling/braking and good subjective comfort/noise in some tests, but is consistently held back by long dry and snow braking distances and poor rolling resistance, which depress efficiency and safety margins. Awards and positions range from 2nd/9 (2013) and 3rd/6 (2015 SUV) to several lower mid-field finishes, yielding an average overall rank of 5.4.

Overall, the tire suits mixed conditions where wet grip and balanced handling are valued over absolute stopping power or efficiency. However, recurring deficits in dry and snow braking plus aquaplaning and RR results limit its competitiveness against newer all-season designs.

Performance Strengths

Performance Weaknesses

Do owners agree with the tests?

Every tester write-up on the Falken EUROALL SEASON AS200 (7 tests) and 22 owner reviews were tagged for the aspects they judge. Where both have spoken, this is how they line up.

Where owners and testers agree

  • Road noise strength in 3 of 7 tests 11 praise, 1 criticise of 22 reviews · Read those reviews
  • Wet grip strength in 2 of 7 tests 10 praise, 1 criticise of 22 reviews · Read those reviews
  • Behavior at the limit weakness in 2 of 7 tests 0 praise, 3 criticise of 22 reviews · Read those reviews
  • Ride comfort strength in 1 of 7 tests 5 praise, 0 criticise of 22 reviews · Read those reviews

Where they disagree

  • Snow traction weakness in 3 of 7 tests 9 praise, 0 criticise of 22 reviews · Read those reviews

Raised by owners, not by any test of this tire

  • Tread life no test mentions it 10 praise, 1 criticise of 22 reviews · Read those reviews
  • Value for money no test mentions it 9 praise, 0 criticise of 22 reviews · Read those reviews
  • Dry grip no test mentions it 7 praise, 0 criticise of 22 reviews · Read those reviews

Every test, newest first 9

Strong = top two of the field in that measurement. Weak = bottom two.

2018 1 test
2017 3 tests
P7 of 11 Beat 30% of the field

2017 All Season VS Winter Tire Test

Auto Zeitung 205/55 R16

StrongNoise WeakSnow BrakingRolling Resistance WinnerContinental WinterContact TS 860

2016 1 test
2015 1 test
2014 1 test
2013 2 tests

Back to the Falken EUROALL SEASON AS200 overview

Owner reviews, sizes and EU label data, comparisons and the Tire Reviews score. All Falken tires

Overview

Rate your tires

My tires

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tires

Save tires from a tire page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tires. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.