“I had these brand new few years ago when I bought my S2000. They slide a lot at the limit compared with Turanza I have on my other sport car. Even in the regular driving they tend to lose the grip unpredictably. Much...”
Bridgestone Adrenalin RE002
Replaced by the Bridgestone Adrenalin RE003
The Bridgestone Adrenalin RE002 is a summer performance tire whose owners generally praise dry grip, handling and refinement. Its single independent test was much less favorable about grip, particularly in the wet, while wear reports vary.
The quick answer
Built from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold for this tire - the evidence is all further down the page. Data updated January 2025.
- 108owner reviews
- 940,927miles driven
- 1professional tests
All Tests
View Test Results2015 EVO Magazine Performance Tire Test P9 of 10
The Bridgestone curveball of the RE002 instead of the S001 didn't pay off. Short of grip in the wet, finishing ninth fastest, and only managing seventh in the dry, the Bridgestone RE003 must be due to Europe soon.
| Year | Test | Result | Award |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 2015 EVO Magazine Performance Tire TestEVO · 225/40 R18 | P9 / 10 |
Dimensions & Label Scores
View AllSize Range
215Width55Profile16Rim93WLoad/
EU Label
Fuel
Wet
Noise
71dB B
Frequently Asked Questions
How many miles does the Bridgestone Adrenalin RE002 last?
What do owners say about the Bridgestone Adrenalin RE002?
What is the Bridgestone Adrenalin RE002's EU tire label rating?
How comfortable and quiet are the Bridgestone Adrenalin RE002?
How well do the Bridgestone Adrenalin RE002 wear, according to owners?
More questions about the Bridgestone Adrenalin RE002 (6)
Would owners buy the Bridgestone Adrenalin RE002 again?
What do owners say about the Bridgestone Adrenalin RE002's dry grip?
What do owners say about the Bridgestone Adrenalin RE002's wet grip?
What do owners say about the Bridgestone Adrenalin RE002's road noise?
Has the Bridgestone Adrenalin RE002 been replaced?
What sizes does the Bridgestone Adrenalin RE002 come in?
Owner Questions
Ask a questionQuestions and Answers for the Bridgestone Adrenalin RE002
Bridgestone Adrenalin RE002 Owner Reviews
Review this tireWhat owners say summarised from 88 reviews
Owners of the Bridgestone Adrenalin RE002 most consistently praise dry grip, followed by wet grip, with handling and steering feedback also well regarded. Quiet running and ride comfort attract substantially more praise than criticism. Wet grip is less unanimous than dry grip, with complaints from around one in ten, sometimes about abrupt loss of grip near the limit. Tread life is more divided, with ten critical accounts against 17 favorable ones and varying longer-use experiences. Later reviews written by the same people remain mixed rather than showing a consistent decline as the tire wears.
What owners mention most counted across 86 reviews
Tap one to read only the reviews that mention it.
Owner ratings averaged from 108 ratings
- Owner score 81%
- Dry Grip 90%
- Road Feedback 82%
- Wet Grip 82%
- Handling 80%
- Wear 77%
- Comfort 77%
Featured reviews
“I ride audi tt 2.0 tfsi FWD. This tire should heated so you should ride at least 15 km before you get best performance. therefore,this tire is unsuitable for short rides. when it is cold it is the worst tire i ve ever...”
“I have a 2000 Ford Laser - 195/55/R15. I got all 4 put on new rims after having the skinny stock tires. They have lasted for 3years and just over 60K and only just getting to the point that I need to shop for new ones...”
All 88 Bridgestone Adrenalin RE002 reviews
- Ford Focus 2002 Hatchback
- 195/60 R15
- 25,000 miles
- A Combination of Roads
- Spirited
- Honda
- 225/50 R16
- Track
- Spirited
- Audi A4 Avant 1.9tdi Sport
- 205/55 R16
- 15,000 miles
- A Combination of Roads
- Spirited
Which tires do you drive?
