Menu
Sailun Atrezzo 4 Seasons View Gallery (1)
185-225/45-65 R15-17 7 sizes 2024 Winter rated

Sailun Atrezzo 4 Seasons

The Sailun Atrezzo 4 Seasons is a Touring All Season tire designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars.

5.9
Tire Reviews Score Based on Professional Tests & User Reviews
Limited Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
70%
Wet Grip
64%
Road Feedback
71%
Handling
64%
Wear
75%
Comfort
77%
Buy again
69%
Snow Grip
70%
Ice Grip
60%
7 Reviews
69% Average
37,020 miles driven
1 Tests (avg: 20th)
Sailun Atrezzo 4 Seasons

Sailun Atrezzo 4 Seasons

All Season Economy
BETA
5.9 / 10
Based on Professional Tests & User Reviews · Limited Confidence · Updated 23 Feb 2026

The Tire Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tire scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Wet
74.3
1.93x / 1 test
Dry
69
1.5x / 1 test

Cross-category scores are derived metrics that combine data from multiple test disciplines to evaluate real-world performance characteristics.

Braking
71.8
2 tests
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 1
Publications: 1
Period: 2020
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 7
Avg Rating: 69%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 1.07
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tire tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.9 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 12 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.75 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
combined_penalty_floor 0.2
Data Sources
TestPublicationDateSizePositionMetrics
2020 All Season Tire Market Overview - 32 Tire Braking Test Auto Bild 2020 205/55 R16 20/33 2 metrics
1
Tests
20th
Average
20th
Best
20th
Worst
Latest Tire Test Results
Size Fuel Wet Noise
15 inch
185/60R15 88 H XL C C 71
195/65R15 91 T D C 72
195/65R15 95 T XL D C 72
195/65R15 91 H D C 72
16 inch
205/55R16 94 V XL D C 72
205/55R16 91 H D C 72
17 inch
225/45R17 94 W XL D C 72
View All Sizes and EU Label Scores for the Sailun Atrezzo 4 Seasons >>

Questions and Answers for the Sailun Atrezzo 4 Seasons

Ask a question
April 29, 2017

Does this tire carry the full winter mountain/snowflake symbol? And/or the M+S marking? I'm seeming different reports on different websites.

Unfortunately we don't have a contact at Sailun to find out whether the Atrezzo 4 Seasons carries the mountain and snowflake symbol.
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

Review Summary

Based on 7 user reviews

Most drivers rate the Sailun Atrezzo 4 Seasons positively, highlighting strong dry and wet grip for the price, low noise, and solid winter/snow performance, with some praising efficiency on the Pro EV version. A minority report braking instability or sliding-often emerging after years of use-which tempers overall confidence. Wear is generally seen as good to average for the cost. Overall, it's a value-focused all-season with good all-weather capability but potential high-speed/late-braking stability concerns noted by a few.

Strengths
  • Dry grip
  • Wet grip
  • Snow/ice traction
  • Low noise
  • Value/price
  • Rolling efficiency (pro ev)
Areas for Improvement
  • Braking stability at high speed/late braking
  • Wet handling/traction under hard maneuvers

Top 3 Sailun Atrezzo 4 Seasons Reviews

Given 85% while driving a Volkswagen Tiguan (235/50 R18) on a combination of roads for 5,000 average miles
All season pro
Perform perfect on dry and rain
I didnt tested yet on ise and snow i will post again
September 23, 2024
Given 75% while driving a MG 6 (215/50 R17) on mostly motorways for 1,000 easy going miles
Bought these tires as a replacement for a set of Falken AS 210 tires which have been used for 41000km. I bought these tires in the Edition "Pro EV" as they were specialised for electric cars and therefore can carry heavier loads.

I pumped them up to 3.2 bar, as this is my usual usage on this car. The tires are quiet, rolling resistance is quite a bit lower (apporx. 1 kwh/100km). Which brings me about 5% more range. Hard breaking under wet and dry circumstances lead to an intervention of the ABS. As these tires seem to loose contact to the road. Also quick maneuvers easily lead to screaming tires.

To be true i knew that i can have either a low rolling resistance or a short breaking distance as both values are mutually exclusive to each other. So i bought these tires with this information in mind. In my opinion these are typical "nothing special tires" with a quality to "middle, or brink to lower class tires".

They were quite cheap, approx. 60% of the Falken AS210 and therefore i am happy with them. I knew that there are better tires, but surely not at the same price.
September 3, 2024
Given 61% while driving a Nissan Micra (185/65 R15) on mostly town for 15,000 average miles
Good stopping distances on dry and wet, they are very quiet. I never had any warrying moment on cornering, either on dry or wet surface. I drove on snowy and icy road in town and they were OK. On strong breaking, at the last 1-2 meters, you get a feeling that the rear tires slide a little, although the ABC isn't working. The most important (and warrying) is that now, after 3 years, on strong breaking, especially in higher speed, even on dry road, the car tenders to slide on its side and you have to correct with the steering wheel. What will happen on wet road???
December 6, 2021

How would you rate the Sailun Atrezzo 4 Seasons?

Click a star to start your review

Latest Sailun Atrezzo 4 Seasons Reviews

Given 47% while driving a BMW 320i Touring (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 20 average miles
I'm not sure if my Sailun winter tires are the same but I've had them for 4 years / 20,000 miles and I now consider them dangerous. For some reason the car now slides on roundabouts and feels unstable on bends, despite the pressures being correct and the tread being only 50% worn. I first noticed this a year ago but having recently switched from my summer wheels the difference in the wet is far worse when it should be a lot better! Why is this?
December 17, 2019
Given 64% while driving a Ford Focus mk2 (205/55 R16 H) on a combination of roads for 6,000 spirited miles
Fitted 12 months 6000 miles ago fonts now about 30 percent worn rears like new got me through 12 inches of snow black ice etc last winter and ok enough in the summer for a non sporty car was not expecting them to be this good for £200 a set fitted Chinese tires will probably get another 2 years out of them if i swap them front to back very happy
October 27, 2018
Given 83% while driving a Hyundai i30 CW CRD (205/55 R16 H) on a combination of roads for 9,000 average miles
I have been running these tires for 12 months now on family hatch/small estate Hyundai i30. with varying loads from driver only to fully loaded with 5 on board plus camping gear. covered approx 9000 miles on the tires. They are excellent. admittedly they replaced a pretty worn pair of Uniroyal rainmasters, but the transformation is fantastic. road noise is on a par with the previous and not particularly intrusive, the General Altimax at the rear are far noisier. handling is excellent in rain, dry, snow or ICE. we had a really heavy snow in teh welsh valleys this year and the tires held their own, never once showing the traction control light. even in heavy snow or slush they just held, you could drive normally without worry. over the 9000 miles they have worn 2 mm, and still have plenty to give. Really cheap at £55 a corner. I also drive an Audi a3 and will be asking for these on that car when its due for a change. the dunlops on that were embarassing in the winter.
February 19, 2018
Given 85% while driving a Saab Automobile 9 5 Aero Saloon (225/45 R17 V) on a combination of roads for 1,000 spirited miles
After going through a front set of Bridgestones in 5000 miles and winter approaching decided to buy these 4 season tires and am very impressed so far dry grip as good as bridgestones wet grip excellent noise level is very good and the tires give good feedback to the driver can't comment on wear as only done about 1000 miles though still look like new, no regrets in buying this tire and at £94 a pair bargain.
November 17, 2016
Rate the Sailun Atrezzo 4 Seasons