Menu

Test source TESTIRENKAAT

2023 Studless vs Studded Snow Tire Test

Overall test winnerGoodyear UltraGrip Ice 3

The 2023 TESTIRENKAAT Snow Tire Test tested eight tires designed for extreme winters in the popular 205/55 R16 size.Interestingly the four premium tires are studless friction tires, and the four budget tires are studded, so it gives us an…

Tires tested
8
Tested size
205/55 R16
Disciplines
9

At a glance

Tire shortlist

8 Tires tested

Published finishing positions, with the strengths and considerations from this test. Owner reviews cover other sizes and driving conditions.

1st

Goodyear UltraGrip Ice 3

2nd

Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5

3rd

Michelin X Ice Snow

4th

Pirelli Ice Zero FR

5th

Tigar Tigar Ice

6th

Sunfull SF W11

7th

Antares GRIP 60 ice

8th

Winrun Winter Max S1 WR60

Tire shortlist

Compare selected tires

2023 Studless vs Studded Snow Tire Test · 205/55 R16

Explore the complete results →

The full test

The evidence behind the verdict

The 2023 TESTIRENKAAT Snow Tire Test tested eight tires designed for extreme winters in the popular 205/55 R16 size.

This is a really interesting test as the four premium tires are studless friction tires, and the four budget tires are studded, so it gives us an interesting data point to compare the best of the new studless friction soft compound tires against the cheaper end of the studded market.

Friction Tires:

  • Goodyear Ultra Grip Ice 3 
  • Michelin X-Ice Snow 
  • Nokian Tires Hakkapeliitta R5 
  • Pirelli Winter Ice Zero FR

Studded Tires:

  • Antares Grip 60 Ice
  • Sunfull SF-W11
  • Tigar Ice
  • Winrun Winter-Max S1 WR60

Test setup & methodology

The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.

Recorded test conditions

Recorded test conditions

Dry Braking
49.7 → 3.1 mph
Wet Braking
49.7 → 3.1 mph
Snow Traction
3.1 → 21.7 mph
Ice Braking
15.5 → 3.1 mph
Ice Traction
3.1 → 15.5 mph

The testers had a few surprises from the studs vs friction results. The test saw a kind of changing of the guard, as Goodyear's new tire rises to the top among Nordic friction tires. The improvement over its predecessor is significant, and the Ultra Grip Ice 3 narrowly snatched victory from the Hakkapeliitta R5. The third-place Michelin falls noticeably behind the top two.

As for the main point of the test—the battle between friction and studded tires—the differences were surprisingly large. We initially thought that even a slightly cheaper studded tire would perform better than studless ones on ice, but only Antares succeeded, and that too only in longitudinal grip tests.

On asphalt, cheaper studded tires generally perform better, which is not surprising since their rubber hardness is closer to summer than winter tires. However, summer rubber compounds won't work in winter conditions, especially if the studs are also installed too deep or in the wrong positions.

The winter driving tests revealed why some tires cost more than others. The performance of cheaper studded tires drops significantly, emphasizing that making a winter tire that works well in varying conditions is not easy. Bad winter tires might perform quite well up to the grip limit, but their behavior can change radically beyond that.

Dry and Wet

On asphalt, inexpensive studded tires hold better on average than on snow and ice, which is not surprising, because the hardness of the rubber is closer to summer tires than winter tires. Still, the cheap studded tires can have surprising and even dangerous behavior.

Dry Braking

Dry Braking

Dry braking in feet (50 - 3 mph)

Lower is better ↓
Dry Braking
Position / TireResultGap to bestResidual speed
101 ft Best 0 mph
102 ft +1 ft 8 mph
102 ft +1 ft 10 mph
103 ft +2 ft 11 mph
103 ft +2 ft 12 mph
104 ft +3 ft 15 mph
107 ft +6 ft 19 mph
108 ft +7 ft 22 mph

The difference between best and worst was 7.8% (7 ft ≈ 0.5 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Antares GRIP 60 ice would still be travelling at 22 mph when the Pirelli Ice Zero FR had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Wet Braking

