Menu

Test Charts / Auto Zeitung

2023 Auto Zeitung All Season Tire Test

Compare each discipline in the tested size. See the measured result, position and gap to the best tire, then read the verdict for the trade-offs behind the finishing order.

Tested size
215/55 R17
Tires tested
9
Disciplines
13

Read the measurements, not just the rank

Lower is better for braking distances and lap times; higher is better for subjective scores and aquaplaning speed. Bars start at zero. Read the gap alongside the position: adjacent tires can be separated by very different margins.

Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tires does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.

Dry

2

Dry Braking

Dry braking in feet (62 - 0 mph)

Lower is better ↓
Dry Braking
Position / TireResultGap to bestResidual speed
118 ft Best 0 mph
120 ft +2 ft 11 mph
122 ft +4 ft 14 mph
123 ft +5 ft 16 mph
124 ft +6 ft 18 mph
126 ft +8 ft 20 mph
129 ft +11 ft 24 mph
130 ft +12 ft 24 mph
137 ft +19 ft 30 mph

The difference between best and worst was 16.1% (19 ft ≈ 1.3 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Uniroyal AllSeasonExpert 2 would still be travelling at 30 mph when the Michelin CrossClimate 2 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Dry Handling

Dry handling time in seconds

Lower is better ↓
Dry Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
83.5 s Best
83.6 s +0.10 s
84 s +0.50 s
84.2 s +0.70 s
84.3 s +0.80 s
84.3 s +0.80 s
84.5 s +1.00 s
85.3 s +1.80 s
85.5 s +2.00 s

All the tires in the Dry Handling test finished less than 3% apart.

Wet

4

Wet Braking

Wet braking in feet (62 - 0 mph)

Lower is better ↓
Wet Braking
Position / TireResultGap to bestResidual speed
134 ft Best 0 mph
141 ft +7 ft 18 mph
143 ft +9 ft 20 mph
143 ft +9 ft 20 mph
143 ft +9 ft 20 mph
143 ft +9 ft 21 mph
144 ft +10 ft 22 mph
151 ft +17 ft 27 mph
161 ft +27 ft 33 mph

The difference between best and worst was 20.1% (27 ft ≈ 1.8 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Nexen N Blue 4Season 2 would still be travelling at 33 mph when the Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF2 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Wet Handling

Wet handling time in seconds

Lower is better ↓
Wet Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
94.4 s Best
98.5 s +4.10 s
98.6 s +4.20 s
99.9 s +5.50 s
100.8 s +6.40 s
101.6 s +7.20 s
101.8 s +7.40 s
102.5 s +8.10 s
102.8 s +8.40 s

The difference between best and worst was 8.9% (8.4 s).

Wet Circle

Wet Circle Lap Time in seconds

Lower is better ↓
Wet Circle
Position / TireResultGap to best
15.6 s Best
15.6 s Best
15.6 s Best
16 s +0.40 s
16 s +0.40 s
16.2 s +0.60 s
16.3 s +0.70 s
16.4 s +0.80 s
16.4 s +0.80 s

The difference between best and worst was 5.1% (0.8 s).

Straight Aqua

Float Speed in mph

Higher is better ↑
Straight Aqua
Position / TireResultGap to best
52.3 mph Best
50.8 mph -1.5 mph
50.8 mph -1.5 mph
50.4 mph -1.9 mph
49.7 mph -2.6 mph
48.1 mph -4.2 mph
47.8 mph -4.5 mph
46.2 mph -6.1 mph
46.1 mph -6.2 mph

The difference between best and worst was 11.9% (6.2 mph).

