The 2023 TESTIRENKAAT Snow Tire Test tested eight tires designed for extreme winters in the popular 205/55 R16 size.
This is a really interesting test as the four premium tires are studless friction tires, and the four budget tires are studded, so it gives us an interesting data point to compare the best of the new studless friction soft compound tires against the cheaper end of the studded market.
Friction Tires:
| Studded Tires:
|
Test setup & methodology
The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.
Recorded test conditions
Recorded test conditions
- Dry Braking
- 49.7 → 3.1 mph
- Wet Braking
- 49.7 → 3.1 mph
- Snow Traction
- 3.1 → 21.7 mph
- Ice Braking
- 15.5 → 3.1 mph
- Ice Traction
- 3.1 → 15.5 mph
The testers had a few surprises from the studs vs friction results. The test saw a kind of changing of the guard, as Goodyear's new tire rises to the top among Nordic friction tires. The improvement over its predecessor is significant, and the Ultra Grip Ice 3 narrowly snatched victory from the Hakkapeliitta R5. The third-place Michelin falls noticeably behind the top two.
As for the main point of the test—the battle between friction and studded tires—the differences were surprisingly large. We initially thought that even a slightly cheaper studded tire would perform better than studless ones on ice, but only Antares succeeded, and that too only in longitudinal grip tests.
On asphalt, cheaper studded tires generally perform better, which is not surprising since their rubber hardness is closer to summer than winter tires. However, summer rubber compounds won't work in winter conditions, especially if the studs are also installed too deep or in the wrong positions.
The winter driving tests revealed why some tires cost more than others. The performance of cheaper studded tires drops significantly, emphasizing that making a winter tire that works well in varying conditions is not easy. Bad winter tires might perform quite well up to the grip limit, but their behavior can change radically beyond that.
Dry and Wet
On asphalt, inexpensive studded tires hold better on average than on snow and ice, which is not surprising, because the hardness of the rubber is closer to summer tires than winter tires. Still, the cheap studded tires can have surprising and even dangerous behavior.
Dry Braking
Dry Braking
Dry braking in feet (50 - 3 mph)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 101 ft | Best | 0 mph | |
| 102 ft | +1 ft | 8 mph | |
| 102 ft | +1 ft | 10 mph | |
| 103 ft | +2 ft | 11 mph | |
| 103 ft | +2 ft | 12 mph | |
| 104 ft | +3 ft | 15 mph | |
| 107 ft | +6 ft | 19 mph | |
| 108 ft | +7 ft | 22 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 7.8% (7 ft ≈ 0.5 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Antares GRIP 60 ice would still be travelling at 22 mph when the Pirelli Ice Zero FR had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
Wet Braking
Wet Braking
Wet braking in feet (50 - 3 mph)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 107 ft | Best | 0 mph | |
| 110 ft | +3 ft | 14 mph | |
| 119 ft | +12 ft | 25 mph | |
| 126 ft | +19 ft | 31 mph | |
| 134 ft | +27 ft | 36 mph | |
| 135 ft | +28 ft | 36 mph | |
| 138 ft | +31 ft | 38 mph | |
| 142 ft | +35 ft | 40 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 32.7% (35 ft ≈ 2.4 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 would still be travelling at 40 mph when the Sunfull SF W11 had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
Wet Handling
Wet Handling
Wet handling time in seconds
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 40.4 s | Best | |
| 40.8 s | +0.40 s | |
| 40.8 s | +0.40 s | |
| 41.4 s | +1.00 s | |
| 42.2 s | +1.80 s | |
| 42.7 s | +2.30 s | |
| 42.8 s | +2.40 s | |
| 44.9 s | +4.50 s |
The difference between best and worst was 11.1% (4.5 s).
Snow
In snow, the tires are rarely divided into two groups in all tests. In all tests, the friction tires are the best tires, with the low cost studs falling behind.
Snow Braking
Snow Braking
Snow braking in feet
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 37 ft | Best | |
| 38 ft | +1 ft | |
| 38 ft | +1 ft | |
| 38 ft | +1 ft | |
| 39 ft | +2 ft | |
| 40 ft | +3 ft | |
| 40 ft | +3 ft | |
| 43 ft | +6 ft |
The difference between best and worst was 14.9% (6 ft ≈ 0.4 Car Lengths).
Snow Traction
Snow Traction
Snow acceleration time (3 - 22 mph)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 4.34 s | Best | |
| 4.39 s | +0.05 s | |
| 4.45 s | +0.11 s | |
| 4.47 s | +0.13 s | |
| 4.91 s | +0.57 s | |
| 5.16 s | +0.82 s | |
| 5.41 s | +1.07 s | |
| 5.44 s | +1.10 s |
The difference between best and worst was 25.3% (1.1 s).