Researching the Bridgestone Adrenalin RE002? Rate the tires you actually drive - and help the next buyer choose.
- Renault Clio III Dynamique 1.2 Turbo
- 205/45 R16 W
- 25,000 miles
- A Combination of Roads
- Ford Focus
- 225/45 R17 W
- 11,000 miles
- Mostly Motorways
- Spirited
Wet: I never had aquaplaning with it, but maybe I drive to careful on the Autobahn when the water stays on the road becuae the P Zero and my last winter-tires V905 are also not fan of to much water.
If the roads are only wet, the RE002 is much more worse than my P Zero. If the P zero is on the rear axis, the car understeering obvious, and it is totally disharmonious. Good feedback and good grip if I stay below the limit, very suddenly the grip disappear if I go a bit harder.
If the P zero are in front and the RE002 on rear I fight with brutal oversteer.
Conclusion: The RE002 is OK if you want a good tire for dry roads and if you like the nice look. But if you want to drive fast in the wet you should stay away from the RE002. It´s a weak performance to loose against a two year older tires with less tread. I would only recommend it for a car which don´t see often wet roads.
- Mazda MX5
- 195/50 R15
- 2,000 miles
- Mostly Country Roads
- Spirited
I've tried it once on a trackday and was very impressed with the level of grip, though it tends to overheat quite fast.
- Fiat Stilo
- 225/45 R17 W
- 6,000 miles
- A Combination of Roads
- Spirited
- Alfa Romeo 156 2.0 TS Veloce
- 205/55 R16 V
- 10,000 miles
- A Combination of Roads
- Spirited
They have a nice crisp steering response and good feedback. Cornering grip was very good but less so in the wet. I found them to generally behave very well with no upsets. Breakaway and recovery was always easily managed and for that they can be recommended.
They have shortcomings though. When new, the tread depth was only just above 6mm (sporting tire). Aquaplaning resistance was very poor though. Indeed, I used them in snow once. It gave new meaning to 'absolutely no grip'. They are very heavy so transmit every bump into the cabin and even tiny road imperfections could clearly be detected. Wear was not good and I'd sum them up as not good for a daily driver. For a toy they're not bad but I believe there are better options available which don't have anything like the RE002's drawbacks.
Not a bad tire but it should have been marketed more accurately and having mainstream autocenters fitting them as a mainstream performance tire certainly had it's drawbacks and I imagine some damage was done to the Bridgestone brand name for that reason.
- Volkswagen Passat 2.0TDI
- 235/45 R17 W
- 35,000 miles
- A Combination of Roads
- Spirited
- Opel Vectra C GTS
- 225/45 R17 W
- 11,000 miles
- A Combination of Roads
- Spirited
The braking on smooth city asphalt leaves plenty to desire. But on the move the grip is very good. Comfort and fuel consumption wise not so good but it is expected for this type o tire and this tread design.
On the wet braking becomes very good (surprisingly) and the grip is great (even with 225's) I never experienced aquaplanning.
Very satisfied with them as I never could reach the limit of their abilities. Even when driving on a very very fast manner.
- Skoda Fabia vRS
- 205/40 R17
- 15,000 miles
- A Combination of Roads
- Spirited
- Mercedes Benz C200 CGI with amg wheels
- 225/45 R17
- 22,000 miles
- A Combination of Roads
- Spirited
No reviews match those filters.
Find your next tire
All tire testsThe latest Tire Reviews tests
- Oct 2026The BEST All Weather Tires for 2026/27 →
- Oct 2026All Season vs All Terrain Tires Tested: Do You Actually Need an All Terrain? →
- Oct 2026The BEST Winter Tires for 2026/27 →
Summer Tires
All Season Tires
Winter Tires
SUV and All Terrain Tires
Track Tires
Which tires do you drive?
You're reading real-world reviews from other drivers - add yours and help the next buyer choose the right tires.