Snow

4

Snow Braking

Snow braking in feet (31 - 0 mph)

Lower is better ↓
Snow Braking
Position / TireResultGap to bestResidual speed
82 ft Best 0 mph
82 ft 0 ft 7 mph
83 ft +1 ft 9 mph
83 ft +1 ft 10 mph
84 ft +2 ft 12 mph
84 ft +2 ft 12 mph
84 ft +2 ft 13 mph
84 ft +2 ft 14 mph
87 ft +5 ft 20 mph

The difference between best and worst was 6.4% (5 ft ≈ 0.4 Car Lengths). From 80 mph, the Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF2 would still be travelling at 20 mph when the Kleber Quadraxer 3 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Snow Traction

Pulling Force in pounds-force

Higher is better ↑
Snow Traction
Position / TireResultGap to best
613 lbf Best
604 lbf -9 lbf
599 lbf -14 lbf
593 lbf -20 lbf
576 lbf -37 lbf
575 lbf -38 lbf
565 lbf -48 lbf
560 lbf -53 lbf
549 lbf -64 lbf

The difference between best and worst was 10.5% (64 lbf).

Snow Handling

Snow handling time in seconds

Lower is better ↓
Snow Handling
Position / TireResultGap to best
51.5 s Best
51.8 s +0.30 s
53.3 s +1.80 s
53.5 s +2.00 s
54.4 s +2.90 s
55.3 s +3.80 s
56.5 s +5.00 s
56.9 s +5.40 s
57 s +5.50 s

The difference between best and worst was 10.7% (5.5 s).

Snow Slalom

Lateral acceleration

Higher is better ↑
Snow Slalom
Position / TireResultGap to best
13.1 ft/s² Best
13.1 ft/s² 0.0 ft/s²
12.2 ft/s² -0.9 ft/s²
12.2 ft/s² -0.9 ft/s²
12.1 ft/s² -1.0 ft/s²
12.0 ft/s² -1.1 ft/s²
12.0 ft/s² -1.1 ft/s²
11.9 ft/s² -1.2 ft/s²
11.5 ft/s² -1.6 ft/s²

The difference between best and worst was 12% (1.6 ft/s²).

Comfort

2

Subj. Comfort

Subjective Comfort Score

Higher is better ↑
Subj. Comfort
Position / TireResultGap to best
12 Points Best
11 Points -1.00 Points
10 Points -2.00 Points
9 Points -3.00 Points
9 Points -3.00 Points
8 Points -4.00 Points
7 Points -5.00 Points
7 Points -5.00 Points
6 Points -6.00 Points

The difference between best and worst was 50% (6 Points).

Noise

External noise in dB

Lower is better ↓
Noise
Position / TireResultGap to best
64 dB Best
65 dB +1.00 dB
66 dB +2.00 dB
67 dB +3.00 dB
67 dB +3.00 dB
68 dB +4.00 dB
68 dB +4.00 dB
69 dB +5.00 dB
69 dB +5.00 dB

The difference between best and worst was 7.8% (5 dB).

Value

1

Rolling Resistance

Rolling resistance in kg t

Lower is better ↓
Rolling Resistance
Position / TireResultGap to bestExtra fuel / year
6.73 kg/t Best $0
7 kg/t +0.27 kg/t $12
7.14 kg/t +0.41 kg/t $18
7.4 kg/t +0.67 kg/t $29
7.52 kg/t +0.79 kg/t $34
7.8 kg/t +1.07 kg/t $47
8 kg/t +1.27 kg/t $55
8.02 kg/t +1.29 kg/t $56
8.75 kg/t +2.02 kg/t $88

The difference between best and worst was 30% (2.02 kg / t). Over 12,000 miles a year at $3.60/gal, the Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF2 uses about 25 gal ($88) more fuel than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.

Adjust the assumptions

Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions. These calculators use the full test field, independently of your tire selection above.

12,000 mi
$3.60/gal
Estimates based on typical driving conditions. Rolling resistance accounts for approximately 20% of IC vehicle fuel consumption and 25% of EV energy consumption. Actual savings vary based on driving style, vehicle weight, road conditions, and tire age. For comparative purposes only. Lifetime savings based on a 40,000km / 25,000 mile tread life.

Test setup & methodology

The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.

Recorded test conditions

Recorded test conditions

Dry Braking
62.1 → 0.0 mph
Wet Braking
62.1 → 0.0 mph
Snow Braking
31.1 → 0.0 mph

More tire tests

Cross-check this test

All tire tests

Where these tires were tested again, and how the verdict held up.

Rate your tires

My tires

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tires

Save tires from a tire page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tires. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.