Menu

2023 TUV Report All Season Test

Overall test winnerBridgestone Turanza All Season 6

For the launch of the new Bridgestone Turanza AllSeason 6, Bridgestone had the independent test body TÜV SÜD Automotive GmbH conduct a comprehensive test of the new all season tire, and compare it to the leaders in the all season category,…

Tires tested
4
Tested size
205/55 R16
Disciplines
8

At a glance

Tire shortlist

4 Tires tested

Published finishing positions, with the strengths and considerations from this test. Owner reviews cover other sizes and driving conditions.

2nd

Michelin CrossClimate 2

Tire shortlist

Compare selected tires

2023 TUV Report All Season Test · 205/55 R16

Explore the complete results →

The full test

The evidence behind the verdict

For the launch of the new Bridgestone Turanza AllSeason 6, Bridgestone had the independent test body TÜV SÜD Automotive GmbH conduct a comprehensive test of the new all season tire, and compare it to the leaders in the all season category, the Continental AllSeasonContact, Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3, and Michelin CrossClimate 2.

While this isn't a traditional magazine test, it is interesting data, and as many of you have questions about the performance of the new Turanza AllSeason 6, we believe it's worth including on the site.

Test setup & methodology

The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.

Recorded test conditions

Recorded test conditions

Snow Braking
24.9 → 3.1 mph
Snow Traction
6.2 → 21.7 mph

There are some missing tests you would usually see in a full tire test, such as dry and wet handling, but from the data we have, the new Bridgestone performs very well in the key safety tests of wet braking, dry braking and snow braking. We've applied a "normal" balanced all season score weighting to the overall results and the new Bridgestone performs best overall.

As always you can adjust the score weighting of the results here to see which tire is best for your own driving.

Wet

Wet Braking

Wet braking in feet

Lower is better ↓
Wet Braking
Position / TireResultGap to best
89 ft Best
93 ft +4 ft
95 ft +6 ft
103 ft +14 ft

The difference between best and worst was 15.4% (14 ft ≈ 0.9 Car Lengths).

Wet Circle

Lateral wet grip in m/s squared

Higher is better ↑
Wet Circle
Position / TireResultGap to best
14.9 mph Best
14.5 mph -0.4 mph
14.3 mph -0.6 mph
13.8 mph -1.1 mph

The difference between best and worst was 7.4% (1.1 mph).

Straight Aqua

Float Speed in mph

Higher is better ↑
Straight Aqua
Position / TireResultGap to best
55.2 mph Best
54.9 mph -0.3 mph
54.4 mph -0.8 mph
53.9 mph -1.3 mph

All the tires in the Straight Aqua test finished less than 3% apart.

Dry

Dry Braking

Dry braking in feet

Lower is better ↓
Dry Braking
Position / TireResultGap to best
124 ft Best
127 ft +3 ft
135 ft +11 ft
139 ft +15 ft

The difference between best and worst was 11.9% (15 ft ≈ 1 Car Lengths).

Snow

Snow Braking

Snow braking in feet (25 - 3 mph)

Lower is better ↓
Snow Braking
Position / TireResultGap to bestResidual speed
56 ft Best 0 mph
57 ft +1 ft 9 mph
57 ft +1 ft 12 mph
59 ft +3 ft 18 mph

The difference between best and worst was 5.3% (3 ft). From 80 mph, the Continental AllSeasonContact would still be travelling at 18 mph when the Michelin CrossClimate 2 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Snow Traction

Snow acceleration time (6 - 22 mph)

Lower is better ↓
Snow Traction
Position / TireResultGap to best
4.05 s Best
4.17 s +0.12 s
4.31 s +0.26 s
4.4 s +0.35 s

The difference between best and worst was 8.6% (0.35 s).

Subj. Snow Handling

Subjective Snow Handling Score

Higher is better ↑
Subj. Snow Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
7.96 Points Best
7.74 Points -0.22 Points
7.24 Points -0.72 Points
7.17 Points -0.79 Points

The difference between best and worst was 9.9% (0.79 Points).

Snow Circle

Lateral snow grip in m/s squared

Higher is better ↑
Snow Circle
Position / TireResultGap to best
11.8 ft/s² Best
11.7 ft/s² -0.1 ft/s²
11.3 ft/s² -0.5 ft/s²
11.0 ft/s² -0.8 ft/s²

The difference between best and worst was 6.4% (0.8 ft/s²).

