Continental PremiumContact 7 vs Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
Expect a decisive split in priorities. The Continental repeatedly delivers class-leading stopping distances and confident handling-especially in the wet-while the Goodyear answers with quieter running, lower rolling resistance, and markedly longer tread life at a lower price. The data shows where each tire shines, and where compromises appear.
Test Results
Independent comparison tire tests are the best source of data to get tire information from, and the good news is there have been six tests which compare both tires directly!
| Tire | Test Wins | Performance |
|---|---|---|
| Continental PremiumContact 7 | six |
While it might look like the Continental PremiumContact 7 is better than the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 purely based on the higher number of test wins, tires are very complicated objects which means where one tire is better than the other can be more important in real world use.
Let's look at how the two tires compare across multiple tire test categories.
Key Strengths
- Class-leading wet and dry braking across all shared tests
- Superior handling precision and feedback in dry and wet
- Consistently faster wet circle/handling performance
- Competitive efficiency with generally good rolling resistance for its grip level
- Outstanding tread life and low abrasion (often class-leading)
- Lower rolling resistance and fuel consumption
- Quieter and more comfortable ride
- Strong value proposition with lower price per 1,000 km
Dry Braking
Looking at data from six tire tests, the Continental PremiumContact 7 was better during six dry braking tests. On average the Continental PremiumContact 7 stopped the vehicle in 4.06% less distance than the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2.
Best In Dry Braking: Continental PremiumContact 7
See how the Dry Braking winner was calculated >>
Dry Handling [s]
Looking at data from two tire tests, the Continental PremiumContact 7 was better during two dry handling [s] tests. On average the Continental PremiumContact 7 was 0.58% faster around a lap than the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2.
Best In Dry Handling [s]: Continental PremiumContact 7
See how the Dry Handling winner was calculated >>
Dry Handling [Km/H]
Looking at data from two tire tests, the Continental PremiumContact 7 was better during two dry handling [km/h] tests. On average the Continental PremiumContact 7 was 0.56% faster around a lap than the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2.
Best In Dry Handling [Km/H]: Continental PremiumContact 7
See how the Dry Handling winner was calculated >>
Subj. Dry Handling
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Continental PremiumContact 7 was better during one subj. dry handling tests. On average the Continental PremiumContact 7 scored 10% more points than the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2.
Best In Subj. Dry Handling: Continental PremiumContact 7
See how the Subj. Dry Handling winner was calculated >>
Wet Braking
Looking at data from six tire tests, the Continental PremiumContact 7 was better during six wet braking tests. On average the Continental PremiumContact 7 stopped the vehicle in 11.31% less distance than the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2.
Best In Wet Braking: Continental PremiumContact 7
See how the Wet Braking winner was calculated >>
Wet Braking - Concrete
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Continental PremiumContact 7 was better during one wet braking - concrete tests. On average the Continental PremiumContact 7 stopped the vehicle in 16.45% less distance than the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2.
Best In Wet Braking - Concrete: Continental PremiumContact 7
See how the Wet Braking - Concrete winner was calculated >>
Wet Handling [s]
Looking at data from two tire tests, the Continental PremiumContact 7 was better during one wet handling [s] tests. On average the Continental PremiumContact 7 was 0.51% faster around a wet lap than the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2.
Best In Wet Handling [s]: Continental PremiumContact 7
See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>
Wet Handling [Km/H]
Looking at data from two tire tests, the Continental PremiumContact 7 was better during two wet handling [km/h] tests. On average the Continental PremiumContact 7 was 1.39% faster around a wet lap than the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2.
Best In Wet Handling [Km/H]: Continental PremiumContact 7
See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>
Subj. Wet Handling
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Continental PremiumContact 7 was better during one subj. wet handling tests. On average the Continental PremiumContact 7 scored 5% more points than the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2.
Best In Subj. Wet Handling: Continental PremiumContact 7
See how the Subj. Wet Handling winner was calculated >>
Wet Circle
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Continental PremiumContact 7 was better during one wet circle tests. On average the Continental PremiumContact 7 had 9.34% higher lateral wet grip than the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2.
Best In Wet Circle: Continental PremiumContact 7
See how the Wet Circle winner was calculated >>
Straight Aqua
Looking at data from five tire tests, the Continental PremiumContact 7 was better during two straight aqua tests. On average the Continental PremiumContact 7 floated at a 0.72% higher speed than the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2.
Best In Straight Aqua: Continental PremiumContact 7
See how the Straight Aqua winner was calculated >>
Curved Aquaplaning
Looking at data from four tire tests, the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 was better during three curved aquaplaning tests. On average the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 slipped out at a 4.49% higher speed than the Continental PremiumContact 7.
Best In Curved Aquaplaning: Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
See how the Curved Aquaplaning winner was calculated >>
Subj. Comfort
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 was better during one subj. comfort tests. On average the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 scored 3.16% more points than the Continental PremiumContact 7.