Snow Handling
Snow Handling
Snow handling time in seconds
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 83.04 s | Best | |
| 83.28 s | +0.24 s | |
| 84.04 s | +1.00 s | |
| 85.19 s | +2.15 s | |
| 90.82 s | +7.78 s | |
| 91.69 s | +8.65 s | |
| 93.33 s | +10.29 s | |
| 93.73 s | +10.69 s |
The difference between best and worst was 12.9% (10.69 s).
Ice
It was noteworthy that on ice the premium friction tires beat the cheap studded tires in the handling tests. When the tires are straight, the studs bite better on slippery ice, and in the acceleration tests two studded tires fit in the top three - but only one in the braking test.
Ice Braking
Ice Braking
Ice braking in feet (16 - 3 mph)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 48 ft | Best | 0 mph | |
| 49 ft | +1 ft | 11 mph | |
| 50 ft | +2 ft | 14 mph | |
| 50 ft | +2 ft | 15 mph | |
| 52 ft | +4 ft | 22 mph | |
| 52 ft | +4 ft | 22 mph | |
| 54 ft | +6 ft | 26 mph | |
| 56 ft | +8 ft | 29 mph |
The difference between best and worst was 14.9% (8 ft ≈ 0.5 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Winrun Winter Max S1 WR60 would still be travelling at 29 mph when the Goodyear UltraGrip Ice 3 had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
Ice Traction
Ice Traction
Ice acceleration time (3 - 16 mph)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 5.95 s | Best | |
| 6.39 s | +0.44 s | |
| 6.67 s | +0.72 s | |
| 6.68 s | +0.73 s | |
| 6.93 s | +0.98 s | |
| 6.93 s | +0.98 s | |
| 7.01 s | +1.06 s | |
| 7.71 s | +1.76 s |
The difference between best and worst was 29.6% (1.76 s).
Ice Handling
Ice Handling
Ice handling time in seconds
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tire | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 69.76 s | Best | |
| 69.9 s | +0.14 s | |
| 71.21 s | +1.45 s | |
| 77.09 s | +7.33 s | |
| 81.25 s | +11.49 s | |
| 82.21 s | +12.45 s | |
| 83.04 s | +13.28 s | |
| 89.39 s | +19.63 s |
The difference between best and worst was 28.1% (19.63 s).
Results
Goodyear UltraGrip Ice 3
205/55 R16Category scores (% of best)
All discipline results (9)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 4th / 8 | 103 ft | +2 ft |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 4th / 8 | 126 ft | +19 ft |
| Wet HandlingLower is better | 1st / 8 | 40.4 s | Best in this discipline |
| Snow BrakingLower is better | 1st / 8 | 37 ft | Best in this discipline |
| Snow TractionLower is better | 2nd / 8 | 4.39 s | +0.05 s |
| Snow HandlingLower is better | 2nd / 8 | 83.28 s | +0.24 s |
| Ice BrakingLower is better | 1st / 8 | 48 ft | Best in this discipline |
| Ice TractionLower is better | 2nd / 8 | 6.39 s | +0.44 s |
| Ice HandlingLower is better | 1st / 8 | 69.76 s | Best in this discipline |
- 3PMSF
- Yes
Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5
205/55 R16Category scores (% of best)
All discipline results (9)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 3rd / 8 | 102 ft | +1 ft |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 8th / 8 | 142 ft | +35 ft |
| Wet HandlingLower is better | 5th / 8 | 42.2 s | +1.80 s |
| Snow BrakingLower is better | 2nd / 8 | 38 ft | +1 ft |
| Snow TractionLower is better | 3rd / 8 | 4.45 s | +0.11 s |
| Snow HandlingLower is better | 1st / 8 | 83.04 s | Best in this discipline |
| Ice BrakingLower is better | 2nd / 8 | 49 ft | +1 ft |
| Ice TractionLower is better | 4th / 8 | 6.68 s | +0.73 s |
| Ice HandlingLower is better | 2nd / 8 | 69.9 s | +0.14 s |
- 3PMSF
- Yes
Michelin X Ice Snow
205/55 R16Category scores (% of best)
All discipline results (9)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 6th / 8 | 104 ft | +3 ft |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 7th / 8 | 138 ft | +31 ft |
| Wet HandlingLower is better | 7th / 8 | 42.8 s | +2.40 s |
| Snow BrakingLower is better | 3rd / 8 | 38 ft | +1 ft |