Results

1st

Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6

205/55 R16 94V XL
Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6
The new Turanza All Season 6 performed well in all tests, with its strongest performances in wet braking (1st place) and dry braking (2nd place). It also performed well in snow, ranking 2nd in snow braking and snow traction. Its performance in the wet circle test and straight aquaplaning was slightly weaker, coming in at 2nd and 4th place respectively
Dry97.9%
Wet98.9%
Snow98.6%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (8)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better2nd / 4127 ft+3 ft
Wet BrakingLower is better1st / 489 ftBest in this discipline
Wet CircleHigher is better2nd / 414.5 mph-0.4 mph
Straight AquaHigher is better4th / 453.9 mph-1.3 mph
Snow BrakingLower is better2nd / 457 ft+1 ft
Snow TractionLower is better2nd / 44.17 s+0.12 s
Subj. Snow HandlingHigher is better2nd / 47.74 Points-0.22 Points
Snow CircleHigher is better2nd / 411.7 ft/s²-0.1 ft/s²
3PMSF
Yes
2nd

Michelin CrossClimate 2

205/55 R16 94V XL
Michelin CrossClimate 2
The CrossClimate 2 demonstrated strong performance in dry conditions, ranking 1st in dry braking. It also excelled in snow tests, achieving 1st place in snow braking, snow traction, and subjective snow handling. However, it did not perform as well in wet conditions, ranking 4th in wet braking and the wet circle test
Dry100%
Wet89.7%
Snow100%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (8)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better1st / 4124 ftBest in this discipline
Wet BrakingLower is better4th / 4103 ft+14 ft
Wet CircleHigher is better4th / 413.8 mph-1.1 mph
Straight AquaHigher is better2nd / 454.9 mph-0.3 mph
Snow BrakingLower is better1st / 456 ftBest in this discipline
Snow TractionLower is better1st / 44.05 sBest in this discipline
Subj. Snow HandlingHigher is better1st / 47.96 PointsBest in this discipline
Snow CircleHigher is better1st / 411.8 ft/s²Best in this discipline
3PMSF
Yes
3rd

Continental AllSeasonContact

205/55 R16 94V XL
Continental AllSeasonContact
The AllSeasonContact showed exceptional performance in wet conditions, achieving 1st place in the wet circle test and straight aquaplaning. It also performed well in wet braking (2nd place). However, it performed less well in dry conditions and snow, ranking 3rd in dry braking and 4th in all snow tests
Dry91.5%
Wet97.7%
Snow94.2%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (8)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better3rd / 4135 ft+11 ft
Wet BrakingLower is better2nd / 493 ft+4 ft
Wet CircleHigher is better1st / 414.9 mphBest in this discipline
Straight AquaHigher is better1st / 455.2 mphBest in this discipline
Snow BrakingLower is better4th / 459 ft+3 ft
Snow TractionLower is better4th / 44.4 s+0.35 s
Subj. Snow HandlingHigher is better3rd / 47.24 Points-0.72 Points
Snow CircleHigher is better3rd / 411.3 ft/s²-0.5 ft/s²
3PMSF
Yes
4th

Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3

205/55 R16 94V XL
Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3
The Vector 4Seasons Gen3 demonstrated a balanced performance across different conditions. It achieved 1st place in the snow circle test and performed relatively well in other tests, although it ranked 4th in dry braking and subjective snow handling
Dry89.4%
Wet95.2%
Snow95%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (8)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tires in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better4th / 4139 ft+15 ft
Wet BrakingLower is better3rd / 495 ft+6 ft
Wet CircleHigher is better3rd / 414.3 mph-0.6 mph
Straight AquaHigher is better3rd / 454.4 mph-0.8 mph
Snow BrakingLower is better3rd / 457 ft+1 ft
Snow TractionLower is better3rd / 44.31 s+0.26 s
Subj. Snow HandlingHigher is better4th / 47.17 Points-0.79 Points
Snow CircleHigher is better4th / 411.0 ft/s²-0.8 ft/s²
3PMSF
Yes

More tire tests

Cross-check this test

All tire tests

Where these tires were tested again, and how the verdict held up.

Discussion

3 comments
  1. Pedro Neves archived

    Is the "snow circle" unit in "seconds" or "meters per second squared"?
    If it's in "meters per second squared" shouldn't the graphic be upside down, meaning the Michelin in first and the Goodyear last?

    #9015
    1. TireReviews Pedro Neves archived

      You make an interesting point!

      Something has gone weird in the database, I'll check it out. Thank you

      #9016
Rate your tires

My tires

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tires

Save tires from a tire page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tires. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.