Best In Subj. Comfort: Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
See how the Subj. Comfort winner was calculated >>
Noise
Looking at data from five tire tests, the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 was better during five noise tests. On average the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 measured 1.35% quieter than the Continental PremiumContact 7.
Best In Noise: Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
See how the Noise winner was calculated >>
Wear
Looking at data from two tire tests, the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 was better during two wear tests. On average the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 is predicted to cover 20.17% miles before reaching 1.6mm than the Continental PremiumContact 7.
Best In Wear: Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
See how the Wear winner was calculated >>
Value
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 was better during one value tests. On average the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 proved to have a 35.49% better value based on price/1000km than the Continental PremiumContact 7.
Best In Value: Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
See how the Value winner was calculated >>
Price
Looking at data from four tire tests, the Continental PremiumContact 7 was better during one price tests. On average the Continental PremiumContact 7 cost 0.42% less than the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2.
Best In Price: Continental PremiumContact 7
See how the Price winner was calculated >>
Rolling Resistance
Looking at data from four tire tests, the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 was better during three rolling resistance tests. On average the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 had a 3.5% lower rolling resistance than the Continental PremiumContact 7.
Best In Rolling Resistance: Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
See how the Rolling Resistance winner was calculated >>
Fuel Consumption
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 was better during one fuel consumption tests. On average the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 used 1.69% less fuel than the Continental PremiumContact 7.
Best In Fuel Consumption: Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
See how the Fuel Consumption winner was calculated >>
Abrasion
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 was better during one abrasion tests. On average the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 emitted 13.64% less particle wear matter than the Continental PremiumContact 7.
Best In Abrasion: Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2
See how the Abrasion winner was calculated >>
Real World Driver Reviews
Continental PremiumContact 7 Driver Reviews
Drivers of the Continental PremiumContact 7 overwhelmingly praise its outstanding wet and dry grip, strong braking, and confidence-inspiring handling, often noting clear improvements over the PC6. Many also report solid comfort and better aquaplaning resistance, though experiences vary by car. The most frequent drawbacks are higher road noise on coarse asphalt and, for a subset of users, faster tread wear; a few enthusiasts note soft sidewalls that reduce steering precision. Overall sentiment is strongly positive given the high number of top-scoring reviews.
Based on 48 reviews with an average rating of 83%
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 Driver Reviews
Across 99 reviews, the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 is most often described as a premium touring tire that delivers standout longevity, strong all-round grip (especially in the wet for many drivers), and a noticeably quieter, more comfortable ride than many previous tires. Drivers frequently report excellent tread life (often 40k-60k+ miles or more with significant tread remaining) along with low rolling resistance and improved fuel economy. Minority complaints focus on a soft sidewall feel that can make steering less precise (especially for sporty driving) and a subset of users reporting pronounced noise/humming developing or worsening over time; wet braking/wet traction is also viewed as weaker by some compared with sportier rivals.
Based on 111 reviews with an average rating of 85%
Conclusion
If you drive high annual mileage, value comfort and efficiency, or want stronger value over the ownership cycle, the Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 makes a compelling case. It's quieter, rolls easier, and routinely posts 14-47% higher projected mileage with better abrasion results and lower fuel consumption. For calm driving and budget-conscious buyers, it's a smart, well-balanced choice. Bottom line: Continental for maximum safety and performance; Goodyear for long-haul value and refinement.
Key Differences
- Braking: Continental stops shorter in both dry and wet in every test (wet gaps ~8-14%).
- Handling: Continental edges dry and subjective handling; Goodyear occasionally matches in wet lap time but trails overall.
- Aquaplaning: Goodyear often better in curved/straight aquaplaning; Continental sometimes average here.
- Noise/Comfort: Goodyear is consistently quieter and rated more comfortable.
- Efficiency: Goodyear shows lower rolling resistance and fuel consumption.
- Longevity/Cost: Goodyear delivers markedly higher mileage and better value per 1,000 km; Continental carries a higher purchase price.
Overall Winner: Continental PremiumContact 7
Based on the tire test data and user reviews we have in our database, the Continental PremiumContact 7 has demonstrated better overall performance in this comparison. However, as you can see from the spider diagram above, each tire has its own strengths which should be considered in your final tire buying choice.Similar Comparisons
Looking for more tire comparisons? Here are other direct comparisons involving these tires:
Footnote
This page has been developed using tire industry testing best practices. This means we are only comparing tests which have had both tires in the same test.
Why is this important? Tire testing is heavily affected by things like surface grip levels and surface temperature, which means you can only compare values from the same day. During a tire test external condition changes are calculated into the overall results, but it is not possible to calculate this between tire tests performed on different days or at different locations.
As a result you will see other tests on Tire Reviews which feature both the %s and %s, but as they weren't conducted on the same day, the results are not comparable.
Lots of other websites do this sort of tire comparison, Tire Reviews doesn't.