Falken Azenis FK520 vs Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
In this article we will be looking at independent tire test data, and real world driver reviews of the Falken Azenis FK520 and the Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 to find out which tire is best for your own driving.
There are a few basic differences between the two tires. The Falken Azenis FK520 is an Max-Performance Summer tire designed to be fitted to Passenger-Cars, and the Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 is an Ultra-High-Performance Summer tire designed to be fitted to Passenger-Cars
Test Results
Independent comparison tire tests are the best source of data to get tire information from, and the good news is there have been eight tests which compare both tires directly!
| Tire | Test Wins | Performance |
|---|---|---|
| Falken Azenis FK520 | six | |
| Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 | two |
While it might look like the Falken Azenis FK520 is better than the Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 purely based on the higher number of test wins, tires are very complicated objects which means where one tire is better than the other can be more important in real world use.
Let's look at how the two tires compare across multiple tire test categories.
Dry Braking
Looking at data from seven tire tests, the Falken Azenis FK520 was better during four dry braking tests. On average the Falken Azenis FK520 stopped the vehicle in 0.38% less distance than the Nexen N Fera Sport SU2.
Best In Dry Braking: Falken Azenis FK520
See how the Dry Braking winner was calculated >>
Dry Handling [s]
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Falken Azenis FK520 was better during one dry handling [s] tests. On average the Falken Azenis FK520 was 1.58% faster around a lap than the Nexen N Fera Sport SU2.
Best In Dry Handling [s]: Falken Azenis FK520
See how the Dry Handling winner was calculated >>
Dry Handling [Km/H]
Looking at data from three tire tests, the Falken Azenis FK520 was better during two dry handling [km/h] tests. On average the Falken Azenis FK520 was 0.97% faster around a lap than the Nexen N Fera Sport SU2.
Best In Dry Handling [Km/H]: Falken Azenis FK520
See how the Dry Handling winner was calculated >>
Subj. Dry Handling
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 was better during one subj. dry handling tests. On average the Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 scored 20.9% more points than the Falken Azenis FK520.
Best In Subj. Dry Handling: Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
See how the Subj. Dry Handling winner was calculated >>
Wet Braking
Looking at data from seven tire tests, the Falken Azenis FK520 was better during five wet braking tests. On average the Falken Azenis FK520 stopped the vehicle in 1.26% less distance than the Nexen N Fera Sport SU2.
Best In Wet Braking: Falken Azenis FK520
See how the Wet Braking winner was calculated >>
Wet Braking - Concrete
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Falken Azenis FK520 was better during one wet braking - concrete tests. On average the Falken Azenis FK520 stopped the vehicle in 2.08% less distance than the Nexen N Fera Sport SU2.
Best In Wet Braking - Concrete: Falken Azenis FK520
See how the Wet Braking - Concrete winner was calculated >>
Wet Handling [s]
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Falken Azenis FK520 was better during one wet handling [s] tests. On average the Falken Azenis FK520 was 0.43% faster around a wet lap than the Nexen N Fera Sport SU2.
Best In Wet Handling [s]: Falken Azenis FK520
See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>
Wet Handling [Km/H]
Looking at data from three tire tests, the Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 was better during three wet handling [km/h] tests. On average the Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 was 0.63% faster around a wet lap than the Falken Azenis FK520.
Best In Wet Handling [Km/H]: Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>
Subj. Wet Handling
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Falken Azenis FK520 and Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 performed equally well in subj. wet handling tests.
Best In Subj. Wet Handling: Both tires performed equally well
See how the Subj. Wet Handling winner was calculated >>
Wet Circle
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Falken Azenis FK520 was better during one wet circle tests. On average the Falken Azenis FK520 had 0.24% higher lateral wet grip than the Nexen N Fera Sport SU2.
Best In Wet Circle: Falken Azenis FK520
See how the Wet Circle winner was calculated >>
Straight Aqua
Looking at data from five tire tests, the Falken Azenis FK520 was better during three straight aqua tests. On average the Falken Azenis FK520 floated at a 0.02% higher speed than the Nexen N Fera Sport SU2.
Best In Straight Aqua: Falken Azenis FK520
See how the Straight Aqua winner was calculated >>
Curved Aquaplaning
Looking at data from four tire tests, the Falken Azenis FK520 was better during two curved aquaplaning tests. On average the Falken Azenis FK520 slipped out at a 2.16% higher speed than the Nexen N Fera Sport SU2.
Best In Curved Aquaplaning: Falken Azenis FK520
See how the Curved Aquaplaning winner was calculated >>
Subj. Comfort
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Falken Azenis FK520 and Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 performed equally well in subj. comfort tests.
Best In Subj. Comfort: Both tires performed equally well
See how the Subj. Comfort winner was calculated >>
Noise
Looking at data from five tire tests, the Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 was better during five noise tests. On average the Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 measured 1.29% quieter than the Falken Azenis FK520.