| Snow TractionLower is better | 4th / 8 | 4.47 s | +0.13 s |
| Snow HandlingLower is better | 3rd / 8 | 84.04 s | +1.00 s |
| Ice BrakingLower is better | 4th / 8 | 50 ft | +2 ft |
| Ice TractionLower is better | 7th / 8 | 7.01 s | +1.06 s |
| Ice HandlingLower is better | 3rd / 8 | 71.21 s | +1.45 s |
- 3PMSF
- Yes
Pirelli Ice Zero FR
205/55 R16Category scores (% of best)
All discipline results (9)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 1st / 8 | 101 ft | Best in this discipline |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 6th / 8 | 135 ft | +28 ft |
| Wet HandlingLower is better | 4th / 8 | 41.4 s | +1.00 s |
| Snow BrakingLower is better | 4th / 8 | 38 ft | +1 ft |
| Snow TractionLower is better | 1st / 8 | 4.34 s | Best in this discipline |
| Snow HandlingLower is better | 4th / 8 | 85.19 s | +2.15 s |
| Ice BrakingLower is better | 5th / 8 | 52 ft | +4 ft |
| Ice TractionLower is better | 5th / 8 | 6.93 s | +0.98 s |
| Ice HandlingLower is better | 4th / 8 | 77.09 s | +7.33 s |
- 3PMSF
- Yes
Tigar Tigar Ice
205/55 R16Category scores (% of best)
All discipline results (9)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 5th / 8 | 103 ft | +2 ft |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 2nd / 8 | 110 ft | +3 ft |
| Wet HandlingLower is better | 2nd / 8 | 40.8 s | +0.40 s |
| Snow BrakingLower is better | 6th / 8 | 40 ft | +3 ft |
| Snow TractionLower is better | 5th / 8 | 4.91 s | +0.57 s |
| Snow HandlingLower is better | 6th / 8 | 91.69 s | +8.65 s |
| Ice BrakingLower is better | 7th / 8 | 54 ft | +6 ft |
| Ice TractionLower is better | 5th / 8 | 6.93 s | +0.98 s |
| Ice HandlingLower is better | 6th / 8 | 82.21 s | +12.45 s |
- 3PMSF
- Yes
Sunfull SF W11
205/55 R16Category scores (% of best)
All discipline results (9)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 2nd / 8 | 102 ft | +1 ft |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 1st / 8 | 107 ft | Best in this discipline |
| Wet HandlingLower is better | 2nd / 8 | 40.8 s | +0.40 s |
| Snow BrakingLower is better | 8th / 8 | 43 ft | +6 ft |
| Snow TractionLower is better | 7th / 8 | 5.41 s | +1.07 s |
| Snow HandlingLower is better | 8th / 8 | 93.73 s | +10.69 s |
| Ice BrakingLower is better | 6th / 8 | 52 ft | +4 ft |
| Ice TractionLower is better | 3rd / 8 | 6.67 s | +0.72 s |
| Ice HandlingLower is better | 7th / 8 | 83.04 s | +13.28 s |
- 3PMSF
- Yes
Antares GRIP 60 ice
205/55 R16Category scores (% of best)
All discipline results (9)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 8th / 8 | 108 ft | +7 ft |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 5th / 8 | 134 ft | +27 ft |
| Wet HandlingLower is better | 8th / 8 | 44.9 s | +4.50 s |
| Snow BrakingLower is better | 5th / 8 | 39 ft | +2 ft |
| Snow TractionLower is better | 8th / 8 | 5.44 s | +1.10 s |
| Snow HandlingLower is better | 5th / 8 | 90.82 s | +7.78 s |
| Ice BrakingLower is better | 3rd / 8 | 50 ft | +2 ft |
| Ice TractionLower is better | 1st / 8 | 5.95 s | Best in this discipline |
| Ice HandlingLower is better | 5th / 8 | 81.25 s | +11.49 s |
- 3PMSF
- Yes
Winrun Winter Max S1 WR60
205/55 R16Category scores (% of best)
All discipline results (9)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 7th / 8 | 107 ft | +6 ft |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 3rd / 8 | 119 ft | +12 ft |
| Wet HandlingLower is better | 6th / 8 | 42.7 s | +2.30 s |
| Snow BrakingLower is better | 6th / 8 | 40 ft | +3 ft |
| Snow TractionLower is better | 6th / 8 | 5.16 s | +0.82 s |
| Snow HandlingLower is better | 7th / 8 | 93.33 s | +10.29 s |
| Ice BrakingLower is better | 8th / 8 | 56 ft | +8 ft |
| Ice TractionLower is better | 8th / 8 | 7.71 s | +1.76 s |
| Ice HandlingLower is better | 8th / 8 | 89.39 s | +19.63 s |
- 3PMSF
- Yes


Discussion