Wet Braking

Wet braking in feet (50 - 3 mph)

Lower is better ↓
Wet Braking
Position / TireResultGap to bestResidual speed
107 ft Best 0 mph
110 ft +3 ft 14 mph
119 ft +12 ft 25 mph
126 ft +19 ft 31 mph
134 ft +27 ft 36 mph
135 ft +28 ft 36 mph
138 ft +31 ft 38 mph
142 ft +35 ft 40 mph

The difference between best and worst was 32.7% (35 ft ≈ 2.4 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 would still be travelling at 40 mph when the Sunfull SF W11 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Wet Handling

Wet Handling

Wet handling time in seconds

Lower is better ↓
Wet Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
40.4 s Best
40.8 s +0.40 s
40.8 s +0.40 s
41.4 s +1.00 s
42.2 s +1.80 s
42.7 s +2.30 s
42.8 s +2.40 s
44.9 s +4.50 s

The difference between best and worst was 11.1% (4.5 s).

Snow

In snow, the tires are rarely divided into two groups in all tests. In all tests, the friction tires are the best tires, with the low cost studs falling behind.

Snow Braking

Snow Braking

Snow braking in feet

Lower is better ↓
Snow Braking
Position / TireResultGap to best
37 ft Best
38 ft +1 ft
38 ft +1 ft
38 ft +1 ft
39 ft +2 ft
40 ft +3 ft
40 ft +3 ft
43 ft +6 ft

The difference between best and worst was 14.9% (6 ft ≈ 0.4 Car Lengths).

Snow Traction

Snow Traction

Snow acceleration time (3 - 22 mph)

Lower is better ↓
Snow Traction
Position / TireResultGap to best
4.34 s Best
4.39 s +0.05 s
4.45 s +0.11 s
4.47 s +0.13 s
4.91 s +0.57 s
5.16 s +0.82 s
5.41 s +1.07 s
5.44 s +1.10 s

The difference between best and worst was 25.3% (1.1 s).

Snow Handling

Snow Handling

Snow handling time in seconds

Lower is better ↓
Snow Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
83.04 s Best
83.28 s +0.24 s
84.04 s +1.00 s
85.19 s +2.15 s
90.82 s +7.78 s
91.69 s +8.65 s
93.33 s +10.29 s
93.73 s +10.69 s

The difference between best and worst was 12.9% (10.69 s).

Ice

It was noteworthy that on ice the premium friction tires beat the cheap studded tires in the handling tests. When the tires are straight, the studs bite better on slippery ice, and in the acceleration tests two studded tires fit in the top three - but only one in the braking test.

Ice Braking

Ice Braking

Ice braking in feet (16 - 3 mph)

Lower is better ↓
Ice Braking
Position / TireResultGap to bestResidual speed
48 ft Best 0 mph
49 ft +1 ft 11 mph
50 ft +2 ft 14 mph
50 ft +2 ft 15 mph
52 ft +4 ft 22 mph
52 ft +4 ft 22 mph
54 ft +6 ft 26 mph
56 ft +8 ft 29 mph

The difference between best and worst was 14.9% (8 ft ≈ 0.5 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Winrun Winter Max S1 WR60 would still be travelling at 29 mph when the Goodyear UltraGrip Ice 3 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Ice Traction

Ice Traction

Ice acceleration time (3 - 16 mph)

Lower is better ↓
Ice Traction
Position / TireResultGap to best
5.95 s Best
6.39 s +0.44 s
6.67 s +0.72 s
6.68 s +0.73 s
6.93 s +0.98 s
6.93 s +0.98 s
7.01 s +1.06 s
7.71 s +1.76 s

The difference between best and worst was 29.6% (1.76 s).

Ice Handling

Ice Handling

Ice handling time in seconds

Lower is better ↓
Ice Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
69.76 s Best
69.9 s +0.14 s
71.21 s +1.45 s
77.09 s +7.33 s
81.25 s +11.49 s
82.21 s +12.45 s
83.04 s +13.28 s
89.39 s +19.63 s

The difference between best and worst was 28.1% (19.63 s).

