Uniroyal RainSport 3 Reviews - Page 14
Given 86%
while driving a
Mazda NB MK2.5 Phoenix 150bhp
(225/45 R17)
on mostly country roads
for 4,000 spirited miles
The Rainsport 3's are without a shadow of a doubt, one of the best tires for the wet. They're incredibly grippy and having a set on my Mk2.5 MX5 Phoenix - I've thrown that car around some pretty tight corners at speeds which should have seen me in a ditch... but honestly, these tires are just ridiculous. Granted, they don't last long... I've had a set on since May, done about 4000 miles on them, they're half worn at least already... but, if you drive like me - especially in the wet, and you have an RWD tail-happy car, these bad boys will keep you firmly on the road.
Given 84%
while driving a
Fiat Bravo
(225/45 R17 W)
on mostly country roads
for 5,000 spirited miles
Great tires in dry and wet, but they are worn out pretty soon. Don't expect to do more than 15,000 miles with a set on the wheels with traction.
Check out how the BEST all seasons tires perform against premium summer and winter tires!
Given 86%
while driving a
Peugeot 207 SW Outdoor
(205/55 R16)
on mostly country roads
for 12,000 easy going miles
First time with the Uniroyal Brand Well impressive wet & dry grip seem the same. Bit niosy on rough country roads.
Pulled 600kg load of logs out of a field with mud up to the calipers.
Should be good for 25k miles which is a surprise for a 'sticky tire.
Pulled 600kg load of logs out of a field with mud up to the calipers.
Should be good for 25k miles which is a surprise for a 'sticky tire.
Given 94%
while driving a
Ford mondeo 2.2
(225/45 R17)
on mostly motorways
for 0 average miles
Had these fitted to my ford Mondeo ST tdci(not so stock)for over a year and have not had a problem with these tires
I can stop as good in the wet as i can in the dry noise & comfort all good
Would definitely buy again
Also got them fitted to my sons ford fiesta
I can stop as good in the wet as i can in the dry noise & comfort all good
Would definitely buy again
Also got them fitted to my sons ford fiesta
Given 61%
while driving a
Ford Mondeo Titanium 2.0 TCDI
(235/40 R18 V)
on a combination of roads
for 3,000 average miles
Rubbish on front of 08 2.0 tdci
Given 79%
while driving a
Hyundai Coupe 2.0L
(225/45 R17)
on a combination of roads
for 10,000 spirited miles
hi ive had these on my hyundai coupe 2.0 in 205/55/r16 and they have decent grip in dry and wet weather, however one massive down point is how soft the sidewalls are. i can actually feel the tire deforming when turning quickly and it feels like the back end is swinging but the tires dont lose grip when i do through it around.
Given 60%
while driving a
Volvo V70 D3
(225/50 R17 W)
on a combination of roads
for 10,800 easy going miles
Having driven on Rainsport 2s for a couple of years I was rather impressed by them and assumed that the Rainsport 3s would be an improvement. But what a disappointment. Overall they were as good, in wet and dry breaking, as the tires they replaced. However I found they had a negative effect on fuel consumption, and were much noisier.
However, the biggest failing of these tires, is their rate of wear. I am not a fast driver and seldom do I exceed the speed limit. I don't drive aggressively and I don't even turn the steering wheel while the car is stationary.
My car went for its service today and to my absolute astonishment, my garage suggested I might consider replacing my front tires as there was only 2mm of tread thereon. I bought these tires 12 months ago and have driven only 10,800 miles on them. So, bye bye Rainsport 3s.
Will I buy them again? NO WAY!
However, the biggest failing of these tires, is their rate of wear. I am not a fast driver and seldom do I exceed the speed limit. I don't drive aggressively and I don't even turn the steering wheel while the car is stationary.
My car went for its service today and to my absolute astonishment, my garage suggested I might consider replacing my front tires as there was only 2mm of tread thereon. I bought these tires 12 months ago and have driven only 10,800 miles on them. So, bye bye Rainsport 3s.
Will I buy them again? NO WAY!
Given 73%
while driving a
Mitsubishi Lancer 1.8 4 Door (2008)
(215/45 R18)
on mostly town
for 5,000 average miles
These are great tires for the wet and not bad atall in the dry. I have them on all four corners and are soley used for my 'winter' wheels due to more rainy days than snow. The wear as mentioned before could be better. I do push my car at roundabouts and fidn these tires dont like changing direction quickly. That is due ot the soft walls. I decided I didnt want these on my 'sport' alloys for summer as the handling is too soft and make the body roll and sway even with a sorted chassis. Very quiet though and compfy. I wouldnt buy them again as their not fit for my purpose but all in a very good tire. Just not for a sporty feel.
Given 69%
while driving a
Mitsubishi Lancer 1.8 (Modified)
(215/45 R18 W)
on mostly country roads
for 4,500 spirited miles
Overall these were very surprising tires. Were much cheaper than the alternatives, yet provide the obvious very good wet grip but also good grip in the dry, as well as good feedback and a very quiet, comfortable ride. However, when pushed to the edge the boundary between grip and the loss of it is quite abrupt - there isn't really a gradual change as grip is lost.