Best In Noise: Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
See how the Noise winner was calculated >>
Wear
Looking at data from three tire tests, the Falken Azenis FK520 was better during three wear tests. On average the Falken Azenis FK520 is predicted to cover 12.31% miles before reaching 1.6mm than the Nexen N Fera Sport SU2.
Best In Wear: Falken Azenis FK520
See how the Wear winner was calculated >>
Value
Looking at data from three tire tests, the Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 was better during two value tests. On average the Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 proved to have a 1.6% better value based on price/1000km than the Falken Azenis FK520.
Best In Value: Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
See how the Value winner was calculated >>
Price
Looking at data from three tire tests, the Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 was better during three price tests. On average the Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 cost 11.82% less than the Falken Azenis FK520.
Best In Price: Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
See how the Price winner was calculated >>
Rolling Resistance
Looking at data from four tire tests, the Falken Azenis FK520 was better during four rolling resistance tests. On average the Falken Azenis FK520 had a 3.47% lower rolling resistance than the Nexen N Fera Sport SU2.
Best In Rolling Resistance: Falken Azenis FK520
See how the Rolling Resistance winner was calculated >>
Fuel Consumption
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Falken Azenis FK520 and Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 performed equally well in fuel consumption tests.
Best In Fuel Consumption: Both tires performed equally well
See how the Fuel Consumption winner was calculated >>
Abrasion
Looking at data from one tire tests, the Falken Azenis FK520 was better during one abrasion tests. On average the Falken Azenis FK520 lost 24.08% less particle wear matter than the Nexen N Fera Sport SU2.
Best In Abrasion: Falken Azenis FK520
See how the Abrasion winner was calculated >>
Real World Driver Reviews
Falken Azenis FK520 Driver Reviews
Drivers report the Falken Azenis FK520 delivers excellent dry grip, very strong wet braking/traction, and predictable, progressive handling, while remaining comfortable and relatively quiet. Value for money is a standout, with several users comparing its performance favorably to premium brands, and wear generally viewed as good for a UHP tire. A minority note that steering precision/feedback isn't as sharp as top-tier UUHP options, and it's not the best choice for track days or prolonged hard driving due to some heat fade. Overall sentiment is strongly positive given the performance-to-price ratio.
Based on 38 reviews with an average rating of 83%
Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 Driver Reviews
For the Nexen N Fera Sport SU2, most high-scoring reviews praise strong dry and wet grip, predictable handling, acceptable comfort for some, and excellent value. However, a significant portion of mid/low-scoring reviews report fast shoulder wear, durability/quality issues, and higher noise/harshness, especially over time. Overall sentiment is mixed but leans slightly positive due to several very high-rated performance-focused reviews, while longevity and refinement remain common concerns.
Based on 17 reviews with an average rating of 70%
Conclusion
In conclusion the Falken Azenis FK520 performed better in dry braking, dry handling [s], dry handling [km/h], wet braking, wet braking - concrete, wet handling [s], wet circle, straight aqua, curved aquaplaning, wear, rolling resistance and abrasion, while the Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 performed better in subj. dry handling, wet handling [km/h], noise, value and price.
Interestingly, both tires performed equally well in dry handling, wet handling, subj. wet handling, subj. comfort and fuel consumption, showing that they are closely matched in these areas.
Which tire is best for you depends a lot on your driving style and situation, plus what you want from the tire. Comparing all the data in the tire reviews database, on balance Falken Azenis FK520 seems to be the best tire overall.
However, it's important to note that both tires have their strengths.
Remember, the best tire for you might depend on which of these factors are most important for your specific driving needs and conditions.
Overall Winner: Falken Azenis FK520
Based on the tire test data and user reviews we have in our database, the Falken Azenis FK520 has demonstrated better overall performance in this comparison. However, as you can see from the spider diagram above, each tire has its own strengths which should be considered in your final tire buying choice.Similar Comparisons
Looking for more tire comparisons? Here are other direct comparisons involving these tires:
Falken Azenis FK520 Top Comparisons
No other comparisons available for this tire.
Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 Top Comparisons
No other comparisons available for this tire.
Footnote
This page has been developed using tire industry testing best practices. This means we are only comparing tests which have had both tires in the same test.
Why is this important? Tire testing is heavily affected by things like surface grip levels and surface temperature, which means you can only compare values from the same day. During a tire test external condition changes are calculated into the overall results, but it is not possible to calculate this between tire tests performed on different days or at different locations.
As a result you will see other tests on Tire Reviews which feature both the %s and %s, but as they weren't conducted on the same day, the results are not comparable.
Lots of other websites do this sort of tire comparison, Tire Reviews doesn't.