Results

1st

Goodyear UltraGrip Ice 3

205/55 R16
Goodyear UltraGrip Ice 3
Ice and Snow: Best control, excellent grip on ice, excellent grip on snow; Wet Conditions: Summer tire-like steering, safe and easy to drive in wet conditions, extreme situation behavior not as good as the best..
Dry98.1%
Wet92.3%
Snow99.5%
Ice97.7%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (9)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better4th / 8103 ft+2 ft
Wet BrakingLower is better4th / 8126 ft+19 ft
Wet HandlingLower is better1st / 840.4 sBest in this discipline
Snow BrakingLower is better1st / 837 ftBest in this discipline
Snow TractionLower is better2nd / 84.39 s+0.05 s
Snow HandlingLower is better2nd / 883.28 s+0.24 s
Ice BrakingLower is better1st / 848 ftBest in this discipline
Ice TractionLower is better2nd / 86.39 s+0.44 s
Ice HandlingLower is better1st / 869.76 sBest in this discipline
3PMSF
Yes
2nd

Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5

205/55 R16
Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5
Ice and Snow: Best control, excellent grip on snow, good braking grip; Wet Conditions: Excellent extreme situation behavior, good driving characteristics on dry surfaces, oversteers in wet conditions..
Dry98.6%
Wet85.6%
Snow98.5%
Ice95.7%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (9)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better3rd / 8102 ft+1 ft
Wet BrakingLower is better8th / 8142 ft+35 ft
Wet HandlingLower is better5th / 842.2 s+1.80 s
Snow BrakingLower is better2nd / 838 ft+1 ft
Snow TractionLower is better3rd / 84.45 s+0.11 s
Snow HandlingLower is better1st / 883.04 sBest in this discipline
Ice BrakingLower is better2nd / 849 ft+1 ft
Ice TractionLower is better4th / 86.68 s+0.73 s
Ice HandlingLower is better2nd / 869.9 s+0.14 s
3PMSF
Yes
3rd

Michelin X Ice Snow

205/55 R16
Michelin X Ice Snow
Ice and Snow: Safe driving behavior on snow, very good steering on snow, general grip level on ice is good; Wet Conditions: Excellent extreme situation behavior, good steering on dry surfaces, understeers in wet conditions..
Dry96.4%
Wet85.9%
Snow97.8%
Ice93.1%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (9)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better6th / 8104 ft+3 ft
Wet BrakingLower is better7th / 8138 ft+31 ft
Wet HandlingLower is better7th / 842.8 s+2.40 s
Snow BrakingLower is better3rd / 838 ft+1 ft
Snow TractionLower is better4th / 84.47 s+0.13 s
Snow HandlingLower is better3rd / 884.04 s+1.00 s
Ice BrakingLower is better4th / 850 ft+2 ft
Ice TractionLower is better7th / 87.01 s+1.06 s
Ice HandlingLower is better3rd / 871.21 s+1.45 s
3PMSF
Yes
4th

Pirelli Ice Zero FR

205/55 R16
Pirelli Ice Zero FR
Ice and Snow: Best traction on snow, most oversteering among friction tires, weakest grip on ice among friction tires; Wet Conditions: Summer tire-like steering, best braking grip on dry surfaces, sharp grip limit in extreme situations..
Dry100%
Wet88.4%
Snow98.4%
Ice89.7%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (9)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better1st / 8101 ftBest in this discipline
Wet BrakingLower is better6th / 8135 ft+28 ft
Wet HandlingLower is better4th / 841.4 s+1.00 s
Snow BrakingLower is better4th / 838 ft+1 ft
Snow TractionLower is better1st / 84.34 sBest in this discipline
Snow HandlingLower is better4th / 885.19 s+2.15 s
Ice BrakingLower is better5th / 852 ft+4 ft
Ice TractionLower is better5th / 86.93 s+0.98 s
Ice HandlingLower is better4th / 877.09 s+7.33 s
3PMSF
Yes
5th