The one big problem with these tires however is lifespan. While I admit that I'm not the kindest to my tires, I wasn't expecting the fronts to be down to 2.5-3mm after just 4500 miles, in a car only putting 143hp through the fronts. The rears are fairing better, with around 4.5-5mm left. The edges also wear much quicker, as the slightly squashy sidewalls mean you often end up rolling onto parts of the tire not designed for use in high speed corners.
The one big problem with these tires however is lifespan. While I admit that I'm not the kindest to my tires, I wasn't expecting the fronts to be down to 2.5-3mm after just 4500 miles, in a car only putting 143hp through the fronts. The rears are fairing better, with around 4.5-5mm left. The edges also wear much quicker, as the slightly squashy sidewalls mean you often end up rolling onto parts of the tire not designed for use in high speed corners.
Given 90%
while driving a
Fiat Bravo
(225/45 R17)
on a combination of roads
for 3,100 spirited miles
Great sport tires for dry and wet.Holding great in cornering.Had rainsport 2 before them.RS3 even better.I would buy them again.
Given 81%
while driving a
BMW 330i M SPORT SALOON
(225/45 R17)
on mostly country roads
for 6,000 spirited miles
Grip in the dry is very good, enough grip to really push the car hard, but also loose enough so as to feel loose enough to have fun (ie easily get the back end out) this is perfect for me but some of my track day grip junkie friends don't like this.
Wet grip is just outstanding, standing water is no drama, only thing that catches it out is grease but that's just a given.
Road feedback is ok but these are a soft tire, so where you do feel some tire roll and squash in hard dry corners this is made up for in comfort. IMO it's an acceptable compromise on a road car in the UK.
The way these tires reach their limit and pass it brilliant and so predictable, very confidence inspiring, and also a poor influence on you tempted you to kick that back end out more and more!
Wear is what lets these tires down sadly, fronts are fine plenty of life, but the tears have worn out after 6000 miles. These were hard miles with lots of launches and skids, but other tires with similar treatment have faired much better, for the price however I am still very satisfied and don't feel out of pocket in the slightest.
As mentioned before comfort is brilliant soaking up bumps with ease, and as a side note absorbed a rather strong impact with a curb after some SnapBack on a greasy corner slide (driver error) with no bulging or tears and protected the wheel well.
I would definitely buy again, admittedly not for my next tires alas I want to try something new purely for curiosity!!! Fitted to an e46 330i on ac schnitzer racing suspension in 225/45r17 front 245/40r17 rear on 8.5j wheels with et43 offset.
Wet grip is just outstanding, standing water is no drama, only thing that catches it out is grease but that's just a given.
Road feedback is ok but these are a soft tire, so where you do feel some tire roll and squash in hard dry corners this is made up for in comfort. IMO it's an acceptable compromise on a road car in the UK.
The way these tires reach their limit and pass it brilliant and so predictable, very confidence inspiring, and also a poor influence on you tempted you to kick that back end out more and more!
Wear is what lets these tires down sadly, fronts are fine plenty of life, but the tears have worn out after 6000 miles. These were hard miles with lots of launches and skids, but other tires with similar treatment have faired much better, for the price however I am still very satisfied and don't feel out of pocket in the slightest.
As mentioned before comfort is brilliant soaking up bumps with ease, and as a side note absorbed a rather strong impact with a curb after some SnapBack on a greasy corner slide (driver error) with no bulging or tears and protected the wheel well.
I would definitely buy again, admittedly not for my next tires alas I want to try something new purely for curiosity!!! Fitted to an e46 330i on ac schnitzer racing suspension in 225/45r17 front 245/40r17 rear on 8.5j wheels with et43 offset.
Given 77%
while driving a
Alfa Romeo (225/40 R18 W)
on a combination of roads
for 3,000 average miles
Soft compound and soft side walls makes this RS3 ok in dry and a razorblade in wet conditions. Comfortable, absorbs really well roads imperfections. Noise is low.
Despite his name "Sport" doesn't have much of sportiveness on the dry, because the side walls are soft, this makes the car understeer easily, compared with previous Falken Azenis 453, but in a really predictable way.
Really good traction.
On the wet is a monster, impressive traction and handling.
Only did 3k miles, wear seems ok. Noticed 1mm/2.5k miles wear on the FWD
The side rim protection is a joke.
Really good price/performance.
Despite his name "Sport" doesn't have much of sportiveness on the dry, because the side walls are soft, this makes the car understeer easily, compared with previous Falken Azenis 453, but in a really predictable way.
Really good traction.
On the wet is a monster, impressive traction and handling.
Only did 3k miles, wear seems ok. Noticed 1mm/2.5k miles wear on the FWD
The side rim protection is a joke.
Really good price/performance.