Tigar Tigar Ice

205/55 R16
Tigar Tigar Ice
Ice and Snow: Most balanced driving behavior among studded tires, weak grip on ice, mediocre grip on snow; Wet Conditions: Good braking grip in wet conditions, good drivability in wet conditions, mediocre grip on dry surfaces..
Dry97.9%
Wet97.9%
Snow90.3%
Ice86.9%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (9)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better5th / 8103 ft+2 ft
Wet BrakingLower is better2nd / 8110 ft+3 ft
Wet HandlingLower is better2nd / 840.8 s+0.40 s
Snow BrakingLower is better6th / 840 ft+3 ft
Snow TractionLower is better5th / 84.91 s+0.57 s
Snow HandlingLower is better6th / 891.69 s+8.65 s
Ice BrakingLower is better7th / 854 ft+6 ft
Ice TractionLower is better5th / 86.93 s+0.98 s
Ice HandlingLower is better6th / 882.21 s+12.45 s
3PMSF
Yes
6th

Sunfull SF W11

205/55 R16
Sunfull SF W11
Ice and Snow: Weak grip on ice, weakest grip on snow, very poor driving behavior on snow; Wet Conditions: Very good braking grip in wet conditions, good drivability in wet conditions, mediocre drivability on dry surfaces..
Dry99%
Wet99.5%
Snow85.2%
Ice88.6%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (9)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better2nd / 8102 ft+1 ft
Wet BrakingLower is better1st / 8107 ftBest in this discipline
Wet HandlingLower is better2nd / 840.8 s+0.40 s
Snow BrakingLower is better8th / 843 ft+6 ft
Snow TractionLower is better7th / 85.41 s+1.07 s
Snow HandlingLower is better8th / 893.73 s+10.69 s
Ice BrakingLower is better6th / 852 ft+4 ft
Ice TractionLower is better3rd / 86.67 s+0.72 s
Ice HandlingLower is better7th / 883.04 s+13.28 s
3PMSF
Yes
7th

Antares GRIP 60 ice

205/55 R16
Antares GRIP 60 ice
Ice and Snow: Best traction on ice, very poor driving behavior on ice, weak grip on snow; Wet Conditions: Weakest drivability on dry surfaces, worst extreme situation behavior, poor grip in wet conditions, very high tire noise..
Dry92.8%
Wet84.8%
Snow88.1%
Ice94.2%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (9)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better8th / 8108 ft+7 ft
Wet BrakingLower is better5th / 8134 ft+27 ft
Wet HandlingLower is better8th / 844.9 s+4.50 s
Snow BrakingLower is better5th / 839 ft+2 ft
Snow TractionLower is better8th / 85.44 s+1.10 s
Snow HandlingLower is better5th / 890.82 s+7.78 s
Ice BrakingLower is better3rd / 850 ft+2 ft
Ice TractionLower is better1st / 85.95 sBest in this discipline
Ice HandlingLower is better5th / 881.25 s+11.49 s
3PMSF
Yes
8th

Winrun Winter Max S1 WR60

205/55 R16
Winrun Winter Max S1 WR60
Ice and Snow: Weakest grip on ice, vague drivability, mediocre braking grip on snow; Wet Conditions: Average braking grip in wet conditions, poor extreme situation behavior, dangerous driving behavior in wet conditions..
Dry94.1%
Wet92.3%
Snow88.2%
Ice80.8%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (9)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better7th / 8107 ft+6 ft
Wet BrakingLower is better3rd / 8119 ft+12 ft
Wet HandlingLower is better6th / 842.7 s+2.30 s
Snow BrakingLower is better6th / 840 ft+3 ft
Snow TractionLower is better6th / 85.16 s+0.82 s
Snow HandlingLower is better7th / 893.33 s+10.29 s
Ice BrakingLower is better8th / 856 ft+8 ft
Ice TractionLower is better8th / 87.71 s+1.76 s
Ice HandlingLower is better8th / 889.39 s+19.63 s
3PMSF
Yes

More tire tests

Cross-check this test

All tire tests

Where these tires were tested again, and how the verdict held up.

Discussion

  1. No comments yet — be the first.
Rate your tires

My tires

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tires

Save tires from a tire page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tires. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.